<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Figgins deal official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gnaztee</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356889</link>
		<dc:creator>gnaztee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356889</guid>
		<description>To address a couple of points from different posters and add my own:

1) A leadoff hitter&#039;s job is to take pitches as well, as he is the first look at what the pitcher has working that day

2) Ichiro&#039;s numbers need to be looked at in context...just because his hits are evenly spread from the leadoff spot doesn&#039;t mean he can&#039;t use the 3-hole...as a leadoff hitter he hasn&#039;t HAD to...if they&#039;re trying to score runs (this is what I&#039;m looking at, not &quot;does it help Ichiro get hits&quot;) and Figgins is on in front of him, he&#039;s as good as anyone at directing the ball, so it&#039;s a good bet he can use that hole more when he needs to.

3) RE: using the 3-hole while hitting behind Figgins, Scioscia said yesterday he thinks Figgins is the best in the league at going 1st to 3rd...why not use that?

4) RE: Ichiro&#039;s left-side IF singles being turned into fielder&#039;s choices - again, context is needed...when a double play situation is in order, middle infielders pinch toward the bag and take a step or two in...this opens up the infield more, it doesn&#039;t close it down</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To address a couple of points from different posters and add my own:</p>
<p>1) A leadoff hitter&#8217;s job is to take pitches as well, as he is the first look at what the pitcher has working that day</p>
<p>2) Ichiro&#8217;s numbers need to be looked at in context&#8230;just because his hits are evenly spread from the leadoff spot doesn&#8217;t mean he can&#8217;t use the 3-hole&#8230;as a leadoff hitter he hasn&#8217;t HAD to&#8230;if they&#8217;re trying to score runs (this is what I&#8217;m looking at, not &#8220;does it help Ichiro get hits&#8221;) and Figgins is on in front of him, he&#8217;s as good as anyone at directing the ball, so it&#8217;s a good bet he can use that hole more when he needs to.</p>
<p>3) RE: using the 3-hole while hitting behind Figgins, Scioscia said yesterday he thinks Figgins is the best in the league at going 1st to 3rd&#8230;why not use that?</p>
<p>4) RE: Ichiro&#8217;s left-side IF singles being turned into fielder&#8217;s choices &#8211; again, context is needed&#8230;when a double play situation is in order, middle infielders pinch toward the bag and take a step or two in&#8230;this opens up the infield more, it doesn&#8217;t close it down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawsonct</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356779</link>
		<dc:creator>dawsonct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356779</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I agree with your assesment (not that you need MY validation). My first thought was to hit Ich #2, but after reflection and the excellent point about his IF hits, most of which go to the L side, I think it would be a big mistake to bat him second.
Looking at them using only basic statistical information, it would seem obvious to have the more patient bat hitting #1, but Ich is such a unique talent at the plate that he should stay in place. He wields his bat like a kendo master, and I long ago quit worrying about him swinging at everything. Chone can act in the lead-off role at #2 by taking pitches, which he does well, and HIS plate discipline will be the irritant at the top of the order. 
Should be damned interesting and a whole lot of fun. 117 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I agree with your assesment (not that you need MY validation). My first thought was to hit Ich #2, but after reflection and the excellent point about his IF hits, most of which go to the L side, I think it would be a big mistake to bat him second.<br />
Looking at them using only basic statistical information, it would seem obvious to have the more patient bat hitting #1, but Ich is such a unique talent at the plate that he should stay in place. He wields his bat like a kendo master, and I long ago quit worrying about him swinging at everything. Chone can act in the lead-off role at #2 by taking pitches, which he does well, and HIS plate discipline will be the irritant at the top of the order.<br />
Should be damned interesting and a whole lot of fun. 117 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356768</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356768</guid>
		<description>Well, point him at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=suzukic01&amp;year=Career&amp;t=b#bases&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ichiro&#039;s career splits&lt;/a&gt; at B-R: 
Ichiro&#039;s batting average with bases empty: .331 (.799 OPS)
Ichiro&#039;s batting average with man on first: .331 (.790 OPS)

