<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Furcal to Braves, maybe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor H</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307541</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307541</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The day after saying the Braves were â€œthe favoritesâ€ to land his clientâ€™s services, Rafael Furcalâ€™s agent told reporters on Wednesday that things are â€œswinging back toward Dodgers, probably.â€

Paul Kinzer, Furcalâ€™s agent, indicated Wednesday that Furcal would likely make a decision by dayâ€™s end.

The Dodgers were â€œin conversationâ€ with Kinzer on Tuesday, with one source saying, â€œThey are talking big-time.â€

Earlier Tuesday, it appeared that Furcal had all but decided to go back to the Braves, the team for whom he played his first six MLB seasons. Atlanta offered a three-year deal worth approximately $30 million, according to major-league sources, and included a vesting option for a fourth year that likely will push the potential value to $40 million. Furcal would still have to pass a physical before any deal can be approved.

The Aâ€™s are believed to have made the high offer for Furcal â€” four years guaranteed in the $40 million range, according to major-league sources.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So says Ken Rosenthal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The day after saying the Braves were â€œthe favoritesâ€ to land his clientâ€™s services, Rafael Furcalâ€™s agent told reporters on Wednesday that things are â€œswinging back toward Dodgers, probably.â€</p>
<p>Paul Kinzer, Furcalâ€™s agent, indicated Wednesday that Furcal would likely make a decision by dayâ€™s end.</p>
<p>The Dodgers were â€œin conversationâ€ with Kinzer on Tuesday, with one source saying, â€œThey are talking big-time.â€</p>
<p>Earlier Tuesday, it appeared that Furcal had all but decided to go back to the Braves, the team for whom he played his first six MLB seasons. Atlanta offered a three-year deal worth approximately $30 million, according to major-league sources, and included a vesting option for a fourth year that likely will push the potential value to $40 million. Furcal would still have to pass a physical before any deal can be approved.</p>
<p>The Aâ€™s are believed to have made the high offer for Furcal â€” four years guaranteed in the $40 million range, according to major-league sources.</p></blockquote>
<p>So says Ken Rosenthal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moz57</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307483</link>
		<dc:creator>moz57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307483</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t want to repeat what&#039;s already been asked (though I&#039;m going to), but was there ever any source showing that Furcal was an option for the Mariners? I love Furcal and I&#039;d love to see him signed in Seattle but is it just wishful thinking on my (our) part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to repeat what&#8217;s already been asked (though I&#8217;m going to), but was there ever any source showing that Furcal was an option for the Mariners? I love Furcal and I&#8217;d love to see him signed in Seattle but is it just wishful thinking on my (our) part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307472</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307472</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe Zduriencik has made any statements regarding the middle infield.  This is just the next obvious opportunity for an upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe Zduriencik has made any statements regarding the middle infield.  This is just the next obvious opportunity for an upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh_h</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307463</link>
		<dc:creator>josh_h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307463</guid>
		<description>Is there any evidence that Z is seriously considering trading Yuni?  Or is this just wishful thinking from the USSM/LL community?  I&#039;m not saying trading him or not trading him is &quot;correct,&quot; I&#039;m just asking if the M&#039;s FO has shown any real desire to deal him...  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any evidence that Z is seriously considering trading Yuni?  Or is this just wishful thinking from the USSM/LL community?  I&#8217;m not saying trading him or not trading him is &#8220;correct,&#8221; I&#8217;m just asking if the M&#8217;s FO has shown any real desire to deal him&#8230;  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 300ZXNA</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307461</link>
		<dc:creator>300ZXNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307461</guid>
		<description>wow, if ATL signs him and puts him at 2b, that sounds like it would be one heck of a rangy middle infield for them.  What&#039;s the general adjustment for a player going from SS to 2B?  I know Furcal is about average defensively at SS, so how would that translate to 2B?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, if ATL signs him and puts him at 2b, that sounds like it would be one heck of a rangy middle infield for them.  What&#8217;s the general adjustment for a player going from SS to 2B?  I know Furcal is about average defensively at SS, so how would that translate to 2B?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sports on a Schtick</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307455</link>
		<dc:creator>Sports on a Schtick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307455</guid>
		<description>Maybe is definitely right. Word is now that the Dodgers are back in the mix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe is definitely right. Word is now that the Dodgers are back in the mix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killer_ewok18</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307437</link>
		<dc:creator>killer_ewok18</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307437</guid>
		<description>By defense, they could have meant they were hiring Everett as a bodyguard. That might actually be a good signing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By defense, they could have meant they were hiring Everett as a bodyguard. That might actually be a good signing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMB</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307436</link>
		<dc:creator>JMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307436</guid>
		<description>Here in Atlanta, they&#039;re saying Furcal will play 2B with Escobar staying at SS.
&lt;blockquote&gt;When I first saw the Everett to Detroit headline, I thought it was Carl Everett.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ditto. Even funnier was that the headline I saw said something like, &quot;Focusing on defense, Tigers sign Everett.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Atlanta, they&#8217;re saying Furcal will play 2B with Escobar staying at SS.</p>
<blockquote><p>When I first saw the Everett to Detroit headline, I thought it was Carl Everett.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ditto. Even funnier was that the headline I saw said something like, &#8220;Focusing on defense, Tigers sign Everett.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMC_Stags</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307434</link>
		<dc:creator>CMC_Stags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307434</guid>
		<description>So is the SS/2B Free Agent market now devoid of upgrades either in general or defensively over Yuni/Lopez?

