Game 67, Mariners at Athletics

DMZ · June 14, 2006 at 6:17 pm · Filed Under Game Threads 

Pineiro v Haren. 7:05, FSN. Nothing weird about the lineup, really.

The M’s have a chance today and tomorrow, when they’re up against the shockingly ineffective Esteban Loaiza, with Washburn pitching for the M’s. Oakland’s been almost as bad against lefties as the Mariners.

Everett option watch: about ~200 plate appearances before the option vests for next year.

Comments

112 Responses to “Game 67, Mariners at Athletics”

  1. Hooligan on June 14th, 2006 6:19 pm

    Thank God that Joe Blanton, DemiGod, is merciful enough to only pitch once every fifth day.

  2. king felix on June 14th, 2006 6:30 pm

    Junkballing Jo-El would be nice tonight. Oh, and a hit or two.

  3. Paul B on June 14th, 2006 6:39 pm

    I don’t know about the M’s having a chance. Does beating up the Royals and Angels mean that the M’s offense has suddenly improved to league average?

    After all, we still have a manager who thinks that basepath outs are a good thing, and that a bench is unnecessary.

    Borchard watch: OBP is now .330, better than Everett, Reed, Sexson, among others.

  4. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 6:50 pm

    The question regarding Everett is, are we as USS Mariner readers going to allow this happen? What lengths are we willing to go to ensure it does not?

  5. jjb on June 14th, 2006 6:50 pm

    After all, we still have a manager who thinks that basepath outs are a good thing, and that a bench is unnecessary.

    Ahem, those are “productive outs” according to Hargrove’s received wisdom.

  6. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 6:51 pm

    Ugh. Cruceta gives up back-to-back dingers. Time for he — as well as Everett — to be “transferred to Everett.”

  7. Bender on June 14th, 2006 6:57 pm

    I can’t see any hope in the Everett situation. There is no one they can play in his place right now. Petagine is horribly rusty from sitting for nearly half a season, Doyle isn’t back to form and there’s no one else.

    Is there any hope?

  8. matu on June 14th, 2006 7:00 pm

    well, it is the A’s so my guess is the m’s get no hit tonight…Ugh.

  9. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:02 pm

    I bet a week of regular play, to begin with, would shake off that rust in a hurry. I really can’t see that Petagine would be any worse than Everett … though, of course, that’s not really the standard we’re shooting for here.

  10. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:03 pm

    Doyle singles and scores!

  11. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:07 pm

    Ichiro! Just simply, Ichiro!

  12. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 7:08 pm

    At this rate this is going to be a good game.

  13. mark s. on June 14th, 2006 7:09 pm

    #9 Doyle scored off a single? Wow, he is a stud.

  14. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:09 pm

    There’s that singles-hitting ability we’ve longed pined for from Beltre ….

  15. Daniel Carroll on June 14th, 2006 7:09 pm

    Am I the only one who just reminded Fairly on the radio that changing things is clearly a “panic” move?

  16. mark s. on June 14th, 2006 7:09 pm

    2 on no outs and Lopez up. Better Bunt!

  17. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 7:09 pm

    Singles by Ichiro and Beltre; just like the ninth last night…oh, that might not be good.

  18. Daniel Carroll on June 14th, 2006 7:10 pm

    Well crap, now the bases are loaded with no outs….

  19. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:11 pm

    Anybody else catch a whiff of salami in the air? Or is it just my socks?

  20. Joe on June 14th, 2006 7:11 pm

    Was I the only person in the 9th last night that felt a huge disappointment when Lopez got HBP? Even then I was sure he was the only hope for driving in a couple of runs.

  21. msb on June 14th, 2006 7:13 pm

    are we at the start of one of Raul’s mini-slumps, or is it just Oakland?

  22. Guuiduck on June 14th, 2006 7:14 pm

    Wow, we got a run out of a bases loaded no out situation. Miricles do happen!

  23. Joe on June 14th, 2006 7:15 pm

    They got rid of Cameron because he was too expensive and struck out to much. So what do we make of Sexson?

