10/19′s thrilling NLCS action

DMZ · October 19, 2006 at 4:27 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

Wheeeeeee! Suppan v Perez! I don’t know about you, but I’m locking the door and leaving the phone off the hook. This one’s going to be a barnburner! Can we just flip a coin to declare who gets sacrificed to the Tigers and get it over with?

Or am I being too pessimistic about this whole series? What’s a good reason to hang around and see tonight’s game?

Comments

213 Responses to “10/19′s thrilling NLCS action”

  1. AK1984 on October 19th, 2006 4:31 pm

    ‘less the score is tied at 20-20 goin’ into the 10th inning, there’s no reason to watch Game 7 of the ’06 NLCS.

  2. JI on October 19th, 2006 4:40 pm

    Or am I being too pessimistic about this whole series? What’s a good reason to hang around and see tonight’s game?

    To see the Cardinals. Go Cards!!!!!

  3. Celadus on October 19th, 2006 4:41 pm

    Well, if the Cardinals win, we can all party like it’s 1968.

  4. msb on October 19th, 2006 4:44 pm

    I dunno there is sort of a train-wreck fascination to these two pitching staffs… A Battle of the Bullpens Smackdown.

    although it seemed he was a lock to go to Chi with Lou, KJR sez the M’s just announced that John McLaren is Hargrove’s new bench coach. Think Johnny Mac feels odds are that he could actually be named a big league manager mid-season here?

  5. Mat on October 19th, 2006 4:48 pm

    What’s a good reason to hang around and see tonight’s game?

    There might only be four games after it until next April?

    Albert Pujols is the best hitter in baseball?

    Yadier Molina might get to show off his howitzer arm?

    Maybe Jim Edmonds gets to show off his arm?

    Perez gets lots of strikeouts, so maybe you get to watch the Cards go all Three True Outcomes tonight?

    David Wright is dreamy?

    Okay, okay, I got a little carried away on the last one–I was trapped under Tim McCarver’s trance for a second. I’ll be watching, but it’s certainly not the most compelling NLCS Game 7 in history.

  6. Grizz on October 19th, 2006 4:52 pm

    What’s a good reason to hang around and see tonight’s game?

    Truck commercials! Lots and lots of truck commercials!

  7. msb on October 19th, 2006 4:53 pm

    hey, it’s true!

  8. JI on October 19th, 2006 4:54 pm

    I like the Rosa Parks/Martin Luther King/John Cougar truck commercial the best. Very tasteful.

  9. msb on October 19th, 2006 4:55 pm

    why, that one is Derek’s favorite– a fine reason for him to watch the game, right there.

  10. adamt on October 19th, 2006 4:57 pm

    Go Cardinals!

  11. JI on October 19th, 2006 5:05 pm

    Perez doesn’t last 3 innings.

  12. adamt on October 19th, 2006 5:07 pm

    JI, God-willing!

    But I’m still anxious. Oliver (ex-Card) will then shut them down.

    As long as the came is decently close when Wagner enters! ;)

  13. terry on October 19th, 2006 5:09 pm

    Tim McCarver is doing the game? Tim Freakin’ McCarver? Timmy M? My gosh people….a former catcher will be doing the game. How much more informative could that be? I’m going to get a notepad to copy some of his insight down… Tim McCarver? Are you sure? No kidding?

    Geesh, people have to ponder why they should watch? :-P

  14. JI on October 19th, 2006 5:13 pm

    Re #11

    Sorry, that was the super fan getting the best of me. But you have to admit the matchup favors STL.

  15. JMB on October 19th, 2006 5:20 pm

    Let’s go Mets!

  16. JI on October 19th, 2006 5:26 pm

    Delgado’s defense is “scary bad” after all.

    Scor it “E-3,” Timmy.

  17. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 5:27 pm

    Because anything can happen in a short series, so we might be seeing a crucial element in the story of who wins the 2006 world series.

    Too bad that error didn’t hurt the mets…

  18. JI on October 19th, 2006 5:29 pm

    Score

    Anyways, that went well for the Mets.

