<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interpretations welcome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:02:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robo Ape</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333671</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo Ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333671</guid>
		<description>*which, is barely more than they&#039;re seeing now.  

(Man, that&#039;s embarrassing to come back after the weekend and see I hit &quot;submit&quot; too soon).

&lt;blockquote&gt; Whilst the point is not unreasonable, it doesnâ€™t reflect Derekâ€™s question.
All the players range from 55% to 75% fastballs seen, but unless Iâ€™m misundertanding, Derekâ€™s asking why would you see players being pitched more carefully (less fastballs) than Ichiro/Branyan within that range
i.e. Guys who canâ€™t hit should just be seeing a steady stream of fastballs (say, up to that 75% mark) since that will tend to give the opposing pitcher the best chance.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In this case I would argue that it has less to do with a player&#039;s ability to hit a fastball, and more to do with his ability to hit a fastball mixed in with other pitches.

Griffey, for example, has slowed down, so if you keep pumping him fastballs he&#039;s going to have a harder time catching up to it than, say, Betancourt.  Similarly, I have no doubt that Wlad &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; hit a fastball, but his poorness with them might not manifest unless he&#039;s seeing off-speed stuff.  That was my original point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*which, is barely more than they&#8217;re seeing now.  </p>
<p>(Man, that&#8217;s embarrassing to come back after the weekend and see I hit &#8220;submit&#8221; too soon).</p>
<blockquote><p> Whilst the point is not unreasonable, it doesnâ€™t reflect Derekâ€™s question.<br />
All the players range from 55% to 75% fastballs seen, but unless Iâ€™m misundertanding, Derekâ€™s asking why would you see players being pitched more carefully (less fastballs) than Ichiro/Branyan within that range<br />
i.e. Guys who canâ€™t hit should just be seeing a steady stream of fastballs (say, up to that 75% mark) since that will tend to give the opposing pitcher the best chance.</p></blockquote>
<p>In this case I would argue that it has less to do with a player&#8217;s ability to hit a fastball, and more to do with his ability to hit a fastball mixed in with other pitches.</p>
<p>Griffey, for example, has slowed down, so if you keep pumping him fastballs he&#8217;s going to have a harder time catching up to it than, say, Betancourt.  Similarly, I have no doubt that Wlad <em>can</em> hit a fastball, but his poorness with them might not manifest unless he&#8217;s seeing off-speed stuff.  That was my original point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbetzsold</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333666</link>
		<dc:creator>jbetzsold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333666</guid>
		<description>There are too many variables to draw a singular conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are too many variables to draw a singular conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niterunner</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333520</link>
		<dc:creator>niterunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333520</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been doing more digging.  The left-handed batters and swith-hitters on the Angels, Rangers, and Athletics generally have a greater percentage of fastballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing more digging.  The left-handed batters and swith-hitters on the Angels, Rangers, and Athletics generally have a greater percentage of fastballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMHawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333519</link>
		<dc:creator>JMHawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333519</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;.e. Guys who canâ€™t hit should just be seeing a steady stream of fastballs...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

But isn&#039;t the conventional wisdom that everybody can hit fastballs?  In that case, people might think a FB is the only thing Betancourt &lt;em&gt;could &lt;/em&gt;hit, so dont&#039; throw him one.  

Of course the stats say otherwise, but it wouldn&#039;t be the first time conventioal wisdom did not square with measured results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>.e. Guys who canâ€™t hit should just be seeing a steady stream of fastballs&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>But isn&#8217;t the conventional wisdom that everybody can hit fastballs?  In that case, people might think a FB is the only thing Betancourt <em>could </em>hit, so dont&#8217; throw him one.  </p>
<p>Of course the stats say otherwise, but it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time conventioal wisdom did not square with measured results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt the Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333518</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt the Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333518</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I havenâ€™t looked at the math here, but I have to imagine thereâ€™s a threshold at which frequency of fastballs becomes time-able to the point that thereâ€™s no benefit continuing to throw it as even guys who do poorly with the fastballs they receive are able to sit dead red.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Whilst the point is not unreasonable, it doesn&#039;t reflect Derek&#039;s question.

