Game 59, Mariners at Padres

DMZ · June 10, 2007 at 11:59 am · Filed Under Game Threads 

Happy Felix Day! 1:05.

I don’t want to make a big deal out of it, but this (and Felix’s next start against the even weaker Astros lineup including the shell of Biggio) are a fine time for him to put up some great numbers. Mix pitches early! Seriously! It’s the key to life!

Faces Chris Young, so I’m looking forward to a great pitching matchup, though looking through past game threads, it looks like hoping for great pitching matchups rarely results in them. Still, I always enjoy looking forward to seeing Felix.

Comments

386 Responses to “Game 59, Mariners at Padres”

  1. Gerald on June 10th, 2007 12:09 pm

    I think something like “Happy Felix Day?” would be more appropriate until he gets back on track. It’s certainly a better reflection of my feelings.

  2. bigred on June 10th, 2007 12:13 pm

    A pox on your house Gerald. Felix rules!!!!

  3. Gerald on June 10th, 2007 12:19 pm

    I’ll give him a ! for every groundball and subtract a ! for every flyball. That seems to me like the best way to gauge whether he’s back.

  4. IdahoInvader on June 10th, 2007 12:27 pm

    As long as we don’t have to see Raul lunging toward any fly balls, Beltre bunting, Davis pitching, Kenji not sliding, or Guillen in a fog, then we’ll win easily

    ;-)

  5. AuburnM on June 10th, 2007 12:27 pm

    To truly contend we need Felix and the bullpen to be great, Washburn to be good, and Batista, Baeck, and Weaver/Feirabend/HoRam to be adequate.

    Lets see the real Felix today!

  6. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 12:31 pm

    Is this game on TV? Channel?

  7. msb on June 10th, 2007 12:35 pm

    ch.11, according to my magnetic schedule

  8. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 12:40 pm

    I hate the Angels so so much.

  9. joser on June 10th, 2007 12:45 pm

    Burke in the lineup, so no Kenji non-slides. Standard day-after night thing, but a little “rest” is probably justified anyway. And Burke knows how to bunt, which is always a good thing when playing the NL.

  10. jefffrane on June 10th, 2007 12:45 pm

    #6: Depends on where you are and what you’re watching. Comcast here in Portland has it on Channel 3. The CW. Maybe they’re reaching for the teen audience.

  11. joser on June 10th, 2007 12:50 pm

    This is a good pitching matchup. We’re just lucky the M’s managed to miss Peavy. The FIP leaders (qualified) go Peavy, Beckett, Bonderman, Penny, and Mr Young here (ahead of Haren). The M’s better take advantage when they can, and try to get to that bullpen again.

    And elsewhere RJ is facing Dice-K. Not a bad Sunday for baseball.

  12. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 12:51 pm

    MSB – finish our mrs. reynolds last night?

  13. joser on June 10th, 2007 12:52 pm

    #10. Chan 11 is the CW in the Seattle area (at least OTA). As in the past few years, they have a contract to broadcast some small number of M’s games that aren’t handled by Fox/FSN or ESPN.

  14. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 12:56 pm

    Is anyone watching this thing on TV about Kenji? I was surprised to see that he likes his pitchers to pitch good games. I was also really glad that the woman had to demonstrate the difference between over the top and sidearm…

  15. Tom on June 10th, 2007 12:56 pm

    Mix pitches early, mix pitches in the middle, mix pitches late. It’s the key to life and it’s called keeping the hitter guessing.

  16. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 12:56 pm

    mix drinks later…

  17. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 12:58 pm

    Why do we have to wait to mix drinks? Its Felix Day, let’s all celebrate!

  18. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 12:59 pm

    13. ‘Small number’ seems like a lot when you’re in a cable lineup that no longer gets KSTW. Seems like it’s about one game a week. *bitter, bitter*

    Dammit, not only are the Angels losing, but no one in the WC race.

  19. joser on June 10th, 2007 12:59 pm

    Bloomquist in the lineup at 3B again. Beltre must still be hurting. I’m worried this is going to turn into a problem all season — and just at the time when his bat starts to heat up. Plus we’re going to miss his defense. Grit is no substitute.

  20. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:00 pm

    We’ve never swept our hated rivals?

  21. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 1:01 pm

    that should be the Angels are *not* losing, and no one else in the WC race.

    Maybe I do need to mix some drinks.

  22. Gerald on June 10th, 2007 1:03 pm

    The Wild Card race is only going to get hotter, because the Yankees are on fire.

  23. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:04 pm

    22 – can you not say things like that so I’m not tempted to try and burn my computer screen? Please?

  24. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:06 pm

    Games on the CW: five in April, six in May, four in June, four in July, five in August, six in September. So, yeah, about one a week. But it’s still only 30/162 =

  25. The Decider on June 10th, 2007 1:06 pm

    If the Mariners win 85 games and miss the playoffs, does everyone get to keep their jobs? I think so. I wonder what minimum number ownership would be satisfied with.

    And I wonder if the king will show us why he wears the crown today.

  26. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 1:08 pm

    Thanks all…I’m in Seattle…I guess I should have made that clear. Looks like CW is it.

    Happy Felix day everyone. Here’s to grounders and knee buckling curves.

  27. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 1:08 pm

    GO M’s!!

  28. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:10 pm

    OK, this is the first Ms game I’ve seen with my new HDTV… I thought everything was widescreen?

  29. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:10 pm

    How oh how are we going to be able to tell where the pitches are located without Joe’s Tracer?

  30. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:11 pm

    Cardinals pull ahead of the Angels!!!!

  31. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 1:11 pm

    SD has Happy Star pitch locater.

  32. brian_sun on June 10th, 2007 1:12 pm

    Albert Pujos just hit a 3 run jack to put the Cardinals up by 2 over the Angels. Da*n, can those guys lose once a while?

  33. colm on June 10th, 2007 1:12 pm

    Are the Yankees on fire because they all deserve to be in hell?

    Just a thought. Scarcely an original one either. I think there’s a musical about it.

  34. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 1:13 pm

    Did you guys notice that the Padres are now the number one team on the “power rankings” on ESPN…and that we’re about to sweep them at home?

  35. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:13 pm

    Well, the M’s have been on fire so far this month too. It just hasn’t seemed like it because the Angels and A’s (and Yankees) have kept pace. This shows how nice it is to get an early lead in the pennant race, so you have some breathing room later. Just ask the Red Sox. Or the Brewers (who, by the way, now actually have a worse winning percentage than the M’s, despite leading their division by 5 games. Wouldn’t it be nice to play everybody in the NL Central except the Brewers this year in interleague? Oh, hey, wait a minute…)

  36. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:15 pm

    Can anyone tell me why Bloomquist is playing? I thought Beltre was OK.

  37. terry on June 10th, 2007 1:15 pm

    How much of Chris Young’s success is Chris Young and how much of it is Petco? He’s got a good Krate but he’ll also walk guys with pretty extreme flyball tendencies. This seaso he has an insane HR/FB ration and he’s had some pretty high LOB% the last few seasons. To me he’s a good arm that has benefitted significantly from his environment as well as some decent luck. Would he look more like a league average arm if he played his home games in GABP or Comiskey?

  38. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:15 pm

    OK, this is the first Ms game I’ve seen with my new HDTV… I thought everything was widescreen?

    Lucky you. The CW broadcasts are all SD only, sorry. The FSN home games are HD; everything else is a crapshoot.

  39. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:16 pm

    33 – Damn Yankees – 1954 I believe, maybe 1955. Adler and Ross show. Choreographed by Mr. Bob Fosse. It’s not really about how they deserve to be in hell though, it’s more that this guy who is a fan of the Senators sells his soul to Mr. Applegate (the devil) so he can beat them.

  40. fargomsfan on June 10th, 2007 1:17 pm

    Time to bring the goods Felix

  41. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:17 pm

    38 – What Comcast plan has FSN HD?

    My TV is reporting the broadcast as 1080i, but clearly it’s not :(

  42. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:18 pm

    Albert Pujos just hit a 3 run jack to put the Cardinals up by 2 over the Angels. Da*n, can those guys lose once a while?

    The M’s kept the Cards from making a big contract mistake this offseason. They owe us. (Though perhaps the Curse of Spiezio outweighs all).

  43. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:18 pm

    38 – and don’t be impressed, it’s a 20″ TV I got from Woot!

  44. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 1:18 pm

    looks like a lot of fastballs to Giles

  45. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:19 pm

    I still remember the days when Weaver and Byrd were the top pitchers during the trade deadline.

