<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assessing Wakamatsu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:41:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: notanangrygradstudent</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323900</link>
		<dc:creator>notanangrygradstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323900</guid>
		<description>So far this has been a dream.  I even disagree somewhat with one of your criticisms: I think pinch-hitting for the platoon advantage is somewhat overrated, and I like that Wakamatsu doesn&#039;t knee-jerk those situations like some of our past managers have.  I agree about the bunting, but every manager has a foible.

Oh, and &quot;Zduriencik&quot;, n&#039;est-ce pas?  Third from last sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far this has been a dream.  I even disagree somewhat with one of your criticisms: I think pinch-hitting for the platoon advantage is somewhat overrated, and I like that Wakamatsu doesn&#8217;t knee-jerk those situations like some of our past managers have.  I agree about the bunting, but every manager has a foible.</p>
<p>Oh, and &#8220;Zduriencik&#8221;, n&#8217;est-ce pas?  Third from last sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrob4343</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323863</link>
		<dc:creator>wrob4343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323863</guid>
		<description>It was ironic touch but judging by your response, it missed the mark. 

I just hope all of this isn&#039;t beginners luck or Wak being the Tony LaRussa of this generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was ironic touch but judging by your response, it missed the mark. </p>
<p>I just hope all of this isn&#8217;t beginners luck or Wak being the Tony LaRussa of this generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beckya57</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323707</link>
		<dc:creator>beckya57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323707</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree with you more, esp re the handling of the touchy Jr situation.  I&#039;m very impressed with both Wakamatsu and Jack Z, and am looking forward to going to games again, after boycotting the team for several years.  As others have already said, it&#039;ll be even more exciting to see what they do after they&#039;re rid of all of the deadweight contracts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree with you more, esp re the handling of the touchy Jr situation.  I&#8217;m very impressed with both Wakamatsu and Jack Z, and am looking forward to going to games again, after boycotting the team for several years.  As others have already said, it&#8217;ll be even more exciting to see what they do after they&#8217;re rid of all of the deadweight contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MKT</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323572</link>
		<dc:creator>MKT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323572</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;just the point the desire for a Betancourtmartial reached its apex

[...]

So as far as Iâ€™m concerned, the jury is still out on that point.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nice juxtaposition with a portmanteau there -- but don&#039;t courts-martial have panels, and not juries?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>just the point the desire for a Betancourtmartial reached its apex</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>So as far as Iâ€™m concerned, the jury is still out on that point.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nice juxtaposition with a portmanteau there &#8212; but don&#8217;t courts-martial have panels, and not juries?  <img src='http://www.ussmariner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323557</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323557</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I rally hate to do thsi Dave, but you mispelled Wakamatsu in the thrid line.&lt;/em&gt;

Fixed now. Would you like yours fixed as well? From your next comment it appears you can spell perfectly well, so I presume that was just an ironic touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I rally hate to do thsi Dave, but you mispelled Wakamatsu in the thrid line.</em></p>
<p>Fixed now. Would you like yours fixed as well? From your next comment it appears you can spell perfectly well, so I presume that was just an ironic touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrob4343</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323555</link>
		<dc:creator>wrob4343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323555</guid>
		<description>About the management of the bullpen, if Batista keeps being utilized in the form he is, that me first mentality, you guys so carefully pointed out will hopefully have him either demanding more playing time because of such little leverage use, or just plain bad and off the team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the management of the bullpen, if Batista keeps being utilized in the form he is, that me first mentality, you guys so carefully pointed out will hopefully have him either demanding more playing time because of such little leverage use, or just plain bad and off the team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wrob4343</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323554</link>
		<dc:creator>wrob4343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323554</guid>
		<description>I rally hate to do thsi Dave, but you mispelled Wakamatsu in the thrid line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rally hate to do thsi Dave, but you mispelled Wakamatsu in the thrid line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323548</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 19:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323548</guid>
		<description>With some of the lineups we might also not have all of the information.  For example, last Saturday Gutierrez sat for Silva&#039;s start, with Chavez in center and Balentien in left.  It seemed as if this was just Wakamatsu juggling the lineup to get some playing time for Balentien, and comments were made that a Silva start was a bad time to put that lineup on the field.

Later in one of the local game stories or blogs it came out that Gutierrez had an eye infection; hence the decision to have him sit that day.

This is the kind of information that we don&#039;t get unless one of the beat writers asks the question and posts a reply.  If the question isn&#039;t asked, we tend to assume everyone is available and are left scratching our heads about the lineup logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With some of the lineups we might also not have all of the information.  For example, last Saturday Gutierrez sat for Silva&#8217;s start, with Chavez in center and Balentien in left.  It seemed as if this was just Wakamatsu juggling the lineup to get some playing time for Balentien, and comments were made that a Silva start was a bad time to put that lineup on the field.</p>
<p>Later in one of the local game stories or blogs it came out that Gutierrez had an eye infection; hence the decision to have him sit that day.</p>
<p>This is the kind of information that we don&#8217;t get unless one of the beat writers asks the question and posts a reply.  If the question isn&#8217;t asked, we tend to assume everyone is available and are left scratching our heads about the lineup logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: et_blankenship</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323547</link>
		<dc:creator>et_blankenship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323547</guid>
		<description>I figured Griffey would be cool with the DH arrangement the moment I saw how fat he was:
  
Wak â€“ &quot;Hey, Junior.  I was thinking about starting you in LF today.  You up for it?&quot;

Junior â€“ &quot;Hmmm . . . &quot;

