Game 30, Mariners at Tigers

DMZ · May 10, 2007 at 9:00 am · Filed Under Game Threads 

Jeff Weaver gets a chance to start in a flyball-friendly park against Justin Verlander. 10:05 am. No TV.

The Mariners are a half-game out of first place. They’ve been outscored by opponents by some amount of runs, yet there they are. The margins for the others? A’s +13, the Angels +5, Rangers -36. So it’s not as if the competition’s been particularly fierce.

Part of the reason it feels weird is that the team’s played, well, check this out.

Number of times the offense scored that many runs as “.”
Number of times the pitching allowed that many runs as “+”


0 - ..+++
1 - ..+
2 - ...+++++
3 - .....+
4 - ....+++
5 - ....+++
6 - .+++
7 - ...+
8 - ..++++
9 - .++
10
11 ++
12
13
14 .+
15 .

Comments

330 Responses to “Game 30, Mariners at Tigers”

  1. Mike Snow on May 10th, 2007 9:08 am

    Your information is out of date. The Mariners are not in first place, and none of those runs scored margins is correct.

  2. lantermanc on May 10th, 2007 9:10 am

    1/2 game out, close enough.
    I’m going to call that chart the Ho-Ram Jeff Weaver effect. And witht that effect RS vs. RA cannot have a great correlation to wins.

  3. DMZ on May 10th, 2007 9:11 am

    Patches welcome, Mike.

  4. Mike Snow on May 10th, 2007 9:15 am

    Sure, Angels +5, Mariners -12, A’s +13, Rangers -36. It seems your information wasn’t updated to include last night’s games, but I have no idea how you got the Mariners in first place. Also, the chart is missing a + in the 14 row.

  5. DMZ on May 10th, 2007 9:15 am

    Cool thanks.

  6. Grizz on May 10th, 2007 9:19 am

    The M’s were in first for a couple hours last night until the Angels game ended.

  7. Manzanillos Cup on May 10th, 2007 9:19 am

    Can anyone remind me how well team OBP correlates with RS? The M’s are third to last in the league in OBP, yet 5th in RS. My initial thought is that they can’t keep scoring at this pace with that bad of OBP.

  8. Mike Snow on May 10th, 2007 9:19 am

    You’re welcome, still ought to change one thing, a dozen is not the same as “almost twenty” in my mind.

  9. oNeiRiC232 on May 10th, 2007 9:23 am

    Not to be a nit-picker, but that’s an odd spelling of Justin.

    Go M’s!

  10. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 9:31 am

    For all the Sexson haters, our day has come… Yahoo sports lineup.
    Ich
    Turbo
    Rauuuul
    Guillen
    Brossard
    Beltre
    Yuni
    Lopez
    Burke

  11. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 9:33 am

    FYI, Anyone who missed that Torii Hunter catch last night is missing out on life

  12. Panev on May 10th, 2007 9:49 am

    Glad to see Burke in the lineup. I was surprised he didn’t play the 8th and 9th last night to give Joh a break.

    Lopez or Yuni should be batting second today. Turbo just doesn’t fit the two hole. Ever.

  13. bergamot on May 10th, 2007 9:56 am

    Those “+” and “.” are showing a lot of negativity. They must want the M’s to lose.

  14. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 9:59 am

    I find it funny that whenever Weaver gets a start Hargrove decides to give some of our daily position players a day off.

    He did the same thing for Weaver’s last start. It’s a direct corellation!!!!

    I hope Weaver doesn’t decide to defy everybody and pitch 8 innings of shutout baseball. That would really piss me off.

  15. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 10:04 am

    Other than Sexson I don’t see any big deal, and by putting Brossard in there, arguably you have a better lineup than when Sexson is in there. It’s not uncommon to sit a catcher on a day game after a night game…

  16. Evan on May 10th, 2007 10:09 am

    I hope Weaver doesn’t decide to defy everybody and pitch 8 innings of shutout baseball.

    His ERA would still be safely above 10 if he did.

  17. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:09 am

    GO M’s!

  18. CSG on May 10th, 2007 10:13 am

    #7

    I’m not sure about OBP, but team OPS correlates remarkably well with RS over the length of a season.

  19. Dave on May 10th, 2007 10:15 am

    OBP correlates at about .5, while OPS correlates at .97.

  20. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:15 am

    TURBO!!!

  21. CSG on May 10th, 2007 10:19 am

    Thanks for the numbers, Dave.

  22. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:20 am

    lets go Beltre, we need some runs here

  23. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 10:20 am

    Come on Beltre..bases loaded

  24. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 10:21 am

    22-I think we need 11 runs here

  25. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:23 am

    ARGH! dang it Beltre, at least hit the ball

  26. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 10:23 am

    All aboard the pain train!!

    We should be allowed to use our bench to field for us during Weavers starts. I think it would make things more even we are at a real disadvantage every 5th day.

  27. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 10:23 am

    Oh dear…Mariners bats…build our expectations up..then crush our hopes…probably a ‘low and away’ pitch to Beltre..no doubt.

  28. Slippery Elmer on May 10th, 2007 10:25 am

    If Weaver is allowed to make his next start his most recent three starts will have been against the three AL teams for whom he’s previously pitched. (Sorry, I couldn’t come up with a more clear way to state this. And apologies if someone’s already pointed this out; I just noticed it and thought it was interesting.)

  29. bakomariner on May 10th, 2007 10:25 am

    well, last time we scored a ton of runs, we couldn’t do shit for two games…here we go again…

  30. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 10:28 am

    here we go! isn’t it comical?

  31. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:28 am

    lets get out of this inning only one run down please!!

  32. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:28 am

    The announcer just called Palonco clutch, last time I checked a hit and run single in the first inning with zero outs against the worst starter in baseball, not clutch.

  33. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 10:29 am

    Get the hook….

  34. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 10:29 am

    Weaver – exit…. stage left eveeeen.

  35. Slippery Elmer on May 10th, 2007 10:30 am

    “Once again, it looks like Jeff Weaver’s throwing batting practice.”
    -Dave Niehaus

    Indeed.

  36. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:30 am

    “Once again, it looks like Jeff Weaver is throwing batting practice.”

    Good call, Mr. Niehaus.

  37. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 10:30 am

    wow…hahahahaha..this is so bad

  38. Otto on May 10th, 2007 10:30 am

    here we go

  39. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:30 am

    Can we take him out now? And should the announcers really be surprised when they hit the ball 400+ feet?

  40. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 10:31 am

    Niehaus made the call that he’s throwing BP (again)…. Come on Weaver, throw some more gas on the fire so we can get rid of your useless butt…

  41. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:31 am

    bye-bye weaver. Thanks for throwing batting practice again. Time for you to leave the rotation!

  42. ExiledMarinerFan on May 10th, 2007 10:31 am

    Batting practice has been extended into the first inning.

  43. Mr. Egaas on May 10th, 2007 10:31 am

    Cut this schmuck.

  44. Slippery Elmer on May 10th, 2007 10:31 am

    You missed the contraction, Thom.

  45. Mustard on May 10th, 2007 10:31 am

    Really, how much longer do we as Mariner fans have to see this pieve of crap pitch? I would laugh at how brutally bad Weaver is, but I am now into anger mode.

  46. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:32 am

    42- It is extended until Grover wakes up and sees the score.

  47. shortbus on May 10th, 2007 10:32 am

    In the words of Krusty the Clown: “It’s all right, kid. You’re just finished.”

  48. Mr. Egaas on May 10th, 2007 10:32 am

    There’s no way Weaver starts again. With Baek rolling and Felix back, he’s either bullpen bound or we could see an 8 million dollar sunk cost get the old Bavasi “Dee-Eff-Aye”.

  49. ExiledMarinerFan on May 10th, 2007 10:32 am

    Wow… three runs in the first third of an inning hardly changed his ERA.

  50. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:33 am

    I was just watching my Season One DVDs of “WKRP In Cincinnati,” and had just paused the famous “Turkey Drop” episode for the start of the game:

    “Oh, the humanity! The turkeys are hitting the ground like sacks of wet cement! Not since the Hindenburg has there been a tragedy like this!”

    Les Nessman should have been a play-by-play announcer.

  51. Evan on May 10th, 2007 10:33 am

    Weaver makes Neihaus sound so tired.

    Can we DFA him between innings?

  52. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 10:33 am

    DFA Weaver… and please, please, please can Bavasi with him before he has a chance to get a PBTNL for Ichiro in July…

  53. atait on May 10th, 2007 10:34 am

    Rejoice, M’s fans!!

    We have seen the last of Jeff Weaver as a starting pitcher!!

    I mean, this HAS to be it…right?

  54. Dan W on May 10th, 2007 10:35 am

    The fact that the Mariners have run Weaver out to start these last 2 games is ridiculous. It’s not like it’s hard to anticipate what will happen. Why give the game away in advance?

  55. Mr. Egaas on May 10th, 2007 10:35 am

    Do we have any fans in Detroit we can suit up throw out there?

  56. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:36 am

    53- We thought it had to be it about 3 starts ago. Starting Jeff Weaver is like wearing sweatpants on a first date, you’re not even trying.

  57. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 10:36 am

    In a really really twisted thought….Would Grover keep running Weaver out there in a measure of revenge against Bavasi for sticking him with a bunch of has-beens? A baseball version of a scorched earth doctrine?