  19. JMB on October 19th, 2006 5:29 pm

    Since when is a seven game series considered a short series? I thought that moniker was reserved for a five gamer.

  20. JI on October 19th, 2006 5:30 pm

    Durned tags…

  21. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 5:33 pm

    Best of 7 is still pretty short for baseball.

  22. DoesntCompute on October 19th, 2006 5:33 pm

    Game 7′s are cool no matter who’s playing in them.

  23. msb on October 19th, 2006 5:34 pm

    well, thank goodness, someone at the Mets kindly explained to Dave Campbell last night that the song they sing when Reyes is up to bat is ‘a popular soccer song in Europe’…

  24. joser on October 19th, 2006 5:43 pm

    You know, if you put together all the pitchers these two teams have on the DL and somehow got them all healthy, you’d actually have a decent rotation. Unfortunately for them, that’s not going to happen — and who ever survives this trainwreck gets to immediately fly to Detroit (Detroit! Outdoors! In late October!) I wonder what the Tigers have been doing with all this free time to rest up — other than watching these games, of course, and hurting their necks shaking their heads (what must one of best defensive teams in baseball think of the Shaw Green – Scott Spiezio muffed-catch tit-for-tat, or really any of the fielding we’ve seen so far?)

  25. Goob on October 19th, 2006 5:46 pm

    Mat, I’m with ya. The idea of there only being a maximum of 8 games of baseball left until April will make me tune into any series. Throw in the fact I’ve always loved watching games where one team might get so desperate, that everybody in the pen might get to throw an inning and I’m set. Getting to watch Pujols, Delgado, Beltran, Wright, and Reyes is simply icing on the cake. COME ON METS!

  26. JI on October 19th, 2006 5:51 pm

    LaRussa should give Hargrove lessons on when and when not to bunt.

  27. JI on October 19th, 2006 6:03 pm

    For all you math majors out there:

    If Perez is hitting 92-94 MPH on the Fox gun, how hard is he really throwing?

  28. shirts on October 19th, 2006 6:03 pm

    Would McCarver just go away? “A saftey squeeze is….” Hey Timmy, most of us watching baseball aren’t morons!

  29. Mat on October 19th, 2006 6:04 pm

    If Perez is hitting 92-94 MPH on the Fox gun, how hard is he really throwing?

    I get the feeling that Fox figured out that they were too obvious about the gun-juicing early on and have racheted it back some. At least for now. Maybe.

  30. Mat on October 19th, 2006 6:08 pm

    Would McCarver just go away? “A saftey squeeze is….” Hey Timmy, most of us watching baseball aren’t morons!

    I’d be willing to bet that at least a quarter of the viewing audience doesn’t know the difference between a safety squeeze and a suicide squeeze off the top of their head–that is, of course, if they even know that there’s more than one kind of squeeze play. Bringing the topic up is perfectly defensible, but McCarver’s style of speech makes it more annoying than it should be for people who already know the difference.

  31. Goob on October 19th, 2006 6:09 pm

    So why is Encarnacion batting behind Pujols again?

  32. terry on October 19th, 2006 6:12 pm

    #31: good lord man…..its because he is one of the few guys on he cards roster that can actually hit a lefty….. :-P

  33. JI on October 19th, 2006 6:17 pm

    31

    So the Mets can maximize their DP chances.

  34. Mat on October 19th, 2006 6:17 pm

    .316/.346/.492 — Encarnacion vs. LHP in ’06

  35. DMZ on October 19th, 2006 6:17 pm

    I just realized that one of things I really like about the Joe Buck/McCarver broadcasts is that they do spend a good portion of the time shutting up. It’s rare, and pretty cool.

  36. terry on October 19th, 2006 6:21 pm

    #34: which is hall of fame compared to the rest of the roster….

  37. JI on October 19th, 2006 6:26 pm

    35

    I will give Timmy that much.

  38. boomdonkey on October 19th, 2006 6:56 pm

    How many more times will TLR let Preston Wilson strike out before he puts in a batter that can, you know, hit?

  39. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 6:57 pm

    I like how the fans cheered a potential injury there. Really classy.

  40. JI on October 19th, 2006 6:58 pm

    Preston needs to pull his head out.