  24. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:15 pm

    Richie Mendoza ….

  25. Joe on June 14th, 2006 7:15 pm

    Has there been a team less efficient at scoring in bases loaded situations this year?

  26. msb on June 14th, 2006 7:16 pm

    the A’s pitching coach claims that Blanton can only get teams in blue uniforms out– meaning the Ms & KC.

  27. Joe on June 14th, 2006 7:18 pm

    I guess Texas knows not to wear their blue jerseys when he starts against them. Or is that “half blue” and Blanton can only get half of them out?

  28. msb on June 14th, 2006 7:20 pm

    oh, this is sad, the only ‘who’s hot’ they can come up with is that the Ms lead the league in triples. And we all know what happens to those triples….

    #26 — Texas whups him, so they must have special non-blue blue jerseys. I like Deanna’s Anti-Nintendo theory, myself.

  29. Daniel Carroll on June 14th, 2006 7:21 pm

    25.

    All the more reason to go back to teal.

  30. Doc on June 14th, 2006 7:22 pm

    Just watching on gamecast. How does Joel look? Easy first inning….

  31. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 7:26 pm

    Everybody’s getting a turn at being on first.

  32. Joe on June 14th, 2006 7:29 pm

    Oh great, as if these games aren’t agonizing enough, now there’s a rain delay to worry about? I guess the one upside is that the M’s bullpen is a little better than the A’s, so if a delay knocks out the starters…

  33. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:32 pm

    If the M’s work hard, they can regain their MLB lead in hit batsmen … they’re seventh overall, just five off the pace, with 30.

  34. rcc on June 14th, 2006 7:32 pm

    I noted a real statistical oddity going into this series….both clubs were exactly even in runs scored and runs allowed. Is that a definition of a 500 ball club? So which club actually has a chance to do something over the remainder of this year? Even though in a player by player comparison the M’s come out ahead of which player you would take…..I would take my chances on the success of the A’s over the M’s in the remainder of this year.

  35. m77 on June 14th, 2006 7:33 pm

    Maybe instead of all the bunting practice they do, they could have someone throw batting practice pitches down and away to hitters without a bat in their hands. This might teach them not to swing at balls shoe top level on the outside corner.

  36. msb on June 14th, 2006 7:33 pm

    a ha! perhaps it’s a cunning new way to lose in Oakland– fill the bases, let them score, and have the game called due to rain?

  37. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:34 pm

    Here’s a surprise: Even with Rual’s first-inning heroics, the M’s are dead last in the AL in hitting into double plays. They’ve hit into just 39; Oakland is tops with 63.

  38. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:38 pm

    Raul “Feet of Concrete” Ibanez strikes again.

  39. DMZ on June 14th, 2006 7:38 pm

    Nice flop there by Raul. He looked like he wanted the ref to red-card someone for tripping.

  40. msb on June 14th, 2006 7:38 pm

    and doggone it, they tried this inning to increase that lead, but the M’s wouldn’t let them. Please can we get Raul out of left field?

  41. m77 on June 14th, 2006 7:41 pm

    A hit batsmen, an error and a double lead to two runs. That’s an efficient offense.

  42. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:44 pm

    Tacoma up 9-3:

    Doyle 2-for-3, 2 RBIs, back up to .250

    Choo 2-2, 2 runs

    Nelson 2-run HR

    Garciaparra 1-2

    Johnson, Dobbs 2 RBI apiece

    Cruceta 5Ks in 4 1/3.

  43. msb on June 14th, 2006 7:45 pm

    #38– obviously he hasn’t had the correct practice

  44. mark s. on June 14th, 2006 7:48 pm

    Would Mike Morse/WFB be better then Ibanez in LF?

    At least then Ibanez could DH.

  45. m77 on June 14th, 2006 7:48 pm

    They swing at everything.

  46. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:48 pm

    Dear Seattle Mariners:

    Please stop chasing Haren’s splitter a foot out of the zone.