  58. darrylzero on May 10th, 2007 10:37 am

    How well hit was that ball by Lopez? Looked like it might have been gone in some parks on Gameday…

  59. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:37 am

    Grover likes has-beens. Remember, he’s the one who agitated for Carl Everett.

  60. CSG on May 10th, 2007 10:38 am

    How can you people defame a World Series Hero?

  61. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 10:38 am

    In a really really twisted thought….Would Grover keep running Weaver out there in a measure of revenge against Bavasi for sticking him with a bunch of has-beens? A baseball version of a scorched earth doctrine?

    I suppose if Hargrove doesn’t really WANT his job…

  62. CSG on May 10th, 2007 10:38 am

    #56

    I absolutely love the wearing sweatpants on a first date comparison.

  63. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:38 am

    Or sweatpants on the sixth date, when not are are you not trying, but your date should know better than to keep accepting dates.

  64. gwangung on May 10th, 2007 10:39 am

    In a really really twisted thought….Would Grover keep running Weaver out there in a measure of revenge against Bavasi for sticking him with a bunch of has-beens? A baseball version of a scorched earth doctrine?

    You’re assuming Grover could recognize that he’s got has-beens. That might be overestimating him…

  65. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:39 am

    not only are you not trying

  66. shortbus on May 10th, 2007 10:39 am

    Some of this sounds like 20/20 hindsight to be honest. I mean, nobody thought Weaver was worth $8 million, but after his WS performance and last year’s numbers during the regular season there was no reason to think he would be an 18+ ERA guy either. I expected Weaver, Batista and Ramirez to give us roughly the same sub-par level of performance. Did anyone forsee Weaver being completely washed up?

  67. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:40 am

    What questions do we have for “Ask The Skipper” this week?

  68. DAK on May 10th, 2007 10:40 am

    66. The Angels

  69. darrylzero on May 10th, 2007 10:41 am

    I thought signing Weaver was a decent idea given the circumstances. I’m not surprised it didn’t work. Given Felix’s injury, I’m not sure it is entirely fair for us to blame Hargrove/Bavasi for not pulling the plug yet. But he does suck, and I do hate him, and I’m going to keep complaining about him.

  70. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:41 am

    I see six innings of pitching by guys named Sean today ….

  71. Andren on May 10th, 2007 10:42 am

    Steve Kelley sez:

    Jeff Weaver not good.

  72. Dan W on May 10th, 2007 10:42 am

    I’d buy the hindsight argument, up until right after the KC game. It was foresight after that.

  73. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:42 am

    66- Little bit, the Angels kicked him off the team for a ERA around 8 if I remember correctly. Figured we would do the same since his ERA is twice that.

  74. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 10:42 am

    Junior belts another. 9th place now. :)

  75. Sports on a Schtick on May 10th, 2007 10:42 am

    I hate Weaver more than any other Mariner ever. And that includes the members of the 90′s gas can bullpen.

  76. vj on May 10th, 2007 10:43 am

    You know what, I can’t help but find Weaver’s outing amusing. BTW, the first inning took him 17 pitches for 6 batters so at least he’s sucking efficiently.

  77. darrylzero on May 10th, 2007 10:43 am

    I would also say that we should probably know by now that when a pitcher appears to be at the twilight of his career, moves to the NL, and all of the sudden looks like he might have something left in the tank, that we should probably be nervous.

  78. ConorGlassey on May 10th, 2007 10:43 am

    Jason Verlander? Brad Inge? Wow…that Doug Niehaus just isn’t on his game today!

  79. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 10:43 am

    Anyone have Weaver’s whip? His ERA is pretty comical, but I’d love to see his WHIP. Also, 17 pitches in the first inning..he is efficiently bad, at least.

  80. DAK on May 10th, 2007 10:43 am

    70. Sean Penn > Weaver ??

  81. shortbus on May 10th, 2007 10:44 am

    72: Good point!

  82. Mustard on May 10th, 2007 10:44 am

    Wha??? Weaver struck out someone?

  83. Evan on May 10th, 2007 10:44 am

    Actually, if Weaver only gives up a 3 run homer every second inning, he’ll lower his ERA.

    By showing improvement in this way, maybe he’ll earn himself another start.

  84. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:44 am

    We almost had to give Rabelo a raise, just missed him.

  85. ExiledMarinerFan on May 10th, 2007 10:45 am

    There is a picture on my desk of my wife and I at Angels Stadium last year watching the M’s tee off on Jeff Weaver. We look so happy. I ridiculed the Angeles fans brutally for their $10m flop. ahhh…poetic justice. Thank you Mr. Bavasi.

  86. CSG on May 10th, 2007 10:46 am

    #79

    His WHIP was at 2.76 coming into the game…I think his BABIP is even more comical: .487 entering today.

  87. Andren on May 10th, 2007 10:46 am

    Watching Weaver pitch is like a living in a Salvador Dali painting with melting bases and a blurry baseball diamond landscape that stretches on for eternity. Please take us out of this surreal nightmare. How many other teams would allow such damnation?

  88. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 10:47 am

    It really sounds like Dave N. hates Weaver too… hehe

  89. ExiledMarinerFan on May 10th, 2007 10:47 am

    87–Anaheim let it go for half the season.

  90. vj on May 10th, 2007 10:48 am

    From the preview on Yahoo sports on Weaver:
    “opponents are batting a robust .465 when facing him”
    I laughed out loud.

  91. Andren on May 10th, 2007 10:48 am

    Polanco is sooooooo clutch! These Detroit announcers have to be ranked up there with the ChiSox clowns.

  92. moz57 on May 10th, 2007 10:48 am

    You know how when a horse turned up lame they used to bring it out to pasture and deal with it?

    How long until they do this with Weaver?

  93. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:48 am

    WHIP sat alone in a boggy marsh … totally motionless except for its heart ….

  94. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:48 am

    pull Weaver Already!

  95. Otto on May 10th, 2007 10:48 am

    So how bad should we root for Weaver to blow this game to make sure they DFA him!

  96. Slippery Elmer on May 10th, 2007 10:49 am

    Calvin had the G.R.O.S.S. club (Get Rid Of Slimy girlS.)
    M’s fans have G.R.O.W. (Get Rid Of Weaver.)
    M’s management has G.R.I.T. (Gentlemen Revealing Idiotic Thinking.)

  97. vj on May 10th, 2007 10:50 am

    re 93: He’s lump!!!

  98. Andren on May 10th, 2007 10:50 am

    I wish we could balloon Weaver’s teammates thoughts.

    What is going through Ichiro’s head right now?

  99. bhsmarine on May 10th, 2007 10:51 am

    98- No way I don’t win a gold glove chasing down all these long fly balls.

  100. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 10:52 am

    Jose Guillen is thinking……I wish Jeff Weaver was still an angel so I can hate him even more!

  101. Andren on May 10th, 2007 10:53 am

    Ichiro is thinking every guaranteed loss by Weaver equals more contract dollars in my pocket.

  102. Mustard on May 10th, 2007 10:55 am

    On the radio, they are talking about the Mariners Long Ball lounge…now I am here in Ontario, Canada….was this lounge made just for Weaver?

  103. Evan on May 10th, 2007 10:55 am

    Weaver’s ERA is currently higher than it was at the start of the game.

    Still think his BABIP will regress to the mean, Dave?

  104. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 10:56 am

    Jeff lingered last in line for stuff … and the stuff he got was sorta rotten and pure fluff ….

  105. Evan on May 10th, 2007 10:56 am

    Why does anyone ever swing at the first pitch following a walk?

  106. Dave on May 10th, 2007 10:58 am

    Still think his BABIP will regress to the mean, Dave?

    Probably not, because I doubt he gets a chance to pitch long enough to watch it come down. But yes, if we gave him 30 starts, he’d end the year with a BABIP under .400. No one, not even Weaver and his suckitude, has a true talent level BABIP of .500.

  107. bakomariner on May 10th, 2007 10:59 am

    the detroit commentators aren’t just homers, but DUMB…in game one, they said that rodney had “good numbers” even though he had an ERA over 5 and his record was 1-4…then when morrow came in they said he was “pretty good for only spending one FULL season in the minors last year” complete jackasses…although that can probably be said by anyone watching their team with the opposing commentators…

  108. joser on May 10th, 2007 10:59 am

    Why does anyone ever swing at the first pitch following a walk?

    Well, it’s a good question in general. I do make a bit of an exception for Sexson because the four balls to the previous guy might be borderline strikes in the ginormous zone between his knees and letters.

  109. vj on May 10th, 2007 11:00 am

    Jim, I gotta go but I expect a full rewrite of that song when I check in after the game.

  110. Sports on a Schtick on May 10th, 2007 11:01 am

    Has there ever been a pitcher who compiled six starts in a row that were as bad as Nightmare’s? His (hopefully) short-lived M’s career just might be historically awfully.

  111. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 11:03 am

    Crap… that 1-2-3 inning probably just guaranteed Weaver another start….

  112. Lauren, token chick on May 10th, 2007 11:03 am

    Something odd just happened. It was like a reverberation through the Force, n shit.

  113. SpokaneMsFan on May 10th, 2007 11:04 am

    A one, two, three inning, he just earned another start!

