<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random free agents: Hinske</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmbaseball7</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306360</link>
		<dc:creator>pmbaseball7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 22:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306360</guid>
		<description>I love the idea of Langerhans if I&#039;m not mistaken he&#039;s one of the better outfielders in the game he sounds like a potential low risk high reward FA to me. Byrnes has $22M left on his contract and a complete no trade clause I do love the way he plays the game but I&#039;ll pass. Tracy would probably be a good pickup he&#039;s owed $4.75M this year and an option for $7M in 2010 with a $1M buyout. His career line is  .343/.461/.285. He&#039;ll be 29 in May.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the idea of Langerhans if I&#8217;m not mistaken he&#8217;s one of the better outfielders in the game he sounds like a potential low risk high reward FA to me. Byrnes has $22M left on his contract and a complete no trade clause I do love the way he plays the game but I&#8217;ll pass. Tracy would probably be a good pickup he&#8217;s owed $4.75M this year and an option for $7M in 2010 with a $1M buyout. His career line is  .343/.461/.285. He&#8217;ll be 29 in May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sugar2323</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306347</link>
		<dc:creator>sugar2323</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 17:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306347</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one to think about as a cheap LF/CF platoon with some skills, Ryan Langerhans.

I like a possible look at Tracy and what about  about someone like Eric Byrnes to bring a little energy and attitude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one to think about as a cheap LF/CF platoon with some skills, Ryan Langerhans.</p>
<p>I like a possible look at Tracy and what about  about someone like Eric Byrnes to bring a little energy and attitude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306337</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306337</guid>
		<description>I think you end up with the second platoon in left. Though I threw Hinske out here randomly, if you figure that Johjima&#039;s a full-time catcher and Clement needs to get at least 400 plate appearances, those are most likely going to come at DH. And if you&#039;ve got Clement taking a massive chunk of the DH at-bats, someone like Hinske doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense any more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you end up with the second platoon in left. Though I threw Hinske out here randomly, if you figure that Johjima&#8217;s a full-time catcher and Clement needs to get at least 400 plate appearances, those are most likely going to come at DH. And if you&#8217;ve got Clement taking a massive chunk of the DH at-bats, someone like Hinske doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMC_Stags</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306335</link>
		<dc:creator>CMC_Stags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 07:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306335</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Itâ€™s what a bench is for. I donâ€™t see any issue carrying at least two platoons. But Iâ€™m not establishment baseball thinking, obviously.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

DMZ - Roster Construction Question:

If Branyan is half of platoon #1 at 1B, where does it make the most sense for the M&#039;s to have the 2nd platoon?  Is it cheaper/easier for them to use the #2 platoon at DH or to find two outfielders with strong platoon splits?

I would also propose that if the team keeps Reed, they could try to find a free agent OF with strong platoon splits versus LH pitching.

Could you take a gander at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fangraphs.com/splits.aspx?playerid=1256&amp;position=OF&amp;page=0&amp;split=lr&amp;type=mini&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gabe Kapler&lt;/a&gt; next in your series?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Itâ€™s what a bench is for. I donâ€™t see any issue carrying at least two platoons. But Iâ€™m not establishment baseball thinking, obviously.
</p></blockquote>
<p>DMZ &#8211; Roster Construction Question:</p>
<p>If Branyan is half of platoon #1 at 1B, where does it make the most sense for the M&#8217;s to have the 2nd platoon?  Is it cheaper/easier for them to use the #2 platoon at DH or to find two outfielders with strong platoon splits?</p>
<p>I would also propose that if the team keeps Reed, they could try to find a free agent OF with strong platoon splits versus LH pitching.</p>
<p>Could you take a gander at <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/splits.aspx?playerid=1256&amp;position=OF&amp;page=0&amp;split=lr&amp;type=mini" rel="nofollow">Gabe Kapler</a> next in your series?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benne</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306332</link>
		<dc:creator>Benne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306332</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a twisted and scary world we live in when Oliver Perez is considered a Type A free agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a twisted and scary world we live in when Oliver Perez is considered a Type A free agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niterunner</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306331</link>
		<dc:creator>niterunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306331</guid>
		<description>What do you think about Oliver Perez?  ESPN&#039;s Keith Law ranks him at no. 10 for free agents, which seems overrated to me.

Oh nevermind, I see that he was offered arbitration (Type A).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think about Oliver Perez?  ESPN&#8217;s Keith Law ranks him at no. 10 for free agents, which seems overrated to me.</p>
<p>Oh nevermind, I see that he was offered arbitration (Type A).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coasty141</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306329</link>
		<dc:creator>coasty141</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306329</guid>
		<description>Hey... whats up with Chad Tracy these days?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey&#8230; whats up with Chad Tracy these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coasty141</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306328</link>
		<dc:creator>coasty141</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306328</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for it because it should be cheap and the downside is minimal. 

Sidenote: Bill James and Marcel project Hinske with a sub 800 ops.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for it because it should be cheap and the downside is minimal. </p>
<p>Sidenote: Bill James and Marcel project Hinske with a sub 800 ops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306327</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306327</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s what a bench is for. I don&#039;t see any issue carrying at least two platoons. But I&#039;m not establishment baseball thinking, obviously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s what a bench is for. I don&#8217;t see any issue carrying at least two platoons. But I&#8217;m not establishment baseball thinking, obviously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickwest1976</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/05/random-free-agents-hinske/comment-page-1/#comment-306325</link>
		<dc:creator>nickwest1976</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 04:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6822#comment-306325</guid>
		<description>What about trading for Nick Johnson to play 1B and moving Branyan to DH?  Then the M&#039;s could find a decent platoon partner for Branyan.

I don&#039;t mind Hinske but I agree with the previous poster that Hinske and Branyan seems like a bit much in terms of guys that need platoon partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about trading for Nick Johnson to play 1B and moving Branyan to DH?  Then the M&#8217;s could find a decent platoon partner for Branyan.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind Hinske but I agree with the previous poster that Hinske and Branyan seems like a bit much in terms of guys that need platoon partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