    Thanks, guys!

    Love,
    Jim

  47. marbledog on June 14th, 2006 7:49 pm

    Jim, it obviously was your socks.

  48. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:49 pm

    I’ve got some powerful left-footed sock right now.

  49. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:51 pm

    #43: No, an actual left fielder would be better in left field.

  50. BigB on June 14th, 2006 7:51 pm

    is it bad that i’m hoping crazy carl gets injured this season so he doesn’t get his option?

  51. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:54 pm

    #49: Is it bad that I’m hoping to injure Crazy Carl this season so he doesn’t get his option?

  52. unkrusty on June 14th, 2006 7:54 pm

    Well, it really has to be Doyle in Left and Ibanez as full-time DH, doesn’t it? Counting the days until it happens.

  53. Doc on June 14th, 2006 7:56 pm

    Is there any timetable on when Doyle will be brought up?

  54. DMZ on June 14th, 2006 7:58 pm

    This is painful to watch.

  55. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 7:59 pm

    For us Gameday viewers, what’s going on?

  56. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 7:59 pm

    Oh, man. Total crap from both the hitter and fielder on the same play. Sheesh.

  57. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:00 pm

    #54: Frank Thomas banged one off the wall in left. Raul misplayed it. But the Big Hurt was in full trot mode, and was held to a single.

  58. msb on June 14th, 2006 8:01 pm

    sigh. while we wait for some Mariner offense (rather than offensive Mariners) I could ask y’all my current mystery movie question … a friend is trying to identify a movie seen on tv sometime in the 70s– prisoners break out while their jailers are distracted by a soccer game (poss. the World Cup?) in order to crack the Bank of England, print up some money, stash it & then break back into prison.

  59. dw on June 14th, 2006 8:01 pm

    Nice flop there by Raul. He looked like he wanted the ref to red-card someone for tripping.

    When I turned on the TV tonight I thought, “Oh, a 1-0 lead. I wonder if the M’s can sit on the ball long enough to win.”

    Have I been watching too much World Cup? Yes, yes I have. But it’s all in the name of blogging.

  60. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:03 pm

    #57: “Break In Like Beckham”?

  61. SoulofaCitizen on June 14th, 2006 8:05 pm

    Question on Raul. At the beginning of the year, people talked a lot about how much he’d hurt the M’s defensively. In the two games I’ve attended, he was bad, but not awful. Is there any way to get a sense of how much he’s hurt the M’s defensively this year, compared to a league average fielder, or even, as we’d talked off season, a good fielder?

  62. msb on June 14th, 2006 8:08 pm

    #59–

    [pah rum pah!] it’s not Porridge or Two Way Stretch … I thought maybe she was combining several movies but she found someone else asking about the same movie (to no reply) at experts.about.com.

    sigh. remember when Dan Johnson couldn’t buy a hit?

  63. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:11 pm

    I love closed captioning: Instead of “Esteban Loaiza,” my TV reads “That Bohn Loaiza” ….

  64. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 8:11 pm

    Mariners :: Angels

    as

    A’s :: Mariners

  65. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:13 pm

    #63: Is that on the WASL?

  66. Dave on June 14th, 2006 8:16 pm

    Question on Raul. At the beginning of the year, people talked a lot about how much he’d hurt the M’s defensively. In the two games I’ve attended, he was bad, but not awful. Is there any way to get a sense of how much he’s hurt the M’s defensively this year, compared to a league average fielder, or even, as we’d talked off season, a good fielder?

    The Hardball Times has the M’s at -5 on flyballs, using John Dewan’s plus/minus system, meaning the team has converted 5 less flyballs into outs than you’d expect. We’re all pretty sure Ichiro is good defensively, so your options for poor defensive outfielder are Ibanez or Reed.

    I’m going with Ibanez. But thats just me.

  67. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:17 pm

    What factors into “what you’d expect,” Dave?

  68. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 8:18 pm

    64: They took this question off because it was too easy.