  41. JMB on October 19th, 2006 6:58 pm

    That doesn’t bode well for St.Louis.

  42. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:02 pm

    Encarnacion is a bum.

  43. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:04 pm

    If the game gets rained out late, do they start over from the first or resume where they left off?

  44. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:07 pm

    Still bored?

  45. pablothegreat on October 19th, 2006 7:07 pm

    Unfuckingbelievable catch.

  46. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:07 pm

    FUCK!!!

  47. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:07 pm

    Woooooooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaah!

    Are you kidding me?!

  48. Mat on October 19th, 2006 7:08 pm

    What’s a good reason to hang around and see tonight’s game?

    How about that catch by Endy Chavez? Holy crap.

  49. boomdonkey on October 19th, 2006 7:08 pm

    Damn, nice catch. Poor Rolen, his best hit of the series taken away…

  50. crewm on October 19th, 2006 7:08 pm

    Oh man. Perez better buy that man a beer.

  51. Goob on October 19th, 2006 7:08 pm

    Big deal, Floyd totally would have had that :)

  52. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:09 pm

    No fucking way. That did just not happen. I’ve never seen a sure homerun turned into a double play. No fucking way. Unfuckingbelieveable.

  53. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:09 pm

    LOL Goob.

  54. Mat on October 19th, 2006 7:09 pm

    And I’ll stop beating that horse now.

  55. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:09 pm

    Oh, and Willie? Get Perez out of there. Thanks.

  56. chimera on October 19th, 2006 7:10 pm

    Perez definately owes a beer.

  57. Goob on October 19th, 2006 7:10 pm

    Also, I love how Chavez had to look in the glove before tossing it back in, as if even he couldn’t quite believe he made the catch.

  58. Mat on October 19th, 2006 7:10 pm

    Perez definately owes a beer.

    More like a keg.

  59. marbledog on October 19th, 2006 7:11 pm

    Now THAT’s a double play.

  60. VaBeachMarinersFan on October 19th, 2006 7:11 pm

    #29, 30 Fox Radar guns

    Here is an article from MLB talking specifically about this post-season and how pitchers speeds have been measured. Very enlightening.

    Measuring pitch speed

    That was a dang good catch by Endy.

  61. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:11 pm

    Also, I love how Chavez had to look in the glove before tossing it back in, as if even he couldn’t quite believe he made the catch.

    Well yeah, the ball was barely in his glove. Snowcone city.

  62. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:12 pm

    That was shades of Barfield v. Griffey. Wow. What a grab.

    I’m going to drink until I can’t feel feelings anymore.

  63. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:15 pm

    I still can’t believe he caught that.

    People are putting it up on youtube even as we speak.

  64. Goob on October 19th, 2006 7:16 pm

    Well yeah, the ball was barely in his glove. Snowcone city.

    Good point. It would have been a shame had he managed to snag the ball, only to have it pop out as he brought his glove back down.

    Now here’s to hoping Randolph listens to ya and sits Perez next inning.

  65. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:16 pm

    Oh man, bad karma for Rolen.

  66. pablothegreat on October 19th, 2006 7:17 pm

    Wow, Scott Rolen is having a rather rough inning.

  67. crewm on October 19th, 2006 7:17 pm

    Rolen is broken.

  68. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:18 pm

    I think what made that catch so amazing is that it was a complete long shot. When Griffey made his homerun robbing catches, he knew that he had it the whole way. This one was Chavez just trying anything to save the game and it somehow worked.

  69. adamt on October 19th, 2006 7:22 pm

    I loath Endy Chavez.

    Rolen, you had all day on that throw. Keep it simple!

    Go Suppan, don’t let Endy Chavez be any more of a hero!

  70. crewm on October 19th, 2006 7:23 pm

    Come on, guys.

  71. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:23 pm

    I wanna have Jeff Suppan’s baby!

  72. boomdonkey on October 19th, 2006 7:24 pm

    Good work by Suppan to get out of that jam.

  73. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:27 pm

    Jason gets his wish. :(

  74. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:36 pm

    Bradford’s a machine.