Wak â€“ &quot;No rush.  Just let me know before 5.  Saaaay . . . check out these mini pizzas.&quot;

Junior â€“ (&quot;Letâ€™s see, what do I feel like doing today . . . I can be the old fat guy who covers 15% of the outfield â€“ man, thatâ€™s so embarrassing - or I can be the old fat guy with unlimited access to the buffet table when the team is in the field.  Those mini-pizzas sure look - oh wow is that Andouille sausage?  And just look at those donuts!&quot;)

&quot;Hey Wak!  Iâ€™ve made my decision!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured Griffey would be cool with the DH arrangement the moment I saw how fat he was:</p>
<p>Wak â€“ &#8220;Hey, Junior.  I was thinking about starting you in LF today.  You up for it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Junior â€“ &#8220;Hmmm . . . &#8221;</p>
<p>Wak â€“ &#8220;No rush.  Just let me know before 5.  Saaaay . . . check out these mini pizzas.&#8221;</p>
<p>Junior â€“ (&#8220;Letâ€™s see, what do I feel like doing today . . . I can be the old fat guy who covers 15% of the outfield â€“ man, thatâ€™s so embarrassing &#8211; or I can be the old fat guy with unlimited access to the buffet table when the team is in the field.  Those mini-pizzas sure look &#8211; oh wow is that Andouille sausage?  And just look at those donuts!&#8221;)</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey Wak!  Iâ€™ve made my decision!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UpOrDownMsFan</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/04/28/assessing-wakamatsu/comment-page-1/#comment-323546</link>
		<dc:creator>UpOrDownMsFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=7947#comment-323546</guid>
		<description>I like it.  It&#039;s been refreshing to see us managed in a way that makes sense.  Even if I don&#039;t always agree with the decisions, there are far fewer &quot;What the hell are you doing?!&quot; moments this year.

He&#039;s been the smartest manager since Piniella when it comes to managing the pitching.  Specifically, when starters go deep in the game, and have pitched well, he takes them out if the tying run gets on base (a well known edict in the clubhouse-- &quot;don&#039;t let a guy who goes 8 innings and gives up 3 or less runs take a loss, if you can help it.&quot;  You can almost call that the Piniella rule-- and pitchers LOVE it!)

As someone else mentioned, I wouldn&#039;t mind seeing him be a little quicker to get someone going in the pen when a starter&#039;s day is obviously headed south (ie- Jak&#039;s and Washburn&#039;s two last starts).  Mainly because we have 12 pitchers, so it&#039;s not like we don&#039;t have the arms to come in early.

And honestly, as much as folks are worried about us sustaining our winning, I&#039;m not really worried about the offense as much as the bullpen.  For the most part, most of our bats are actually gonna correct to the norm in an upward direction at this point.  We still have a lot of key guys batting well below their averages:  Beltre, Junior, Guty, Lopez, Cedeno, and even Yuni currently.  I can&#039;t help but think Guty, Junior and Cedeno will pick it up the 2nd and 3rd times they see AL West starters and bullpens.

So yeah, all in all, I like Wak&#039;s approach and the way he&#039;s used his defense and offense.  Although, the Griffey thing isn&#039;t settled yet, we&#039;re still very young in the season and he&#039;s gonna want to see the field with a glove at some point.  Period.

Best thing about his managing-- he&#039;s got us playing winning baseball, which is putting pressure on the front office to work towards finding a bullpen lefty, another left handed bench bat, and gonna force us to make some hard decisions about guys like Batista as some key injured pitchers start coming back over the next month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.  It&#8217;s been refreshing to see us managed in a way that makes sense.  Even if I don&#8217;t always agree with the decisions, there are far fewer &#8220;What the hell are you doing?!&#8221; moments this year.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s been the smartest manager since Piniella when it comes to managing the pitching.  Specifically, when starters go deep in the game, and have pitched well, he takes them out if the tying run gets on base (a well known edict in the clubhouse&#8211; &#8220;don&#8217;t let a guy who goes 8 innings and gives up 3 or less runs take a loss, if you can help it.&#8221;  You can almost call that the Piniella rule&#8211; and pitchers LOVE it!)</p>
<p>As someone else mentioned, I wouldn&#8217;t mind seeing him be a little quicker to get someone going in the pen when a starter&#8217;s day is obviously headed south (ie- Jak&#8217;s and Washburn&#8217;s two last starts).  Mainly because we have 12 pitchers, so it&#8217;s not like we don&#8217;t have the arms to come in early.</p>
<p>And honestly, as much as folks are worried about us sustaining our winning, I&#8217;m not really worried about the offense as much as the bullpen.  For the most part, most of our bats are actually gonna correct to the norm in an upward direction at this point.  We still have a lot of key guys batting well below their averages:  Beltre, Junior, Guty, Lopez, Cedeno, and even Yuni currently.  I can&#8217;t help but think Guty, Junior and Cedeno will pick it up the 2nd and 3rd times they see AL West starters and bullpens.</p>
<p>So yeah, all in all, I like Wak&#8217;s approach and the way he&#8217;s used his defense and offense.  Although, the Griffey thing isn&#8217;t settled yet, we&#8217;re still very young in the season and he&#8217;s gonna want to see the field with a glove at some point.  Period.</p>
<p>Best thing about his managing&#8211; he&#8217;s got us playing winning baseball, which is putting pressure on the front office to work towards finding a bullpen lefty, another left handed bench bat, and gonna force us to make some hard decisions about guys like Batista as some key injured pitchers start coming back over the next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

