<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated Take On Kotchman Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeasonTix</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-4/#comment-361969</link>
		<dc:creator>SeasonTix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361969</guid>
		<description>Have you guys changed your opinion on this trade at all since hearing what Jack said at the USSM event?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you guys changed your opinion on this trade at all since hearing what Jack said at the USSM event?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wschroer</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-4/#comment-361627</link>
		<dc:creator>wschroer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361627</guid>
		<description>[more trolling]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[more trolling]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wschroer</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-4/#comment-361626</link>
		<dc:creator>wschroer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361626</guid>
		<description>[trolling]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[trolling]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nye</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-4/#comment-361625</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361625</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t have a &quot;company line&quot;, and your constant accusations of groupthink are getting really, really old.

Cut it out, or go away. It really is that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t have a &#8220;company line&#8221;, and your constant accusations of groupthink are getting really, really old.</p>
<p>Cut it out, or go away. It really is that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-4/#comment-361620</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361620</guid>
		<description>I see that you answered rather emphatically that no, you do not know what you are talking about. Saves me the trouble of interacting with you in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that you answered rather emphatically that no, you do not know what you are talking about. Saves me the trouble of interacting with you in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-3/#comment-361617</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361617</guid>
		<description>No first baseman available is as good as Richie Sexson was in his prime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No first baseman available is as good as Richie Sexson was in his prime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Snow</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-3/#comment-361613</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361613</guid>
		<description>Richie Sexson was not a good fielder. You&#039;re completely wrong about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richie Sexson was not a good fielder. You&#8217;re completely wrong about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wschroer</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-3/#comment-361610</link>
		<dc:creator>wschroer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 22:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361610</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are you trying to troll or do you really have no idea what youâ€™re talking about?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have a very strong idea of what I am talking about, unfortunately it does not hue to the company line so it looks like I am trolling. 

Do a real comparison of Sexson and Kotchman - they get there in a bit different way, but Richie&#039;s career OBP is better and Kotchman has no power. I don&#039;t make this stuff up.  

I see Z making a point that Kotchman didn&#039;t strike out much and of course, Sexson did strike out a lot. But at the end of the day I have to say, so what? A guy who grounds out and hits more poppers than Sexson, but has a full one hundred points lower slugging percentage. Sexson was a more productive hitter than this guy has been. Even in his four pitiful years for the Mariners Sexson&#039;s numbers were .244/.334/.474  - one could quite easily argue that these numbers are better than Kotchman&#039;s  .269/.337/.406. I would certainly rather have Richie&#039;s numbers. And remember, Richie was a decent fielding 1st baseman also. 

So I really am serious when I say we now have a powerless Richie Sexson type player. The numbers say I am right. 

I suspect someone will ultimately ape about the difference in salaries between the players...but again...is that really up to you? Richie did better for himself...why is that any skin off your nose? Kotchman is cheaper, because his value is less. Not saying that Sexson was not overpaid - he was, but as far as on the field product...Richie Sexson is a better player than the new guy we just installed at 1st. 

And that sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are you trying to troll or do you really have no idea what youâ€™re talking about?
</p></blockquote>
<p>I have a very strong idea of what I am talking about, unfortunately it does not hue to the company line so it looks like I am trolling. </p>
<p>Do a real comparison of Sexson and Kotchman &#8211; they get there in a bit different way, but Richie&#8217;s career OBP is better and Kotchman has no power. I don&#8217;t make this stuff up.  </p>
<p>I see Z making a point that Kotchman didn&#8217;t strike out much and of course, Sexson did strike out a lot. But at the end of the day I have to say, so what? A guy who grounds out and hits more poppers than Sexson, but has a full one hundred points lower slugging percentage. Sexson was a more productive hitter than this guy has been. Even in his four pitiful years for the Mariners Sexson&#8217;s numbers were .244/.334/.474  &#8211; one could quite easily argue that these numbers are better than Kotchman&#8217;s  .269/.337/.406. I would certainly rather have Richie&#8217;s numbers. And remember, Richie was a decent fielding 1st baseman also. </p>
<p>So I really am serious when I say we now have a powerless Richie Sexson type player. The numbers say I am right. </p>
<p>I suspect someone will ultimately ape about the difference in salaries between the players&#8230;but again&#8230;is that really up to you? Richie did better for himself&#8230;why is that any skin off your nose? Kotchman is cheaper, because his value is less. Not saying that Sexson was not overpaid &#8211; he was, but as far as on the field product&#8230;Richie Sexson is a better player than the new guy we just installed at 1st. </p>
<p>And that sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diderot</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-3/#comment-361583</link>
		<dc:creator>diderot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361583</guid>
		<description>Statistics aside, I think it&#039;s worthwhile to link over to Baker&#039;s blog and watch the story about Kotchman&#039;s mother.  Along with Lopez&#039; family history, the right side of our infield will certainly lead the majors in personal trauma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statistics aside, I think it&#8217;s worthwhile to link over to Baker&#8217;s blog and watch the story about Kotchman&#8217;s mother.  Along with Lopez&#8217; family history, the right side of our infield will certainly lead the majors in personal trauma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Nye</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/06/updated-take-on-kotchman-deal/comment-page-3/#comment-361553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Nye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=9998#comment-361553</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are you trying to troll or do you really have no idea what youâ€™re talking about?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought that was pretty obvious by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are you trying to troll or do you really have no idea what youâ€™re talking about?</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought that was pretty obvious by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