  75. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:37 pm

    Man, the Mets’ bench is awful.

  76. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:38 pm

    The annoucer on ESPN radio just refered to “God Bless America” as a “delay.” Hee, hee.

  77. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:39 pm

    What, Michael Tucker doesn’t cut the mustard?

  78. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:40 pm

    Definitely starting to come down harder.

    Tigers are doing a rain dance. Deplete all pitchers.

  79. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:41 pm

    Tucker, Franco, Hernandez… bad bench, even with Chavez on it.

  80. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:42 pm

    They should move the game upstate. It’s not raining here.

  81. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:44 pm

    If Suppan and Weaved had pitched like this during the regular season, St. Louis would have won 110 games.

    Alright kids, on three: 1-2-3 RUNS!

  82. JI on October 19th, 2006 7:45 pm

    What’s so sad about the Met bench is that Tucker is the Ace Pinch Hitter. It hasn’t mattered much so far this season though…

  83. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:45 pm

    Here’s the rather bizarre answer to my rainout question:

    “What makes even less sense is that some tie games ARE suspended and picked up where they left off — but only if the visiting team has just tied the score in the top half of an inning and the home team hasn’t completed its at-bat in the bottom of the inning. We ask again: Huh?”

    http://espn.go.com/mlb/columns/stark/545503.html

  84. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:47 pm

    The Speeez is on deck.

  85. boomdonkey on October 19th, 2006 7:48 pm

    Man, I was hoping to watch Wilson strike out again. We get the Speez instead?

  86. adamt on October 19th, 2006 7:48 pm

    The Spiez. Shine Spiez, shine.

  87. JMB on October 19th, 2006 7:48 pm

    Well, he’s clutch dontcha know.

  88. Goob on October 19th, 2006 7:49 pm

    And we yet again get to listen to Buck talk about all the post-season heroics of Speez! Yeeeeeea!

  89. adamt on October 19th, 2006 7:52 pm

    The Spiez peed his panties on that strike three down the middle.

  90. adamt on October 19th, 2006 7:52 pm

    The Spiez peed his panties on that strike three down the middle.

  91. msb on October 19th, 2006 7:52 pm

    back again (dang those real life interruptions) just in time to see Speez sit down. ahhhh.

    I see the plan is to give Albert the Bonds Treatment from here on out.

  92. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 7:55 pm

    sorry JI

  93. zzyzx on October 19th, 2006 7:58 pm

    No more Spez, perhaps for the year.

  94. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 7:59 pm

    oh boy!

    So Taguchi! The only non-Mariner from Japan!

  95. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:00 pm

    yes, i’m aware of the matsui (non)brothers

  96. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:00 pm

    Too bad Beltran doesn’t run anymore.

  97. msb on October 19th, 2006 8:03 pm

    Spiezio, Scott
    Post-season statistics
    Year TM G AB R H OBP SLG OPS AVG
    2006 StL 2 5 1 1 .200 .200 .400 .200
    2006 StL 5 16 3 4 .333 .563 .896 .250

  98. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:07 pm

    “Literally.”

  99. msb on October 19th, 2006 8:07 pm

    huh. Beltran’s middle name is Ivan. who knew.

    I’d forgotten he had 41 SBs in ’03, and 42 in ’04 — and then 17 & 18 once he got to the Mets.

  100. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:09 pm

    Tony’s either stalling or feeling really adventurous right here.

  101. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:09 pm

    And there were those two years when he was caught ONCE, combined…

  102. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:10 pm

    Have to save those million dollar legs.

    Cool thing about former-Beltran is that he had really good caught stealing percentages.

  103. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:11 pm

    Perhaps TLR and Randolph are trying to undermanage each other? See who can make the more insane pitching match up and get away with it.

  104. Mat on October 19th, 2006 8:12 pm

    Cool thing about former-Beltran is that he had really good caught stealing percentages.

    18 SB vs. 3 CS this year isn’t too shabby, either.

  105. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:12 pm

    Gaaaaah.

  106. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:13 pm

    Surprised AND wrong.

  107. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:13 pm

    “I was both suprised and wrong…”

    -Tim McCarver

    It’s the first step.

