<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blue Jays Release Frank Thomas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clueless in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262543</link>
		<dc:creator>Clueless in Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262543</guid>
		<description>If Frank is &quot;done&quot; after you&#039;ve watched him Xteve-X I&#039;d love to have him anyways.  

.277 26HR and 95RBI last year is &quot;done?&quot;  How many Mariners put up those numbers last year???

Oh ya, Guillen at 23HR 99RBI...but I was fine with Seattle passing on his 10-12 Million per year wages.  At the time we thought we had Adam Jones, Clement and Wladdy on the way.

I wish a few more M&#039;s were &quot;done&quot; like you described Frank...  

And don&#039;t forget our beloved Edgar...he wasn&#039;t to mobile at the end of his career.  Hence the DH position is born.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Frank is &#8220;done&#8221; after you&#8217;ve watched him Xteve-X I&#8217;d love to have him anyways.  </p>
<p>.277 26HR and 95RBI last year is &#8220;done?&#8221;  How many Mariners put up those numbers last year???</p>
<p>Oh ya, Guillen at 23HR 99RBI&#8230;but I was fine with Seattle passing on his 10-12 Million per year wages.  At the time we thought we had Adam Jones, Clement and Wladdy on the way.</p>
<p>I wish a few more M&#8217;s were &#8220;done&#8221; like you described Frank&#8230;  </p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget our beloved Edgar&#8230;he wasn&#8217;t to mobile at the end of his career.  Hence the DH position is born.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan smithee</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262512</link>
		<dc:creator>alan smithee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262512</guid>
		<description>sighing big frank is an upgrade over Vidro but what isn&#039;t? At this point his production isn&#039;t any better than what Jeff Clement gives you and Clement can at least run out a grounder. and yea yea yea I know they want to develop Clement as a catcher.  ill buy that for a dollar. they can call me when he doesn&#039;t drop every fourth pitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sighing big frank is an upgrade over Vidro but what isn&#8217;t? At this point his production isn&#8217;t any better than what Jeff Clement gives you and Clement can at least run out a grounder. and yea yea yea I know they want to develop Clement as a catcher.  ill buy that for a dollar. they can call me when he doesn&#8217;t drop every fourth pitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xteve X</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262424</link>
		<dc:creator>Xteve X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262424</guid>
		<description>Having watched Big Frank in his final years with the White Sox he is pretty darn close to done. His mobility makes Vidro look like Rickey Henderson ... I wouldn&#039;t expect him to have anywhere near close to the season he had with the As, but knowing the Ms I&#039;m sure that&#039;s what they&#039;d be expecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having watched Big Frank in his final years with the White Sox he is pretty darn close to done. His mobility makes Vidro look like Rickey Henderson &#8230; I wouldn&#8217;t expect him to have anywhere near close to the season he had with the As, but knowing the Ms I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s what they&#8217;d be expecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerBear</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262423</link>
		<dc:creator>JerBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262423</guid>
		<description>McLaren on Ibanez recently:

&quot;His all-around game has been outstanding,&quot; manager John McLaren said. &quot;His defense, his throwing arm, the way he is running the bases. He has looked really, really good.&quot; 

Sadly, there&#039;s no way they&#039;re gonna move him from LF. So go for Thomas, I say, though I don&#039;t really expect it to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McLaren on Ibanez recently:</p>
<p>&#8220;His all-around game has been outstanding,&#8221; manager John McLaren said. &#8220;His defense, his throwing arm, the way he is running the bases. He has looked really, really good.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sadly, there&#8217;s no way they&#8217;re gonna move him from LF. So go for Thomas, I say, though I don&#8217;t really expect it to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terminator X</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262417</link>
		<dc:creator>Terminator X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262417</guid>
		<description>Warning: this post is long, and kind of jumps all over the place and my train of thought isn&#039;t always clear, so bear with me.

