Comments on: Contract sheet updated

By: DMZ

DMZ — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:45:42 +0000

Mateo’s fixed, I agree with Jason and Mr. Corcoran.

By: fiction

fiction — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:59:04 +0000

Thankyou Derek. You have been busy lately. Your efforts are appreciated.

A reminder of that great beverage Anchor Steam of San Francisco has resulted in a 40 bottle 5 day refreshing of enjoyment.

By: Bela Txadux

Bela Txadux — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:14:56 +0000

Thanks for the effort on all this, Derek. It’s revealing, and allows more weight and less conjecture in handicaping future FO moves for the Ms. A gen-yu-ine public service.

By: David J Corcoran

David J Corcoran — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:18:21 +0000

He doesn’t have enough service time yet for arb. He needs another 5 months of major league experience.

By: JMB

JMB — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 01:14:33 +0000

For what it’s worth, it’s my understanding that Mateo is not arbitration eligibile.

jason

By: Adam S

Adam S — Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:28:44 +0000

Cool, thanks (since I was one of the people who asked about Bucky and Wiki). By the way, you have Mateo in both groups, though I’ve heard both that he IS and IS NOT eliglble for arbitration, so maybe that’s right.

Is totalling the columns dangerous territory? I.e., because of bonuses — signing and incentive — would it misrepresent that true payroll?