  108. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:13 pm

    18 SB vs. 3 CS this year isn’t too shabby, either.

    Not too shabby at all, wasn’t aware of his end of season stats.

  109. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:14 pm

    I owe someone a coke.

  110. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:15 pm

    That’s gotta be the theme of Timmy’s life

  111. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:19 pm

    I could watch that catch all night.

  112. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:22 pm

    I’d send up Duncan.

    Just saying…

  113. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:23 pm

    yes, i agree

    the snowconity (snowconus?) of the catch makes me giggle.

  114. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:23 pm

    Frickin’ Molina?!

  115. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:23 pm

    why did they put Wagner in?

  116. DMZ on October 19th, 2006 8:23 pm

    OMFG WTF

  117. Goob on October 19th, 2006 8:25 pm

    Well that sucked.

  118. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:25 pm

    F*** me, I’m stupid!!!

  119. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:25 pm

    Yuck — Valentin, Chavez, Franco(?) for the Mets;

  120. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:25 pm

    Yadir .200 Molina! WOOH

  121. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:26 pm

    OTOH, it’d be fkn hi-larious of Valentin and Chavez got on and Franco homered to win the game.

  122. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:26 pm

    Un****ing believable! I love it!

  123. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:26 pm

    You know, everyone has been worried about the Mets’ pitching all series, but it has been the offense that’s let them down. It’s been pretty awful, actually.

  124. Mat on October 19th, 2006 8:27 pm

    Wow. If the Cardinals can win with a Yadier Molina HR, pretty much anything’s possible. The Tigers had best be afraid.

  125. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:27 pm

    the fans’ faces are priceless

  126. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:28 pm

    119: I’m more of an Anderson Hernandez guy myself.

  127. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:28 pm

    Tommy, the guy’s wearing a Cubs jersey. You have to ask the wife what his team is? C’mon.

  128. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:29 pm

    3 outs from 1968. And ironically, the talk today has been about whether current situation in Iraq is the insurgency’s Tet Offensive.

  129. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:30 pm

    The Mets could use some Tet Offensive.

  130. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:30 pm

    I should’ve known once I started cheering for the Mets they’d lose.

  131. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:31 pm

    OK, OK.

  132. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:31 pm

    The Mets could use any offensive.

  133. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:31 pm

    Ok, ok, I take it back, I take it back. They could still make it!

  134. DMZ on October 19th, 2006 8:31 pm

    If I was in charge of a team, I would make my alternate road jerseys greenscreen-green, making it impossible to put ads up behind my players without making them disappear.

  135. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:33 pm

    You’re down two runs. Why are you bunting?

  136. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:33 pm

    Ooooookay.

  137. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:33 pm

    Floyd! I forgot about Floyd!

  138. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:33 pm

    Chavez was showing bunt for a hit.

  139. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:34 pm

    I can’t wait to see Floyd win this. Floyd is my man. Nothing would make me happier.

  140. martin026 on October 19th, 2006 8:34 pm

    here comes the double play

  141. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:34 pm

    I’d make my road jerseys covered in ads that clash with the sponsors of the opposing team. E.g. I’d have “COORS” across the front of the jerseys when I played in St. Louis.

  142. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Woosh.

  143. Roger on October 19th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Has this been shown here before? Kinda interesting.

    Go _____________! (My interest in these two teams is showing.)

  144. Ed on October 19th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Was leaving Heilman in with Wagner in the pen at all equivalent to Hargrove leaving Mateo in a tied-in-the-9th game with Putz in the pen? Comparing Heilman to Mateo is probably an insult, but it still seems like the same theory–if you’re going to lose late, make them beat your best guy.

  145. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Go METS!

  146. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:35 pm

    Another high strike.

  147. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:36 pm

    I think he got him.

  148. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:37 pm

    Wow.

  149. martin026 on October 19th, 2006 8:37 pm

    Wow, nice pitch

  150. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:38 pm

    Down goes Floyd, down goes Floyd!

  151. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:38 pm

    fuck you floyd

  152. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:38 pm

    That’s a nasty curve.

  153. flash_33 on October 19th, 2006 8:38 pm

    Cmon Jose!