  114. joser on May 10th, 2007 11:04 am

    You know, this Farmer’s commercial really bugs me. An airforce? People parachuting? If I make a claim, and they don’t have people parachute in and rebuild, can I sue them for false advertising?

  115. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 11:05 am

    That ERA is creeping lower…Hargrove and Bavasi will feel thats a sign he is turning it around! Give him an extension!

  116. apunetid on May 10th, 2007 11:05 am

    4 runs through 3…and Weaver has lowered his ERA during this start.

    Maybe here ERA is an indication of true talent level!

  117. frenchonion on May 10th, 2007 11:05 am

    #50 (The WKRP comment)

    The “Oh the humanity!” and “Everyone get out of the way!” are an homage to the audio of the Hindenberg disaster…

    My favorite part of that episode:

    (A shaken Les Nessman) “With God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!”

    Evidently Bavasi could say the same about Weaver. “I thought he was a major-league pitcher!”

  118. S1lent on May 10th, 2007 11:07 am

    Just checking in, so I don’t know if anyone has commented on this, but…Sexson shows signs of coming out of his slump and possibly getting hot and then Grover benches him the next game? Genius.

  119. Dave on May 10th, 2007 11:09 am

    Verlander is death to RH hitters, and Sexson needed a day off eventually. Nothing wrong with it.

  120. mln on May 10th, 2007 11:09 am

    Given the Mariner’s luck, Jeff Weaver will pitch shut out ball the rest of the game for as long as he’s in there, and the Mariners score some runs and rally to win the game in a stirring comeback.

    End result: the Jeff Weaver Era continues for one more start.

  121. Evan on May 10th, 2007 11:09 am

    So, does Weaver keep his ERA under 15 in this inning?

  122. Chris on May 10th, 2007 11:10 am

    114: I work for Farmers and I agree the commercial is lame, but not as lame as the “master of destruction” one where the adjusters are playing video games with their claims…very embarrassing.

  123. No Rhubarb on May 10th, 2007 11:10 am

    To the commenter who said that Less Nessman should have been a play-by-play guy: Remember the Chi Chi Rodriguez incident.

  124. bakomariner on May 10th, 2007 11:11 am

    mln- could weaver really be pitching shut out ball if he wasn’t in there?

  125. dks on May 10th, 2007 11:12 am

    From Diamond Mind’s FAQ (scroll down to 2.13), in 1997 position players collectively had this line

    22.3 innings, 15 hits, 26 BB, 5 K, 6.34 ERA

    Or, in other words
    93 PA, 10 BB/G, 2 K/G, .250 BABIP

    Even random outfielders don’t have a .500 BABIP.

  126. mln on May 10th, 2007 11:13 am

    124, just meant that he wouldn’t go 9 innings.

  127. Evan on May 10th, 2007 11:14 am

    Inge!

    Way to give up a homer to the guy hitting under .200, Weaver.

  128. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 11:14 am

    120 – This is Jeff Weaver we’re talking about, don’t be ridicoolos cousin Larry.

  129. S1lent on May 10th, 2007 11:14 am

    Yup. Weaver’s done.

  130. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 11:14 am

    Got Inge above the Mendoza Line…with a HR..haha..comical

  131. joser on May 10th, 2007 11:17 am

    Haven’t heard “Masters of Destruction” — guess I’ve just been lucky.

    From what Hargrove said last night in the after-game press conference, it sounds like he was already planning to have Sexson sit today even before last night’s game — whether that was due to the matchup, or just “day game after night game and he needs a rest” I have no idea. But maybe Sexson hit so well last night because he knew he had a day off today (no, I’m only half serious).

  132. bakomariner on May 10th, 2007 11:18 am

    just remembered all the shit talking spezio did about seattle after they cut his ass…what do you think weaver, his buddy, will say?

  133. robbbbbb on May 10th, 2007 11:22 am

    114: I’d settle for Farmer’s making any sort of timely settlement at all. Some good friends of mine had a house fire. Farmer’s was their insurance company. It took them over two years to rebuild the house, and they stopped paying the re-settlement payments they were legally obligated to make.

    My friends had to take them to court to get them to pay out anything at all.

    Basically, Farmer’s tried to break my friends financially so they could short them on the settlement when they were desperate. I find their business practices to be despicable.

  134. msb on May 10th, 2007 11:23 am

    You’re assuming Grover could recognize that he’s got has-beens. That might be overestimating him…

    after all, he did pick Carl off the list of possible bats last year.

    so, the Cardinals are pretty desperate — think we could convince them that they could ‘fix’ Jeff once more?

  135. Swungonandbelted on May 10th, 2007 11:24 am

    132. What can he say? Spezio can gripe that he rode the pine for several weeks before he was finally cut and didn’t get a chance to bring his game around. Weaver can’t say he wasn’t given every opportunity.

  136. Tek Jansen on May 10th, 2007 11:26 am

    While I am aware of Weaver’s poor aptitude at pitching, are either of his last two starts, including this one, any worse than HoRam’s previous two starts? Out of the two, is Weaver that much worse than Ho

  137. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 11:27 am

    TURRRRRBOOOOO

  138. msb on May 10th, 2007 11:27 am

    Sexson shows signs of coming out of his slump and possibly getting hot and then Grover benches him the next game? Genius.

    or, he gives him much needed rest after a feel-good success.

    hmm. oddly enough, Weaver isn’t on Stark’s “Pitchers you’d pay to watch pitch” list

  139. Dave on May 10th, 2007 11:27 am

    Turbo has twice as many infield hits as extra base hits. That’s just mind blowing.

  140. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 11:28 am

    If the Mariners get within 3 runs here I hope Grover pulls Weaver.

    Again, the Tigers BP is not good, especially with Zumaya out.

  141. Tek Jansen on May 10th, 2007 11:30 am

    Dave, I assume you feel that Turbo’s infield hit rate is not sustainable or repeatable.

  142. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 11:30 am

    Turbo’s like the version of Spike Owen who hits .300 and wears concrete overshoes.

  143. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 11:30 am

    turbo just does enough so far this year where i don’t like him or hate him

  144. Dave on May 10th, 2007 11:31 am

    There’s no way Turbo keeps getting infield hits at this rate. He’s on pace for 35 infield hits. For comparison, Ichiro got 41 last year and 31 the year before. Ichiro is fast. Turbo is not.

  145. Paul B on May 10th, 2007 11:33 am

    How could any GM think that Weaver and Turbo and Ramirez were valuable players and better than players that the M’s already had?

    I know Bavasi had some justifications for it that made sense to him at the time, but… wow.

  146. Tek Jansen on May 10th, 2007 11:37 am

    In Weaver’s defense, while he costs 8+ million, he did not come at the cost of Soriano, Fruto, or Snelling. That is the reason that I dislike Ho more than Weaver.

  147. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 11:38 am

    Sheffield is the best thing that has happened to Weaver…Sheffield has been a bum today (he’s on my fantasy team and disappointing)

  148. Evan on May 10th, 2007 11:40 am

    Fruto is probably a better starting pitcher right now than Weaver is.

  149. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 11:40 am

    Verlander is closing in on 100 pitches. We could pull this out.

  150. apunetid on May 10th, 2007 11:42 am

    Weaver’s closing in on 100 pitches; maybe there is hope.

  151. Wood Dog on May 10th, 2007 11:42 am

    Don’t look now, but 5 runs in 5 innings has Weaver’s ERA down to 14.12. He’s trying to make this decision to demote him tough on the m’s.

  152. Ralph Malph on May 10th, 2007 11:42 am

    Don’t let the door hit you on your way out, Jeff.

  153. Wood Dog on May 10th, 2007 11:43 am

    Don’t look now, but 6 runs in 5 innings has Weaver’s ERA down to 14.54. He’s trying to make this decision to demote him tough on the m’s.

  154. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 11:43 am

    You know, pulling Weaver BEFORE this inning started would’ve been the best course of action and Grover refused to do this why? Weaver shouldn’t be getting another start whether or not he pitches another couple innings of shutout baseball.

  155. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 11:45 am

    There is no God. Doyle got thrown off balance running through first, trying to avoid colliding with the pitcher, started stumbling, slowed down and started hobbling, stopped, went into a crouch and stayed there for a minute or two, coaches and trainers come out, put in a pinch runner for him. Injury could involve any part of either leg. It looked very awkward.

  156. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 11:45 am

    Weaver lowers his ERA yet again!

  157. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 11:46 am

    Whats wrong with carlos zambrano? 3 runs to the pirates in the first inning. his era is at 6.31 now. he’s a free agent next year, if not resigned by the cubs would you take him? if so how many years and at what $$$?

    Weaver your gone now, no way he stays in the rotation.

  158. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 11:47 am

    Rally time!

  159. apunetid on May 10th, 2007 11:48 am

    157: 6.31 really doesn’t sound too bad when 14.32 is what we’re dealing with!

  160. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 11:48 am

    Send in the Seans.

  161. JIMINEDMONDS on May 10th, 2007 11:50 am

    Fans should take a moritorium on purchasing any tickets for games started by Weaver (any maybe Ramirez), because it is just an exercise in futility. You just can not score enough runs to keep up with the pinball-type scores these guys rack up. When these guys pitch,it just isn’t quality major league baseball that is on display.

