Comments on: Game 120, White Sox at Mariners

By: Jeff Nye

Jeff Nye — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 04:40:38 +0000

I think rsrobinson should start his own Mariners site.

vidrorox.com is still available!

By: PullmansFinest

PullmansFinest — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:14:33 +0000

It takes a lot of baseball intelligence to find something to bad mouth about a 2 hole hitter batting .320.

By: Rick L

Rick L — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:59:59 +0000

I am glad we aren’t playing a good offensive team.

By: Mr. Egaas

Mr. Egaas — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:21:58 +0000

Pour it on fellas.

By: The Unknown Comic

The Unknown Comic — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:39:06 +0000

#391

Gotta admit that even though I do think that the Mariners would be a better organization if they followed the advice of Dave and DMZ I can appreciate a polite voice of opposition to the Uss Mariner orthodoxy. Sometimes I find it quite refreshing to be honest.

By: rsrobinson

rsrobinson — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:14:17 +0000

Weâ€™d argued it out in dozens of game threads! Posts on topics even remotely touching Vidro! Thereâ€™s nothing in there that was new!

If people are continuously arguing it then obviously quite a few people aren’t buying your argument. So how does a one-sided preach-to-the-choir post settle the issue? Even Geoff Baker has been getting snarky lately about the constant beating of the “regression to the mean” drums to advocate benching guys who are swinging the bat well in favor of a talented but unproven rookie.

Anyway, I’m off to the game. Go M’s!

By: _David_

_David_ — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:04:26 +0000

Santana slapping around the Rangers…12 up 12 down, 9 Ks.

By: DMZ

DMZ — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:04:05 +0000

We’d argued it out in dozens of game threads! Posts on topics even remotely touching Vidro! There’s nothing in there that was new!

You could have emailed this hypothetically awesome rebuttal to us and we could have discussed it! Started your own blog!

brraaarrraaaaararaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

By: rsrobinson

rsrobinson — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:58:38 +0000

Plus, see elsewhere, thereâ€™s a fine argument that Vidroâ€™s success is unlikely to continue, though obviously, one never knows.

You mean the argument where you closed comments? That one?

I’m not saying you’re wrong. I’m saying that some of your arguments were weak and you provided no opportunity for a rebuttal.

By: DMZ

DMZ — Sun, 19 Aug 2007 21:50:24 +0000

OMG