For those who think the M&#039;s should sign Thomas now and release him if something better comes along, or platoon him with Player X: Won&#039;t happen. Thomas wants a full-time, starting job - he&#039;s made that very clear. And he&#039;s good enough to land one somewhere. He won&#039;t take a platoon job. And as far as taking him until something better comes along and dropping him... that&#039;s not the Bavasi way. Bavasi is historically VERY good to his players, possibly to a fault. He simply WON&#039;T sign a guy who&#039;s already upset about losing his job with the intend of releasing him again 2 months later. Not a realistic scenario.

Basically, we&#039;ve got to look at how much of an upgrade Thomas is over Vidro, and determine how many runs/wins that increases the M&#039;s projections by. If what I stated above is pretty much true, and we assume that signing Thomas would more or less be this season&#039;s patch to everything but RF, then we&#039;re pretty much looking at that roster for the rest of the season. Here&#039;s the #&#039;s I come up with, using averages of all the projections on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=255&amp;position=DH&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fangraphs&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://ussmariner.com/2008/02/14/2008-win-values/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;guidelines&lt;/a&gt; laid out by Dave. None of this accounts for ballpark factors, which are currently mathematically beyond me.

Thomas: .259/.366/.466, .368 wOBA, 2.73 VORP based on 700 PA
Vidro: .287/.361/.386, .338 wOBA, .98 VORP based on 700 PA

Take into account that 20 games have passed by and they&#039;re each only likely to get ~500 more PA in, and those numbers shift to 1.95 and .70 VORP. Fudge the numbers a little to account for Thomas coming to Safeco and you get him at right around 1 win over Vidro from here on out, which is about what I expected.

So then you have to look at what happens if we don&#039;t sign Thomas, and wait a couple months  to bring in a LF and move Ibanez to DH. Now we need to determine if getting this new LF and moving Ibanez to DH for the last 60 games of the season is worth more than that 1 extra win. I&#039;m not terribly savy on the ins and outs of free agency and late season trades, but right now it looks like the options will be of the Griffey/Bradley/Patterson/Wily Mo Pena/Mench/Dunn varieties. 

So 80 more games of Vidro/Ibanez would cut Vidros PA&#039;s down from 500 to ~300ish, making the rest of his win contribution .42 VORP. Using the same methodology as above, I get Ibanez at .276/.343/.446, .347 wOBA, and 1.08 wins above replacement level for 700 PA, with his -15 runs (IIRC) defensively factored in. Give him 300 PA as a LF and that cuts down to .46 VORP for his time in LF, and his ~225 PA for his time at DH would be worth .49 VORP. So now we&#039;ve got .42+.46+.49=1.37. (Ibanez for the rest of the season in LF is worth about .77 VORP for reference)

So, I&#039;ll try to summarize this a bit here. 
Vidro+Ibanez for the rest of the season (no moves made)=.70+.77=1.47 VORP
Thomas+Ibanez=1.80(fudging for Safeco)+.77=2.57 VORP for the rest of the season
Vidro+Ibanez for ~80 games, and then Ibanez as DH=1.34 VORP

If I&#039;m doing this correctly, that means we&#039;d have to find a LF who is worth around 1.1-1.4 VORP over ~60 games to approximately get to the 2.62 we reach with Thomas and Ibanez, depending upon Thomas&#039;s actual production. Even going on the low end with 1.1 VORP over 60 games, that still means the M&#039;s would need to find a LF with a full-season VORP of ~3 to just break even. I&#039;m too burned out on all this to figure out the VORPs of Griffey or Mo Pena or Patterson or whoever, but I doubt there will be an OF available at the trade deadline good enough to make up for 80 games of Vidro instead of Thomas.

And then there&#039;s the other factors. Vidro gets dangerously close to vesting his option if the M&#039;s wait for a trade, and prospects also have to be given up. Bring in Thomas now and it&#039;s virtually guaranteed Vidro&#039;s option doesn&#039;t vest, and only money is lost - no more minor leaguers. And then there&#039;s the chance that even if a 3-3.5 VORP LF is available another team trades for him, and there&#039;s a chance that a player that good won&#039;t even be available. And with Thomas/Ibanez locked into their roles, the M&#039;s can still pursue trade options to replace Wilkerson - the prospect price to replace both COF spots in trades would be greater than any of us would want.