  162. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 11:50 am

    There have to be Seans

  163. Dave on May 10th, 2007 11:52 am

    And here comes the lefty to face Ichiro. MLB managers will never learn.

  164. Benno on May 10th, 2007 11:52 am

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but if you take out Weavers starts, the M’s have outscored their opponents by ~30 runs (I think I’m missing a game, however). In Weaver’s starts, the M’s have been outscored by 37 (and counting). I wonder what the numbers would look like if I isolated HoRam’s starts. I’m sure there isn’t a full correlation here, as Weaver isn’t the only pitcher in those games, but it gives me some hope that the M’s aren’t as bad as I was thinking earlier.

  165. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 11:52 am

    The Tigers are averaging two hits an inning.

  166. Wood Dog on May 10th, 2007 11:52 am

    Do you think Grover is instinctively calling for Mateo right now in the bullpen?

  167. Lauren, token chick on May 10th, 2007 11:53 am

    Luckily, my moratorium on purchasing any Mariners tickets at all will nicely cover the Weaver/Ramirez issue.

  168. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 11:53 am

    What is going through Ichiro’s head right now?

    What contender will the M’s trade me to in July?

  169. Dave on May 10th, 2007 11:54 am

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but if you take out Weavers starts, the M’s have outscored their opponents by ~30 runs (I think I’m missing a game, however). In Weaver’s starts, the M’s have been outscored by 37 (and counting). I wonder what the numbers would look like if I isolated HoRam’s starts. I’m sure there isn’t a full correlation here, as Weaver isn’t the only pitcher in those games, but it gives me some hope that the M’s aren’t as bad as I was thinking earlier.

    I’m sure you could do this for just about every team in baseball, though. Everyone looks better if you eliminate the games pitched by their worst pitcher.

  170. Mat on May 10th, 2007 11:55 am

    Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but if you take out Weavers starts…

    Every team looks better when you take out the results from their worst starter.

  171. Wood Dog on May 10th, 2007 11:56 am

    Best #2 hitter in the league

  172. darrylzero on May 10th, 2007 11:57 am

    That was anticlimactic. At least we knocked Verlander out.

  173. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 11:57 am

    That seemed kind of predictable

  174. moz57 on May 10th, 2007 11:57 am

    Vidro now 6-32 with runners in scoring position. OUCH.

  175. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 11:58 am

    Vidro now 6-32 with runners in scoring position. OUCH.

    Hey, he’s doing his job as a DH- hitting useless infield singles. Quit being a hater.

  176. colm on May 10th, 2007 12:01 pm

    Joser – that Farmers’ Helpoint commercial has been driving me off the hinge for the last two seasons. It’s such hogwash.

    But what sets my teeth on edge is the daytime soap opera emoting that the actor puts into saying “There’s been a fire in our house”. If there’d been a fire in my bloody house I wouldn’t be gushing like some love-struck intern on General Hospital.

    Off topic insurance tip of the day. Find a veteran in the family and join USAA.

    Maybe the M’s could buy a policy to compensate them if Weaver is healthy enough to make 28 more starts this season.

  177. matthew on May 10th, 2007 12:02 pm

    Why does it feel that every time the Mariners put Weaver out on the mound that they are telling the other team they’re forfeiting the game?

  178. Benno on May 10th, 2007 12:06 pm

    Dave – That is true, taking out the results of the worst pitch on a team skews the information. And I certainly didn’t mean to imply that the M’s are a good team, if only Weaver wasn’t on it. I was actually thinking that the M’s had been outscored in their other games as well, and that the season was more bleak than it actually was. However, I’m sure it was a misuse of the RS-RA statistic.

  179. msb on May 10th, 2007 12:06 pm

    could we have Mr. Pink or Mr. Blonde instead of Mr. Green?

  180. colm on May 10th, 2007 12:07 pm

    Hmm, if we start Green instead of Weaver, is that likely to be any better?

  181. kentroyals5 on May 10th, 2007 12:09 pm

    Anyone else find it very difficult to root for the Mariners on a day when Weaver pitches? I sometimes get disappointed when the other teams strands the bases loaded or strikeout with runners in scoring position..weird

  182. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 12:09 pm

    178. There is White, but he is worse. As we will likely see in later innings.

  183. colm on May 10th, 2007 12:11 pm

    Joser
    That Farmers’ Helpoint commercial has been driving me off the hinge for years now. It’s such hogwash.

    If my house had burned down I wouldn’t be gushing “There’s been a fire in our house” like some dewy-eyed intern on General Hospital.

  184. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 12:11 pm

    Again, Doyle got injured, I described what I saw in 155. I think this time it’s being a member of the Athletics, rather than his own personal curse.

  185. Evan on May 10th, 2007 12:12 pm

    I’m sure you could do this for just about every team in baseball, though. Everyone looks better if you eliminate the games pitched by their worst pitcher.

    This isn’t unlike Gillick’s justification of the Phranklin signing.

    “If you take out those four starts, his ERA wouldn’t be over 5.”

  186. moz57 on May 10th, 2007 12:13 pm

    175. Quit being a hater.

    But it’s the only thing that I know!

  187. Evan on May 10th, 2007 12:15 pm

    MESA!

    Here’s our chance. His ERA has the same number of digits as Weaver’s.

  188. Rick L on May 10th, 2007 12:16 pm

    I predict Weaver goes to the pen after this, ready to come in after on days when the Ho starts and we are trailing 7-0 after 4.

  189. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:17 pm

    That’s 2 HR’s we have been robbed of today. Any other park and we’d be right in this thing.

  190. colm on May 10th, 2007 12:18 pm

    Holy crap Jose Mesa! When was the last time two pitchers this bad got into the same game? Jose Lima isn’t on the bench anywhere, is he?

  191. SexsonPower on May 10th, 2007 12:19 pm

    atkeast Beltre hit the ball hard this time. he’s in for his best season as a mariner. Well thats my prediction anyways

  192. Dylan on May 10th, 2007 12:19 pm

    fricking Comerica.

  193. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 12:20 pm

    Gameday actually shows it going past the 420 mark. I hate uncontrollable outcomes.

  194. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 12:21 pm

    A’s say Doyle has a “contusion to the left knee” Anyone know what that usually means?

  195. frenchonion on May 10th, 2007 12:21 pm

    Does that make the Snelling trade look better from our end — when a historically injured player gets injured again?

  196. moz57 on May 10th, 2007 12:23 pm

    193- Contusion is just a fancy name for a bruise. Depends on how severe the bruise is. Is there’s a lot of swelling with the bruise, he could be out 3-5 days, I’d say. If there’s no swelling, he could be back out there with a bit of a limp tomorrow.

  197. msb on May 10th, 2007 12:23 pm

    A’s say Doyle has a “contusion to the left knee” Anyone know what that usually means?

    um, a knee bruise?

  198. billT on May 10th, 2007 12:24 pm

    Does that make the Snelling trade look better from our end — when a historically injured player gets injured again?

    No. You judge the trade on the talent swapped at the time of the trade, not what happens to the players afterwards.

  199. joser on May 10th, 2007 12:24 pm

    Yeah, Safeco is 405 in center, right? So it’s either a catch at the top of the wall or all the way out there.

  200. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:24 pm

    164 – I agree completely. I also think this is an extreme case, so it doesn’t apply to any other team in the majors.

    Mariners are a better team than their record shows and it’s because they have the worst #5 pitcher in the majors, and it’s not even close.

    I’m strictly talking about ERA here, and ERA doesn’t lie. It tells people whether you suck or not.

  201. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 12:24 pm

    194: 6 million less to throw at Zambrano or whomever…the trade was so bad that any outcome that makes it more balanced is not noticable.

  202. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:26 pm

    197 – we all knew Snelling would get hurt again it was only a matter of a month or three.

    Thinking otherwise is silly because of Snelling’s history.

    Therefore the trade is either justified, or doesn’t mean anything. Probably more towards the latter.

  203. bellacaramella on May 10th, 2007 12:26 pm

    Depends on how severe the bruise is. Is there’s a lot of swelling with the bruise, he could be out 3-5 days, I’d say. If there’s no swelling, he could be back out there with a bit of a limp tomorrow.

    That’s no ordinary knee, man. God knows what’s in there to hold things together.

  204. joser on May 10th, 2007 12:26 pm

    Well, normally a bruise is the result of some kind of collision. If he’s got swelling because of how the joint moved, not as a result of an impact, (ie internal vs surface swelling) it could be significantly worse.

  205. Dave on May 10th, 2007 12:26 pm

    I’m strictly talking about ERA here, and ERA doesn’t lie. It tells people whether you suck or not.

    Well, that’s just not true.

  206. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 12:27 pm

    Okay, if it’s only a bruise, a day to week sort of thing, it seem’s he’ll be okay. Looking at the replay, he might have actually been kicked by the heel of the pitcher as he ran in front of him covering first.

  207. Josh on May 10th, 2007 12:28 pm

    ERA doesn’t lie? Brad Penny is far and away the best pitcher in MLB?

    Weaver is probably the worst pitcher in any starting rotation now. You don’t need ERA to see that, though.

  208. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:29 pm

    Along with bases on balls, innings pitched, and other intangable crap.

    ERA is the most telling out of the 3 though.

