Game Thread, Las Vegas at Tacoma

Dave · July 20, 2006 at 5:57 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

The Las Vegas 51s bring their prospect-a-thon to Tacoma to face suddenly effective Cha Baek. Baek has a 3.02 ERA, but he’s basically become the Triple-A version of Jamie Moyer at this point – crafty enough to let guys get themselves out through very little skill of his own. Beats last year’s Cha Baek, though.

But seriously, this Las Vegas line-up is crazy: James Loney, Matt Kemp, Andy LaRoche, and Joel Guzman are all future major leaguers, and Delwyn Young might be. Should be a fun test for Baek.

As always, you can catch the greatness of commentary that is Mike Curto streaming live online.

Comments

53 Responses to “Game Thread, Las Vegas at Tacoma”

  1. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:06 pm

    Dave:

    Have any thoughts on why the Rainiers have been platooning Snelling? I’ve looked for his past numbers, but it’s my strong impression that he historically doesn’t have much of a platoon split. Is this a strategy that could be harmful to his major league prospects? (Seems to me they did the same thing with Reed — decided he was a platoon player because he fit some pre-cast image of one, rather than basing such an assessment on his actual record.)

  2. Tantamount on July 20th, 2006 7:09 pm

    Hello?

  3. msb on July 20th, 2006 7:09 pm

    Brundage had Doyle in San Antonio, right? so he should know him, and what he can do….

  4. dnc on July 20th, 2006 7:14 pm

    Snelling’s never had problems hitting lefties. I can understand the desire to give him periodic days off, but I echo Jim’s concerns that he’s going to get labeled as a platoon player with no reason.

    I think there was a lot more basis for platooning Reed, and I disagreed with that decision.

  5. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:16 pm

    And then there’s Wilson Valdez, who is NOT a future major-leaguer. Or even a past one.

  6. mike on July 20th, 2006 7:16 pm

    Snelling is not being platooned. Where did this idea come from? He’s played 6 of 7 games since the break, all in the OF. He’s hitting .304 vs. LHP.

  7. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:19 pm

    He’s sat quite a bit all season since he came back … arbitrarily, as far as I can tell.

  8. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:20 pm

    Choo! Way to shake off being dissed by Hargrove.

  9. thr33niL on July 20th, 2006 7:21 pm

    I thought Matt Kemp was tearing it up in LA (?). Whats he doing back in Las Vegas?

  10. mike on July 20th, 2006 7:24 pm

    I thought that Snelling’s playing time has been dictated by the Mariners doctors.

  11. dnc on July 20th, 2006 7:26 pm

    Okay, if his off days have been arbitrary and not based on the side of the mound the pitches are coming from, I can live with that.

    I just have this dream of the M’s finally realizing Snelling’s capable of playing in the bigs. Against everybody.

  12. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:26 pm

    I can’t usually listen to games at work, so I go by minorleaguebaseball.com. And by that measure, it seems like he’s sat against a number of lefty pitchers.

  13. Dave on July 20th, 2006 7:29 pm

    Snelling’s not being platooned. He was on a pretty strict play-two-sit-one regimen after he returned, but that’s mellowed a bit. They still rest him occassionally, but there’s no platoon.

  14. dnc on July 20th, 2006 7:30 pm

    Thanks Dave.

  15. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:31 pm

    Thanks. Now that I’m going back through minorleaguebaseball.com game reports, I’m seeing he’s sat against about as many righties.

  16. msb on July 20th, 2006 7:41 pm

    and Curto just told us about the cycle the catchers are on, swapping off their catching & DH days, so they must have to fit Doyle’s rest days in there, somehow, too :)

  17. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 7:47 pm

    Funny they couldn’t make room for Quiroz in that rotation … for the crime of hitting .300 with power, he was shipped out to San Antonio.

  18. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 8:00 pm

    Damn. How does Baek do it?

  19. Coach Owens on July 20th, 2006 8:04 pm

    Hey look it’s our old friend Wilson Valdez.

  20. joser on July 20th, 2006 8:05 pm

    Great story about the kid playing for the aquasox (I thought he was Dutch, not Australian, or am I confusing him with someone else?)