  46. IdahoInvader on June 10th, 2007 1:19 pm

    33

    The Yanks feasted on a miseable ChiSox team, an even worse Pirates team and caught Boston during a pretty bad streak too. Oakland manhandled the Red Sox too, didn’t they?

    Yanks are definitely playing well, but haven’t faced too tough of a test lately, have they? I mean the Pirates have blow a lead in every game, I think.

  47. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:20 pm

    Gerald – did he lose a ! for the walk?

  48. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:21 pm

    Felix didn’t exactly hustle there.

  49. Julio Cruz on June 10th, 2007 1:22 pm

    Jose Guillen has looked AWFUL the past 3 games. Truly horrible. How long can Dudley keep him batting third?

  50. dw on June 10th, 2007 1:23 pm

    That was more like a splitter than a slider the way it dove.

  51. DMZ on June 10th, 2007 1:23 pm

    Unless you’re Julio Cruz, you need to go change your display name.

  52. colm on June 10th, 2007 1:24 pm

    chucking four seamers in a fastball count is not a brilliant strategy. What’s up with the 2 seamer?

  53. DMZ on June 10th, 2007 1:24 pm

    6 straight fastballs to Giles for the walk. Awesome.

  54. dw on June 10th, 2007 1:25 pm

    That’s the Felix I like. K on an unhittable ball, then turn a 2-0 into a 3-1 groundout.

  55. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:25 pm

    You’d have to talk to Comcast. I just know what their press release said. HD tends to be limited geographically by the physical plant (ie whether or not they’ve upgraded the pipes in the ground, etc) and when it comes to sports there’s contract complexities, too. If you’re not in the immediate Seattle area you might be SOL, I don’t know. Don’t forget the HD channels are separate from the standard ones (more than once in a bar I’ve had to tell them to tune up to 600 whatever because they were showing the SD version on their spanking new plasmas).

  56. Lauren, token chick on June 10th, 2007 1:26 pm

    Waaah. I want to SEE this one.

  57. dkulich44 on June 10th, 2007 1:26 pm

    50 – I’ve been seeing that slider and thought splitter all year. Whatever it is, its a pretty nasty pitch when he puts it on that corner to a lefty.

  58. dw on June 10th, 2007 1:27 pm

    BTW, if he’s Julio Cruz, I’m Darrell Waltrip, posting from the Pocono 500.

  59. colm on June 10th, 2007 1:29 pm

    Young seems to have a really easy going, nonchalant delivery for a guy who’s the height of a house.

  60. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:29 pm

    55 – yeah, Comcast is weird that way.

    Verizon FiOS or Fios or FIoS or however they capitalize it is supposed to be coming to my neighborhood soon. It will be nice to choose.

  61. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:29 pm

    Hargrove is apparently a big believer in allowing hitters to “battle through” their problems (see also that little horror flick “Richie Sexson and the Line of Mendoza”) so I’d expect we’d get to see Guillen suck for several weeks before he did anything. (Can we have another one of Hargrove’s kids graduate or get married or something so MacLaren can come in and do smart things with the lineup again? Note that Hargrove is still batting Lopez 2nd).

  62. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 1:29 pm

    gotta hand it to Giles…nifty play!

  63. Tim-in Tampa on June 10th, 2007 1:29 pm

    LAA just got a run they are only loosing by 1

  64. Julio Cruz on June 10th, 2007 1:30 pm

    I’m sorry if I offended you Derek. I’ve used this screen name for years. Julio was my favorite Mariner when I was a kid. Thanks for the warm welcome to the board!!

  65. fargomsfan on June 10th, 2007 1:30 pm

    Beating this guy isn’t going to happen with 9 pitch innings, that’s for sure

  66. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:33 pm

    I was sad when I had to change my alias from “Austin Kearns, International Man of Injury.”

  67. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 1:35 pm

    Is it just me or is Cammy looking gaunt?

  68. Julio Cruz on June 10th, 2007 1:36 pm

    Never mind. I’ll just go work on my book project: “The Cheater’s Guide to Baseball, Part II”

  69. Wells on June 10th, 2007 1:36 pm

    I trade Felix for Chris Young right now. Maybe you can get Khalil with him. Deal.

  70. ConorGlassey on June 10th, 2007 1:36 pm

    Welcome Julio! I don’t think Derek’s offended – it’s just against the rules he set for his site. Also – don’t call it a “board.”

    Here’s the rule from the “Comment Guidelines” link at the top…

    “Fake names are fine. Offensive names and assuming the names of public figures is not, and will get your posts and account deleted. If you’re famous and want to use your real name, email us, and we can work something out.

    In particular, pretending you’re a current Mariner player/coach/front office member is not cool. That includes taking their nickname. No “Felix Hernandez” no “King Felix” or anything. If you pick an obscure former non-M’s player, it’ll probably take us a lot longer to get around to asking you to change, since we have more important things on our plates.”

  71. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 1:37 pm

    Hate!Greene!

  72. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 1:37 pm

    Its called “sitting fastball”

    Note to Burke and Felix…ignore Chaves.

  73. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:39 pm

    The 3rd base ump has used a lot of conviction during his last two calls (Didn’t go in the bottom of the first, did go in the bottom of the second). I bet he’s making it up as he goes. There’s probably gonna be a pattern. Next one is safe… next on is not…

  74. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:39 pm

    Julio was my favorite when I was a kid too, so welcome. But see the note on “Identification” in the guidelines. (A friend in college used to call himself Cruelio Juze, but then he was a NY puerto rican jew)

  75. joser on June 10th, 2007 1:44 pm

    So who’s on the All-Spicoli team? Greene, of course. And Eric Byrnes (who somehow has his own fansite). Watching the A’s yesterday it looks like Travis Buck belongs. Who else?

  76. Norm Charlton Fan Club on June 10th, 2007 1:46 pm

    Felix coming up to the plate soon…how has he done at the plate so far in his career?

  77. jefffrane on June 10th, 2007 1:48 pm

    Ignition!

  78. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:48 pm

    When he says one of the things Willie does is hit and run… Does he only mean one of those two? Cuz I’d pick run, personally.

  79. Jordan of Boise on June 10th, 2007 1:49 pm

    C’mon felix, drive one in!

  80. dw on June 10th, 2007 1:49 pm

    This is why I like the DH.

  81. planB on June 10th, 2007 1:50 pm

    Nice!

  82. Wells on June 10th, 2007 1:50 pm

    1/5 all time! Go Felix.

  83. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:50 pm

    Felix!

  84. Norm Charlton Fan Club on June 10th, 2007 1:50 pm

    Felix RBI on a 2-strike bunt!!!

  85. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:50 pm

    80… Felix did better than Vidro would have.

  86. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 1:51 pm

    Better then Beltre did…

  87. Tim-in Tampa on June 10th, 2007 1:51 pm

    King Felix RBI?

  88. Lauren, token chick on June 10th, 2007 1:51 pm

    Haha. I so wish I could see Felix running the bases. Carefully.

  89. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 1:51 pm

    It’s always good when the pitcher gets a hit or RBI; makes the other hitters try harder.

    …or at least that’s what I hope.

  90. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:52 pm

    Felix’s BA is officially higher than Sexson’s.

  91. Wells on June 10th, 2007 1:53 pm

    88- Ichiro fielder’s-choiced Felix.

  92. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:55 pm

    Once again, Ichiro’s selfishness shows through.

    Seriously, Willie did try hard on that one.

  93. ConorGlassey on June 10th, 2007 1:55 pm

    Way to go, Willie!

  94. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 1:55 pm

    You are not good Willie Bloomquist.

  95. Wells on June 10th, 2007 1:56 pm

    Does Ichiro stay in his own hotel on the road?

  96. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 1:57 pm

    If only I could have seen where that high pitch was ACTUALLY located… but alas, Joe’s Tracer is not here today.

  97. UofMichgoMs on June 10th, 2007 1:58 pm

    How is Ichiro selfish on that one? He took third base when it was evident Bloomquist was gonna get out. If anything that was a good move for the team, now he is only 90 feet away.

  98. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 1:58 pm

    Damn, I was wrong. Only our pitcher showed the grit to get in a run!

  99. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 1:59 pm

    97… I wasn’t serious; I was mocking the occasional column or KJR rant about Ichiro!

  100. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 2:01 pm

    Spiezio with a two out double!!! 9 – 5 Cards!

  101. planB on June 10th, 2007 2:01 pm

    Mmmmmmmmmmm, two groundouts.