  209. Karen on May 10th, 2007 12:30 pm

    187. That’ll be just great. Weaver can widen the RS-RA gap.

    Oh, well, all that’ll do is give a false Pythagorean winning percentage. WE’LL know the M’s are better than their current 75-87 Pythagorean winning percentage.

  210. joser on May 10th, 2007 12:30 pm

    That UPS “spitball” commercial is especially humorous if you’ve read the “Cheater’s Guide” chapter on ball doctoring.

  211. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:31 pm

    A guy has pitched a month and a half in the majors and he has a 15 ERA vs a guy in the majors that has pitched a month and a half and has a 5 era. I’ll take the second option 95% of the time. There is no arguement for this.

  212. Josh on May 10th, 2007 12:31 pm

    Therefore the trade is either justified, or doesn’t mean anything. Probably more towards the latter.

    It does mean something. By the fact that it took place it must have some ramifications.

    In this case, it means that the Mariners took on $6m for the next three years, and a horrible DH that Hargrove will just have to fill the #2/#3 spots in the lineup. It also means they gave up Fruto.

  213. Dave on May 10th, 2007 12:31 pm

    ERA is the most telling out of the 3 though.

    You really need to read this article.

  214. Josh on May 10th, 2007 12:32 pm

    Along with bases on balls, innings pitched, and other intangable crap.

    ERA is the most telling out of the 3 though.

    Are you saying bases on balls and innings pitched are also intangible?

    Are you saying ERA, BB and IP are the three measures of a pitcher’s quality?

  215. darrylzero on May 10th, 2007 12:33 pm

    197, others,

    While I agree the trade was terrible and would love to have Doyle back, and while I agree that you can’t take random events into consideration, I sort of have to disagree.

    I think that in Snelling’s case, particularly, because how likely he is to get injured is and was such an unknown quantity, how able he is to stay healthy is relevant. It wouldn’t make trading for Vidro a good idea, for all the reasons already specified. But I think as huge Snelling fans — and I consider myself one — we should be open to realizing on some level that people who were just too worried about his ability to stay healthy may have been right.

    Obviously, a knee contusion doesn’t say anything at all, and here’s hoping he’ll be back soon (though a friend of mine in college got a severe knee contusion that resulted in massive swelling for months). But I think we need to be thoughtful about it before we just say, “nope, the only way it can be evaluated is at the time of the trade.”

    In the same vein, if Vidro had come in and torn the cover off the ball last year, I don’t think it would have been fair for us to say, “well, we still shouldn’t have traded for him because he was likely to decline.” We would have to make room for the possibility that people with greater access to him personally knew more than we did about the nature of his injuries and how they were affecting his game. As it turns out, there will be no mea culpa, but I don’t think we should be so sure that we can get all the information through the news/blogs/stats/etc.

  216. joser on May 10th, 2007 12:35 pm

    I’m strictly talking about ERA here, and ERA doesn’t lie. It tells people whether you suck or not.

    Wow, just… wow. And “intangible” crap? I don’t think you understand the meaning of that word. There are some very tangible numbers that tell the truth about a pitcher far better than ERA. Have you tried reading that article over in “Features” box called Evaluating Pitcher Talent?

  217. robbbbbb on May 10th, 2007 12:35 pm

    164:

    Dave’s right, if you pull every team in baseball’s worst starter, then their RS/RA looks better. However, we have hope that Weaver’s going to get yanked and replaced with Felix. If that happens, then you can rely on that RS/RA without Weaver to talk about the M’s future chances.

  218. Ben Ramm on May 10th, 2007 12:36 pm

    Sure, every team looks better without their worst pitcher, but Weaver gives up enough runs to make the Pythagorean calculations make his losses count double. Yet, in the standings they count for only one loss. See, he really is a good deal!

    Seriously, extremely bad pitchers, especially when given a large number of starts, skew the calculations enough to be worth considering an adjustment.

  219. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:39 pm

    OK, you take the pitcher that has a 5-6 ERA and I’ll take the one that has a 3-4 ERA, with the same player lineups for both teams.

    I’ll win 7 times out of 10.

    There are many things that go into the ERA and there is no doubt about that. ERA is just a bottom line number, and it’s very simple to understand.

  220. _David_ on May 10th, 2007 12:39 pm

    Also, a contusion means that he probably did get kicked by the pitcher’s heel as it looked like, and that doesn’t seem to have to do with how prone the body is too injury, unless you consider trying to beat the pitcher to first unnecessary carelessness that a more careful and less injury prone player would avoid :)

  221. darrylzero on May 10th, 2007 12:39 pm

    Guys there’s no need to flip out at MWSB. I’m not even convinced he doesn’t understand FIP/BABIP and the like yet. He’s using Weaver’s 14+ ERA to say he sucks, which he does. And no matter how much luck there is in all this, good pitchers never run ERAs like Weaver’s. ERA’s not particularly exact, but it can still be pretty telling, especially in this case.

  222. frenchonion on May 10th, 2007 12:41 pm

    Years ago Bill James called “The ability to stay healthy” a skill, just like a good outfield arm, or speed, or anything else.

    Btw, I don’t mean to imply that an injury to Snelling makes the trade equal or anything of the sort — it just makes the trade look a little more even than all the hyperventilating around here at the time made it seem.

  223. Evan on May 10th, 2007 12:42 pm

    OK, you take the pitcher that has a 5-6 ERA and I’ll take the one that has a 3-4 ERA, with the same player lineups for both teams.

    I’ll win 7 times out of 10.

    But you won’t necessarily. Those ERAs tell me how many runs the pitchers have allowed in the past, but that’s not entirely based on their talent. It’s entirely possible the 5-6 ERA guy is the better pitcher, and will outperform the 3-4 ERA going forward.

    But you can’t tell that just from ERA.

  224. terrybenish on May 10th, 2007 12:43 pm

    In 2006 Ichiro at .786 had the 45th best OPS in AL, now its .751 and still about the same at 46th best. Runs scored 6th in league for whole year last year at 110, with 19 he’s 22nd this year. OBPCT last year .370 and 26th and .341 and 36th, so far.

    Bad for him 29 games, or is it a settling of skills? Does either level of production warrant the money he seeks this year?

  225. Russ on May 10th, 2007 12:45 pm

    Mariners_World_Series_Bound, re: ERA

    You are barking up the wrong tree here…Not only are you wrong, you are trying to convince a group of knowledgeable baseball analysts that they are wrong.

    The equivalent of sellling ice cubes to Eskimos.

    hope this helps

  226. Evan on May 10th, 2007 12:45 pm

    First of all, holy small sample size, batman. Ichiro actually outperformed both 2006 and his career averages in April this year. He’s doing pretty much what he always does.

    Whether Ichiro stays will not be based on money. If we suck, Ichiro will leave (and probably go play for Boston).

  227. IdahoInvader on May 10th, 2007 12:47 pm

    What makes these Weaver abortions even harder to be subjected to, is that the M’s have scored just 12 runs in his six starts.

    I guess they figure, what’s the bother?

  228. Josh on May 10th, 2007 12:48 pm

    Roy Halladay and his 10.64 ERA over 67.2 IP in 2000 say hello.

  229. IdahoInvader on May 10th, 2007 12:49 pm

    Oh pardon me…THIRTEEN runs now.

  230. Josh on May 10th, 2007 12:51 pm

    With that double, Guillen’s OPS crosses .800.

  231. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 12:54 pm

    224 – I’m not trying to convince anyone that they’re wrong. I’m just stating simple fact that career ERA is an indication of how good a pitcher is whether anyone likes it or not. It’s a little behind the times now that people have developed newer statistical evaluations, but it doesn’t mean that ERA has no meaning.

    It’s also a more accessable stat, and one that 99 percent of fans look at when evaultating a pitcher. This blog obviously wants to teach those 99 percent of fans a better way to evaluate pitching talent, but that doesn’t mean we can’t still bring it up now and again. It’s still a fun stat, and it always will be.

  232. Dave on May 10th, 2007 12:54 pm

    Also, just for fun, here are the pitchers I recommended the Mariners acquire this past offseason, followed by their 2006 ERA, and then their 2007 ERA.

    Tim Hudson – 4.86, 1.70
    Rodrigo Lopez – 5.90, 1.59 (though, to be fair, he is currently on the DL)
    Claudio Vargas – 4.83, 2.65
    Angel Guzman – 7.39, 2.19

    The collective ERA of the guys I wanted to bring to Seattle was about 5.50 last year. Their collective ERA this year? About 2.25.

    Maybe we know something about evaluating pitchers that ERA does not…

  233. Dave on May 10th, 2007 12:57 pm

    Horse and buggies are also a more accessable mode of transportation, and one that 99 percent of people look to when commuting. These “car people” obviously wants to teach those 99 percent of commuters a better way to get around town, but that doesn’t mean we can’t take our carriages. It’s still a great way to get around, and it always will be.

    Your comment, re-written to fit into early 20th century history.

  234. Dave on May 10th, 2007 1:00 pm

    I’m just stating simple fact that career ERA is an indication of how good a pitcher is whether anyone likes it or not.

    And finally:

    Horacio Ramirez, career ERA: 4.29
    Jeremy Bonderman, career ERA: 4.69

  235. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 1:02 pm

    I tend to look at career ERA as oppposed to single-season ERA. Also, those low ERA’s will eventually….

    regress
    to
    the
    mean

    of their true ERA.

