<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Game 108, Red Sox at Mariners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortbus</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218150</link>
		<dc:creator>shortbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218150</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the notion of platooning Ibanez and Vidro at DH.  Their OPS is almost identical vs. RHP. Vidro has no platoon split, so either fire him or let him play every day. 

Why not platoon Ibanez and Guillen in RF?  Both of these players show very significant platoon splits and Ibanez&#039; defense wouldn&#039;t present a massive downgrade from Guillen&#039;s in RF.

Or shove both of &#039;em out the door and call up Balantien!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the notion of platooning Ibanez and Vidro at DH.  Their OPS is almost identical vs. RHP. Vidro has no platoon split, so either fire him or let him play every day. </p>
<p>Why not platoon Ibanez and Guillen in RF?  Both of these players show very significant platoon splits and Ibanez&#8217; defense wouldn&#8217;t present a massive downgrade from Guillen&#8217;s in RF.</p>
<p>Or shove both of &#8216;em out the door and call up Balantien!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notor</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218128</link>
		<dc:creator>Notor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 10:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218128</guid>
		<description>Jones is going to start tomorrow in CF.  Ichiro will DH.  Ibanez will unfortunately be playing left field where undoubtedly Boston will pummel him as they did tonight and as every team has done every night for the entire season.

McLaren, you&#039;ve been here a month, you have earned the credibility with the players, so fix it.  Jones to left, Ibanez/Vidro platooned at DH.  DO IT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jones is going to start tomorrow in CF.  Ichiro will DH.  Ibanez will unfortunately be playing left field where undoubtedly Boston will pummel him as they did tonight and as every team has done every night for the entire season.</p>
<p>McLaren, you&#8217;ve been here a month, you have earned the credibility with the players, so fix it.  Jones to left, Ibanez/Vidro platooned at DH.  DO IT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lailaihei</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218126</link>
		<dc:creator>lailaihei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218126</guid>
		<description>We best not have to wait until Burres to see Felix pitch again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We best not have to wait until Burres to see Felix pitch again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortbus</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218124</link>
		<dc:creator>shortbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218124</guid>
		<description>That was a much MUCH better game than I feared it would be.  The top of the order murdered us today.  Nobody could predict an 0-4 day by Ichiro, but is there any damn reason why Beltre and Broussard are betting 5,6 and Ibanez and Guillen are hitting 3,4?  Switch those two pairs around just based on their performance...we win the game.  

Or Ichiro could have gotten &lt;em&gt;just one hit!!&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a much MUCH better game than I feared it would be.  The top of the order murdered us today.  Nobody could predict an 0-4 day by Ichiro, but is there any damn reason why Beltre and Broussard are betting 5,6 and Ibanez and Guillen are hitting 3,4?  Switch those two pairs around just based on their performance&#8230;we win the game.  </p>
<p>Or Ichiro could have gotten <em>just one hit!!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DizzleChizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218123</link>
		<dc:creator>DizzleChizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 09:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218123</guid>
		<description>Guillen in this series so far, 0 for 8, 6 K&#039;s, 0 RBI&#039;s, 2 GIDP, 1 error.  I guess Adam Jones did disrupt the team chemistry afterall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guillen in this series so far, 0 for 8, 6 K&#8217;s, 0 RBI&#8217;s, 2 GIDP, 1 error.  I guess Adam Jones did disrupt the team chemistry afterall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DizzleChizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218122</link>
		<dc:creator>DizzleChizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218122</guid>
		<description>322 I just read your comment.  Thanks for the laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>322 I just read your comment.  Thanks for the laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notor</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218121</link>
		<dc:creator>Notor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218121</guid>
		<description>Who the hell cares what the veterans think?  If they can&#039;t perform they shouldn&#039;t be playing, period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who the hell cares what the veterans think?  If they can&#8217;t perform they shouldn&#8217;t be playing, period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218120</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218120</guid>
		<description>372:
Lots of reasons, 1) wouldn&#039;t be fair to put Jones up against Paplebon a day after he was called up, 2) righty-lefty matchup, 3) why rub Jones in face of the veterans, he&#039;s going to be taking enough of their AB&#039;s as it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>372:<br />
Lots of reasons, 1) wouldn&#8217;t be fair to put Jones up against Paplebon a day after he was called up, 2) righty-lefty matchup, 3) why rub Jones in face of the veterans, he&#8217;s going to be taking enough of their AB&#8217;s as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMB</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218119</link>
		<dc:creator>JMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218119</guid>
		<description>Seriously? First pitch swinging? Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? First pitch swinging? Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DizzleChizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/comment-page-8/#comment-218118</link>
		<dc:creator>DizzleChizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/2007/08/04/game-108-red-sox-at-mariners/#comment-218118</guid>
		<description>Beltre should have really tried to work the count in his favor instead of swinging on the first pitch  The guy just walked 2 batters in a row.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beltre should have really tried to work the count in his favor instead of swinging on the first pitch  The guy just walked 2 batters in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