  21. joser on July 20th, 2006 8:14 pm

    Man, this is like the first game against the Yankees — except the Rainiers are actually scoring on the 51′s errors.

  22. Coach Owens on July 20th, 2006 8:16 pm

    God, they’re murdering them.

  23. Mr. Egaas on July 20th, 2006 8:16 pm

    While we’re on the minor league prospect topic, I went to the Aquasox game last night.

    Centerfielder Greg Halman looks like a real stud in the making. He homered his first two trips to the plate, the third time up, he was thrown a brushback pitch and then plunked. Starred down the pitcher, walked out to the mound a little bit, benches emptied but nothing happened. Can’t really blame the guy.

    He also doubled, walked, and made his only out on the hardest hit ball all night, one that had eyes for the left field corner that was snared by the third basemen.

    He’s a player.

  24. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 8:19 pm

    You’ve gotta like Choo … he really does his job, within his limitations. You have to think that if he had had Carl Everett’s job all year, he might have hit .270/.350/.490. Maybe 10 HRs, with 10-15 stolen bases, and the ability to play left once in a while.

  25. joser on July 20th, 2006 8:21 pm

    Doyle out twice in this inning.

  26. msb on July 20th, 2006 8:22 pm

    that’s our boy, never does anything the standard way…

  27. joser on July 20th, 2006 8:26 pm

    #23: that was the story I was referring to. Apparently the pitcher got ejected, so something happened. And Halman is a teenager (one can imagine that converstation– pitcher: you trying to show me up? Halman: Nope, just showing I belong in double-A)

    Of course it’s not that unusual to look like a worldbeater in your first few at-bats (or look like a total loser either, naturally). And it’s not like he’s facing dominant, MLB-ready pitching. We’ll see how he develops. Hell of a start, though.

  28. dnc on July 20th, 2006 8:36 pm

    Jim, you really think Choo would slug .490 in the bigs right now?

  29. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 8:41 pm

    I think that in the upper limit of his ability, yes. He’s got fair extra-base-hit power, with 36 of his 116 hits going for extra bases (20 doubles, 3 triples, 13 HRs) and I think his bat may be nearly as well-suited to Safeco’s alleys as Raul Ibanez’s is.

  30. chris white on July 20th, 2006 8:45 pm

    Remember its AAA pitching and if you have seen any games in tacoma it isnt very good pitching!

  31. Grant on July 20th, 2006 8:46 pm

    That’s only 31%. If he’s going to slug .490 he going to hit for a lot better average than .270. There’s no way kid is going to have an ISO of .220, that’s almost better than C-Rex and Sexson’s BA.

  32. Grant on July 20th, 2006 8:52 pm

    Did anyone see that Luis Gonzalez got in the game, our former rule 5 guy. To be honest I’d rather have him right now than Woods, although his numbers are pretty poor in AAA.

  33. JMB on July 20th, 2006 8:57 pm

    Yeah, 31% XBH really isn’t very good, especially for a corner OF. You’d like that to be up around 40%.

  34. Dave on July 20th, 2006 9:01 pm

    Especially in the PCL.

    Choo’s a .430-.450 SLG guy. It’s part of the reason he’ll never make it as a major league regular.

  35. joser on July 20th, 2006 9:13 pm

    So Curto just dubbed Bavasi’s philosophy “push up the prospects.” Works for me (the name, I’m still reserving judgement on the philosophy).

  36. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 9:33 pm

    Is Atchison going to be September call-up material? Baek, even?

  37. marc w on July 20th, 2006 9:36 pm

    So much for the shutout.

  38. marc w on July 20th, 2006 9:40 pm

    Nice win for the Rainiers and for Baek. Seriously, this is a damned impressive run for Cha Seung, lowering his ERA to basically 3 even in the PCL and going 7 shutout against the best line-up in the conference. He’s gone 7IP with 1H and 0R against Portland (another fairly tough line-up), been solid in Las Vegas, and given the Rainiers a heck of a lot of consistency, ALL while his BB/K is pretty bleh. It’s amazing, but it sure is welcome.
    At this rate, he’s got to get a ‘congrats’ promotion in September; he’s done everything the Rainiers have asked. It still looks like smoke and mirrors, but man, it’s been going on for quite a while now.