  236. bergamot on May 10th, 2007 1:02 pm

    If you throw out Innings 1, 2, 4, and 5, Jeff Weaver’s ERA today was 0.00. Clearly, ERA sez that he should only pitch in the third inning.

  237. feingarden on May 10th, 2007 1:04 pm

    “…one that 99 percent of fans look at when evaultating a pitcher.”

    Dave – Maybe it’s time to put up that link to the list of logical fallacies again. I don’t have it handy at the moment, otherwise I’d do the honors myself.

  238. Evan on May 10th, 2007 1:05 pm

    Roy Halladay and his 10.64 ERA over 67.2 IP in 2000 say hello.

    To be fair, Halladay was sent down to single-A and completely reinvented his mechanics after that.

  239. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 1:07 pm

    Who’s to say Ramirez won’t regress to his career ERA eventually this season?

    Ramirez sucks, but Bonderman isn’t exactly a world beater himself.

  240. CSG on May 10th, 2007 1:08 pm

    Dave,

    do you think there will be a time when stats like xFIP become the stats that people casually reference? Do you think that one day you’ll be able to open a newspaper (or a futuristic holographic newspaper) and see the AL leaders for xFIP, VORP, etc., instead of wins, ERA, BA?

  241. Eleven11 on May 10th, 2007 1:09 pm

    On a slightly different measure of performance, excluding Boone and Olerude, out of Bavasi’s free agents, how many millions has he DFA’d? This may be a new stat, Earned Dollars Wasted. (Am foolishly assuming that Weaver is not long for the M’s)

  242. CSG on May 10th, 2007 1:09 pm

    #238

    Bonderman’s one of the better pitchers in the majors.

  243. Dave on May 10th, 2007 1:09 pm

    Who’s to say Ramirez won’t regress to his career ERA eventually this season?

    Well, he’s obviously not going to post a 7.50 ERA all year, but he won’t get near 4.29 either. His career ERA isn’t even close to his actual talent level.

    Ramirez sucks, but Bonderman isn’t exactly a world beater himself.

    See, this is why your slavish devotion to ERA is a bad thing. Jeremy Bonderman is one of the five best pitchers in the A.L., but you don’t know it yet.

  244. feingarden on May 10th, 2007 1:11 pm

    240 – Good idea; stats for management! I like Earned Dollars Wasted, and would suggest Salary Per Win as another metric that our beloved M’s might show poorly at.

  245. Benno on May 10th, 2007 1:13 pm

    Well, I certainly hope that this $8.3M experiment with Weaver as a starter has come to a close. He has to be sent to the pen after this. Perhaps the best result would be Weaver refusing to pitch out of the pen, and the M’s suspending him without pay. Its a possible way to get our money back. Out of curiosity, are there any other options for starters in the minors?

  246. Dave on May 10th, 2007 1:14 pm

    do you think there will be a time when stats like xFIP become the stats that people casually reference? Do you think that one day you’ll be able to open a newspaper (or a futuristic holographic newspaper) and see the AL leaders for xFIP, VORP, etc., instead of wins, ERA, BA?

    No, I don’t. But I do think we’re on the cusp of a statistical revolution, and that things like xFIP are going to be overtaken in usefulness within 5 years. Once we start getting advanced ball-tracking data, we’re going to have some incredible resources at our disposal that will totally reinvent the way we understand how to evaluate players.

    I think we’ll see a future where it’s not uncommon to see the average speed of a batted ball of a pitcher listed, or the average distance of a flyball by a certain hitter. Who needs slugging percentage when we know that Willie Bloomquist’s flyballs only travel 138 feet, while Ryan Howards travel 384 feet? Who needs BABIP when we know that hitters can only hit the ball 34 MPH off of Felix Hernandez but are hitting it 108 MPH off of Jeff Weaver?

    So I think we will see a mainstream revolution in which statistics are given credibility, but they will be tangibly measured things that happen during games, and not statistical formulas that have to be calculated in a database.

  247. Dave on May 10th, 2007 1:15 pm

    240 – Good idea; stats for management! I like Earned Dollars Wasted, and would suggest Salary Per Win as another metric that our beloved M’s might show poorly at.

    This has already been done, pioneered by the late Doug Pappas. It’s called Marginal Dollars/Marginal Wins. If you google for Pappas’ work, you’ll find some really interesting stuff.

  248. CSG on May 10th, 2007 1:25 pm

    #245

    Do you think that such advanced batted ball data could eliminate the need for scouting at the major league level?

  249. Dave on May 10th, 2007 1:28 pm

    Do you think that such advanced batted ball data could eliminate the need for scouting at the major league level?

    Scouting will never be eliminated, because their reports serve a totally different role than statistics do. They can see physical changes in players immediately, while stats have to wait for an adequate sample size to pile up before any firm conclusions can be drawn. If you want to know if a pitcher’s healthy, you want a recent scouting report. If you want to know how to pitch to a certain hitter, you want a scouting report.

    There are a lot of things that scouts can do that simply can’t be automated. Scouts are here to stay.

  250. Sports on a Schtick on May 10th, 2007 1:32 pm

    Is there any chance of salvaging the Weaver fiasco by trading Nightmare to a team (back to the pitching-starved Cards perhaps), eating most his salary and getting back a very mediocre prospect?

  251. CSG on May 10th, 2007 1:34 pm

    Yeah, I guess I got ahead of myself a bit. It’ll be interesting to see what people are able to do with all that data once it becomes a reality. It pretty amazing to see the advances in the evaluation of fielding due to what Baseball Info Solutions is doing.

  252. gwangung on May 10th, 2007 1:38 pm

    224 – I’m not trying to convince anyone that they’re wrong. I’m just stating simple fact that career ERA is an indication of how good a pitcher is whether anyone likes it or not.

    So’s pressing your finger to the metal to see how hot it is. Think I prefer to keep my fingers and use a thermometer, at least….

    You’re using a very gross and blunt instrument to determine finer gradations than warranted (moreover, you’re not recognizing those finer gradations as existing).

  253. Zero Gravitas on May 10th, 2007 1:39 pm

    236 – here it is:
    http://www.csun.edu/~dgw61315/fallacies.html

    I think the one you were looking for is argumentum ad numerum…

    hjw

  254. terrybenish on May 10th, 2007 2:08 pm

    226 First of all, holy small sample size, batman. Ichiro actually outperformed both 2006 and his career averages in April this year.

    Not.

    His 05 numbers were a significant drop from 04…06 the same as 05 and so far in 07 he’s below 06…

    Contrasted to other cf in the league, he is average offensively. There are seven center fielders in AL who have a superior OPS. Tori Hunter, Johnny Damon, Grady Sizemore, Curtis Granderson, Vernon Wells, David Dejesus and Gary Matthews Jr..

    Let him go or trade him, where ever the leverage best happens. Hugely over-rated. If Randy Johnson and Junior can be traded and Alex Rodriguez let go, certainly he can as his talent level does not approach any of them at the stage they were released.

  255. garhof on May 10th, 2007 2:12 pm

    Just waiting for the day that we don’t have to hear about the injury prone, career .240 hitter that is Christopher Doyle Snelling. Who is, by the way, once again, injured. I am quite sure he was a sweetheart of a young man… but PLEASE. Give it up.

  256. CouchGM on May 10th, 2007 2:24 pm

    What are the Mariner options with Weaver that have the least financial impact. i.e. I belive trading him and his contract would have the least impact and thus be the biggest bonus. Next would be to trade him and have to pay just some of his salary? What would it take for the M’s to be free of his contract? If they just release him, someone would have to pick him up off waivers for the M’s to be off the hook. Right?

  257. scraps on May 10th, 2007 2:26 pm

    I’ve seen more sophisticated statistics get gradually but eventually widely adopted within my lifetime. To take two examples, in the 1970s you never saw On Base Average or Yards Per Pass Attempt so much as mentioned in the paper or on TV, let alone routinely listed and casually discussed as they are now.

    When did ERA become widely accepted? Wins and losses must have come first, right?

  258. Dave on May 10th, 2007 2:27 pm

    Just waiting for the day that we don’t have to hear about the injury prone, career .240 hitter that is Christopher Doyle Snelling. Who is, by the way, once again, injured. I am quite sure he was a sweetheart of a young man… but PLEASE. Give it up.

    You should probably just go away then.

  259. scraps on May 10th, 2007 2:27 pm

    255: I’ll bet you’re a conversational hit wherever you go.

  260. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 2:28 pm

    But garhof, he’s got a good eye at the plate and he walks sometimes! He’s also all of what’s wrong with the Mariners, and represents all the good things about the game!

    Unless Doyle can suit up as our 5th starter and be dependable, he’d be pretty much worthless on this team. Not to mention any other team in the majors.

    Unwarranted Doyle hating! Deal with it!

  261. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 2:28 pm

    Weaver’s double in Mariner history:

    In 1986, the Mariners signed free agent pitcher Milt Wilcox, the No. 2 starter on the 1984 World Champion Tigers (17-8, 4.00 ERA).

    The M’s, often citing that World Series grit and his experience, stuck with an obviously finished Wilcox for 10 stars, during which he went 0-8.

    His ERA was “just” 5.50, but it was obviously to one and all that he was getting his brains beaten out — he gave up 74 hits in 55 2/3 innings, 11 home runs, walked 28 and struck out just 26.