  69. msb on June 14th, 2006 8:19 pm

    here’s a theory re: Joel … maybe all that hair is tilting him backwards on the mound, affecting his release point

  70. VandalJeff on June 14th, 2006 8:21 pm

    Building to the Future – just for Jim!

  71. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 8:21 pm

    Mauer watch: 0-3 tonight against Boston, which brings his average “down” to .376.

    If Ichiro goes 5 for his next 5, he will take the lead.

  72. msb on June 14th, 2006 8:22 pm

    Did anyone tell the Mariners that Haren’s ERA balloons after 50 pitches or so? For everybody else, that is?

    oh, Derek– Hendu helpfully tells us that Loaiza is All Better after his visit to the DL.

  73. John in L.A. on June 14th, 2006 8:23 pm

    65 – And Willie on lefty days.

    57 – it sounds like a combination of the original The Italian Job, with Michael Caine and Victory with… Michael Caine. And Sly Stallone and Pele and…

  74. msb on June 14th, 2006 8:26 pm

    #72– My thought was Victory + Who’s minding the mint …

  75. msb on June 14th, 2006 8:34 pm

    If Joe Blanton is a DemiGod, is Danny Haren a Demigod Once Removed?

  76. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Let’s look at the bright side: after the A’s take the series, Hardgrove will have a team meeting for x minutes, and then the M’s will sweep the following series!

  77. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 8:37 pm

    More good news! The Royals just tied the Angels in the 6th, 3-3. Who knows how long that will last…

  78. Huskermariner on June 14th, 2006 8:38 pm

    Gameday makes it look as though Johnson just missed going yard on that SAC. True?

  79. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:39 pm

    Well, now that the D-Backs have set a healthy precedent of unhealthiness by falling on the $22 million grenade known as Russ Ortiz, perhaps the M’s may be more willing to contemplate doing the same with Pineiro should he prove untradeable in July ….

  80. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:40 pm

    #77: Nah, shallow warning track.

  81. Mr. Egaas on June 14th, 2006 8:41 pm

    I’m so tired of Woods and Green.

  82. lokiforever on June 14th, 2006 8:42 pm

    At least we have fewer LOB. So we’re not stranding runners as bad as you might think.

  83. apunetid on June 14th, 2006 8:46 pm

    Stranding runners is hard if you can’t get them out there in the first place.

  84. Bodhizefa on June 14th, 2006 8:47 pm

    At what point are we going to give up on Pineiro and call up Cruceta, who, y’know, may actually give us a chance to win games?

    And some of you guys are still harping on Sexson despite his great year last year and career .900+ OPS?! Unreal. Meh.

  85. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:50 pm

    Dave had a good analysis of Cruceta a few threads back. Cruceta strikes out a lot of guys but struggles mightily at times. There’s no reason to think he’d be much of an improvement right now until he improves his command, maybe establishes a solid change-up.

  86. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 8:54 pm

    Quiroz is back already from “Everett.”

  87. IndieSnob on June 14th, 2006 8:57 pm

    And sadly, some things never change.

  88. Nate on June 14th, 2006 8:57 pm

    what happened?

  89. IndieSnob on June 14th, 2006 8:58 pm

    Stupid baserunning, what else?

  90. Nate on June 14th, 2006 8:59 pm

    I couldn’t follow the radio description.
    did sexon go out of his way to run to the player with the ball so he could get his big tall self out?

  91. IndieSnob on June 14th, 2006 8:59 pm

    I think it’s time for another long team meeting in Oakland.

    However, this meeting would be the players telling Hargrove to suck an egg after he’s been fired.

  92. Prenderman on June 14th, 2006 9:08 pm

    Woohoo offensive upgrade to start a big ninth inning rally!

  93. Prenderman on June 14th, 2006 9:26 pm

    KC takes the lead. 4-3 going into the top of the ninth.

  94. Phoenician Todd on June 14th, 2006 9:30 pm

    Well, at least I picked a couple good games to NOT see.

  95. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 9:32 pm

    How appropriate that Willie be chosen for the honor of ending this game.