  39. Jim Thomsen on July 20th, 2006 9:41 pm

    Is sustained smoke-and-mirrors still smoke-and-mirrors, or at some point does it represent real improvement?

  40. marc w on July 20th, 2006 9:59 pm

    That’s the question, isn’t it Jim?
    The Rainiers had two guys metaphorically asking that question, and have received two different answers. Cesar Jimenez got torched (although he was unlucky) in that TV game against Portland, and then got beat up again in his next start. Meanwhile, Baek has kept it going.
    Jimenez’ run was more impressive – allowing 1R in 38IP – but it really seems to be over. Emphatically.
    And that’s the deal with these pitch-to-contact guys; it’s tough to tell when someone’s made a developmental leap as opposed to just getting lucky. I keep thinking that Baek cutting down on his HRs is a key to this, but every time I see him, he’s getting outs on the tacoma warning track that would’ve been way, way out of most PCL parks (or Seattle). Of course, he then goes on the road to some place like Las Vegas and gets the same deep fly outs. Weird. But cool.

  41. Oly Rainiers Fan on July 20th, 2006 10:32 pm

    Just got back from the game. A few things to note.

    Choo made a really great catch against the fence in center. Surprisingly good.

    Dan Rohn was down watching the game, sitting with the scouts.

    And for all those folks who hate the aggressive baserunning…you people would adore Dave Brundage, who won’t send guys even when they’ll clearly score. (Yesterday he tried a squeeze play, and I thought I would die of shock). Tonight, Bryan Lahair, rounded third, and Brundage did one of those Dave Myers moves (go, stop, go) and it was sort of an ugly get-back-to-third-without-injury moments for Lahair. But all worked out as he scored on the next batter. Still, I don’t know what he did in San Antonio as far as baserunning, but it’s a night/day difference in that regard between he and Dan Rohn.

  42. nfreakct on July 20th, 2006 10:52 pm

    #41, it seems one thing people forget with Dan Rohn is from all indications he’s as much a proponent of aggressive baserunning as Hargrove is this season. So while replacing Hargrove with Rohn might give us improvements for lineup and bullpen management (might), it almost certainly wouldn’t change the way the Mariners seem to run themselves out of innings occasionally.

    As for Baek, impressive game and it looks like he induced a ton of groundballs today (11 groundballs today). I’ve never heard Baek described as a groundball pitcher, but it seems like he’s had a few games during this run where he’s induced a ton. Is there some trend here due to some improvement or has Baek just gotten some luck?

  43. adamt on July 20th, 2006 11:18 pm

    Was at the game tonight as well. Looked like Choo took a horrible route to that great catch in center but the winds are also very strong in Tacoma tonight. He adjusted on the fly very well!

    Was there yesterday afternoon also, terrible bunt on that squeeze play!

    Baek pitched well tonight and pushed through being tired his last inning of work.

  44. Oly Rainiers Fan on July 21st, 2006 12:45 am

    Personally, I do think Baek has turned some kind of corner. He’s been very solid this year. I suck at recognizing mechanics or even pitch types, but he just looks different out there than years prior. I don’t know whether it’s mechanics or confidence or maybe a little of both.

    God yeah, that bunt (by Ismael Castro) was horrible. Poor Rob Johnson was what, 5 feet from home when he had to try to get up and run back to 3rd. I just sat in shock and disbelief that Brundage had tried something, anything, so daring. That’s so not like him.

    curious to see what’s going to happen on the next homestand. Petagine is reporting to the Tacoma club on Saturday, and I wonder what that’ll do to Lahair’s playing time, which then, what, in turn bumps Rob Johnson into playing more games in the outfield just to get some AB’s? And I’ve got a sneaking suspicion Balentien is coming up. We’re short outfielders, and he’s been tearing it up – but if that happens, it almost seems crowded. If it were both he and Petagine, then you’re trying to get Choo some experience in center, and you end up with only 1 outfield spot to rotate between Snelling and Nelson, and Johnson when Clement is catching and somebody else is at DH. We’ll see, I just think something is going to happen before the next homestand.