    TEN starts of this. It was a big part of an awful start to an awful year, one which saw the M’s make a terrible midseason trade to Boston (Dave Henderson and Spike Owen for Rey Quinones, Mike Brown and Mike Trujillo) just to wash out the aftertaste.

  262. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 2:30 pm

    Maybe they can fit Doyle with a special wheelchair that he can use to hit with. It’s the only way he’ll ever play a full season in the majors.

  263. Dave on May 10th, 2007 2:31 pm

    If you want to be a troll, you can go elsewhere. Otherwise, you’ve made your opinion known, so now, you can move on to talking about something else.

  264. scraps on May 10th, 2007 2:32 pm

    Deal with it!

    One of the top five ways to say I Am Being a Jerk.

  265. scraps on May 10th, 2007 2:33 pm

    Cueing: You Guys Only Want To Hear Opinions You Agree With.

  266. scraps on May 10th, 2007 2:35 pm

    In defense of that trade, Jim, Quinones looked like he had a chance to be something special, and Henderson and Owen were career mediocrities. Even though Henderson had some big-stage moments later in his career, the trade was defensible at the time it was made.

  267. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 2:36 pm

    So, you’re saying I should remove the pin needles I constantly stick into my voodoo Doyle dolls?

    Never.

    *wait for it*

  268. Robo Ape on May 10th, 2007 2:37 pm

    This is a late coming question, but in the intro to this post are those . and + indicative of when the team(s) scored EXACTLY that many runs or AT LEAST that many runs. Also, despite the run differentials in the league, for what it’s worth (maybe nothing) I thought these runs/game were interesting:

    Texas 4.79 r/g
    Seattle 4.77 r/g
    Anaheim 4.06 r/g
    Oakland 3.88 r/g

  269. Dave on May 10th, 2007 2:38 pm

    We’re saying don’t be a jerk and respect the fact that people around here have an emotional attachment to the guy.

  270. Evan on May 10th, 2007 2:41 pm

    Not.

    His 05 numbers were a significant drop from 04…06 the same as 05 and so far in 07 he’s below 06…

    His April numbers. He performed as well in April 2007 as he did in April 2006 (better, actually), and as well a he always has in April, consistently his worst month.

    Ichiro’s Aprils are always about what we saw this April.

    How hard is this?

  271. nfreakct on May 10th, 2007 2:56 pm

    If Weaver is moved into the bullpen, how useful is he going to be? Even with the usual improvements a pitcher gains from going from starting to relieving, Weaver honestly looks so bad at this point that even then I can’t imagine him being much better than mop-up.

    Or is he so bad the Mariners won’t even give him that chance?

  272. joealb1 on May 10th, 2007 2:59 pm

    To Mariners_World_Series_Bound, Please read or re-read the comment guidelines.

  273. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 3:02 pm

    Scraps, what bugged me most about 1986 is the the M’s made lip service to a significant youth movement, but never really gave a full and fair shot to Danny Tartabull (wrongly playing him at second base, where he was horrible), Ivan Calderon and especially Mickey Brantley (who I still think is owed a HUGE apology for the way his whole career was handled; her’s the Roberto Petagine of his generation). Donell Nixon was dumped too quickly, too. The M’s didn’t have the courage to back up the vision, and pretty much threw the rest of the 1980s under the bus as a result — cashing in promising youngsters for mediocrities like Mike Kingery and Glenn Wilson and Steve Trout.

    Jim Presley was on his way to being the Sexson of his time.

  274. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    And meanwhile, Edgar Martinez was vainly waving his hands from Calgary, shouting: “Hello? Bueller? Bueller?”

  275. scraps on May 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    Jim, yeah, you bring the memory of all that frustration back vividly.

  276. msb on May 10th, 2007 3:08 pm

    I am enjoying imagining Edgar saying ‘Bueller’.

  277. Jim Thomsen on May 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    Sorry … sometimes you just just can’t choke back 30 years of frustration any longer, and it comes back up in big impolitic belches of verbalized memory.

  278. scraps on May 10th, 2007 3:11 pm

    Danny Tartabull was the dry run for Gary Sheffield.

  279. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 3:12 pm

    Jim, the reason why the 00′s are survivable for me was I was reading Bill James AND a Mariners fan in the 1980′s. One of his essays was growing up an A’s fan in the 1960′s under the reign of error of Charlie Finley- but at least he had the innocence of relative ignoance of advanced baseball statistics helping out. It was pretty terrible to love a team, see talented young players come up, while knowing they were being horribly, HORRIBLY mismanaged in an awful, mostly empty ballpark.

    At least now the ballpark doesn’t suck.

  280. eponymous coward on May 10th, 2007 3:17 pm

    Oh, and Presley was more like the slow, white version of Adrian Beltre, if he was never coached for ANY plate discipline. The guy was for all intents and purposes washed up at age 26.

  281. Brian Rust on May 10th, 2007 3:17 pm

    So, we signed Weaver basically because he heroically beat Detroit last October. Will Hargrove and Bavasi now conclude it’s not a repeatable skill?

  282. terrybenish on May 10th, 2007 3:30 pm

    270

    His April numbers. He performed as well in April 2007 as he did in April 2006 (better, actually), and as well a he always has in April, consistently his worst month.
    Ichiro’s Aprils are always about what we saw this April.
    How hard is this?

    That’s not what you wrote…be precise and his May sucks too and he’s not the long term answwer. How hard is that?

    Eight cfs are better than him now…just about the same as the whole of 2006…that’s average by definition.

    If lighting a match to multiple years for Sexson or Batista is a waste, why do the same thing for Ichiro? He’s not going to get better.

  283. Tom on May 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    Bye Weaver!

    Don’t let the frickin’ door hit you on the way out.

  284. msb on May 10th, 2007 3:46 pm

    sigh. KJR. Vidro is a good signing because he is hitting .306.

    more entertaining– a nice ramble on age & ballplayers from Caple with some fine Rickey quotes.

  285. Nuss on May 10th, 2007 3:47 pm

    Is anyone else excited by the offense’s performance the past three days? That sure was a welcome sight, even if they could only scratch out three runs today. Now, I’d like to see Hargrove move Guillen up to that No. 3 hole — someone who gives them a little pop who’s swinging a hot bat.

  286. DizzleChizzle on May 10th, 2007 3:47 pm

    Didn’t someone mention a while back that they should/could move Weaver to the bullpen?

  287. CSG on May 10th, 2007 3:54 pm

    His May has been 10 days long. I don’t think it’s a good idea to assume he’s going to suck all month based on 10 days. Ichiro’s a streaky hitter; you have to live with it.

  288. Nuss on May 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    286: Sure, you could, which seems like the logical move when Felix comes back. But you’re still stuck with HoRam, because the cupboard is absolutely bare at Tacoma, in terms of starting pitchers.

    Not to beat a dead horse, but man it would be nice to have Emiliano Fruto right about now …

  289. CSG on May 10th, 2007 4:00 pm

    285

    I said in last night’s game thread that this is a fun offense to watch when they’re hitting. They’ve done it against good pitching this series, too, which is good to see. I’ve been really happy with the Guillen signing. Raul’s power outage is concerning, though.

  290. Grizz on May 10th, 2007 4:02 pm

    Ichiro finished sixth in VORP among major league centerfielders last year. There are thirty major leagues teams. How is that average?

  291. DizzleChizzle on May 10th, 2007 4:04 pm

    288. I just don’t see this guy being all that great out of the bullpen either. He can’t even get out of the 1st inning of the game with out getting smacked around like a stepchild.

  292. gwangung on May 10th, 2007 4:05 pm

    Ichiro finished sixth in VORP among major league centerfielders last year. There are thirty major leagues teams. How is that average?

    ‘ Cause it ain’t superblindingly obviously superior…

    (And he brings some value as a fielder, too, I’d say…)

  293. IdahoInvader on May 10th, 2007 4:06 pm

    284

    Thanks for the link. Its probably a sign of me feeling older every passing day as I’m in my mid 30′s, but I really enjoy seeing guys like Franco, Moyer, Omar, Johnson, etc have success well past their contemporaries.

    Pretty soon, one of them will lay claim as the last player from the 1980′s. (Like Cliff Robinson in the NBA fwiw)

  294. CSG on May 10th, 2007 4:08 pm

    #291

    I think Weaver could still be alright out of the bullpen. The difference between ok Weaver and war-crime atrocious Weaver seems to be the velocity on his fastball. If he’s put in the bullpen and doesn’t have to consider pacing himself, he may pick up a couple MPH on his fastball, and regain some effectiveness.

  295. joser on May 10th, 2007 4:15 pm

    It would be nice to still have Soriano in the pen, and Morrow learning to be a starter in Tacoma while we’re at it. In fact, it would be nice to undo pretty much all the offseason transactions right about now. Though I don’t mind Guillen — no talent was given up to get him, and assuming his legs don’t give out on him (Drayer on the radio said last night he’s hurt both his ankles so far this season) so far he’s been a reasonable return for the money. Guys trying to reset their careers after a serious injury are often a bargain (see Frank Thomas, Jim Thome, Jermaine Dye, etc) though the risk of them being absolutely useless is far higher too, of course.

