<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated OF/DH Playing Time Chart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/</link>
	<description>Seattle Mariners blog and general baseball discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363390</link>
		<dc:creator>Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363390</guid>
		<description>Ah man, I&#039;m going to skip this conversation.  Enjoy doing what you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah man, I&#8217;m going to skip this conversation.  Enjoy doing what you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363374</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363374</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;People are attempting to discredit or question Daveâ€™s intel on every post I read here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s a HUGE difference between discrediting (Dave) and questioning (an opinion). And Dave&#039;s &quot;intel&quot; is his opinion, albeit a very informed opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>People are attempting to discredit or question Daveâ€™s intel on every post I read here.</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s a HUGE difference between discrediting (Dave) and questioning (an opinion). And Dave&#8217;s &#8220;intel&#8221; is his opinion, albeit a very informed opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363367</guid>
		<description>&quot;Maybe you should have waited with this comment until someone attempted to discredit Dave.&quot;

People are attempting to discredit or question Dave&#039;s intel on every post I read here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe you should have waited with this comment until someone attempted to discredit Dave.&#8221;</p>
<p>People are attempting to discredit or question Dave&#8217;s intel on every post I read here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tmac9311</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363320</link>
		<dc:creator>tmac9311</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363320</guid>
		<description>We really need a post about this Garko signing, does this mean 11 man pitching staff? I don&#039;t see who you send down, Hannahan, Langerhauns, Johnson are all required on the bench. If you send Langerhuans down your fourth outfielder is Griffey. I think you could survive with an 11 man pitching staff, especially with the King and Lee pitching 2/5ths of the games. Maybe Brynes isn&#039;t expected to make the team, but then you&#039;re still left with Griffey as the 4th OF.


EDIT: You just put it up, you can just delete this now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really need a post about this Garko signing, does this mean 11 man pitching staff? I don&#8217;t see who you send down, Hannahan, Langerhauns, Johnson are all required on the bench. If you send Langerhuans down your fourth outfielder is Griffey. I think you could survive with an 11 man pitching staff, especially with the King and Lee pitching 2/5ths of the games. Maybe Brynes isn&#8217;t expected to make the team, but then you&#8217;re still left with Griffey as the 4th OF.</p>
<p>EDIT: You just put it up, you can just delete this now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joser</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363319</link>
		<dc:creator>joser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363319</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Seems to me that these are all cheap signings; if any of them suck, we just drop â€˜em and not miss a thing. I mean, $600K or so is less than 1% of payroll, more or lessâ€¦.Three or four of them isnâ€™t going to hurtâ€¦
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Exactly.  People were asking for a &quot;Plan B&quot; -- well, Plan B is whichever of these guys turns out not to be Plan A.  Throw the rats in a cage and shake it, and see which one emerges the winner.  Maybe Byrnes shows up looking lost at the plate and unable to run in the field, and they cut him.  Maybe they just stash Langerhans in Tacoma as insurance.  Maybe all of them look good, and the team comes out of Spring Training confident enough in their starters and bullpen that they decide to go with an 11 man pitching staff at least for the early part of the season.

At the end of the day ( ;) ) the key word with Zduriencik is &quot;options&quot; -- whether it&#039;s the positions guys can play, the side of the plate they stand on, or the flexibility they give Wakamatsu filling out the lineup card or in the late innings, Zduriencik does not want a roster that traps the team into having nothing but bad choices.  And clearly that applies to figuring out last couple of guys on the 25 man roster in spring training, too.  Signing a few players to relatively cheap contracts and seeing how they look in Arizona is insurance against injuries and suckiness and whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Seems to me that these are all cheap signings; if any of them suck, we just drop â€˜em and not miss a thing. I mean, $600K or so is less than 1% of payroll, more or lessâ€¦.Three or four of them isnâ€™t going to hurtâ€¦
</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly.  People were asking for a &#8220;Plan B&#8221; &#8212; well, Plan B is whichever of these guys turns out not to be Plan A.  Throw the rats in a cage and shake it, and see which one emerges the winner.  Maybe Byrnes shows up looking lost at the plate and unable to run in the field, and they cut him.  Maybe they just stash Langerhans in Tacoma as insurance.  Maybe all of them look good, and the team comes out of Spring Training confident enough in their starters and bullpen that they decide to go with an 11 man pitching staff at least for the early part of the season.</p>
<p>At the end of the day ( <img src='http://www.ussmariner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) the key word with Zduriencik is &#8220;options&#8221; &#8212; whether it&#8217;s the positions guys can play, the side of the plate they stand on, or the flexibility they give Wakamatsu filling out the lineup card or in the late innings, Zduriencik does not want a roster that traps the team into having nothing but bad choices.  And clearly that applies to figuring out last couple of guys on the 25 man roster in spring training, too.  Signing a few players to relatively cheap contracts and seeing how they look in Arizona is insurance against injuries and suckiness and whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arron</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363316</link>
		<dc:creator>Arron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363316</guid>
		<description>Langerhans has to be gone.  Hopefully he will stay in Tacoma.

Maybe a pitcher if they are wise and go with a five-man bench.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Langerhans has to be gone.  Hopefully he will stay in Tacoma.</p>
<p>Maybe a pitcher if they are wise and go with a five-man bench.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TumwaterMike</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363315</link>
		<dc:creator>TumwaterMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363315</guid>
		<description>If Garko has a Major League contract, who comes off the 40 man roster?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Garko has a Major League contract, who comes off the 40 man roster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leroy Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363314</link>
		<dc:creator>Leroy Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363314</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Have an opinion of what the Mâ€™s should do all you want, but you may want to read back through *all* of the posts here at USSM before attempting to discredit something Dave says.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe you should have waited with this comment until someone attempted to discredit Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Have an opinion of what the Mâ€™s should do all you want, but you may want to read back through *all* of the posts here at USSM before attempting to discredit something Dave says.</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe you should have waited with this comment until someone attempted to discredit Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arron</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363313</link>
		<dc:creator>Arron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363313</guid>
		<description>So against RHP:

DH- Griffey
LF- Bradley
1B- Kotchman

Against LHP:

DH- Bradley
LF- Byrnes
1B- Garko

The bench is C, Hannahan, 1B Platoon and DH/LF Platoon.

We REALLY need a five-man bench...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So against RHP:</p>
<p>DH- Griffey<br />
LF- Bradley<br />
1B- Kotchman</p>
<p>Against LHP:</p>
<p>DH- Bradley<br />
LF- Byrnes<br />
1B- Garko</p>
<p>The bench is C, Hannahan, 1B Platoon and DH/LF Platoon.</p>
<p>We REALLY need a five-man bench&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.ussmariner.com/2010/01/31/updated-ofdh-playing-time-chart/comment-page-2/#comment-363312</link>
		<dc:creator>Dobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ussmariner.com/?p=10108#comment-363312</guid>
		<description>After years of quality writing and so rarely being wrong, you&#039;d think people would just give Dave/DMZ the benefit of the doubt on any M&#039;s-related subject there is to be had.

Have an opinion of what the M&#039;s should do all you want, but you may want to read back through *all* of the posts here at USSM before attempting to discredit something Dave says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years of quality writing and so rarely being wrong, you&#8217;d think people would just give Dave/DMZ the benefit of the doubt on any M&#8217;s-related subject there is to be had.</p>
<p>Have an opinion of what the M&#8217;s should do all you want, but you may want to read back through *all* of the posts here at USSM before attempting to discredit something Dave says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