All the players range from 55% to 75% fastballs seen, but unless I&#039;m misundertanding, Derek&#039;s asking why would you see players being pitched more carefully (less fastballs) than Ichiro/Branyan &lt;em&gt;within that range&lt;/em&gt;

i.e. Guys who can&#039;t hit should just be seeing a steady stream of fastballs (say, up to that 75% mark) since that will tend to give the opposing pitcher the best chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I havenâ€™t looked at the math here, but I have to imagine thereâ€™s a threshold at which frequency of fastballs becomes time-able to the point that thereâ€™s no benefit continuing to throw it as even guys who do poorly with the fastballs they receive are able to sit dead red.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whilst the point is not unreasonable, it doesn&#8217;t reflect Derek&#8217;s question.</p>
<p>All the players range from 55% to 75% fastballs seen, but unless I&#8217;m misundertanding, Derek&#8217;s asking why would you see players being pitched more carefully (less fastballs) than Ichiro/Branyan <em>within that range</em></p>
<p>i.e. Guys who can&#8217;t hit should just be seeing a steady stream of fastballs (say, up to that 75% mark) since that will tend to give the opposing pitcher the best chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robo Ape</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333516</link>
		<dc:creator>Robo Ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333516</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If youâ€™re facing a Mariner hitter who canâ€™t do anything with them, why wouldnâ€™t you throw a way higher proportion to those guys?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I haven&#039;t looked at the math here, but I have to imagine there&#039;s a threshold at which frequency of fastballs becomes time-able to the point that there&#039;s no benefit continuing to throw it as even guys who do poorly with the fastballs they receive are able to sit dead red.  These are major league players, their whole lives they&#039;ve faced fastball pitchers, the quality and variety of offspeed stuff they see in the bigs is orders of magnitude better than what they faced coming up through high school, college, the minors, etc.  

In short, a fastball doesn&#039;t really become a fastball unless it&#039;s contrasted by another pitch, and in, say, a six pitch at bat, even throwing one off-speed pitch would still account for 17% of pitches thrown.  Make it two and you&#039;re at 33% off-speed, 66% fastballs, which.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If youâ€™re facing a Mariner hitter who canâ€™t do anything with them, why wouldnâ€™t you throw a way higher proportion to those guys?</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t looked at the math here, but I have to imagine there&#8217;s a threshold at which frequency of fastballs becomes time-able to the point that there&#8217;s no benefit continuing to throw it as even guys who do poorly with the fastballs they receive are able to sit dead red.  These are major league players, their whole lives they&#8217;ve faced fastball pitchers, the quality and variety of offspeed stuff they see in the bigs is orders of magnitude better than what they faced coming up through high school, college, the minors, etc.  </p>
<p>In short, a fastball doesn&#8217;t really become a fastball unless it&#8217;s contrasted by another pitch, and in, say, a six pitch at bat, even throwing one off-speed pitch would still account for 17% of pitches thrown.  Make it two and you&#8217;re at 33% off-speed, 66% fastballs, which.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tek Jansen</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333515</link>
		<dc:creator>Tek Jansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333515</guid>
		<description>If M&#039;s hitters really don&#039;t care to walk much, throw breaking balls out of the strike zone.  It is possible that the Beltres, Lopezes, etc. would lay off fastballs out of the zone, but everyone knows that they constantly chase sliders down and away.  Get ahead in the count with breaking balls and then use a fastball up and in.  That&#039;s one possibility for why the bad fastball hitters see fewer fastballs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If M&#8217;s hitters really don&#8217;t care to walk much, throw breaking balls out of the strike zone.  It is possible that the Beltres, Lopezes, etc. would lay off fastballs out of the zone, but everyone knows that they constantly chase sliders down and away.  Get ahead in the count with breaking balls and then use a fastball up and in.  That&#8217;s one possibility for why the bad fastball hitters see fewer fastballs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMHawkins</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333514</link>
		<dc:creator>JMHawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 20:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333514</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you look at just simply BA, everyone from Beltre on down (I use this as the benchmark for extremely unacceptable â€˜09 BA), Iâ€™d say the way those guys are hitting indicates they way theyâ€™ve been pitched is working. WIth the exception of Wlad and Rob Johnson (pathetic considering his career avg. is .198) theyâ€™re all hitting below their career averages.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, that does make sense.  One thing that the raw pitch % don&#039;t tell us is how many of those FBs are in the zone vs O-Zone.  Maybe Lopez has such a lousy wFB/C because the first couple of pitches are curbeballs for strikes followed by O-Zone FBs for him to chase until he strikes out, pops up, or rolls over to the SS.