  296. Joe on May 10th, 2007 4:27 pm

    Somebody mentioned opening those holographic newspapers to read advanced stats (actually, it’s far more likely you’ll just be reading your customized internet newstream on a retinal display fed by your phone, but anyway). And Pappas’ marginal wins came up for evaluating GMs. What I’d like to know is whether anyone has used the leverage stats as a way to evaluate and compare managers’ use of their bullpens? Bullpen management is probably the biggest contribution a manager makes towards whether his team wins or loses a particular game, and given how a by-the-book manager (ie “role” and “save stat” driven) can be strongly at odds with the information LI gives us (or a good manager feels “in his gut”), good vs bad management should stand out fairly clearly. It would take some work to put the data together, however, because to do it right you’d have to take into account who was available (vs worn out by recent appearances) and factor in matchups, LOOGYs, etc. So I guess I’m asking if anyone has done anything like that?

  297. revbill on May 10th, 2007 4:52 pm

    I thought I remembered this, and I found the story from January 6 of this year:

    Weaver, 30, was deciding whether to push for a one- or two-year contract, FOXSports.com reported Thursday. He apparently decided to go for a one-year deal so he can explore free agency after this season.

    I bet he’s rethinking that decision, but it may have helped Bavasi dodge a bullet. At least by next year this will all just be another painful memory.

  298. JMHawkins on May 10th, 2007 5:01 pm

    of their true ERA.

    I don’t think a pitcher has a true ERA, assuming you mean true ERA as an inherent talent/skill level for the guy. ERA is a lot like RBI – it’s not so much a measure of talent as it is of luck intersected with talent. Likewise ERA, as the article Dave constantly links to explains.

    But I think ERA and RBI hold sway over people who believe in clutchness, because “clutch” only comes into play when runs are on the line. Ergo, ERA and RBIs are not measures of skill+luck, they are measures of skill+grit.

    So I propose we start calling them Grit-RA and Grit-BI’s. Weaver’s grit-RA indicates he doesn’t have enough grit to be on the team.

  299. bergamot on May 10th, 2007 5:06 pm

    Weaver has had poor-to-awful beginnings, which is not a good talent in someone coming out of the bullpen. Unless he has a good L/R split to allow him to be used as a situational reliever, I assume he’ll be tossed into games that are already lost. Of course, Grover may appoint him to be the new Guy-To-Get-A-Groundball now that Mateo is (temporarily?) out of the picture.

  300. B_Con on May 10th, 2007 6:41 pm

    Weaver should start throwing side armed knuckle eephus’. That’d be better for the team than his “2 seamer”.

  301. Greg08 on May 10th, 2007 6:47 pm

    weaver is terrible

    Can Weaver even COUNT to his era?

  302. DizzleChizzle on May 10th, 2007 7:24 pm

    #294 So you’d be pretty confident with him coming out of the bullpen with let’s say a 1 run lead?

  303. Gomez on May 10th, 2007 7:25 pm

    I wanna see Terry name out the eight center fielders that are better than Ichiro.

  304. awolfgang on May 10th, 2007 7:26 pm

    I know the ERA validity argument has been beaten to death in this post, and I 100% agree with Dave and the other 99% of the ussmariner nation that believe ERA is useless for accurate pitcher evaulation. I read the evaluating a pitcher post just last week and think it should be required reading for all Baseball announcers and writers.

    So how about this middle ground:
    From baseball-reference.com

    GmSc – Game Score – This is a value created by Bill James that evaluates how good a pitcher’s start was.

    Start with 50 points. Add 1 point for each out recorded, (or 3 points per inning). Add 2 points for each inning completed after the 4th. Add 1 point for each strikeout. Subtract 2 points for each hit allowed. Subtract 4 points for each earned run allowed. Subtract 2 points for each unearned run allowed. Subtract 1 point for each walk.

    Mariners’ W-L
    GmSc => 50 11-0
    GmSc

  305. awolfgang on May 10th, 2007 7:27 pm

    the last should have been GmScr below 50 4-15

  306. DMZ on May 10th, 2007 7:35 pm

    Game score is fun, like quality starts, but it’s nothing more than that.

  307. John D. on May 10th, 2007 8:33 pm

    Game score is fun, like quality starts, but it’s nothing more than that. (See # 306.)

    And it’s quite subjective. Suppose Bill had valued economy of pitches as much as he did strikeouts, giving a point for each pitch below 100? Then KERRY WOOD would no longer hold the distinction of having pitched the best game in MLB history It would be Red Barrett.
    http://tinyurl.com/cgjay

  308. awolfgang on May 10th, 2007 8:42 pm

    The only thing I think that it shows is that the M’s bullpen and the batters haven’t blown a well pitched game by the pitcher, and they have managed to overcome 4 poorly pitched games.

  309. Mariners_World_Series_Bound on May 10th, 2007 10:08 pm

    New template looks great, good job DMZ&Company.

    I am succumbing to the “ERA is not a great way to evalutate pitcher talent” arguement.

    I’m also dropping the Doyle comments, wasn’t aware so many dug him so much around here.

  310. msb on May 10th, 2007 10:16 pm

    that Brandon Inge, sharp as a tack–

    “It’s an easy difference,” said Inge, who saw Weaver last season when the right-hander helped the Cardinals win the World Series. “He pitched well then, not so well today.”

  311. msb on May 10th, 2007 10:33 pm

    new template doesn’t adequately convey contagious and sunny optimism of USSM authors and community

    what you said.

  312. CSG on May 10th, 2007 10:54 pm

    #302

    First I’d like to see him in mop up work, just to see if the move to the bullpen does help him out. I wouldn’t immediately throw him into high-leverage situations, as he’s never been a reliever.

  313. Axtell on May 10th, 2007 11:30 pm

    How terrible a pitcher are you when you throw 5 1/3, you give up 6 runs, and your ERA actually goes down?

    Weaver’s now 0-6, and he’s not getting better…when Felix comes back, is Weaver done? I’d rather the M’s simply cut him loose and pay him his salary than give this guy any more chances to lose games. And bullpen work? Please, he’s obviously not cut out to be a MLB pitcher.

  314. Beniitec on May 10th, 2007 11:43 pm

    I like the new look as well. Great work fellas.

  315. Tak on May 11th, 2007 1:01 am

    Great template, I love it. Good job.

    #313 – Hopefully they can convince him to play for the Angels so he gives them negative contribution. Maybe that’s worth a few million.

  316. 88fingerslukee on May 11th, 2007 7:11 am

    Hey Derek, what about the enhanced post buttons? Are they coming back?

  317. 88fingerslukee on May 11th, 2007 7:13 am

    Also, would it be difficult to put a year on the date for your posts? When I go check out previous year posts the date is there but I can’t tell which year it’s from. Not a huge thing, but it would be nice.

  318. gwangung on May 11th, 2007 7:45 am

    Like the look, hate the blockquote (can’t read ‘em; the contrast is often very wonky).

    AT MOST….mop up work for Weaver. He shouldn’t even get near the start of a game.

    But, of course….there’s a world of difference between “should” and “will”…

  319. 88fingerslukee on May 11th, 2007 8:15 am

    Agreed, the blockquote is weak. It’s almost impossible to read. Perhaps just making the font darker. not sure about all that though.

  320. DMZ on May 11th, 2007 8:45 am

    Stop complaining. Especially if it’s on the to-do list. Seriously, it’s really annoying.

  321. Steve T on May 11th, 2007 9:40 am

    I think you should move everything a little over to the left, and then a little back over to the right.

  322. Evan on May 11th, 2007 10:03 am

    I think you should move everything a little over to the left, and then a little back over to the right.

    LET’S DO THE TIME WARP AGAIN!

  323. eponymous coward on May 11th, 2007 10:12 am

    I think that rather than conveying contagious and sunny optimism, your theme should be conveying gritty intangibles. Call it the “Willie Bloomquist” theme.

    Can we add that to the to-do list?

  324. PositivePaul on May 11th, 2007 10:22 am

    Hmmm. Another to add to the “Theme To Do Items” list:

    There’s not enough beer. Need more beer.

    kthxbye!

  325. westfried on May 11th, 2007 10:23 am

    In the meantime, you can highlight the blockquote with your mouse, which makes it look dark blue.

    Thanks for all the work on the site, Derek.

  326. eponymous coward on May 11th, 2007 10:25 am

    Also, we should be upping the quota of Unjustified Vidro Hatred in the theme.

  327. msb on May 11th, 2007 10:43 am

    cowbell?

  328. gwangung on May 11th, 2007 10:43 am

    Also, shouldn’t there be a couple hundred units of snark built into the template…

    Plus a minor temple or two for Doyle worship…

    I’d be very surprised NOT to see Weaver in the rotation again. Pleasantly surprised, but surprised nonetheless…

  329. 88fingerslukee on May 11th, 2007 10:43 am

    “Stop complaining. Especially if it’s on the to-do list. Seriously, it’s really annoying.”

    Sorry, I thought that I read the To Do list and didn’t see those in there. I apologize about the “complaining”.

  330. eponymous coward on May 11th, 2007 10:53 am

    From DMZ’s post:

    “Please don’t just complain – I need help a lot more than I need to hear that we suck or whatever.

    Also, and I can’t stress this enough: this is not my strong point. I wouldn’t do this if I didn’t have to. So help, or leave me and the people who are helping alone.”

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.