Sorry for drawing it out so long, but if I did everything more or less correctly it looks like it makes the most sense to sign Thomas now than to wait and see what is available at the end of July.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warning: this post is long, and kind of jumps all over the place and my train of thought isn&#8217;t always clear, so bear with me.</p>
<p>For those who think the M&#8217;s should sign Thomas now and release him if something better comes along, or platoon him with Player X: Won&#8217;t happen. Thomas wants a full-time, starting job &#8211; he&#8217;s made that very clear. And he&#8217;s good enough to land one somewhere. He won&#8217;t take a platoon job. And as far as taking him until something better comes along and dropping him&#8230; that&#8217;s not the Bavasi way. Bavasi is historically VERY good to his players, possibly to a fault. He simply WON&#8217;T sign a guy who&#8217;s already upset about losing his job with the intend of releasing him again 2 months later. Not a realistic scenario.</p>
<p>Basically, we&#8217;ve got to look at how much of an upgrade Thomas is over Vidro, and determine how many runs/wins that increases the M&#8217;s projections by. If what I stated above is pretty much true, and we assume that signing Thomas would more or less be this season&#8217;s patch to everything but RF, then we&#8217;re pretty much looking at that roster for the rest of the season. Here&#8217;s the #&#8217;s I come up with, using averages of all the projections on <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=255&amp;position=DH" rel="nofollow">fangraphs</a> and the <a href="http://ussmariner.com/2008/02/14/2008-win-values/" rel="nofollow">guidelines</a> laid out by Dave. None of this accounts for ballpark factors, which are currently mathematically beyond me.</p>
<p>Thomas: .259/.366/.466, .368 wOBA, 2.73 VORP based on 700 PA<br />
Vidro: .287/.361/.386, .338 wOBA, .98 VORP based on 700 PA</p>
<p>Take into account that 20 games have passed by and they&#8217;re each only likely to get ~500 more PA in, and those numbers shift to 1.95 and .70 VORP. Fudge the numbers a little to account for Thomas coming to Safeco and you get him at right around 1 win over Vidro from here on out, which is about what I expected.</p>
<p>So then you have to look at what happens if we don&#8217;t sign Thomas, and wait a couple months  to bring in a LF and move Ibanez to DH. Now we need to determine if getting this new LF and moving Ibanez to DH for the last 60 games of the season is worth more than that 1 extra win. I&#8217;m not terribly savy on the ins and outs of free agency and late season trades, but right now it looks like the options will be of the Griffey/Bradley/Patterson/Wily Mo Pena/Mench/Dunn varieties. </p>
<p>So 80 more games of Vidro/Ibanez would cut Vidros PA&#8217;s down from 500 to ~300ish, making the rest of his win contribution .42 VORP. Using the same methodology as above, I get Ibanez at .276/.343/.446, .347 wOBA, and 1.08 wins above replacement level for 700 PA, with his -15 runs (IIRC) defensively factored in. Give him 300 PA as a LF and that cuts down to .46 VORP for his time in LF, and his ~225 PA for his time at DH would be worth .49 VORP. So now we&#8217;ve got .42+.46+.49=1.37. (Ibanez for the rest of the season in LF is worth about .77 VORP for reference)</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;ll try to summarize this a bit here.<br />
Vidro+Ibanez for the rest of the season (no moves made)=.70+.77=1.47 VORP<br />
Thomas+Ibanez=1.80(fudging for Safeco)+.77=2.57 VORP for the rest of the season<br />
Vidro+Ibanez for ~80 games, and then Ibanez as DH=1.34 VORP</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m doing this correctly, that means we&#8217;d have to find a LF who is worth around 1.1-1.4 VORP over ~60 games to approximately get to the 2.62 we reach with Thomas and Ibanez, depending upon Thomas&#8217;s actual production. Even going on the low end with 1.1 VORP over 60 games, that still means the M&#8217;s would need to find a LF with a full-season VORP of ~3 to just break even. I&#8217;m too burned out on all this to figure out the VORPs of Griffey or Mo Pena or Patterson or whoever, but I doubt there will be an OF available at the trade deadline good enough to make up for 80 games of Vidro instead of Thomas.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the other factors. Vidro gets dangerously close to vesting his option if the M&#8217;s wait for a trade, and prospects also have to be given up. Bring in Thomas now and it&#8217;s virtually guaranteed Vidro&#8217;s option doesn&#8217;t vest, and only money is lost &#8211; no more minor leaguers. And then there&#8217;s the chance that even if a 3-3.5 VORP LF is available another team trades for him, and there&#8217;s a chance that a player that good won&#8217;t even be available. And with Thomas/Ibanez locked into their roles, the M&#8217;s can still pursue trade options to replace Wilkerson &#8211; the prospect price to replace both COF spots in trades would be greater than any of us would want.</p>
<p>Sorry for drawing it out so long, but if I did everything more or less correctly it looks like it makes the most sense to sign Thomas now than to wait and see what is available at the end of July.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hub</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262415</link>
		<dc:creator>hub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 11:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262415</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to gauge the number of projected offensive runs that Thomas is +/- over Vidro at DH?  Regardless of Left/Right/Left/Right lineups, is he gonna make the offense score more often?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to gauge the number of projected offensive runs that Thomas is +/- over Vidro at DH?  Regardless of Left/Right/Left/Right lineups, is he gonna make the offense score more often?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clueless in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262406</link>
		<dc:creator>Clueless in Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262406</guid>
		<description>The M&#039;s should JUMP on the chance to sign The BIG HURT faster than Ichiro can get down the 1st baseline for virtually pennies on the dollar.  WHY??