  96. psalexander on June 14th, 2006 9:37 pm

    the angels game looks as if it could offer some excitement

  97. DMZ on June 14th, 2006 9:38 pm

    I finished a book chapter while not paying attention to this game. I think it was a good decision.

  98. Nate on June 14th, 2006 9:41 pm

    you really ought to consider skipping the game thread tomorrow altogether.
    games in oakland are way too depressing.

  99. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 9:45 pm

    Pity the poor Mariners. Nobody told them they’d have to play some games against good teams.

  100. SoulofaCitizen on June 14th, 2006 9:46 pm

    Finishing the chapter was a very good decision. I followed the game instead of working on a book of mine and now I feel unproductive and depressed.

    At least Ichiro and Lopez are still hitting

  101. Dave in Palo Alto on June 14th, 2006 9:46 pm

    #65– I actually think Reed was worse on his miscue than Ibanez tonight. Center fielders shouldn’t run backwards on balls that drop at their feet.

    The lowlight reel from this game would almost be as long as the game.

  102. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 9:51 pm

    Choo with a two-run shot! Tacoma up 4-3 in the nightcap.

  103. Jim Thomsen on June 14th, 2006 10:30 pm

    Beavis Bocachica ties it with a blast off Baek!

  104. shortbus on June 14th, 2006 11:37 pm

    #97 You know, when I tell people I HATE the Oakland A’s people look at me like I’m out of my mind. The reason I hate the A’s is, for one, when I first started watching the M’s the A’s were one of best teams in our division (the Stewart, Eckersly, McGwire days). Since then the M’s for some reason just play like total ASS when they go to Oakland, leaving every shred of fundamental baseball ability and good luck at home for the trip. Even in 2001 it was in Oakland that the M’s lost three in a row AND a series for first time all year.

    I freakin’ HATE the A’s.

  105. Jon Wells on June 15th, 2006 12:03 am

    Hey, maybe we’ll be able to get a win in this series yet — tomorrow’s scheduled starter, Esteban Loaiza was reportedly arrested for driving his Ferrari 120 MPH early Wednesday while drunk. Can he possibly start after that and even if he starts, can he possibly be effective? (I know it’s against the Mariners, but hmmmmm….). This article was just posted at the Oakland Tribune web site…

    http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_3938375

  106. joser on June 15th, 2006 1:00 am

    Back in the day there were guys who went out on the field drunk, and still won. I’m not sure the M’s could be a talented team no matter how drunk or hung over they were. Tomorrow’s game is the best shot the M’s have in this series, but not because of anything Loaiza may have done. Loaiza is the weakest pitcher in this series, and the A’s have trouble with lefties like Washburn.

  107. pinball1973 on June 15th, 2006 1:25 am

    Has Grover been fired yet?

  108. BelaXadux on June 15th, 2006 3:54 am

    Pentland on working with Beltre in Thursday’s times. The boil-down: there’s no hope.

  109. Oly Rainiers Fan on June 15th, 2006 4:24 am

    No mention that in the first game of the Rainiers doubleheader last night, Doyle actually played in the field instead of just DH-ing. It was only the 2nd time since he’s been back. The first time, he played 5 innings in right. Last night it was 7 innings (complete game of doubleheader) in center.

    And then he sat out the 2nd game, even though he also sat out Tues afternoon…..

  110. Benno on June 15th, 2006 10:27 am

    Well, I think this series is telling us right where the M’s are. Better than the wors teams in the league, not as good as the better teams. From a rough estimate, I see them as a 70-75 win team. The Everett option could be a nasty problem for next year. Bavasi should be called on the carpet if he allows that option to vest.

  111. shortbus on June 15th, 2006 12:17 pm

    #109: The M’s actually tend to play worse in Oakland than usual. They are probably a little better than they’ve looked the last two games.

  112. Ralph Malph on June 15th, 2006 12:56 pm

    Anyone see who the new manager is in Everett? Do managers at that level coach third?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.