I guess he could counter with his average with a man on second (.370) suggesting Figgins first get on and  then steal, but Figgins gets CS a lot and there&#039;s less confidence in that average anyway due to sample size.  (Plus pitchers that get into that situation with Ichiro at the plate -- keeping in mind that man on second must have been from the bottom of the M&#039;s lineup -- are probably going to be giving up lots of hits in general).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, point him at <a href="http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/split.cgi?n1=suzukic01&amp;year=Career&amp;t=b#bases" rel="nofollow">Ichiro&#8217;s career splits</a> at B-R:<br />
Ichiro&#8217;s batting average with bases empty: .331 (.799 OPS)<br />
Ichiro&#8217;s batting average with man on first: .331 (.790 OPS)</p>
<p>I guess he could counter with his average with a man on second (.370) suggesting Figgins first get on and  then steal, but Figgins gets CS a lot and there&#8217;s less confidence in that average anyway due to sample size.  (Plus pitchers that get into that situation with Ichiro at the plate &#8212; keeping in mind that man on second must have been from the bottom of the M&#8217;s lineup &#8212; are probably going to be giving up lots of hits in general).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toddk</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356730</link>
		<dc:creator>Toddk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356730</guid>
		<description>I know that and you know that, but he&#039;s a bit stubborn. Even when I got him to admit that Ichiro! isn&#039;t a pull hitter, he still stuck by his original idea. I finally just had to let it drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that and you know that, but he&#8217;s a bit stubborn. Even when I got him to admit that Ichiro! isn&#8217;t a pull hitter, he still stuck by his original idea. I finally just had to let it drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nye</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356714</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356714</guid>
		<description>Ichiro doesn&#039;t really need that help, though.

Take a quick look at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ichiro-and-infield-hits&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this article on Fangraphs&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ichiro doesn&#8217;t really need that help, though.</p>
<p>Take a quick look at <a href="http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ichiro-and-infield-hits" rel="nofollow">this article on Fangraphs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356713</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356713</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I also wouldnâ€™t call adding Blalock a hopeful or reassuring move unless we were positioning him at 1B in lieu of Branyan/Johnson.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wouldn&#039;t find it hopeful or reassuring to have Blalock even if we were putting him at 1B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I also wouldnâ€™t call adding Blalock a hopeful or reassuring move unless we were positioning him at 1B in lieu of Branyan/Johnson.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t find it hopeful or reassuring to have Blalock even if we were putting him at 1B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toddk</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356712</link>
		<dc:creator>Toddk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356712</guid>
		<description>Jeff, 

 That was exactly the same argument I had with a buddy last night. He insists that Figgins should lead off because his walks would help Ichiro! by giving him a huge hole through which to hit. 

 My thought is that with Ichiro! leading off and getting those goofy hits, how is it a bad thing if Figgins walks behind him? It puts 2 speedy guys on with no outs, which decreases the chance of the #3 hitter hitting a DP ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, </p>
<p> That was exactly the same argument I had with a buddy last night. He insists that Figgins should lead off because his walks would help Ichiro! by giving him a huge hole through which to hit. </p>
<p> My thought is that with Ichiro! leading off and getting those goofy hits, how is it a bad thing if Figgins walks behind him? It puts 2 speedy guys on with no outs, which decreases the chance of the #3 hitter hitting a DP ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nye</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356711</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think that Ichiro staying in the leadoff spot is the best solution.

I just have a feeling that too many of his wacky infield hits would turn into a fielder&#039;s choice if there was already a runner on first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think that Ichiro staying in the leadoff spot is the best solution.</p>
<p>I just have a feeling that too many of his wacky infield hits would turn into a fielder&#8217;s choice if there was already a runner on first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356710</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356710</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Iâ€™d rather see Figgins lead off and Ichiro in the 2-slot. Figgins takes pitches, like a leadoff hitter should&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The leadoff hitter&#039;s job is to get on base, by any means possible.  The 2 hitter needs to take pitches so the leadoff hitter has a chance to steal.  (I guess every hitter&#039;s job is to get on base, but especially the leadoff).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Iâ€™d rather see Figgins lead off and Ichiro in the 2-slot. Figgins takes pitches, like a leadoff hitter should</p></blockquote>
<p>The leadoff hitter&#8217;s job is to get on base, by any means possible.  The 2 hitter needs to take pitches so the leadoff hitter has a chance to steal.  (I guess every hitter&#8217;s job is to get on base, but especially the leadoff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coreyjro</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2009/12/08/figgins-deal-official/comment-page-2/#comment-356709</link>
		<dc:creator>coreyjro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9759#comment-356709</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Thanks to Kenji for making this deal possible.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hear, hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Thanks to Kenji for making this deal possible.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hear, hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

