<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations Ichiro &amp; Beltre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304365</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304365</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Wellâ€¦ if you believe that Win Shares is correctly varying the size of the pool based on merit, yeah.&lt;/em&gt;

Okay, I didn&#039;t mean to be making a case for Win Shares, just acknowledging that it was slightly better designed than my idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Wellâ€¦ if you believe that Win Shares is correctly varying the size of the pool based on merit, yeah.</em></p>
<p>Okay, I didn&#8217;t mean to be making a case for Win Shares, just acknowledging that it was slightly better designed than my idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304363</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304363</guid>
		<description>it has been highly entertaining (once you get past the many WTFs) to read the various articles and bloggings about this years voting -- from &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/print?id=3686664&amp;type=blogEntry&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Neyer&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/mariners/index.html#34022&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Baker,&lt;/a&gt; not to mention &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/michael-youngs-value/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dave&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it has been highly entertaining (once you get past the many WTFs) to read the various articles and bloggings about this years voting &#8212; from <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/print?id=3686664&amp;type=blogEntry" rel="nofollow">Neyer</a> and <a href="http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/mariners/index.html#34022" rel="nofollow">Baker,</a> not to mention <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/michael-youngs-value/" rel="nofollow">Dave</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill1410</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304362</link>
		<dc:creator>bill1410</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304362</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Conor.  I forgot that was up there.  According to PMR, the only touted rankings from USSM&#039;s article that I could actually find for 2008, Michael Young was a pretty average SS.  Bobby Crosby and Jason Bartlett had clearly better seasons (I thought Bartlett had incredible range during the World Series, FWIW).  Peralta and Cabrera were about even.  Jeter was a little behind.  Yuni and Renteria were pulling up the rear among AL SS&#039;s eligible.

http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/cat_probabilistic_model_of_range.php

Of course, who knows if the PMR system is accurate, or the right one to look at, but yeah, they don&#039;t love Michael Young like RZR does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Conor.  I forgot that was up there.  According to PMR, the only touted rankings from USSM&#8217;s article that I could actually find for 2008, Michael Young was a pretty average SS.  Bobby Crosby and Jason Bartlett had clearly better seasons (I thought Bartlett had incredible range during the World Series, FWIW).  Peralta and Cabrera were about even.  Jeter was a little behind.  Yuni and Renteria were pulling up the rear among AL SS&#8217;s eligible.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/cat_probabilistic_model_of_range.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/cat_probabilistic_model_of_range.php</a></p>
<p>Of course, who knows if the PMR system is accurate, or the right one to look at, but yeah, they don&#8217;t love Michael Young like RZR does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304361</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304361</guid>
		<description>We really should put a link at the top of the page on &lt;a href=&quot;http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/24/evaluating-defense/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;how to evaluate defense&lt;/a&gt;. Oh, wait...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really should put a link at the top of the page on <a href="http://ussmariner.com/2006/01/24/evaluating-defense/" rel="nofollow">how to evaluate defense</a>. Oh, wait&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill1410</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304358</link>
		<dc:creator>bill1410</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304358</guid>
		<description>Michael Young led the league in RZR and is close to 2nd on &quot;out of zone&quot; plays (according to Hardball Times).  Of course, they have Jeter in 2nd in RZR.  So if Young and Jeter are not good fielders (I would completely agree about Jeter), then RZR is basically crap I guess.  And we&#039;ve been told on here that BP&#039;s defensive stats are crap.

Anyone know which defensive stats we should be using then (and why)?  Because it&#039;s only been a couple years since statistical guys were quoting RZR or BP&#039;s stuff on defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Young led the league in RZR and is close to 2nd on &#8220;out of zone&#8221; plays (according to Hardball Times).  Of course, they have Jeter in 2nd in RZR.  So if Young and Jeter are not good fielders (I would completely agree about Jeter), then RZR is basically crap I guess.  And we&#8217;ve been told on here that BP&#8217;s defensive stats are crap.</p>
<p>Anyone know which defensive stats we should be using then (and why)?  Because it&#8217;s only been a couple years since statistical guys were quoting RZR or BP&#8217;s stuff on defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304357</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304357</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;. I do have a question, though. Why donâ€™t they break down the outfielders as LF, CF, RF instead of lumping them all together as just OF?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

because that might imply they were legitimate awards?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>. I do have a question, though. Why donâ€™t they break down the outfielders as LF, CF, RF instead of lumping them all together as just OF?</p></blockquote>
<p>because that might imply they were legitimate awards?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msb</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304356</link>
		<dc:creator>msb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304356</guid>
		<description>what I find hard to believe is that it has &lt;i&gt;been&lt;/i&gt; eight years since Ichiro arrived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what I find hard to believe is that it has <i>been</i> eight years since Ichiro arrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsrobinson</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304354</link>
		<dc:creator>rsrobinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304354</guid>
		<description>Beltre definitely deserved it.  Ichiro?  Meh.  I don&#039;t think he had a great year defensively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beltre definitely deserved it.  Ichiro?  Meh.  I don&#8217;t think he had a great year defensively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JLP</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304348</link>
		<dc:creator>JLP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 05:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304348</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t disagree with too much on the list.  Cases could be made for Youkilis at 1B and a few outfielders, namely Markakis.  I do have a question, though.  Why don&#039;t they break down the outfielders as LF, CF, RF instead of lumping them all together as just OF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t disagree with too much on the list.  Cases could be made for Youkilis at 1B and a few outfielders, namely Markakis.  I do have a question, though.  Why don&#8217;t they break down the outfielders as LF, CF, RF instead of lumping them all together as just OF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/11/06/congratulations-ichiro-beltre/comment-page-1/#comment-304347</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 04:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6647#comment-304347</guid>
		<description>Well... if you believe that Win Shares is correctly varying the size of the pool based on merit, yeah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; if you believe that Win Shares is correctly varying the size of the pool based on merit, yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