On the other hand, look at Beltre.  He&#039;s never gotten very many FBs.  He&#039;s averaged 58.2% FBs for his career (this year he&#039;s at 59.0%).  He probably has a rep as a fastball hitter (in his monster 04 season he had a +2.89 wFB/C*).  And prior to this year (-0.68 wFB/C) he&#039;s generally deserved it.  

Or Betancourt.  Last year he was -5.63 wCB/C, and surpirse, this year he&#039;s seeing more curveballs.  

One final thought - fastballs are the pitch a pitcher is least likely to make a mistake with.  Opposing pitchers might look at Branyan standing up there and think &quot;a mistake will go 480 feet, better try to paint with a fastball&quot;.  Same guy looks at Rob Johnson thinking &quot;mistake scmistake, hang a curveball and he&#039;ll pop it up&quot;.  


* for those who haven&#039;t gone an looked at the fangraphs data, wFB/C is runs above average per 100 FBs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you look at just simply BA, everyone from Beltre on down (I use this as the benchmark for extremely unacceptable â€˜09 BA), Iâ€™d say the way those guys are hitting indicates they way theyâ€™ve been pitched is working. WIth the exception of Wlad and Rob Johnson (pathetic considering his career avg. is .198) theyâ€™re all hitting below their career averages.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, that does make sense.  One thing that the raw pitch % don&#8217;t tell us is how many of those FBs are in the zone vs O-Zone.  Maybe Lopez has such a lousy wFB/C because the first couple of pitches are curbeballs for strikes followed by O-Zone FBs for him to chase until he strikes out, pops up, or rolls over to the SS.</p>
<p>On the other hand, look at Beltre.  He&#8217;s never gotten very many FBs.  He&#8217;s averaged 58.2% FBs for his career (this year he&#8217;s at 59.0%).  He probably has a rep as a fastball hitter (in his monster 04 season he had a +2.89 wFB/C*).  And prior to this year (-0.68 wFB/C) he&#8217;s generally deserved it.  </p>
<p>Or Betancourt.  Last year he was -5.63 wCB/C, and surpirse, this year he&#8217;s seeing more curveballs.  </p>
<p>One final thought &#8211; fastballs are the pitch a pitcher is least likely to make a mistake with.  Opposing pitchers might look at Branyan standing up there and think &#8220;a mistake will go 480 feet, better try to paint with a fastball&#8221;.  Same guy looks at Rob Johnson thinking &#8220;mistake scmistake, hang a curveball and he&#8217;ll pop it up&#8221;.  </p>
<p>* for those who haven&#8217;t gone an looked at the fangraphs data, wFB/C is runs above average per 100 FBs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmb13</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333513</link>
		<dc:creator>jmb13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333513</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If youâ€™re facing a Mariner hitter who canâ€™t do anything with them, why wouldnâ€™t you throw a way higher proportion to those guys?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you look at just simply BA, everyone from Beltre on down (I use this as the benchmark for extremely unacceptable &#039;09 BA), I&#039;d say the way those guys are hitting indicates they way they&#039;ve been pitched is working. WIth the exception of Wlad and Rob Johnson (pathetic considering his career avg. is .198) they&#039;re all hitting below their career averages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If youâ€™re facing a Mariner hitter who canâ€™t do anything with them, why wouldnâ€™t you throw a way higher proportion to those guys?</p></blockquote>
<p>If you look at just simply BA, everyone from Beltre on down (I use this as the benchmark for extremely unacceptable &#8216;09 BA), I&#8217;d say the way those guys are hitting indicates they way they&#8217;ve been pitched is working. WIth the exception of Wlad and Rob Johnson (pathetic considering his career avg. is .198) they&#8217;re all hitting below their career averages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DMZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/06/13/interpretations-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-333512</link>
		<dc:creator>DMZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=8425#comment-333512</guid>
		<description>Please:
1. Go to the front page
2. Read Dave&#039;s post on Branyan
3. Repeat step 2 until you understad it.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please:<br />
1. Go to the front page<br />
2. Read Dave&#8217;s post on Branyan<br />
3. Repeat step 2 until you understad it.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