  102. davepaisley on June 10th, 2007 2:02 pm

    Spiezio (??!?!?!?) just homered to put the Cards up 9-5 against the Angels…

  103. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 2:02 pm

    Oh wait… Homer by spiezio, someone after him must have doubled.

  104. planB on June 10th, 2007 2:03 pm

    Well, two ground balls, three outs.

  105. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 2:03 pm

    sitting here with my buddy who is a cardinals fan…he’s talking about how much money spiezio is…

  106. davepaisley on June 10th, 2007 2:03 pm

    Also note that Jered left the game after three innings with a stiff lower back. Bad weekend for Weaver spines, I guess.

  107. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 2:03 pm

    102 – It’s about time he came through in the clutch for us.

  108. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:03 pm

    Awesome. King Felix is responsible for the only Mariners run so far in this game. And he just turned a kick-ass double play.

  109. JI on June 10th, 2007 2:04 pm

    What’s hilarious about the Spiezio HR is that Carrasco had just struck out Pujols on 3 pitches.

  110. Erithtotl on June 10th, 2007 2:04 pm

    I don’t know if it’s accurate, but according to the online gamecast Felix seems to start every hitter off with a fastball off the outside corner. I’m not sure if you can call that ‘establishing a pitch’ when it’s a ball in the same spot every time.

  111. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:04 pm

    106 — That’s an awfully odd coincidence.

  112. zvazda on June 10th, 2007 2:05 pm

    110 – we can’t tell without Joes Tracer. :’(

  113. planB on June 10th, 2007 2:08 pm

    The Padres pitcher is newspaper headline gold: C Young.

  114. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 2:08 pm

    not only speizio, but franklin was pitching some good relief…two former Ms helping us out today vs. the angels….

  115. dw on June 10th, 2007 2:08 pm

    I don’t know if it’s accurate, but according to the online gamecast Felix seems to start every hitter off with a fastball off the outside corner. I’m not sure if you can call that ‘establishing a pitch’ when it’s a ball in the same spot every time.

    No, no, no.

    He’s announcing his presence with authority!

  116. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 2:09 pm

    106. “Also note that Jered left the game after three innings with a stiff lower back. Bad weekend for Weaver spines, I guess.”

    Why am I suddenly seeing the two of them going out Friday night and doing some weird sort of surfer dude dance that led to back strain? Something totally groovy.

  117. Norm Charlton Fan Club on June 10th, 2007 2:12 pm

    Aaaaand just as everyone’s talking about ex-Mariners helping us out, Cammy goes yard.

  118. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:12 pm

    Darn, knew that was gone right away.

  119. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:13 pm

    Dammit Cammie. I love you, but not when you hit a HR off of Felix.

  120. lokiforever on June 10th, 2007 2:13 pm

    If someone is going to hit a homer off Felix, might as well be Cameron. Sometimes I still wish he had an M’s uniform on.

  121. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:14 pm

    Watching the Diamondbacks-Red Sox game at the same time. Randy Johnson against Dice-K, great matchup.

  122. planB on June 10th, 2007 2:16 pm

    Argh.

  123. Joe Bag o' Doughnuts on June 10th, 2007 2:16 pm

    Bad Felix is in da house.

  124. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 2:16 pm

    Only sometimes you wish? We’ve never adequately replaced Cammy’s glove or bat.

  125. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:17 pm

    Settle down, Felix.

  126. Erithtotl on June 10th, 2007 2:17 pm

    This is what happens when you start behind on every hitter.

  127. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:17 pm

    Doesn’t matter, Cammy wouldn’t have caught either one of those.

  128. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 2:17 pm

    Felix getting tendinitis or something?

  129. E-bomb on June 10th, 2007 2:17 pm

    Damnit Felix!!! C’mon man, bring the good stuff.

  130. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:19 pm

    Are we purposely trying to come from behind nowadays?

  131. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:20 pm

    Randy has 4 Ks, 2 shy of tying Clemens again.

  132. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 2:20 pm

    we’re losing because the angels are…fucking bullshit…

  133. brian_sun on June 10th, 2007 2:20 pm

    Isn’t Slege used to be a Mariners too?

  134. Jordan of Boise on June 10th, 2007 2:21 pm

    So is Chavez to blame for Felix establishing the 88mph over the plate ball?

  135. planB on June 10th, 2007 2:22 pm

    124: Never adequately replaced his .250/.340/.444? He’s great and all, but the bat isn’t Cammy’s strong point :)

  136. Rick L on June 10th, 2007 2:24 pm

    Felix through 4: 6 hits, 3 runs, all earned, two home runs, 63 pitches.

    Weaveresque.

  137. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:24 pm

    And Willie ignites a double play.

  138. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 2:24 pm

    “The more playing time he’s had, the more productive he’s been”. This is similar to the process by which a grocer loses a dollar a pound, but makes it up on volume, right? Willie: .616 OPS, 71+ OPS.

  139. Brandon on June 10th, 2007 2:25 pm

    Nice gritted into Double Play.

  140. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:25 pm

    #136 You forget that Weaver has been pitching better than Felix over the past 2 weeks. ;)

  141. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 2:26 pm

    An OPS of nearly .800 for a CF in Safeco is pretty damn good. Cammy was a strong hitter. We’ve been over this a thousand times: look past the strikeouts, which don’t matter.

  142. ConorGlassey on June 10th, 2007 2:26 pm

    I think Felix has the best plate discipline on the team

  143. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:27 pm

    Look at Felix battling.

  144. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:29 pm

    I know people love to hate Arod, but if he hits 63 HRs this year will people argue that he’s the legitimate season record holder? I know people were having that discussion with Ryan Howard last year…

  145. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:32 pm

    Randy has just tied Clemens again!

  146. Axtell on June 10th, 2007 2:33 pm

    144-

    The record is 73. By no means am I a Bonds’ fan, but the record is indeed 73. People dismiss Bonds and his accomplishments because he’s such a jackass to everyone, but his records are as legitimate as anyone’s.

  147. agingfan on June 10th, 2007 2:33 pm

    A right hander hitting 63 HRs with half his games in Yankee Stadium? Tough to see. And the Yankee fans will argue that none of them mattered anyway.

  148. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 2:34 pm

    Can 5th inning Felix go back and pitch the 4th again please.

  149. Tim-in Tampa on June 10th, 2007 2:35 pm

    Looks like everyone is frustrated with the calls behind the plate today.

  150. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:35 pm

    #146 I don’t dismiss Bonds’ accomplishments because he’s a jerk. In fact, I was rooting for Bonds when he hit 73, but when the evidence started piling up with regards to his HGH use that’s when I changed my view.

    If I were fortunate enough to catch his 756th home run I’d store it in my house and not sell it or donate it to the HOF until he admitted to his steroid use.

  151. brian_sun on June 10th, 2007 2:37 pm

    146: Bonds season HR record is as legit as Ben Johnson’s win in 1988 Olympics game.

  152. JR Ewing on June 10th, 2007 2:38 pm

    132. you don’t think that the mariners losing has anything at all to do with felix giving up 2 hr’s and chris young authoring another strong performance at petco. another typical comment from bako the clown.

  153. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 2:38 pm

    Adam Jones: 4-5 a triple and 4 RBI

    Also the pitch before the Homerun to Cammy was not only strike three but Cammy also swung.

  154. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 2:38 pm

    How many HR did Bonds get because of stuff he used? I need an exact number here.

  155. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:40 pm

    #154 I’d assume at least 30. Look at his career numbers, he hit over 50 how many times in his career?

  156. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:41 pm

    Wow, that was fortunate for Ichiro.

  157. Jordan of Boise on June 10th, 2007 2:41 pm

    154 – ESPN.com did a pretty interesting analysis on that a while ago – looking at how performance enhancers would likely affect his power, his recuperativeness, even his confidence, etc. Interesting food for thought.

  158. Erithtotl on June 10th, 2007 2:41 pm

    The real problem with invalidating Bond’s record is, then, who is the real record holder? Is it McGwire? Sosa? I think there’s little doubt they were both using something too. Roll it back to Maris? Throw out all stats since 1990?

    Sadly there’s no easy, good answer.

  159. Erithtotl on June 10th, 2007 2:42 pm

    Also, for decades MLB players have been poppying amphetemines too boost their performance, which are also illegal. Where do we draw the line on what is a valid record?

  160. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 2:43 pm

    So wait, we’re wiping away all the players who hit over 61 home runs, then? So that’s McGwire, Sosa, and Bonds? For those of you who don’t respect the record, don’t you have to eliminate all three.

