<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thank You Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:59:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nye</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-6/#comment-215677</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215677</guid>
		<description>Besides, everyone knows that it&#039;s Willie Bloomquist that I really hate.

I&#039;m even linked back from his Wikipedia entry for calling him &quot;Princess Willie&quot; even though I&#039;m pretty sure I&#039;m not the person that originally coined that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides, everyone knows that it&#8217;s Willie Bloomquist that I really hate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m even linked back from his Wikipedia entry for calling him &#8220;Princess Willie&#8221; even though I&#8217;m pretty sure I&#8217;m not the person that originally coined that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren, token chick</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-6/#comment-215672</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren, token chick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215672</guid>
		<description>I must admit, I find it a little mean-spirited for people to say &quot;God that was lucky&quot; or &quot;thank goodness it was right at him&quot; when a bad fielder makes a good play. But I think a &quot;tip of the cap&quot; probably does describe exactly what those folks were offering to Raul. Most said &quot;nice play, but...&quot; which did recognize the effort involved.

If Raul is your childhood friend or you&#039;re face to face with the guy, I&#039;m sure anyone would be more conventionally polite. But really, among rabid sports fans? Seems like the USSM treatment is about as good as a failing player can expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit, I find it a little mean-spirited for people to say &#8220;God that was lucky&#8221; or &#8220;thank goodness it was right at him&#8221; when a bad fielder makes a good play. But I think a &#8220;tip of the cap&#8221; probably does describe exactly what those folks were offering to Raul. Most said &#8220;nice play, but&#8230;&#8221; which did recognize the effort involved.</p>
<p>If Raul is your childhood friend or you&#8217;re face to face with the guy, I&#8217;m sure anyone would be more conventionally polite. But really, among rabid sports fans? Seems like the USSM treatment is about as good as a failing player can expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OppositeField</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215669</link>
		<dc:creator>OppositeField</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215669</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s silly to say &quot;You don&#039;t want to depend on a young player in a pennant race&quot; when both Betancourt and Lopez are our starting middle infielders. They have thrived on this stage so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s silly to say &#8220;You don&#8217;t want to depend on a young player in a pennant race&#8221; when both Betancourt and Lopez are our starting middle infielders. They have thrived on this stage so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215668</link>
		<dc:creator>John in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215668</guid>
		<description>248 - Or... and this is just a suggestion... you be whatever you want to be about Raul&#039;s play last night and you let others be the way they want to be. 

It&#039;s ok to think that was a good play or not. It&#039;s ok to be upset if you think he&#039;s getting too much credit for something he is, overall, terrible at.

And the problem is that many people still believe Raul is a good defender... so you convince all of them that he isn&#039;t and people will stop feeling the need to point it out. 

Bottom line is that the club is being very dim about a few decisions and some people don&#039;t feel like throwing Raul a surprise party for doing his job well once in a while. 

But you feel free to be happy and excited... but if you don&#039;t understand why others are not, then you are way too wrapped up in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>248 &#8211; Or&#8230; and this is just a suggestion&#8230; you be whatever you want to be about Raul&#8217;s play last night and you let others be the way they want to be. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s ok to think that was a good play or not. It&#8217;s ok to be upset if you think he&#8217;s getting too much credit for something he is, overall, terrible at.</p>
<p>And the problem is that many people still believe Raul is a good defender&#8230; so you convince all of them that he isn&#8217;t and people will stop feeling the need to point it out. </p>
<p>Bottom line is that the club is being very dim about a few decisions and some people don&#8217;t feel like throwing Raul a surprise party for doing his job well once in a while. </p>
<p>But you feel free to be happy and excited&#8230; but if you don&#8217;t understand why others are not, then you are way too wrapped up in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsrobinson</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215663</link>
		<dc:creator>rsrobinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215663</guid>
		<description>No one here is arguing that Jones wouldn&#039;t be a defensive upgrade in LF.  I know I&#039;m not.  What&#039;s becoming tedious is the non-stop trashing of everything Ibanez does which has gone beyond analysis of defensive skills into mindless naysaying.  And magnifying Jones&#039; defensive skills into the second coming of Junior isn&#039;t fair to him either.  

When Raul makes a hell of a play to save a couple of runs, tip your cap and say thanks even if you want him replaced.  Don&#039;t be so goddamn pissy about his very existence in left field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one here is arguing that Jones wouldn&#8217;t be a defensive upgrade in LF.  I know I&#8217;m not.  What&#8217;s becoming tedious is the non-stop trashing of everything Ibanez does which has gone beyond analysis of defensive skills into mindless naysaying.  And magnifying Jones&#8217; defensive skills into the second coming of Junior isn&#8217;t fair to him either.  </p>
<p>When Raul makes a hell of a play to save a couple of runs, tip your cap and say thanks even if you want him replaced.  Don&#8217;t be so goddamn pissy about his very existence in left field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Egaas</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Egaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215662</guid>
		<description>Flipping Mateo for a guy who can walk on water.  Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flipping Mateo for a guy who can walk on water.  Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in L.A.</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215661</link>
		<dc:creator>John in L.A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215661</guid>
		<description>&quot;Bavasi said (on the radio a few minutes ago) that â€œYou donâ€™t want to depend on a young player in a penant race.â€&quot;

Good crap, that&#039;s a dumb blanket statement. 

&quot;Can we ever have a civilized discussion that doesnâ€™t turn into a pro-AJ and anti-Raul/Vidro circle jerk?&quot;

Sure, call up AJ and platoon Raul... poof, done.

As to the second part, everyone seems perfectly content to discuss, you always seem to be the one that turns it ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Bavasi said (on the radio a few minutes ago) that â€œYou donâ€™t want to depend on a young player in a penant race.â€&#8221;</p>
<p>Good crap, that&#8217;s a dumb blanket statement. </p>
<p>&#8220;Can we ever have a civilized discussion that doesnâ€™t turn into a pro-AJ and anti-Raul/Vidro circle jerk?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, call up AJ and platoon Raul&#8230; poof, done.</p>
<p>As to the second part, everyone seems perfectly content to discuss, you always seem to be the one that turns it ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byronebyronian</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215658</link>
		<dc:creator>byronebyronian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215658</guid>
		<description>#241:  Bavasi told Geoff Baker that Jones will be up in a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#241:  Bavasi told Geoff Baker that Jones will be up in a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick L</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215655</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215655</guid>
		<description>141.  On KJR, Bavasi said just the opposite, that he was looking for a veteran utility guy and that having Jones in reserve did not enter into his thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>141.  On KJR, Bavasi said just the opposite, that he was looking for a veteran utility guy and that having Jones in reserve did not enter into his thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JeffS</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/comment-page-5/#comment-215653</link>
		<dc:creator>JeffS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/07/31/thank-you-bill/#comment-215653</guid>
		<description>[]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