Barring a trade, how will the M&#039;s look infield defense wise next season?  If I take rough 2-3 year UZR/150 averages for each likely infield defender next year, these are the options.

3B - Beltre ~ 10 UZR/150
SS - Yuni ~ -10 UZR/150
2B - Lopez ~ 0 UZR/150
1B - Branyan ~ 0 UZR/150

Assuming that group, the M&#039;s would post about a league average infield defense.  

Looking at the larger picture, assuming Chavez (+20 UZR/150 in LF), Gutierrez (probably around a +5 in CF), and Ichiro (+5 in RF) are your 3 outfielders the total team defense would be around +30 UZR/150.  That would be a team average of 3.75 UZR/150, good for 8th best in the majors last year.

Other options on the 40 man roster with enough history to tell us anything meaningful:

3B - Branyan ~ -10 UZR/150
SS - Morse ~ -25 UZR/150

Corona, Hulett, Morse (at non-SS positions), Tui, and LaHair don&#039;t have large enough samples at the MLB level to tell us anything about their defensive abilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is the SS/2B Free Agent market now devoid of upgrades either in general or defensively over Yuni/Lopez?</p>
<p>Barring a trade, how will the M&#8217;s look infield defense wise next season?  If I take rough 2-3 year UZR/150 averages for each likely infield defender next year, these are the options.</p>
<p>3B &#8211; Beltre ~ 10 UZR/150<br />
SS &#8211; Yuni ~ -10 UZR/150<br />
2B &#8211; Lopez ~ 0 UZR/150<br />
1B &#8211; Branyan ~ 0 UZR/150</p>
<p>Assuming that group, the M&#8217;s would post about a league average infield defense.  </p>
<p>Looking at the larger picture, assuming Chavez (+20 UZR/150 in LF), Gutierrez (probably around a +5 in CF), and Ichiro (+5 in RF) are your 3 outfielders the total team defense would be around +30 UZR/150.  That would be a team average of 3.75 UZR/150, good for 8th best in the majors last year.</p>
<p>Other options on the 40 man roster with enough history to tell us anything meaningful:</p>
<p>3B &#8211; Branyan ~ -10 UZR/150<br />
SS &#8211; Morse ~ -25 UZR/150</p>
<p>Corona, Hulett, Morse (at non-SS positions), Tui, and LaHair don&#8217;t have large enough samples at the MLB level to tell us anything about their defensive abilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2008/12/16/furcal-to-braves-maybe/comment-page-1/#comment-307433</link>
		<dc:creator>terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=6905#comment-307433</guid>
		<description>I know the Braves claim they won&#039;t trade Escobar but he would actually be a much better target than Furcal (the perfect target for the Ms IMHO). The addition of Furcal might actual crack the door on someone&#039;s chances of trading for Escobar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the Braves claim they won&#8217;t trade Escobar but he would actually be a much better target than Furcal (the perfect target for the Ms IMHO). The addition of Furcal might actual crack the door on someone&#8217;s chances of trading for Escobar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