    I’m sorry to add to this, personally I’d rather see this discussion center on the game of today.

  161. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:45 pm

    Anyone remember when McGwire was supposedly only taking Andro? Well, even Andro was illegal in Canada, which means that the Blue Jays and Expos players at the time were at a disadvantage.

  162. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 2:45 pm

    I hate losing to a 6’10″ soft throwing rightie with child bearing hips. Really quite annoying.

  163. mark s. on June 10th, 2007 2:46 pm

    #144 when it comes to the NYY I root for 3 things this year:
    -A-Rod hitting 75HRs.
    -Clemens winning all of his starts.
    -The NYY missing the playoffs by several games.

    I think all those things would be good for baseball.

  164. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:46 pm

    #160 Yes, I’d erase all 3 of them. But anyway, what inning will we get some runs this game? It seems we like the 7th inning lately.

  165. Erithtotl on June 10th, 2007 2:47 pm

    I’m sure I’m going to curse him here, but why is Felix always a much better pitcher after he gives upa a big inning?

  166. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:47 pm

    C’mon M’s. The Angels lost today.

  167. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 2:49 pm

    So you’re sure it’s not 29, or 31, then? I’m not saying you’re wrong; I’ll defer to your superior medical knowledge. I’d just like to know for sure. I’d like to know which ones, too. You can’t just take away the biggest record in the sport on speculation. What are you planning to do, go back and take 20 feet off of all his fly balls? Or just on certain dates, or what, exactly?

  168. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 2:49 pm

    When do we get to see Adam Jones up with the big club. He is just on fire.

    4-5 a triple and 4 RBI’s today

  169. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:49 pm

    Randy is in 2nd place for all-time Ks once again!

  170. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 2:54 pm

    Also anyone notice that they changed Felix’s setup in the windup. Before today he would have his hands together at his belt and than pitch. Today he has his hands at his face and than pitches. The Marienrs might have felt like he was tipping his pitches.

  171. Tim-in Tampa on June 10th, 2007 2:54 pm

    At least the King is eating some innings.

  172. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 2:55 pm

    168 — does Adam Jones play any other positions other than CF? If not, we won’t get to see him unless Ichiro leaves (which is unfortunately a very real possibility). Or unless someone gets hurt in the OF.

  173. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 2:57 pm

    Hopefully we can get something off of Young here as he gets close to 100 pitches.

    Not how you do it Yuni…

  174. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 2:57 pm

    great at bat by Yuni…

  175. theraven on June 10th, 2007 2:58 pm

    #167 Here’s the article that someone else mentioned previously: http://proxy.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hruby/060512

  176. agingfan on June 10th, 2007 2:58 pm

    Adam Jones could left field right now

  177. joser on June 10th, 2007 2:58 pm

    Having RJ and the Rocket both pitching this season with their K stats so closely matched is pretty interesting. Nice of Roger to take those half seasons off so Randy could catch up.

    Jones plays the outfield. He could replace Raul (yes please) or Guillen (as long as he continues with the problems he’s having lately). But if they called him up now, odds are Hargrove would just swap him for Ellison, which means he’d basically rot on the bench.

  178. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 2:59 pm

    Jamie Burke the greatest bloop hitter of all time.

  179. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:00 pm

    Giving Vidro a run for his money on cheap singles.

  180. fargomsfan on June 10th, 2007 3:00 pm

    This Burke guy sure can hit

  181. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 3:00 pm

    Bud Black just went out to the mound to tell Young that, “Bloomquist sucks”

  182. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:02 pm

    Reminds me of when Ryan and Carlton traded strikeout leads for a couple of seasons.

  183. dislocated on June 10th, 2007 3:03 pm

    Broussard’s about to go deep…

  184. agingfan on June 10th, 2007 3:03 pm

    Way to take one for the team, Ben

  185. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 3:03 pm

    or not

  186. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:04 pm

    Deep tissue massage to get ride of that pain?

  187. dislocated on June 10th, 2007 3:04 pm

    DOH! That leaves me at .500 calling BB’s ph blasts (I was in Anaheim for his shot earlier this season and called it)

  188. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:04 pm

    He’s had good success against Ichiro today, I’m sure he just wanted to face him instead.

  189. joser on June 10th, 2007 3:05 pm

    Nobody in today’s Padre lineup has a BA over .300. Lopez has now dropped to .299, but the M’s still have four players over .300. Although, granted, one of them is Felix who’s at .500 ;) And Burke is small sample size too.

  190. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:05 pm

    So close.

  191. agingfan on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    ICHIRO!

  192. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    ICHIRO!!!!!!!!!!!

  193. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    Son of a bitch! Rizz is getting as bad as Dave for those calls that makes your heart leap…and then crash.

  194. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    OOOOOOO… Burke was soooo Out. Wow that was a lucky lucky play.

  195. ConorGlassey on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    I’ll take it!

  196. Wells on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    Bad call but I’ll take it!

  197. Norm Charlton Fan Club on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    BURKE NICE SLIDE!!!!

  198. DKCecil on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    Jamie Burke, ladies and gentlemen. Greatest backup catcher in the history of baseball.

  199. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    I’d just like to remind everyone about my comment at #164…

  200. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:06 pm

    I’ll take it, but I don’t know…

  201. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    BURKE! The best slide ever!!!!!

  202. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    That was one of the best plate slaps I’ve ever seen.

  203. Brandon on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    Looked like a good call to me.

  204. daimajin on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    must be the 7th inning…

  205. juneau_fan on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    My god, would Garcia send a three-legged donkey home on a shallow fly?

    Not that it didn’t work this time.

  206. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    Not a bad call, he was totally in there. You couldn’t ask for a better throw than that, either. He just beat him.

  207. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 3:07 pm

    So Burke is the greatest bloop hitter of all time, and now juding the votes so far, the greatest plate slapper ever.

  208. Brandon on June 10th, 2007 3:08 pm

    I was just about to comment that I thought Beltre or Ellison should have ran for Burke once he got to second. Any thoughts on that?

  209. teacherrefpoet on June 10th, 2007 3:08 pm

    Thought he was out on first look, but on replay, Bard whiffed on the first tag…didn’t actually touch him until after Burke hit the plate. Tough call, and GREAT call.

  210. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    #205 Wow, that’s hilarious. Still got me chuckling about it.

  211. Jared on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    The Padres announcers can’t believe the call. Looked safe to me.

  212. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    Can we get a petition going to give all of Jeff Weaver’s money to Burke? At least half right?

  213. DMZ on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    This talk of wiping home runs by used/accused/suspected steroid users is impracticable, unenforceable, ridiculous. Please knock it off.

  214. jefffrane on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    One of the best throws in from centerfield I’ve seen and incredibly tight call at home. I’ll take it.

  215. _David_ on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    Marco Fucking Scutaro homers to off Cain to give A’s 1-0 lead in 8th.

  216. djw on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    Yeah, I think the replay vindicates the ump.

  217. prospect21 on June 10th, 2007 3:09 pm

    I thought he was out on the play as well. But good call by the Ump after seeing the replay. Go M’S!

  218. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:10 pm

    Wow, Royals 17 and Phillies 5? Is there another Weaver brother?

  219. joser on June 10th, 2007 3:11 pm

    And just like that, Win Probability goes from 75% Padres right back to 50-50. It must be really depressing to be a Padres fan this weekend.

    Crap, Scutaro HR just put the A’s up 1-0 in the 8th.

  220. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 3:15 pm

    I’m just as confused as Sledge. How the hell did those crummy pitches strike him out? Reitsma likes it up in the strike zone.

  221. cgmonk on June 10th, 2007 3:18 pm

    Batista warming up

  222. JR Ewing on June 10th, 2007 3:18 pm

    how much better does the mariners pen get if reitsma is worthwhile ?
    no more sean green in the 7th when morrow needs to rest.
    batista in the pen ? is grover planning ahead ?

  223. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:20 pm

    Post DL Reitsma seems much better, he must have had an actual injury.

  224. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:20 pm

    ESPN.com has both Griffey and Bonds listed as weighing 228 pounds. Does anyone believe that? Bonds looks quite a bit heavier.

  225. DMZ on June 10th, 2007 3:21 pm

    Breaking news: Player reported weights, heights often not representative of actual weight or height. Outraged fans call for Congressional investigation.

  226. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:21 pm

    Dave Sims just said “natch”. That’s the final straw.

