<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Forty 2.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:00:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-143122</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-143122</guid>
		<description>We could have had David Wright instead of Garciaparra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We could have had David Wright instead of Garciaparra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-143116</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-143116</guid>
		<description>Whoops, wrong thread open. *blushes*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, wrong thread open. *blushes*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-143115</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 03:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-143115</guid>
		<description>Well, JJ isn&#039;t getting overused in these meaningless September games...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, JJ isn&#8217;t getting overused in these meaningless September games&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoulofaCitizen</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-143014</link>
		<dc:creator>SoulofaCitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 01:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-143014</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Michael Garciaparra, Ryan Howard went in Round 5 of 2001 We could have had him but picked Garciaparra, Rene Rivera, Laszaro Abreau, Michael Wilson, Tim Merritt and Bobby Livingston, all before the Phillies picked Howard in the fifth round.

I know lots of other teams could say the same, as they could with Pujols, but we sure had a slew of terrible drafts--at least that seems to be turning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Michael Garciaparra, Ryan Howard went in Round 5 of 2001 We could have had him but picked Garciaparra, Rene Rivera, Laszaro Abreau, Michael Wilson, Tim Merritt and Bobby Livingston, all before the Phillies picked Howard in the fifth round.</p>
<p>I know lots of other teams could say the same, as they could with Pujols, but we sure had a slew of terrible drafts&#8211;at least that seems to be turning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-143000</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 19:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-143000</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Any thoughts on Michael Garciaparra?&lt;/em&gt;

He&#039;s not a major leaguer.  He has zero power, which major league pitchers would exploit by throwing the ball right down the middle and forcing him to swing the bat.  A good eye isn&#039;t useful if you can&#039;t hit the ball, and Michael Garciaparra can&#039;t hit the ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Any thoughts on Michael Garciaparra?</em></p>
<p>He&#8217;s not a major leaguer.  He has zero power, which major league pitchers would exploit by throwing the ball right down the middle and forcing him to swing the bat.  A good eye isn&#8217;t useful if you can&#8217;t hit the ball, and Michael Garciaparra can&#8217;t hit the ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bongo</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-142998</link>
		<dc:creator>bongo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 15:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-142998</guid>
		<description>Any thoughts on Michael Garciaparra?  He only got in 136 ABs in Tacoma, but did have an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/app/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Michael%20Garciaparra&amp;pos=&amp;sid=milb&amp;t=p_pbp&amp;pid=455752&quot;&gt;OBP of .422&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any thoughts on Michael Garciaparra?  He only got in 136 ABs in Tacoma, but did have an <a href="http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/app/milb/stats/stats.jsp?n=Michael%20Garciaparra&amp;pos=&amp;sid=milb&amp;t=p_pbp&amp;pid=455752">OBP of .422</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km4_1999</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-142970</link>
		<dc:creator>km4_1999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 04:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-142970</guid>
		<description>Dave,

Didn&#039;t the M&#039;s think they had a SPECIAL personality in Tillman when they drafted him. All you had to do was check out his myspace account. It would be great to see Morrow, Tillman and Butler all at Inland next year at the same time. Fun rotation to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t the M&#8217;s think they had a SPECIAL personality in Tillman when they drafted him. All you had to do was check out his myspace account. It would be great to see Morrow, Tillman and Butler all at Inland next year at the same time. Fun rotation to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-142954</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-142954</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Doesnâ€™t Morrow also have command issues?&lt;/em&gt;

Not nearly to the degree that Lincecum does.  Even when Timmy is rolling, he&#039;s walking 4-5 guys a game and throwing 120-130 pitches.  

&lt;em&gt;Apologies for needlessly separating this post, but Dave, whatâ€™s the deal with Butlerâ€™s stuff? Youâ€™ve said that heâ€™s a soft-tosserâ€“under 90â€“and thatâ€™s what the reports before the draft said as well. But BA says heâ€™s in the low-nineties now?&lt;/em&gt;

I don&#039;t recall saying he&#039;s a soft tosser.  The scouting reports on him that I&#039;ve gotten have him at 87-91 with a big curveball that&#039;s an outpitch when it&#039;s on.  An 18-year-old who stands 6&#039;7 and already sits at 87-91 isn&#039;t a soft tosser in anyone&#039;s book, including mine.  

