<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Divisional play math</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: currcoug</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262426</link>
		<dc:creator>currcoug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262426</guid>
		<description>Trading Sherrill might prove to be the single greatest mistake Bavasi made in the off-season. 

The injury to J.J., the implosion of O&#039;Flaherty, and poor defense, resulted in the sweep in Baltimore (with Sherrill nailing the coffin). That early season sweep might end up being the difference in the AL West and Wildcard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trading Sherrill might prove to be the single greatest mistake Bavasi made in the off-season. </p>
<p>The injury to J.J., the implosion of O&#8217;Flaherty, and poor defense, resulted in the sweep in Baltimore (with Sherrill nailing the coffin). That early season sweep might end up being the difference in the AL West and Wildcard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262386</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262386</guid>
		<description>So I guess it&#039;s a good thing they won, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I guess it&#8217;s a good thing they won, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breadbaker</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262236</link>
		<dc:creator>Breadbaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262236</guid>
		<description>The last two years, the M&#039;s record against the division winner was the difference in the division.  It&#039;s not so much the 5-9 as the 0-14 that really can bite you in the ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last two years, the M&#8217;s record against the division winner was the difference in the division.  It&#8217;s not so much the 5-9 as the 0-14 that really can bite you in the ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262121</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262121</guid>
		<description>I think Rickey got that quote from Milton.  But it&#039;s a good quote, and he&#039;s the guy who applied it to baseball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Rickey got that quote from Milton.  But it&#8217;s a good quote, and he&#8217;s the guy who applied it to baseball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eponymous coward</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262112</link>
		<dc:creator>eponymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262112</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Obviously the outcomes of those two seasons could be very significant, but I imagine that a team with a certain talent level around 84 wins, will end up winning 87 games (or more) a fair number of times-just out of pure luck.&lt;/em&gt;

Of course, the converse is that a true talent of 84 wins might end up with 81 just as easily at 87, if we assume luck is equally likely to be bad luck as good luck.

I believe in Branch Rickey&#039;s aphorism: &quot;Luck is the residue of design&quot;. And, well, I don&#039;t think the 2008 Mariners are all that awesomely designed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Obviously the outcomes of those two seasons could be very significant, but I imagine that a team with a certain talent level around 84 wins, will end up winning 87 games (or more) a fair number of times-just out of pure luck.</em></p>
<p>Of course, the converse is that a true talent of 84 wins might end up with 81 just as easily at 87, if we assume luck is equally likely to be bad luck as good luck.</p>
<p>I believe in Branch Rickey&#8217;s aphorism: &#8220;Luck is the residue of design&#8221;. And, well, I don&#8217;t think the 2008 Mariners are all that awesomely designed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlc</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262109</link>
		<dc:creator>jlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262109</guid>
		<description>I always figured the Mariners were counting on good luck to get to the playoffs this season anyway. Minimal injuries, players having solid to career years with no holes. Not really my idea of how to build a winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always figured the Mariners were counting on good luck to get to the playoffs this season anyway. Minimal injuries, players having solid to career years with no holes. Not really my idea of how to build a winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA M's Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262108</link>
		<dc:creator>LA M's Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262108</guid>
		<description>My one question about this analysis is:  is there really a statistical significance between an 84-win team and an 87-win team?  

Obviously the &lt;em&gt;outcomes&lt;/em&gt; of those two seasons could be very significant, but I imagine that a team with a certain talent level around 84 wins, will end up winning 87 games (or more) a fair number of times-just out of pure luck.

I get that the idea is that if they lose Mariners will now have to be luckier than if they win, but on the other hand I think there are so many more opportunities for &quot;luck&quot; in the season that these types of things tend to balance out. 

It&#039;s sort of the ideal gas law applied to baseball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My one question about this analysis is:  is there really a statistical significance between an 84-win team and an 87-win team?  </p>
<p>Obviously the <em>outcomes</em> of those two seasons could be very significant, but I imagine that a team with a certain talent level around 84 wins, will end up winning 87 games (or more) a fair number of times-just out of pure luck.</p>
<p>I get that the idea is that if they lose Mariners will now have to be luckier than if they win, but on the other hand I think there are so many more opportunities for &#8220;luck&#8221; in the season that these types of things tend to balance out. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sort of the ideal gas law applied to baseball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sentinel</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262106</link>
		<dc:creator>Sentinel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262106</guid>
		<description>As they say, &quot;You can&#039;t win the division in April, but you can certainly lose it.&quot;  Hopefully things start to turn around some.

On a happier note, I just got an inside track on some season tickets from my neighbor.  13 rows behind the visitor&#039;s dugout.  Should be fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As they say, &#8220;You can&#8217;t win the division in April, but you can certainly lose it.&#8221;  Hopefully things start to turn around some.</p>
<p>On a happier note, I just got an inside track on some season tickets from my neighbor.  13 rows behind the visitor&#8217;s dugout.  Should be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jspektor</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/04/20/divisional-play-math/comment-page-1/#comment-262104</link>
		<dc:creator>jspektor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=5064#comment-262104</guid>
		<description>Man ... those number are daunting ... we really do need to take this game. Hopefully ... uhh - the stats are wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man &#8230; those number are daunting &#8230; we really do need to take this game. Hopefully &#8230; uhh &#8211; the stats are wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