  227. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:21 pm

    If Batista throws is that a possible Weaver to the DL with his back injury and Firebrand gets called back up?

  228. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:23 pm

    DMZ – lol. I remember years ago getting a Frank Thomas baseball card that had Griffey’s weight/height/handedness on the back of it. That was slightly amusing.

  229. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:23 pm

    Jose! Congrats you are 1-13 on the series.

  230. _David_ on June 10th, 2007 3:24 pm

    224, Griffey is 2 inches taller, BR has him listed as 205, but yeah, Bonds looks heavier.

  231. JR Ewing on June 10th, 2007 3:24 pm

    weaver is still listed as the starter on thursday at wrigleyville

  232. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:26 pm

    231- Batista still slated?

  233. JR Ewing on June 10th, 2007 3:27 pm

    232. batista vs sean marshall on wed.

  234. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:28 pm

    Padres announcers are saying Batista is just doing his daily throwing routine.

  235. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:28 pm

    He plays to win, but he doesn’t try to do too much.

  236. derubino on June 10th, 2007 3:29 pm

    Hitting 8th, batting .417, JAMIE BURKE!!!

  237. jdsc55 on June 10th, 2007 3:29 pm

    Yuni has seen a grand total of 6 pitches in his 4 at bats today…

  238. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:29 pm

    Burke was destined for this AB. More then Raul was the other night.

  239. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:30 pm

    #237 Lauren needs to have a talk with her man!

  240. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:30 pm

    lol bhs, I hope you’re right this time.

  241. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:31 pm

    How much worse do you guys think our record would be if we’d been marching Rivera out there as a backup instead of Burke? Such a nice upgrade.

  242. vitalogist on June 10th, 2007 3:31 pm

    fuck you sims and your dunkeroo

  243. PhilKenSebben on June 10th, 2007 3:31 pm

    1-0 Beavers!!! Yay local team!!

  244. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:32 pm

    The destined for line is done, 0-2 is enough.

  245. JR Ewing on June 10th, 2007 3:32 pm

    padres announcer don’t know what they are talking about

  246. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:33 pm

    Randy has 9 Ks in 5 innings against the Red Sox. Something tells me that Sportscenter won’t be drooling over his performance like they were with Clemens. I guess 7 Ks and 3 runs allowed against the Pirates is rather impressive though.

  247. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 3:33 pm

    batista?

  248. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:33 pm

    Batista? Am I still watching the M’s game?

  249. Tim-in Tampa on June 10th, 2007 3:34 pm

    Wow Batista is coming in, to get his off day work in. Saw one of the NYY pitchers do this earlier this year.

  250. Wells on June 10th, 2007 3:34 pm

    Why is this dude in the game?

  251. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:35 pm

    Relievers are burned out.

  252. Jared on June 10th, 2007 3:36 pm

    no, i don’t think this is so he can get work in, i think grover is afraid this one might go on & on and he doesn’t want to use up his bullpen

  253. ConorGlassey on June 10th, 2007 3:36 pm

    I like using starters as RPs on their throw days. Why not, right? I think a smart team would do that to add another bench bat, defensive whiz or pinch runner to their bench. This, I’m pretty sure, is just an accident or something…

  254. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:36 pm

    #252 Well by putting Batista in it appears the game may not go on and on…

  255. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:37 pm

    Is Hargrove on the take?

    Note to M’s: when I joked the other day that you looked like you were going to a no-starter, 15-reliever rotation, I WAS JOKING.

    I guess Weaver is considered solid now.

  256. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 3:37 pm

    WTF? Batista??? Is our relief corps that burnt out?

  257. David J. Corcoran I on June 10th, 2007 3:39 pm

    With a 7 man bullpen, this should NEVER need to happen. WTF?

  258. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:39 pm

    This is only game 3 of a 10 game stretch, we need our relievers. The move is defensible.

  259. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:40 pm

    Supposedly the Ms broadcast team told the Padres broadcast team that this is partially because of the Indians game tomorrow. Also, if the Ms would’ve taken the lead in the top of the 8th then Morrow would’ve come in.

  260. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 3:41 pm

    good call BHS…especially since he got out of it…WE NEED TO SCORE!

  261. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:41 pm

    #258 It’s defensible now that the inning is over. ;)

  262. Dylan on June 10th, 2007 3:42 pm

    I love the ******** and moaning about the move to Batista but no love when it works out perfectly.

  263. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:43 pm

    Interesting to see a move by Hargrove that is simultaneously thinking outside the box and incredibly robotic. Nice pitching by Batista though.

  264. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 3:44 pm

    Willie and Vidro! USSMariner is excited i’m sure!

  265. F-Rod on June 10th, 2007 3:44 pm

    Terrific move..why the heck not? He was gonna throw anyway…I love it.

  266. Jared on June 10th, 2007 3:44 pm

    Way to hustle Wille Ballgame!

  267. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:44 pm

    Nice hussle!

  268. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    Get outta the way 1st base coach! Thats an extra base.

  269. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    Vidro is PH?

  270. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    A boot and a bunt! couldn’t have gone better for those two!

  271. apunetid on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    Boy, our hitters strike terror in the hearts of opposing third basemen.

  272. G-Man on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    Goff didn’t help, stopping the ball, but I’ll let him off because it was deflected.

  273. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    PH bunt! Sweet.

  274. agingfan on June 10th, 2007 3:45 pm

    Make ‘em pay, Jose

  275. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:46 pm

    Woh, Turbo couldn’t leg that one out? Took his day off a tad to literal.

  276. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 3:46 pm

    Double steal?

  277. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:46 pm

    C’mon Lopez.

  278. PhilKenSebben on June 10th, 2007 3:47 pm

    Rizzs would call that a gritty-money bag

  279. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:47 pm

    WILLIE!!!!!!!

  280. F-Rod on June 10th, 2007 3:47 pm

    What a player…He would be worth 2 million in the national league

  281. Jared on June 10th, 2007 3:47 pm

    Willie!

  282. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    Gritty! Ichiro needs to take off now.

  283. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    Whoah. Nice, Willie.

  284. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    Huh, the single steal, interesting concept. Was that a free Willy decision? Free Willy, I like that.

  285. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

  286. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    Yeah Lopez!

  287. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    god i love this team…

  288. SexsonPower on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    run willie run!

  289. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:48 pm

    Ichiro trying to get Vidro’d?

  290. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:49 pm

    Good enough for now.

  291. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:49 pm

    Wow, that was a big, big steal by Bloomquist. Very impressive.

  292. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:49 pm

    Putz closing today even after throwing 35 pitches the last two days?

  293. theraven on June 10th, 2007 3:50 pm

    Who’s closing out the game now? Morrow?

  294. The bottle on June 10th, 2007 3:51 pm

    Niehase belatedly realized a run scored. Good times.

  295. G-Man on June 10th, 2007 3:52 pm

    Scoring a run that way solves my fantasy dilemma – I have Hoffman, but his stats will not hurt me – 0 WHIP, 0 ERA.

  296. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 3:52 pm

    This is so incredible: A team that succeeds very much in spite of its manager.

  297. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:53 pm

    Putz is so awesome.

  298. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:53 pm

    Putz tells Padre batters to shut their mouth when they are talking to him.

  299. Tim-in Tampa on June 10th, 2007 3:53 pm

    Putz looked tired the last time out. I wonder how this will go.

    So far do good.

  300. soggys on June 10th, 2007 3:54 pm

    Is it too early to start talking about pitchers to target for a trade? Was kind of browsing through the cellar dwellers and had a couple of ideas.

  301. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 3:54 pm

    can we gain on the angels?

  302. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 3:56 pm

    The Mariners have nothing to trade. One, we’re not dealing the players that other teams want; and two, nobody wants the players we should be trying to get rid of.

    If Woody Woodward was running this team, though, Adam Jones would be gone by July 31.

  303. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:56 pm

    We gain a game on the Angles and get our half game back on the Tigers WC lead.

  304. E-bomb on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    oh yeah baby! I heart Putz!

  305. apunetid on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    M’s win! First three-game sweep of the year?

  306. Steve T on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    I’ll be damned. Weird feelings, unfamiliar ones — is this “happiness”? Is this “hope”? This was a helluva game.

  307. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    booyah!

  308. carcinogen on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    Fangraphs…good looking graph today

  309. darrylzero on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    Not even fair; he’s just untouchable.

  310. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 3:57 pm

    7 Games above .500?? I think I see Ichiro leading off for us next year already!

  311. soggys on June 10th, 2007 3:58 pm

    So a Matt Morris trade by the deadline would be out of the question you think 302?