  154. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:39 pm

    Floyd sucks

  155. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:39 pm

    Reyes I’ll like you even if you don’t get a hit. But please get a hit.

  156. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:39 pm

    Ugh. Two strikes.

  157. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:39 pm

    That curve drops through the strike zone. I’m not sure how you could hit it successfully.

  158. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:40 pm

    At least we know Reyes isn’t going to try for a home run like Floyd was.

  159. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:40 pm

    Bummer. He hit it hard.

  160. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:41 pm

    nice try reyes

  161. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:41 pm

    Almost.

  162. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:41 pm

    Take one for the team!

  163. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:41 pm

    Step into it!

  164. martin026 on October 19th, 2006 8:42 pm

    It hurts me to watch the leg buckle

  165. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:42 pm

    this game is over.

  166. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:43 pm

    Patience, patience.

  167. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:43 pm

    let yourself walk. please yourself walk.

  168. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:43 pm

    Oh boy.

  169. martin026 on October 19th, 2006 8:43 pm

    DRAMA

  170. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:43 pm

    damn

  171. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:43 pm

    LO DUCA!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 YEA!!!!

  172. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:44 pm

    Ok, so this Beltran fellow is pretty good, right?

  173. joser on October 19th, 2006 8:45 pm

    Man, every kid in every sandlot forever has done this:
    “It’s game seven, down by two, two out, two on, and I come to the plate….”

  174. martin026 on October 19th, 2006 8:45 pm

    Beltran looks nervous

  175. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:45 pm

    Ugh.

  176. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:46 pm

    oh man

  177. JMB on October 19th, 2006 8:46 pm

    Well, what are you gonna do with that.

  178. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:46 pm

    FUCK YOU BELTAN!!! I AM SO GLAD WE DIDN’T SIGN YOU!!!

  179. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:46 pm

    and now, I’m a Cardinals fan.

  180. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:46 pm

    Good Lord.

  181. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:47 pm

    That stadium is library quiet.

  182. crewm on October 19th, 2006 8:47 pm

    Well, I can’t say I care much about this World Series matchup at all.

  183. adamt on October 19th, 2006 8:47 pm

    WOO HOO! Wow, K’d Beltran looking with the bases juiced. AMAZING!

  184. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:47 pm

    that was such a dirty pitch

  185. David J. Corcoran I on October 19th, 2006 8:47 pm

    That’s what I love about the postseason is the ability to hate one team with a passion (the Cards), and then love tehm in the next series.

  186. Goob on October 19th, 2006 8:47 pm

    You gotta swing at that, Beltran!

  187. shigelojoe on October 19th, 2006 8:49 pm

    There is no joy in Mudville–mighty Carlos has struck out.

  188. 88fingerslukee on October 19th, 2006 8:49 pm

    dude, what’s with the rolen and larussa back-slapfest?

  189. SBG on October 19th, 2006 8:49 pm

    Yep. The two teams playing the absolute worst before the post season started are going to the World Series.

  190. chimera on October 19th, 2006 8:49 pm

    You definately gotta swing, given the situation.

  191. dw on October 19th, 2006 8:49 pm

    Well, I guess we’ll see if the Cards can do the impossible.

  192. msb on October 19th, 2006 8:51 pm

    sigh. so does this mean the Mets fans go back to hating Beltran? Dammit. I am so tired of hearing about Spiezio.

    #134– seems like the D-Rays are the perfect green-screen jersey experiment….

  193. shirts on October 19th, 2006 8:52 pm

    Thank you for not talking for so long here Timmy! I can hear the knees buckling all the way to NYC.

  194. JI on October 19th, 2006 8:54 pm

    Suppan has to be the the LCS MVP by a Country Mile.

  195. marbledog on October 19th, 2006 9:10 pm

    Baseball at its finest tonight. And my two favorite teams in all of baseball after the poor pathetic Mariners are in the World Serious. Life is good.

  196. Coach Owens on October 19th, 2006 10:33 pm

    I hate the Cardinals and the umpire. As an umpire your main rule is to be consistent in calling the same location a strike/ball and he sure wasn’t.

