<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super Bowl XL MVP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-4/#comment-87669</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87669</guid>
		<description>Closing comments, as this has gotten pointless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Closing comments, as this has gotten pointless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87668</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87668</guid>
		<description>Alright how about this as a perspective:

No team has ever dropped 5 passes, missed 2 field goals, allowed a 75 yard rushing touchdown, allowed a 43 yard touchdown pass, and whiffed in two 2 minute drills and won a superbowl. 

I think youre right about one thing....superbowl 40 was a gift to the Steelers but not for the reasons alot of Hawks fans are offering....

Bottom line, just tackle Parker and use the clock more efficiently in the closing minutes of both halves while not missing the fieldgoals (in as conducive of an environment as there will ever be for kicking fieldgoals) and the Seahawks probably had a good shot of winning. Given these realities, blaming the officials seems a little silly. It wasnt the officials that gave the game away.  At best you could argue the officials made the Hawks mistakes more costly by decreasing their margin of error.

The Seahawks are a nice team-I really like how theyre constructed-but they made enough mistakes to doom themselves irrespective of things that were out of their control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright how about this as a perspective:</p>
<p>No team has ever dropped 5 passes, missed 2 field goals, allowed a 75 yard rushing touchdown, allowed a 43 yard touchdown pass, and whiffed in two 2 minute drills and won a superbowl. </p>
<p>I think youre right about one thing&#8230;.superbowl 40 was a gift to the Steelers but not for the reasons alot of Hawks fans are offering&#8230;.</p>
<p>Bottom line, just tackle Parker and use the clock more efficiently in the closing minutes of both halves while not missing the fieldgoals (in as conducive of an environment as there will ever be for kicking fieldgoals) and the Seahawks probably had a good shot of winning. Given these realities, blaming the officials seems a little silly. It wasnt the officials that gave the game away.  At best you could argue the officials made the Hawks mistakes more costly by decreasing their margin of error.</p>
<p>The Seahawks are a nice team-I really like how theyre constructed-but they made enough mistakes to doom themselves irrespective of things that were out of their control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidE</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87663</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87663</guid>
		<description>no team has ever won the Super Bowl while giving up more first downs, more total yards, and having possession of the ball less than their opponent, except for this years gift to the Steelers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no team has ever won the Super Bowl while giving up more first downs, more total yards, and having possession of the ball less than their opponent, except for this years gift to the Steelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vj</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87646</link>
		<dc:creator>vj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87646</guid>
		<description>&#039;supperbowl&#039; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;supperbowl&#8217; <img src='http://www.ussmariner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87644</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87644</guid>
		<description>#146:  There have been 14 teams that have won the superbowl given your criteria. If you expland the criteria to the number of teams that have won the superbowl with under 200 yards passing (which would still be considered below the league average), then over half of the superbowl winners qualify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#146:  There have been 14 teams that have won the superbowl given your criteria. If you expland the criteria to the number of teams that have won the superbowl with under 200 yards passing (which would still be considered below the league average), then over half of the superbowl winners qualify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vj</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87641</link>
		<dc:creator>vj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87641</guid>
		<description>Terry, how many teams managing only 158 yards passing have won the supperbowl?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, how many teams managing only 158 yards passing have won the supperbowl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87639</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87639</guid>
		<description>&quot; Nobody saw any of those plays from the angle of the officials.&quot;

Including, as you point out here, the officials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Nobody saw any of those plays from the angle of the officials.&#8221;</p>
<p>Including, as you point out here, the officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87638</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87638</guid>
		<description>Guys here is a *stat* that should provide a little perspective concerning Sunday&#039;s game:

NO team has ever given up 181 yards rushing and won the superbowl.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys here is a *stat* that should provide a little perspective concerning Sunday&#8217;s game:</p>
<p>NO team has ever given up 181 yards rushing and won the superbowl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87636</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 12:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87636</guid>
		<description>#135:  of course your comment assumes this thread has been littered with  a scientific discussion of football.

Football is a quite different *sabermetric beast* than baseball, however, whining about officiating and making plays to the emotions isnt really a scietific discussion.


There are really two bottom lines about Sunday:
1. the perception of a majority of disputed calls really is influenced by both the viewer&#039;s bias and limited camera angles (obviously of course, Hasselbeck shouldnt have been flagged for attempting a tackle).  Clearly emotions are a major part of the mix (would we watch sports if they weren&#039;t?). Nobody saw any of those plays from the angle of the officials.

2. Just about any team that made the playoffs this year couldve knocked off the Hawks on Sunday given the way they played penalties notwithstanding. 

3. Clearly the match up the world really wanted to see was the Bengals vs. the Seahawks. Your anger should really be directed at the conspiritors that refused to allow that marquee game to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#135:  of course your comment assumes this thread has been littered with  a scientific discussion of football.</p>
<p>Football is a quite different *sabermetric beast* than baseball, however, whining about officiating and making plays to the emotions isnt really a scietific discussion.</p>
<p>There are really two bottom lines about Sunday:<br />
1. the perception of a majority of disputed calls really is influenced by both the viewer&#8217;s bias and limited camera angles (obviously of course, Hasselbeck shouldnt have been flagged for attempting a tackle).  Clearly emotions are a major part of the mix (would we watch sports if they weren&#8217;t?). Nobody saw any of those plays from the angle of the officials.</p>
<p>2. Just about any team that made the playoffs this year couldve knocked off the Hawks on Sunday given the way they played penalties notwithstanding. </p>
<p>3. Clearly the match up the world really wanted to see was the Bengals vs. the Seahawks. Your anger should really be directed at the conspiritors that refused to allow that marquee game to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D.</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/02/05/super-bowl-xl-mvp/comment-page-3/#comment-87619</link>
		<dc:creator>John D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=3301#comment-87619</guid>
		<description>PINCH-HITTING SPECIALISTS - Not to change the subject, but The Hardball Times has an excellent history of the pinch-hitting specialist.   http://tinyurl.com/cnept</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PINCH-HITTING SPECIALISTS &#8211; Not to change the subject, but The Hardball Times has an excellent history of the pinch-hitting specialist.   <a href="http://tinyurl.com/cnept" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cnept</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