  312. JR Ewing on June 10th, 2007 3:59 pm

    chris burke ? san diego broadcast is pretty sharp today

  313. agingfan on June 10th, 2007 3:59 pm

    An 11th inning win and two come from behind wins. Exciting series (well, the way it turned out). I remember at the beginning of the season one of the things the Ms had going for them was that all the other teams in the division looked like they had serious problems. Now it looks like we are in maybe the second toughest division in baseball behind the AL Central (althought Angels lost). But Sexson, Ibanez and Vidro can all hit better so maybe hope springs eternal?

  314. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 4:04 pm

    305- We swept KC 2 weekends ago. But this was a real team so it feels better.

    Hopefully this momentum takes us into Cleveland for a W, catch another half game on the Angels and the Tigers. By Tuesday night we could have a share of the wild card lead!

  315. Zero Gravitas on June 10th, 2007 4:05 pm

    As of today the M’s win percentage projects to 90 wins over a 162-game season. Just want to throw that out there. Do yourself a favor and don’t look at what the Angels’ record projects to, just enjoy it!

  316. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 4:05 pm

    I love that shot of Putz giving Burke some noogie love.

  317. bakomariner on June 10th, 2007 4:05 pm

    and we’re getting national coverage…gammons was just on espnnews talking about how we are now scaring people and are going to give the angels a run if we get quality starting pitching…

  318. Anna11 on June 10th, 2007 4:06 pm

    Awesome. Just awesome.

    I love this team.

  319. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 4:08 pm

    I love this team. I still hate this manager.

  320. theraven on June 10th, 2007 4:09 pm

    We’ve played 5 fewer games than the Angels? We still have a ton of games to make up. You can tell the team is playing confident though and not worrying about if they’re behind by a run or two.

  321. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 4:09 pm

    Since Grover got back from his little trip either he got smarter or his moves just seem to be working. I am taking the second one, but I will take luck any day.

  322. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 4:14 pm

    APBs have just been issued for Tim Belcher, Andy Benes, Terry Mulholland, Doug Strange, Alex Diaz, Vince Coleman and Bill Risley ….

  323. colm on June 10th, 2007 4:15 pm

    Weaver, HoRam, Baek, Ferraribrand (I’m on my 2nd drink and I’m not even trying) Batista…. quality starting is a lot to hope for. Still, I’m enjoying the ride.

    The Angels offense is no great shakes; the A’s is worse. There’s no reason the Mariners can’t make this season more enjoyable than the last three combined.

  324. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 4:15 pm

    Further proof that Pat Gillick is completely insane: After putting Freddy Garcia on the DL, he just filled the roster spot with …

    … Jose Mesa.

  325. bradderup on June 10th, 2007 4:16 pm

    gaslampball.com

    Pad’s fans are ready to embrace the “rivalry” after this weekend. I think Mr. Z was egging them on too.

  326. vj on June 10th, 2007 4:16 pm

    Great game. Still, using Batista in the 8th was odd. Reitsma had last pitched on the 6th in Baltimore so he should’ve been good for two innings at least.

  327. _David_ on June 10th, 2007 4:17 pm

    and Mesa gives up 2 in 1.1 innings in the 17-5 loss to the Royals.

  328. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 4:17 pm

    The M’s should have used Ellison on the mound … he was 20-0 career as a starter for South Kitsap.

  329. TheMsfan on June 10th, 2007 4:18 pm

    isnt it at least nice to know we dont suck? i dont know how good we are, we’re probably not a 90 win team with this SP, but isnt it nice to know we dont suck?

  330. Thom Jimsen on June 10th, 2007 4:18 pm

    I would rather use Scott Elarton as my closer than have Jose Mesa anywhere in my area code.

  331. kentroyals5 on June 10th, 2007 4:18 pm

    325- I like their game thread title with the “Damn Mariners”

  332. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 4:20 pm

    The M’s have the 3rd best FIP in the AL, but the 3rd lowest LOB%. If that LOB% regresses to the league mean we are in business big time! No reason we can’t catch the WC easily or the division title.

  333. theraven on June 10th, 2007 4:20 pm

    Something no one has mentioned is that Yuni’s hit streak is now over. I vote that Lauren’s new unofficial should be Jamie Burke. He’s a bit older, but he sure can slide!

  334. Gerald on June 10th, 2007 4:25 pm

    Suck on that Padres! That was a great game and series.

    I was particularly pleased with Felix’s performance. He may have surrendered some homers but…

    Innings: 6
    Ground Outs: 9
    Fly Outs: 3

    Two of those fly outs were in his last inning and at least two of the hits he allowed were ground balls.

    Felix earned a bunch of !!! today.

  335. B_Con on June 10th, 2007 4:25 pm

    I’m glad everyone knows that Ichiro is God. MY friend from NYC: “He’s going to make a great Yankee.”

  336. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 4:27 pm

    The 2 teams with the highest LOB5%?? LAA and OAK. Those regress to the mean also and we are in good shape.

  337. Ninja Jordan on June 10th, 2007 4:33 pm

    Does Oakland EVER friggin lose? Sweep SF, and are getting Harden back. As good as the Mariners have been, theyve gained nothing on Oakland.

  338. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 4:36 pm

    Oakland has gained nothing on us, bet they are pissed too.

  339. theraven on June 10th, 2007 4:38 pm

    #325 Haha, there are some good comments over there. My favorite was: I HATE THE FING MARINERS – GO BACK TO YOUR RAIN YOU AHOLES.

    I’m starting to feel a rivalry now. Three 1-run games, what more can you ask for? We’re now 9-7 in 1-run games.

  340. lemonverbena on June 10th, 2007 4:47 pm

    yeeeeeaaaaah!! what a great day at the yard. i got heckled by Padres fans as usual but it was good natured and we got the sweeeeeep… just a couple questions:

    what in god’s name was Miguel Batista doing on the mound on my Felix Day?

    why does G. Cleveland insist on catching Burke on those night/day starts despite needing him to handle Felix? he should never have given in to Sledge with the pitcher spot coming up.

    so stoked overall. did Bloomquist steal 3rd on his own? Ichiro! looked shocked. guess is should look through this here game thread…

  341. lemonverbena on June 10th, 2007 5:04 pm

    needing Kenji, i should’ve said. beer(s).

  342. lemonverbena on June 10th, 2007 5:05 pm

    and interleague play is awesome, so who does espn run out for the Sunday night game? the only NL game, Cubs-Braves. stupid f-ing Bristol.

  343. Axtell on June 10th, 2007 5:06 pm

    Wow, another great game…and another 1-run M’s win to complete the sweep…topped only by the Angels losing, too!

    One thing I have to wonder, though, is why don’t they utilize Burke sometimes at DH instead of Vidro? Burke’s swinging too good a bat right now not to utilize him more often, and instead of taking out Johjima, why not platoon Burke at DH with Vidro? Seems like a good way to get the guy swinging a hot bat as many at-bats as possible, no?

  344. Tak on June 10th, 2007 5:11 pm

    so much for the AL West being the “weakest” league.

  345. bayoumariner on June 10th, 2007 5:13 pm

    #339 The best part is the fans on that site act like they have some superior team down there. The truth is we are 9-3 against the Padres over the past two seasons. Right now we could easily make a case the M’s would own the NL West if we played in it.

  346. planB on June 10th, 2007 5:14 pm

    Kinda funny that Batista gets the win.

  347. bhsmarine on June 10th, 2007 5:15 pm

    That is hilarious he gets the win, almost as good as O’Flaherty’s 1 pitch win Friday night.

  348. planB on June 10th, 2007 5:22 pm

    I think it’s better, since he is a starter and he didn’t start. :)

  349. msb on June 10th, 2007 5:26 pm

    MSB – finish our mrs. reynolds last night?

    why yes, yes I did. you know, she was all naked … and articulate.

    Damn Yankees – 1954 I believe, maybe 1955. Adler and Ross show

    based on a very entertaining novella called The year the Yankees lost the pennant, and featuring some fine ballplayer dancing :)

    I think Jamie is my Back-up Boyfriend.

  350. msb on June 10th, 2007 5:41 pm

    local guy John Moe takes advantage of his national radio gig to do a story for Weekend Edition about Jamie Burke

  351. Paul B on June 10th, 2007 5:41 pm

    Anyone notice the article in the Sunday Times by a sports writer we thought was gone for good?

    Is he undead?