1.  Vidro is a nice hitter for average.  .301 Career hitter...Nice.  Frank Thomas is a power hitter that strikes fear into a pitcher. Oh, .302 Career hitter by the way.

2.  I will now compair Vidro&#039;s best stats at his prime age against Thomas at age 38-39.  At age 26 (2000) Vidro had 24HR and 96RBI for his best.  At the age of  38 Thomas hit 39 HR 114 for Oakland and at 39 he hit 36HR with 95RBI with a heel problem.

3.  What have you done for me lately??

Vidro last 4 years:  34HR 198RBI in 1,732 At Bats, that&#039;s 1 HR every 15 games played.

Thomas last 4 years:  95HR 284RBI in 1,342 At Bats, that&#039;s 1HR every 3-4 games played.

IMPACT would be immediate.

4.  Our bench is a joke for AL and weak for NL.  Burke, Norton (4th OF/1b), Bloomquist (IF/OF) and Cairo (IF/Pinch Runner??).  Bloomquist and Cairo are the same player, with Cairo being an older version.  I&#039;m sure Cairo is a great guy, heck I like him...but we already have that guy in Bloomquist.  It was a terrible blunder by Bavasi to sign him.  Therefore, we NEED Thomas.

4.  Bench thoughts....  Cairo or a career .301 hitting switch hitter who will still put a little bit of pressure on Lopez to perform well in Jose Vidro?

FINALLY, think of this lineup folks:

1  Ichiro
2  Lopez/Vidro
3  Ibanez
4  Thomas/[even after a couple of years of watching our starting first baseman I am unaware that his name is Sexson]whom ever is hotter
5  [even after a couple of years of watching our starting first baseman I am unaware that his name is Sexson]/Thomas
6  Beltre
7  Wilkerson
8  Johjima
9  Betancourt