  197. mln on October 20th, 2006 6:47 am

    Cardinals to the World Series. That means at least 4 more games with closeups of Scott Spiezo and his facial hair. Woo-hoo!

  198. Paul B on October 20th, 2006 8:56 am

    Scott Spiezio in the WS.

    How can someone that was under the Mendoza line as a Mariner (82 for 414 = .198 BA) be in the World Series?

  199. Safeco Hobo on October 20th, 2006 9:15 am

    Well it all evens out in the end… The Cardinals set the standard with Scott Spiezio on their WS roster, and the Tigers only raise the stakes with Neifi Perez!

    It would be the ultimate irony in “small sample size theater” if one of those players walked away with the MVP!

  200. msb on October 20th, 2006 9:34 am

    #198– the same reason that a .216 AVE/.274 OBP/.321 SLG batter hits the home run that gets the team to the WS?

  201. Evan on October 20th, 2006 9:41 am

    Take that, Fox. Let’s see what a Detroit-St. Louis series does for your ratings.

  202. msb on October 20th, 2006 10:18 am

    might not be too OT, see no. 4 :)

  203. kwk on October 20th, 2006 11:42 am

    The intro to this game thread really bugged me. I would agree that the Tigers are the better team, but what makes everyone forget that anything can happen in the playoffs? A couple guys from a weaker team get hot at the right time and that team advances. Or maybe a couple fly balls go 365 feet for outs instead of 370 feet for homers. This happens every year. Would anyone here argue that if this W.S. was played 100 times, the Cards might win 30-40 times?

    I really couldn’t care less about either the Cards or the Mets, but that game was awesome. THATS the reason that you watch baseball in the playoffs. Anytime someone dismisses a postseason game, they forget that almost anything can happen in the course of a game, or even a series.

    Just seems like intelligent people are forgeting some fundamental sample size principles…

  204. Otto on October 20th, 2006 11:48 am

    oops

  205. Karen on October 20th, 2006 1:02 pm

    #198. “How can someone that was under the Mendoza line as a Mariner (82 for 414 = .198 BA) be in the World Series?”

    In spite of him, not because of him :)

    I want the Tigers to win, so hopefully this is The Curse of Scott Spiezio, Part II.

  206. Evan on October 20th, 2006 2:51 pm

    Remember that Spiezio has never been as bad as he was here. In Bavasi’s words, his “brain exploded” when he was in Seattle.

  207. Steve T on October 20th, 2006 3:10 pm

    206: How could they tell? I’m picturing a tiny puff of dust.

  208. Paul B on October 20th, 2006 3:15 pm

    #206, Hargrove could make a thinking person’s brain explode.

    I’m not implying that Spezio is a thinking person, btw. I believe we have sufficient evidence to indicate that he is not.

    On the theory that everything is online, I just checked. Yup,
    Mendoza Line on wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendoza_line

  209. Mr. Egaas on October 20th, 2006 4:44 pm

    I think DMZ needs Tommy Lasorda to show up and tell him “Watch the damn games! You’re a baseball fan!”

  210. byronebyronian on October 20th, 2006 5:24 pm

    Yep, but didn’t Spiezio have some personal issues? I thought he and his wife were seperating due to some infidelity on his part?

  211. byronebyronian on October 20th, 2006 5:26 pm

    #199: Don’t forget that the Tigers also have Ramon Santiago AND Carlos Guillen. It’s just a cornucopia of former Mariners!!!!

    I would be willing to give it to the Cards due to the fact they let Nellie go before ST ended.

  212. JMB on October 20th, 2006 5:36 pm

    “It’s your duty, Judy!”

  213. msb on October 21st, 2006 7:52 am

    2004 was the marital collapse year– some say due to infidelity — the divorce was final at the start of 2005. 2005 he arrived at ST thinner (due to the ‘stop eating like a college student’ diet), strained his back/oblique in April, ended up playing 29 games, got a tattoo, was released in Aug., had the cab run-in with his girlfriend in Oct– I guess since then they’ve married & he seems to have settled down again…

    I am very sad that a portion of my brain contains this information.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.