<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Target-rich environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomTuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302705</link>
		<dc:creator>TomTuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302705</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;$117 mil, 100 lossesâ€“ Whereâ€™s our bailout plan?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It comes when Chuck and Howard are voted off the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>$117 mil, 100 lossesâ€“ Whereâ€™s our bailout plan?</p></blockquote>
<p>It comes when Chuck and Howard are voted off the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killer_ewok18</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302655</link>
		<dc:creator>killer_ewok18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302655</guid>
		<description>$117 mil, 100 losses-- Where&#039;s our bailout plan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$117 mil, 100 losses&#8211; Where&#8217;s our bailout plan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xteve X</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302654</link>
		<dc:creator>Xteve X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302654</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from an idiot who think Gillick is the &lt;em&gt;ne plus ultra &lt;/em&gt; of baseball management. 

If Chuck tried any harder to pat himself on the back for his team&#039;s past successes (and 2001 is getting pretty far in the rearview mirror at this point ...) he&#039;d break his arm.

This team&#039;s in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from an idiot who think Gillick is the <em>ne plus ultra </em> of baseball management. </p>
<p>If Chuck tried any harder to pat himself on the back for his team&#8217;s past successes (and 2001 is getting pretty far in the rearview mirror at this point &#8230;) he&#8217;d break his arm.</p>
<p>This team&#8217;s in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevie_j13</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302653</link>
		<dc:creator>stevie_j13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302653</guid>
		<description>So, wait... two positive moves over 20 years provides precedent for a more integrative approach?  This level of self-delusion is Cheney-esque.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, wait&#8230; two positive moves over 20 years provides precedent for a more integrative approach?  This level of self-delusion is Cheney-esque.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302651</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302651</guid>
		<description>wonder how many baseball front offices do &#039;invite dissent&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wonder how many baseball front offices do &#8216;invite dissent&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smb</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302650</link>
		<dc:creator>smb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302650</guid>
		<description>Just once, I want an interviewer to say to him, &quot;Dude, you are one naked emperor.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just once, I want an interviewer to say to him, &#8220;Dude, you are one naked emperor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SonOfZavaras</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302649</link>
		<dc:creator>SonOfZavaras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302649</guid>
		<description>RE: Armstrong&#039;s latest MLB interview

WHERE-DO-I-....BEGIN???!?

(The Passion Of Chuck Armstrong. Coming soon to a theatre near you. Gah.)

From virtually &lt;em&gt;everything&lt;/em&gt; I read in that interview, I am thinking several things. Number one on that list of thoughts is that this stands a very, very real chance of sucking exponentially.

As I&#039;ve said before, I wouldn&#039;t trust Armstrong with tying my shoes correctly, let alone selecting a GM with something on the ball. That he trusts his instincts? His decisions?? 

Note to Chuck: you have the baseball acumen of a fiddler crab, your job hangs on one thing and one thing only: that ownership doesn&#039;t involve itself in baseball operations, otherwise you&#039;d&#039;ve been shitcanned long ago.

What glory days this organization has had (and they get more distant all the time) were NOT the results of your own doing, Chuckie. 

And I can&#039;t help but think that all the young bright boys and girls you plan on interviewing are gonna look at THIS mess, and say to themselves &quot;you know, I really WANT you guys helping me every step of the way&quot;...

The Mariners tolerate dissent. That was good for another belly-laugh. This is the most G-rated organization in pro sports. The broadcasters get a reprimand if they so much as utter &quot;gosh darn it all to heck&quot;. The Mariners no more invite dissent than what Oakland Raiders owner Al Davis invites less than omnipotent-worship of himself.

The sad thing is, the Raiders might JUST be run a little better than what the M&#039;s have been lately.

Fingers crossed, trying to think good thoughts. LaCava...LaCava...LaCava....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Armstrong&#8217;s latest MLB interview</p>
<p>WHERE-DO-I-&#8230;.BEGIN???!?</p>
<p>(The Passion Of Chuck Armstrong. Coming soon to a theatre near you. Gah.)</p>
<p>From virtually <em>everything</em> I read in that interview, I am thinking several things. Number one on that list of thoughts is that this stands a very, very real chance of sucking exponentially.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said before, I wouldn&#8217;t trust Armstrong with tying my shoes correctly, let alone selecting a GM with something on the ball. That he trusts his instincts? His decisions?? </p>
<p>Note to Chuck: you have the baseball acumen of a fiddler crab, your job hangs on one thing and one thing only: that ownership doesn&#8217;t involve itself in baseball operations, otherwise you&#8217;d've been shitcanned long ago.</p>
<p>What glory days this organization has had (and they get more distant all the time) were NOT the results of your own doing, Chuckie. </p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t help but think that all the young bright boys and girls you plan on interviewing are gonna look at THIS mess, and say to themselves &#8220;you know, I really WANT you guys helping me every step of the way&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>The Mariners tolerate dissent. That was good for another belly-laugh. This is the most G-rated organization in pro sports. The broadcasters get a reprimand if they so much as utter &#8220;gosh darn it all to heck&#8221;. The Mariners no more invite dissent than what Oakland Raiders owner Al Davis invites less than omnipotent-worship of himself.</p>
<p>The sad thing is, the Raiders might JUST be run a little better than what the M&#8217;s have been lately.</p>
<p>Fingers crossed, trying to think good thoughts. LaCava&#8230;LaCava&#8230;LaCava&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302648</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302648</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Academic studies from social psychology, economics and business management show pretty unequivocally that organizations that invite dissent are much better at making decisions that organizations that invite agreement.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Academic studies from social psychology, economics and business management show pretty unequivocally that organizations that are managed by stubborn individuals who cannot recognize their limitations are much worse at making decisions than organizations in which the managers are more adept and aware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Academic studies from social psychology, economics and business management show pretty unequivocally that organizations that invite dissent are much better at making decisions that organizations that invite agreement.</p></blockquote>
<p>Academic studies from social psychology, economics and business management show pretty unequivocally that organizations that are managed by stubborn individuals who cannot recognize their limitations are much worse at making decisions than organizations in which the managers are more adept and aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302646</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302646</guid>
		<description>ever since I read this I&#039;ve had the old Larry Hart lyric running through my head 

&quot;the self-deception that believes the lie...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ever since I read this I&#8217;ve had the old Larry Hart lyric running through my head </p>
<p>&#8220;the self-deception that believes the lie&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/10/09/target-rich-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-302645</link>
		<dc:creator>tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6421#comment-302645</guid>
		<description>I just read the article, and sure,there are things that made me wince, but nothing that I think could stop Ng from building a winner. She even more than the others will know how to negotiate that &#039;collaborative and inclusive&#039; quagmire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read the article, and sure,there are things that made me wince, but nothing that I think could stop Ng from building a winner. She even more than the others will know how to negotiate that &#8216;collaborative and inclusive&#8217; quagmire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