WOW, what an improvement!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M&#8217;s should JUMP on the chance to sign The BIG HURT faster than Ichiro can get down the 1st baseline for virtually pennies on the dollar.  WHY??</p>
<p>1.  Vidro is a nice hitter for average.  .301 Career hitter&#8230;Nice.  Frank Thomas is a power hitter that strikes fear into a pitcher. Oh, .302 Career hitter by the way.</p>
<p>2.  I will now compair Vidro&#8217;s best stats at his prime age against Thomas at age 38-39.  At age 26 (2000) Vidro had 24HR and 96RBI for his best.  At the age of  38 Thomas hit 39 HR 114 for Oakland and at 39 he hit 36HR with 95RBI with a heel problem.</p>
<p>3.  What have you done for me lately??</p>
<p>Vidro last 4 years:  34HR 198RBI in 1,732 At Bats, that&#8217;s 1 HR every 15 games played.</p>
<p>Thomas last 4 years:  95HR 284RBI in 1,342 At Bats, that&#8217;s 1HR every 3-4 games played.</p>
<p>IMPACT would be immediate.</p>
<p>4.  Our bench is a joke for AL and weak for NL.  Burke, Norton (4th OF/1b), Bloomquist (IF/OF) and Cairo (IF/Pinch Runner??).  Bloomquist and Cairo are the same player, with Cairo being an older version.  I&#8217;m sure Cairo is a great guy, heck I like him&#8230;but we already have that guy in Bloomquist.  It was a terrible blunder by Bavasi to sign him.  Therefore, we NEED Thomas.</p>
<p>4.  Bench thoughts&#8230;.  Cairo or a career .301 hitting switch hitter who will still put a little bit of pressure on Lopez to perform well in Jose Vidro?</p>
<p>FINALLY, think of this lineup folks:</p>
<p>1  Ichiro<br />
2  Lopez/Vidro<br />
3  Ibanez<br />
4  Thomas/[even after a couple of years of watching our starting first baseman I am unaware that his name is Sexson]whom ever is hotter<br />
5  [even after a couple of years of watching our starting first baseman I am unaware that his name is Sexson]/Thomas<br />
6  Beltre<br />
7  Wilkerson<br />
8  Johjima<br />
9  Betancourt</p>
<p>WOW, what an improvement!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDRE</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262398</link>
		<dc:creator>SDRE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262398</guid>
		<description>21: One thing I like about Thomas is his ability to work the count and take a walk.  He could help this lineup.  He killed the ball when he played for Oakland at the Safe a few years back. 
One things the Angel series shined light on is that Hunter and Vlad are a nice combo that the M&#039;s don&#039;t have.  While Thomas wouldn&#039;t be a long-term solution (call up Clement and Wlad for that)  His presence in the lineup would take some pressure off Sexson and Beltre.  At best as you said, getting Thomas AB as a DH would limit the likely of a Vidro vesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21: One thing I like about Thomas is his ability to work the count and take a walk.  He could help this lineup.  He killed the ball when he played for Oakland at the Safe a few years back.<br />
One things the Angel series shined light on is that Hunter and Vlad are a nice combo that the M&#8217;s don&#8217;t have.  While Thomas wouldn&#8217;t be a long-term solution (call up Clement and Wlad for that)  His presence in the lineup would take some pressure off Sexson and Beltre.  At best as you said, getting Thomas AB as a DH would limit the likely of a Vidro vesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BMW</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262393</link>
		<dc:creator>BMW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262393</guid>
		<description>Absalutely the Ms should go after Frank, Toronto is on the hook for his salary, So Seattle could land him for the minimum salary, around 360,000 I think.. Remember this guy led Toronto in HR and RBi last year... Its worth a shot..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absalutely the Ms should go after Frank, Toronto is on the hook for his salary, So Seattle could land him for the minimum salary, around 360,000 I think.. Remember this guy led Toronto in HR and RBi last year&#8230; Its worth a shot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Egaas</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/blue-jays-release-frank-thomas/comment-page-1/#comment-262384</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Egaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5065#comment-262384</guid>
		<description>Part of me says it&#039;s time to get ballsy.  Kick Norton to the curb and pick up Big Frank.  At the very least, you can find a high leverage at bat for him to pinch hit once a game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of me says it&#8217;s time to get ballsy.  Kick Norton to the curb and pick up Big Frank.  At the very least, you can find a high leverage at bat for him to pinch hit once a game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