  45. Oly Rainiers Fan on July 21st, 2006 4:49 am

    and in related news. headline story in the tnt says the rainiers have finally been sold, but that they’ll stay in tacoma (at least for another 2 years).

  46. adamt on July 21st, 2006 9:35 am

    They’re short outfielders and infielders :)

    Any news on Bohn, Brown or Nomar_2.0? Thought I heard Bohn & Garciaparra are in Arizona taking cuts.

    LaHair’s been hitting solid, now just needs find (develop?) a power stroke. 1 home run in just over 100 at bats.]

    Yea for staying in Tacoma!

  47. jtopps on July 21st, 2006 10:06 am

    Tacoma Rainiers Sold! To an out-of-town ownership group!

    Except they won’t be moving the team…

    http://www.thenewstribune.com/sports/story/5969259p-5249160c.html

  48. Gregor on July 21st, 2006 10:15 am

    In the same article, you can also learn that the franchise was once affiliated with the Yankees, and called the Tacoma Yankees, for a year in 1978.

  49. dw on July 21st, 2006 10:24 am

    Tacoma Rainiers Sold! To an out-of-town ownership group!

    Luckily for us, Oklahoma City already has the Redhawks.

  50. G-Man on July 21st, 2006 10:48 am

    So what sort of new staium are the new owners asking for? A 40,000 seat retractable dome with a view of Commencement Bay?

  51. marc w on July 21st, 2006 11:09 am

    “Any news on Bohn, Brown or Nomar_2.0?”
    They’ve been in Peoria, playing with the new draftees and working through injuries. Garciaparra’s been tearing it up (as he should, really), while Bohn’s been so-so (though it’s all in like 10-15 ABs or something).

    “So what sort of new staium are the new owners asking for?”
    It’s not just the new owners. PCL President Branch Rickey’s said Tacoma needs a new stadium for years. Everyone loves those downtown jobs like they’ve got in Memphis or Nashville or wherever, but I just don’t know where they’d put it in tacoma. It’s weird, but if they’d wanted the stadium to anchor downtown, they could’ve bought some land cheap 10 years ago. Now, they’ve gotta fight 10000 new condos and high-end apartments. I think everyone’s focusing on improving the existing stadium, which may be less than ideal, but hey: the team is actually profitable. They’ve got a shoestring operation to go with their poor revenue, and they make it work.

  52. msb on July 21st, 2006 3:43 pm

    yup, it’s been a topic of discussion for a decade, at least, especially as the roof really isn;t all that code in an earthquake anymore…. this was a proposal back in ’99:

    “In the Cheney Stadium Development Study, the DLR Group architects envision an $18 million renovation that would leave much of the seating bowl in place but surround it with a three-story brick-and-concrete structure housing new concession stands, restrooms, offices, locker rooms, a press box and a row of about 16 suites.

    The plan has the enthusiastic backing of Mike Combs, Tacoma’s director of public assembly facilities.

    “Triple-A baseball has been in Tacoma for over 40 years,” Combs said. “But if you don’t maintain your facilities you diminish their chances of being successful. Cheney Stadium is a beautiful stadium … there’s not a bad seat in the house. But it needs so many upgrades.”

  53. Oly Rainiers Fan on July 21st, 2006 6:18 pm

    I love Cheney Stadum. Well, not the concessions or restroom areas. and the player and press facilities definitely need upgrading.

    But there’s no place in downtown Tacoma that you’d be able to find a site large enough to accomodate parking and stuff like Cheney has, and if you did, what happens to the every-Friday fireworks?

    Also, I’m unconvinced that adding suites and luxury boxes would be a good idea. I’ve been meaning to do some research on this for a while now, but I’m thinking proximity of AAA to major league club, especially if they’re affiliated, lowers attendance at AAA park. And Tacoma isn’t exactly brimming with businesses that would fork over for suites to entertain their clients at Cheney instead of heading to much more glamorous Safeco.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.