&lt;em&gt;I find it encouraging that Butlerâ€™s command has really improved his past three starts. Overall, his walk rate will look troublesomely, even with the lenience to very young pitchers, but perhaps something clicked recently and maybe heâ€™ll be able to carry this over into next season.&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s the Northwest League and it&#039;s a really small sample.  There&#039;s no reason to let performances dictate your excitement level.  That said, Butler got pretty terrific reviews from scouts who saw him, so there are reasons to be excited about his debut.  I just wouldn&#039;t get excited based on the numbers.  Short-season League stats don&#039;t really mean anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Doesnâ€™t Morrow also have command issues?</em></p>
<p>Not nearly to the degree that Lincecum does.  Even when Timmy is rolling, he&#8217;s walking 4-5 guys a game and throwing 120-130 pitches.  </p>
<p><em>Apologies for needlessly separating this post, but Dave, whatâ€™s the deal with Butlerâ€™s stuff? Youâ€™ve said that heâ€™s a soft-tosserâ€“under 90â€“and thatâ€™s what the reports before the draft said as well. But BA says heâ€™s in the low-nineties now?</em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall saying he&#8217;s a soft tosser.  The scouting reports on him that I&#8217;ve gotten have him at 87-91 with a big curveball that&#8217;s an outpitch when it&#8217;s on.  An 18-year-old who stands 6&#8242;7 and already sits at 87-91 isn&#8217;t a soft tosser in anyone&#8217;s book, including mine.  </p>
<p><em>I find it encouraging that Butlerâ€™s command has really improved his past three starts. Overall, his walk rate will look troublesomely, even with the lenience to very young pitchers, but perhaps something clicked recently and maybe heâ€™ll be able to carry this over into next season.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s the Northwest League and it&#8217;s a really small sample.  There&#8217;s no reason to let performances dictate your excitement level.  That said, Butler got pretty terrific reviews from scouts who saw him, so there are reasons to be excited about his debut.  I just wouldn&#8217;t get excited based on the numbers.  Short-season League stats don&#8217;t really mean anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murton</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-142941</link>
		<dc:creator>Murton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-142941</guid>
		<description>Apologies for needlessly separating this post, but Dave, what&#039;s the deal with Butler&#039;s stuff?  You&#039;ve said that he&#039;s a soft-tosser--under 90--and that&#039;s what the reports before the draft said as well.  But BA says he&#039;s in the low-nineties now?   

I find it encouraging that Butler&#039;s command has really improved his past three starts.  Overall, his walk rate will look troublesomely, even with the lenience to very young pitchers, but perhaps something clicked recently and maybe he&#039;ll be able to carry this over into next season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies for needlessly separating this post, but Dave, what&#8217;s the deal with Butler&#8217;s stuff?  You&#8217;ve said that he&#8217;s a soft-tosser&#8211;under 90&#8211;and that&#8217;s what the reports before the draft said as well.  But BA says he&#8217;s in the low-nineties now?   </p>
<p>I find it encouraging that Butler&#8217;s command has really improved his past three starts.  Overall, his walk rate will look troublesomely, even with the lenience to very young pitchers, but perhaps something clicked recently and maybe he&#8217;ll be able to carry this over into next season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murton</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/comment-page-2/#comment-142936</link>
		<dc:creator>Murton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2006/09/08/future-forty-25/#comment-142936</guid>
		<description>------Iâ€™d still take Morrow over Lincecum. I know Iâ€™m in the minority, but Lincecumâ€™s command is a problem, even though his absurd strikeout rate is definitely tantalizing.-----


Doesn&#039;t Morrow also have command issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;Iâ€™d still take Morrow over Lincecum. I know Iâ€™m in the minority, but Lincecumâ€™s command is a problem, even though his absurd strikeout rate is definitely tantalizing.&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t Morrow also have command issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