    As to the interesting use of Batista on his bullpen day… just checking the Mariner bullpen and appearances and IP in last 7 days (on ESPN, I assume this does not include today):

    Davis: 2 games, 2.1 IP
    Green: 2 games, 3.1 IP
    Huber: 2 games, 4.1 IP (to DL)
    Morrow: 2 games, 2 IP
    O’Flaherty: 3 games, 1.1 IP
    Putz: 4 games, 4 IP
    Reitsma: 1 game, 1 IP
    Sherrill: 3 games, 1.1 IP

    Doesn’t strike me that any of those guys, possibly excepting Putz, is overused. A couple of them could probably use some work. So I don’t think the Batista thing was absolutely necessary, but perhaps it was a good thing. Hargrove is a little overcautious sometimes with his relievers.

  352. Paul B on June 10th, 2007 5:44 pm

    I think Bloomquist stole third on his own.

    They showed Grover in the dugout and he was yelling about something. Maybe he was fired up by the ignitor, or maybe he was upset that WFB was running in the situation (that seems unlikely), so maybe he was upset about something unrelated. Maybe his pizza order was late.

  353. joser on June 10th, 2007 6:16 pm

    They showed Grover in the dugout and he was yelling about something

    He hates it when he’s woken up in the middle of a game.

    Further proof that Pat Gillick is completely insane:

    Don’t you get the feeling Gillick is the Disco Stu of GMs — his brain stuck somewhere in the late 90s? If a name comes up from his days with the M’s, he grabs it no matter how little sense it makes. It’s like he’s certain he was smarter than everyone else then, and despite all evidence to the contrary (and the fact all these guys are now almost a decade older) he’s going to take another opportunity to prove it. I’m sure if Buhner and Borders unretired he’d sign them too.

  354. joser on June 10th, 2007 6:19 pm

    I vote that Lauren’s new unofficial should be Jamie Burke. He’s a bit older, but he sure can slide!

    And bunt. Dude can bunt too, don’t forget. And he hits a little.

    Yeah, Lauren needs to give the whole cougar thing a rest — however briefly. The danger with switching to Burke, however, is that we could be witness to an exact Bull Durham re-enactment.

  355. msb on June 10th, 2007 6:20 pm

    Anyone notice the article in the Sunday Times by a sports writer we thought was gone for good?

    oh, sadly, I knew it wasn’t for good — they had a note online that he was just on leave until June 10th.

    And he came back with a column just chock full o’ wacky humor.

  356. lemonverbena on June 10th, 2007 6:23 pm

    i don’t know how to link on this mf, but Gaslamp thinks we’re like, a Rival! au natural. http://www.gaslampball.com/story/2007/6/10/185942/896

    ‘I will not stand for getting swept by another one of our rivals…’

  357. IMissBenDavis on June 10th, 2007 6:23 pm

    Watched the game on UPN 11. Gotta say, Bloomquist is pulling his weight (great steal), Burke is pulling his weight (great slide!), everyone is contributing. Felix was OK, certainly not the dominant pitcher we saw in his first two starts this year, but good enough to keep us in it…just like…Jeff Weaver(!!??) was yesterday. This sweep was a true team effort. Now lets get one out of Cleveland.

  358. joser on June 10th, 2007 6:24 pm

    No reason we can’t catch the WC easily or the division title

    Dude, this team once won as many games as any team in the AL ever did, and they couldn’t “catch the WC easily.” If it was easy to catch, they would’ve got one sometime in the last 30 years. It’s not easy. It’s never easy. Grabbing a wildcard or getting out of a 4 team division is one thing; the postseason is something else. Not trying to harsh your mellow or anything; I’m pleased with the way this team is playing too. But the 2001 team had better pitching than this one and it let them down in the postseason. Of course any team can catch fire and whistle their way through October — just ask Miami. But it’s never easy.

  359. joser on June 10th, 2007 6:27 pm

    Anyone notice the article in the Sunday Times by a sports writer we thought was gone for good?

    Yeah, and he managed to suggest Hargrove deserved “Manager of the Year” in the first couple of paragraphs. Good to see the time off hasn’t harmed his cluelessness. The less said about that column the better; the last thing we want is to encourage more of them.

  360. planB on June 10th, 2007 6:36 pm

    WC = Wild Card, I think you read WS

  361. joser on June 10th, 2007 6:37 pm

    The best thing on that padres fan site (well, other than all the hollow boasting followed by semi-articulate expressions of pain and rage) is the picture of the Mariner’s cat. (Scroll down). Cats in hats are funny in general (just ask Dr Seuss) but that pic in particular is hilarious. And a little disturbing. Suggested caption: I don’t know what a “padre” is but I think I just ate a whole team of them. Tastes like chicken.

  362. Karen on June 10th, 2007 6:41 pm

    #315 Zero Gravitas Says: As of today the M’s win percentage projects to 90 wins over a 162-game season. Just want to throw that out there. Do yourself a favor and don’t look at what the Angels’ record projects to, just enjoy it!

    “SG” over at the Replacement Level Yankees Weblog has a handy dandy table to calculate the “Pythagorean winning percentage of the team…to determine [theoretically] how many wins they should pick up over the remainder of the schedule.”

    The Mariners currently stand at a possible 87 wins using that calculator. Either way, it’s a winning season. :)

    The M’s are 3 wins, zero losses back of Detroit for the WC (with Oakland right on their tail).

  363. AQ on June 10th, 2007 6:44 pm

    Would now be a bad time to mention the shock that I felt when looking at Greg Dobbs’ line with the Phillies this year? .284/.325/.541(!!!!) in 109 AB’s thus far.

  364. joser on June 10th, 2007 7:18 pm

    WC = Wild Card, I think you read WS

    Yeah, I did, sorry (actually I read it as “World Championship” since my brain wouldn’t parse it as anything but World something). In that case, yeah, you’re right. And after that, well, who knows. The good thing about there being two good teams (and possibly 3) in the AL Central is they may pull each other down. Plus the M’s get to play the NL Central in interleague, but miss the Brewers. Who are the class of that division… and yet are on the verge of getting swept by Texas.

  365. Ninja Jordan on June 10th, 2007 7:18 pm

    Bautista deserved the win; he was robbed the other night.

  366. joser on June 10th, 2007 7:22 pm

    This is the first time the M’s have swept the Padres in San Diego? Ever?

  367. joser on June 10th, 2007 7:25 pm

    The Mariners’ scored three earned runs off Padres starter Chris Young , one more than the big right-hander had allowed in his five previous home starts combined. Young came in with the best home ERA in the majors, 0.52, and saw it rise to 1.10.

    Beware the, uh, moose!

  368. Rick L on June 10th, 2007 7:29 pm

    363 This is further evidence (Spezio and Weaver being more) that it is easier to succeed in the National League.

  369. brian_sun on June 10th, 2007 8:00 pm

    Looking at the schedule for the next 13 games: besides the makeup game at Cleveland tomorrow, the other 12 games are against NL central and east teams that are WAY under 500. The M’s need to at least go 8-5 in those 13 games to get to 10 games over to have a chance to make the playoff. The rest of the schedule are pretty tough. These 13 games will make or break the M’s season.

  370. brian_sun on June 10th, 2007 8:08 pm

    I am just counting tomorrow’s game as a loss to CLE. The M’s will need to go 8-4 against the NL teams.

    I love the Mariners, but I am a Cubs fan first and foremost. I live by Wrigley Field and will be at Tuesday’s game. That’s the first time the M’s will play at Wrigley. Not to get too much ahead of myself, but the Cubs are a better team than the M’s.

    Based on coolstandings.com, even though the Cubs currently are 6 games below 500, they have a 56.8% chance to make the playoff, more than 3 times as likely to make the playoff than the M’s, who’s at 18.1%. Also, based on RS/RA, the Cubs sould be 33-27, 6 games over, where the M’s should be 31-28, 3 games over. So clearly, the Cubs are the better team.

  371. lemonverbena on June 10th, 2007 8:09 pm

    366: i’ve been going to these games since they started playing interleague, and this is definitely the first sweep here. don’t think they had ever swept them period, actually.

    ‘On a sunny Sunday afternoon, they hung in against a starting pitcher that has the lowest home ERA in the Major Leagues, overcame a two-run deficit with another productive seventh inning, used Friday night’s starting pitcher as a reliever in the eighth inning of a tie game, stole the go-ahead run in the top of the ninth against history’s only 500-save closer and handed the ball to their own dependable game-ender to put a bow on the Interleague series.

