<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squashing a Rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul B</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214841</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214841</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why not the compromise?

Platoon Raul and AJ
Platoon Sexson and Broussard

I know itâ€™s the same argument made 100x already.. McLaren pays attention to splits when using the bullpen, but not when it comes to his own batters.

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As I posted in the previous entry, I&#039;d platoon Ral and Guillen.  Guillen has a huge split, too.  But Guillen is being Babe Ruth against lefties this year, so his overall totals are covering it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why not the compromise?</p>
<p>Platoon Raul and AJ<br />
Platoon Sexson and Broussard</p>
<p>I know itâ€™s the same argument made 100x already.. McLaren pays attention to splits when using the bullpen, but not when it comes to his own batters.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As I posted in the previous entry, I&#8217;d platoon Ral and Guillen.  Guillen has a huge split, too.  But Guillen is being Babe Ruth against lefties this year, so his overall totals are covering it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214831</link>
		<dc:creator>John in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214831</guid>
		<description>52 - In addition to the fact that the phrase &quot;aggressive base running&quot; brought back year-old cold sweats. Oh, bad times, bad times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>52 &#8211; In addition to the fact that the phrase &#8220;aggressive base running&#8221; brought back year-old cold sweats. Oh, bad times, bad times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RoninX</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214822</link>
		<dc:creator>RoninX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214822</guid>
		<description>@ 51

So you are saying that singles just aren&#039;t getting it done unless someone gets on base ahead of him *and* steals a base?

BTW, it looks like Vidro has gone 4 for 4 exactly once all year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 51</p>
<p>So you are saying that singles just aren&#8217;t getting it done unless someone gets on base ahead of him *and* steals a base?</p>
<p>BTW, it looks like Vidro has gone 4 for 4 exactly once all year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMHawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214817</link>
		<dc:creator>JMHawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214817</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;How many times have you seen Ichiro go 2 for 4 and Vidro go 4 for 4 with NO RBIâ€™s? &lt;/i&gt;

Zero times.  Geez, don&#039;t post made up crap, okay?  Really, there&#039;s a saying about blogs that the Internet will fact-check your ass.  

Vidro has had 4 hits exactly once as a member of the Mariners. On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/TEX/TEX200707230.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;July 23rd&lt;/a&gt; he was 4 for 4 with 2 RBIs.  Ichiro was 2 for 5, scoring one of the runs Vidro drove in (after stealing second, oddly enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>How many times have you seen Ichiro go 2 for 4 and Vidro go 4 for 4 with NO RBIâ€™s? </i></p>
<p>Zero times.  Geez, don&#8217;t post made up crap, okay?  Really, there&#8217;s a saying about blogs that the Internet will fact-check your ass.  </p>
<p>Vidro has had 4 hits exactly once as a member of the Mariners. On <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/TEX/TEX200707230.shtml" rel="nofollow">July 23rd</a> he was 4 for 4 with 2 RBIs.  Ichiro was 2 for 5, scoring one of the runs Vidro drove in (after stealing second, oddly enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyosei</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214814</link>
		<dc:creator>kyosei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214814</guid>
		<description>RE: 51

I&#039;m not sure how much more aggressive you are expecting Ichiro to be.  He is currently 3rd in the AL with 29 steals, as well as 6th in MLB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: 51</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how much more aggressive you are expecting Ichiro to be.  He is currently 3rd in the AL with 29 steals, as well as 6th in MLB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214809</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214809</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re not having the Vidro argument again.  You can read any of the 8,413 times we&#039;ve had it before.  Or, the short version - you&#039;re wrong, Vidro&#039;s lousy, and the M&#039;s would be a better team today if they had never acquired him.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re not having the Vidro argument again.  You can read any of the 8,413 times we&#8217;ve had it before.  Or, the short version &#8211; you&#8217;re wrong, Vidro&#8217;s lousy, and the M&#8217;s would be a better team today if they had never acquired him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigdad03</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-2/#comment-214808</link>
		<dc:creator>bigdad03</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214808</guid>
		<description>I guess I just don&#039;t understand why so many fans are riding Vidro. Granted he doesn&#039;t have power numbers, but who says your DH has to have them? He&#039;s a great number two hitter. 

The biggest problem that I see is that Ichiro doesn&#039;t try to steal when Vidro is batting left handed. He sits over there tyring to keep the &quot;hole open&quot;.

Why? Vidro hits to all fields and seldom needs the &quot;hole&quot; to hit through. How many times have you seen Ichiro go 2 for 4 and Vidro go 4 for 4 with NO RBI&#039;s? 

Remember the other day when Beltre was hitting second? Ichiro finally stole a base and low and behold scored a run when Beltre singled. What a miracle!

Ichiro and others need to get off the dime and become more aggressive on the base paths. Beltre is just about the only guy who still tries to stretch a single into a double these days. 

I LOVE it when these guys challenge the defense with aggressive base running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I just don&#8217;t understand why so many fans are riding Vidro. Granted he doesn&#8217;t have power numbers, but who says your DH has to have them? He&#8217;s a great number two hitter. </p>
<p>The biggest problem that I see is that Ichiro doesn&#8217;t try to steal when Vidro is batting left handed. He sits over there tyring to keep the &#8220;hole open&#8221;.</p>
<p>Why? Vidro hits to all fields and seldom needs the &#8220;hole&#8221; to hit through. How many times have you seen Ichiro go 2 for 4 and Vidro go 4 for 4 with NO RBI&#8217;s? </p>
<p>Remember the other day when Beltre was hitting second? Ichiro finally stole a base and low and behold scored a run when Beltre singled. What a miracle!</p>
<p>Ichiro and others need to get off the dime and become more aggressive on the base paths. Beltre is just about the only guy who still tries to stretch a single into a double these days. </p>
<p>I LOVE it when these guys challenge the defense with aggressive base running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gwangung</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-214807</link>
		<dc:creator>gwangung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214807</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; I know itâ€™s the same argument made 100x already.. McLaren pays attention to splits when using the bullpen, but not when it comes to his own batters. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Which is puzzling, since a lot of other SUCCESSFUL teams do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> I know itâ€™s the same argument made 100x already.. McLaren pays attention to splits when using the bullpen, but not when it comes to his own batters. </p></blockquote>
<p>Which is puzzling, since a lot of other SUCCESSFUL teams do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lokiforever</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-214806</link>
		<dc:creator>lokiforever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214806</guid>
		<description>Why not the compromise?

Platoon Raul and AJ
Platoon Sexson and Broussard

I know it&#039;s the same argument made 100x already..  McLaren pays attention to splits when using the bullpen, but not when it comes to his own batters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not the compromise?</p>
<p>Platoon Raul and AJ<br />
Platoon Sexson and Broussard</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s the same argument made 100x already..  McLaren pays attention to splits when using the bullpen, but not when it comes to his own batters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddieranch</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/comment-page-1/#comment-214805</link>
		<dc:creator>eddieranch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 22:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/30/squashing-a-rumor/#comment-214805</guid>
		<description>47, LF is the obvious spot but if we still want to give Raul his play time maybe play the new guy in LF against lefties and DH against righties(assuming he&#039;s an outfielder).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>47, LF is the obvious spot but if we still want to give Raul his play time maybe play the new guy in LF against lefties and DH against righties(assuming he&#8217;s an outfielder).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