    Add it all up, and what the Mariners received was a 4-3 victory over the Padres in front of 35,950 and the first three-game sweep by an opposing team all season and the first-ever for the Mariners in San Diego.’

    pretty damn cool.

  372. lemonverbena on June 10th, 2007 8:13 pm

    ‘Based on coolstandings.com, even though the Cubs currently are 6 games below 500, they have a 56.8% chance to make the playoff, more than 3 times as likely to make the playoff than the M’s, who’s at 18.1%.’

    lies, damn lies, and statistics. Cubs 3x more likely to make the playoffs as the M’s? that make sense unless you, like, watch baseball.

  373. brian_sun on June 10th, 2007 8:17 pm

    #372: here is the link: http://www.coolstandings.com/baseball_standings.asp?i=1

    The reason Cubs under-performed so much was because they are 3-12 in 1 run ball game, which is about to go 3-13 now. We know this type of thing will even out over the course of the season. Winning 1 run game, which the M’s do really well, while the Cubs do poorly, isn’t a repeatable skill.

  374. JIMINEDMONDS on June 10th, 2007 8:44 pm

    This recent hot streak, particularly the sweep in San Diego, shows that the Mariners can play something resembling championship level baseball. All of a sudden my 80-1 bet in Las Vegas in February that this team will win the World Series does not look so crazy. Maybe Grover was right: that this team has talent on a par with his AL Championship Indian teams. Let’s keep in going.

  375. JIMINEDMONDS on June 10th, 2007 8:45 pm

    Pardon me: Let’s keep IT going.

  376. davepaisley on June 10th, 2007 9:01 pm

    #373

    Basing projections for the rest of the season on just the Pythag theorem is crazy.

    The M’s are no longer the team that started the year (thanks to injuries beyond Hargrove’s control), whereas the Cubs are still floundering.

    Cubs by month:
    10-14,12-15,5-5

    Mariners:
    10-10,16-14,7-2

    And one run games aren’t entirely luck. Quality bullpens help that a lot.

  377. smb on June 10th, 2007 9:33 pm

    Question of the night:

    At what point do I go from rational skeptic to curmudgeon for insisting this team doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of getting out of the first round of the playoffs?

    I’m not quite a fan-tanker, but all this unlikely winning is creating, in my opinion, the illusion of a team to really be excited about.

    I don’t mind asking myself this, because less than a month ago I would’a swore we didn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of even making the playoffs. Don’t get me wrong…this team is actually fun to watch right now, and I am grateful for that at least. Nevertheless, we sure look like the ChiSox team we swept in the first round of the ’01 playoffs, no?

  378. shortbus on June 10th, 2007 10:02 pm

    The ’95 M’s provided one the most exciting sports experiences ever and never gave the impression of being dominant. At some point you have to put aside all the skepticism and just enjoy the ride.

    Here’s me in the M’s 9th:

    – Way to get on board, Bloomy.
    – Bunt by a pinch hitter? RETARDED!!
    – Of course they walk Ichiro…Nice Call Hargrove!!
    – OHMYGODWHYAREYOUSTEALINGTHIRD??….YES!!!!
    – DON’T SWING AT THAT CRAP JOSE!! YESS!!!

    I would have enjoyed the inning a lot more if I was a completely ignorant fan.

  379. colm on June 10th, 2007 10:26 pm

    I’d guess that over a large enough sample size teams tend to win one run games at about the same rate that they win the rest of their games.

    Also I’d take issue with: “We know this type of thing will even out over the course of the season.” Umm, that’s optimistic. We know they should, but that’s not the same as saying they WILL.

    Here’s a note from Rob Neyer’s blog from last year: “But this season the Royals are 10-18 in one-run games. Call that bad luck if you like; just remember that over the previous 10 years the Royals had the worst record in one-run games in major league history, and they’re doing it again this year.” http://www.robneyer.com/robrany.html

    All the same, power to the Cubbies.

  380. colm on June 10th, 2007 10:29 pm

    SMB – that was 2000 and that White Sox team one over 100 games that season. Of course their rotation went something like James Baldwin, Cal Eldred, Jim Parque so maybe their eventual collapse should have been expected.

    And didn’t the umpire fail to notice Carlos Guillen step on home plate while executing the suicide squeeze that won Game 3 at Safeco?

  381. colm on June 10th, 2007 11:55 pm

    “won over 100 games”, not “one over..”.
    What a goof.

  382. Slippery Elmer on June 11th, 2007 12:24 am

    #370 – brian_sun:

    Those are useless stats. I have watched the Cubs more than any other team this season, since their games, unlike the M’s, are on a channel I receive. The Cubs stink. They’ve had a couple big blowouts, which skews their runs scored/runs given statistic towards the former. Most of their pitching is inconsistent, and so is their hitting. If you watch the Cubs you’d realize there’s no way the Mariners could even be considered to be worse than them.

  383. DiamondDave on June 11th, 2007 12:42 am

    I just read the game threads for the last two days in their ENTIRETY. Does that make me an obsessive USSM fan? Mebbe so. Or maybe it’s just becaue this weekend was an absolutely incredible display of clutch hitting and somewhat clutch pitching (bullpen). And winning the Weaver start was downright miraculous. I oculdn’t watch today’s game because I was at my son’s Cub Scout picnic, but I snuck away to listen to the later innings (I just knew it would be another good game). BUt unfortunately they started the special ceremony right as the Ms ninth was starting. Came back in 30 minutes or so and heard Rick Rizzs utter those two sweet words: “Mariners win.”

    What a weekend. What a team. Don’t pinch me, please, because I don’t want to wake up.

    oh, and I just wanted to get the last word in on this thread ;-)

  384. Tak on June 11th, 2007 12:52 am

    #370

    Sorry, but that is a pretty bad argument. I am not necessarily saying that the Ms are better than the Cubs, but bringing up stats which are highly dependant on your league/division (like RS/RA and Playoff %) is a very bad idea. No offense, but most people believe that the NL central is the worst division in baseball by far.

  385. joser on June 11th, 2007 1:14 am

    Winning 1 run game, which the M’s do really well, while the Cubs do poorly, isn’t a repeatable skill.

    Uh, no. The M’s are 9 and 7 (.563) in one run games, which is exactly in line with their winning percentage (.559) — it’s not something they do “really well.” There’s no skill here to repeat: the Mariners are doing exactly as you’d expect.

    Not to get too much ahead of myself, but the Cubs are a better team than the M’s. Based on coolstandings.com…

    Hoo boy, I knew Cubs fans were delusional (how else to survive as a Cubs fan?) but that’s some seriously stretched logic.

    Cubs vs NL East: 9-13; vs NL Central: 13-15; vs NL West: 3-5 (including 1-2 vs SD).

    The NL Central, which has only one team over .500, as a division is 31-39 (.443) vs the NL East and a woeful 25-52 (.325) vs the NL West. The Central is inarguably the weakest division in the NL, and the Cubs are under .500 even there. The Cubs aren’t the strongest team in the NL Central; the NL Central is weaker than the NL West; the Padres are the division leaders in the West; the Mariners just swept the Padres.

    All coolstandings.com is telling you is that the Cubs play in a weak-ass division. Look at it this way: you have a much clearer path to qualifying for the Winter Olympics if you’re Jamaican than if you’re Austrian, but that says nothing about who is more likely to win gold when the Jamaicans and the Austrians go head to head.

    Now, I suppose you could try to argue that even the weakest division in the NL is stronger than any division in the AL, but the history of interleague play certainly doesn’t support that — including history as recent as this weekend. Texas is inarguably the weakest team in the AL West, and they just took two of three from the only team in the NL Central with a winning record.

    Of course the Brewers don’t appear to be the team they were a month ago, and maybe the Cubs are getting it together (though losing 5 of the last 10, maybe not). Yeah, the Cubs figure to win a few more one-run games — but there’s no reason to expect the M’s will start losing more of them. Yeah, the Mariners are certainly not a great team: they have a rotation with more holes than arms, they’ve been lucky, and they often succeed in spite of their manager. So, yeah, anything can happen in a three day series, especially for a team playing for the first time in a stadium as quirky as Wrigley. But there’s no way you can argue that the Cubs are a better team than the Mariners. And neither ESPN nor SI think so either.

  386. lemonverbena on June 11th, 2007 3:22 am

    “To tell the truth, I’m not excited to go to Cleveland, but we have to,” Ichiro said through an interpreter. “If I ever saw myself saying I’m excited going to Cleveland, I’d punch myself in the face, because I’m lying.”

    i love that guy.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.