Game 94, Mariners at Blue Jays

Dave · July 21, 2007 at 8:38 am · Filed Under Mariners 

Weaver vs Towers, 10:05 am.

As far as non-Safeco matchups go, this one is pretty Weaver friendly. The Blue Jays best hitters are all right-handers, and Weaver’s traditionally much better against same handed hitters. I don’t expect him to dominate, but if we have to start the back end of our rotation on the road, this is about as good a matchup as we can hope for.

Josh Towers is the Blue Jays version of Cha Seung Baek – throw the ball over the plate and see what happens. He’s a bit homer prone, but he won’t walk anyone, so the M’s will have to earn their runs today.

Comments

318 Responses to “Game 94, Mariners at Blue Jays”

  1. Crooklyn Banks on July 21st, 2007 8:47 am

    To think a team with Jeff Weaver and Jose Vidro would be in the playoff hunt.

  2. nuin on July 21st, 2007 8:54 am

    To think that a team with Jeff Weaver would win the World Series.

  3. Crooklyn Banks on July 21st, 2007 8:58 am

    Ture. So very ture.

  4. chopstik on July 21st, 2007 9:02 am

    Weaver will be all right today… i feel it for some reason..

  5. patnmic on July 21st, 2007 9:21 am

    Chopstik,

    That’s just the buzz you have left over from last night :-)

  6. Cmalone187 on July 21st, 2007 9:34 am

    Adding on top of that; to think Weaver was one of the reasons a team won the World Series.

  7. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 9:45 am

    Everytime I see Vidro in the 2 spot and Ibanez hitting 3rd it feels like a kick in the stomach. Why must the Mariners tempt fate instead of just putting their best lineup out there everyday and easily beating teams like the Oreo’s and BJ’s?

  8. Greg08 on July 21st, 2007 9:48 am

    Weird lineup for the Jays..

  9. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 9:50 am

    I can’t wait for tomorrow….i’ll be sitting first row behind the M’s dugout cheering for the Mariners, although it will be Halladay pitching against Ramirez. Crap.

  10. Huskermariner on July 21st, 2007 9:50 am

    Dave -
    Sorry if I missed it but anxiously awaiting your trade deadline piece. Been delayed because more fodder on the fire? Keep up the good work!

  11. ndrfx on July 21st, 2007 9:52 am

    For the love cheese bench Sexson, let’s see Broussard out there.

  12. chris23 on July 21st, 2007 9:55 am

    RE #9
    The M’s pushed Ramirez back and the King is starting tomorrow against Halladay. So it should be a real treat.

  13. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 9:58 am

    Holy Crap….are you serious, this is great news. My girlfriend bought me tickets as a b-day gift back in May, so I could only hope for the 1-5 chance of seeing The King.

  14. geofftoons on July 21st, 2007 9:58 am

    Mustard, I just read in the paper this morning that Felix is going to start tomorrow and they’re going to bump HoRam to start Monday against Texas. Lucky you! : )

  15. fetish on July 21st, 2007 10:02 am

    Ugh… M’s pre-game is disgustingly bad. It’s about 1/10th as objective as Fox News.

  16. Dan W on July 21st, 2007 10:02 am

    Vidro post-ASB: 423/483/538

  17. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:03 am

    Yeah, if anyone is watching the game, I’ll be the guy wearing the Mariner gear (1977 throwbacks) My girlfriend gets the pleasure of wearing Mariners gear as well. lol Tomorrow just went from great to kickass.
    Let’s hope for a Josh Flowers (bp tossing) kind of performance today.

  18. SequimRealEstate on July 21st, 2007 10:04 am

    Congratulations Mustard. Two gifts in one. Maybe 3 if your girlfriend actually likes baseball.

  19. joser on July 21st, 2007 10:05 am

    If your girlfriend bought the tickets for you, of course you’re going to get a good matchup. You think she’d give you HoRam as a gift?

    (And actually, considering the time he spent on the DL, this season you had less than a 1-in-5 chance to see the King)

  20. dirk on July 21st, 2007 10:06 am

    If we had any other hitter who could consistantly hit the ball to the right side, then I think McClaren would be more apt to move Vidro down in the lineup.

    I hate the fact we burn through our three lefties in the first three hitters.

  21. Mr. Egaas on July 21st, 2007 10:07 am

    Good Line-Up McLaren, you jackass. Show some creativity. Fix some problems.

  22. Mr. Egaas on July 21st, 2007 10:08 am

    Ha. This game may feature the fastest lead-off hitter in the game against the slowest lead-off hitter in the game. Gotta love Matt Stairs.

  23. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 10:09 am

    “Josh Towers is the Blue Jays version of Cha Seung Baek – throw the ball over the plate and see what happens. He’s a bit homer prone, but he won’t walk anyone, so the M’s will have to earn their runs today.”

    I predict either quick innings or a quick hook for Towers. If the M’s find the range, he’s toast early. If not, then they’ll be burning through innings, swinging at the first pitch.

  24. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:09 am

    She loves it live, not so much on TV. 3 years now and she still has plenty of questions, which is great. Last time the M’s were in town she was impressed by Ichiro’s stretching routine in the on deck circle, and asked why Beltre swung at so many pitches that he couldnt reach. Great!

  25. terry on July 21st, 2007 10:09 am

    I’m sticcking a pin in my mlbam voodoo doll…. the Ms game is blacked out in southern indiana…. kiss my ass.

  26. Norm Charlton Fan Club on July 21st, 2007 10:10 am

    Why is this blacked out on mlb.tv???

  27. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:10 am

    I hate FOX…

  28. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 10:11 am

    F FOX. And to make matters worse they M’s aren’t on the Fox Saturday schedule for the rest of the season.

  29. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:11 am

    Game is on CBC here in Canada, and blacked out on MLBTV here.

  30. terry on July 21st, 2007 10:12 am

    BTW, Toronto is a GREAT city but I’m not a huge fan of watching games in Rogers center. It kind of has the sterile feel that some domes can have IMHO.

  31. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:13 am

    Wow, quick two outs.

  32. ndrfx on July 21st, 2007 10:14 am

    Where was the 12 pitch at bat Ichiro? Come on!

  33. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:14 am

    1,2,3. Good contact for 2/3 AB’s though.

  34. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:16 am

    6 Pitches, way to work the count fellas. Just cause we can’t see you on TV doesn’t mean that you can suck without us knowing.

  35. ndrfx on July 21st, 2007 10:17 am

    CBC is broadcasting about 5 seconds earlier than FSN! Amazing!

  36. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:17 am

    Nice play by Beltre, 1 out.

  37. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:18 am

    Gameday and MLB Audio is about 30 seconds off sync. Perfect.

  38. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:20 am

    Holy crap, was that an 5 minute first inning? haha

  39. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 10:20 am

    Sexson with… range?

    Weaver finishes it off as awkwardly as possible too.

    Good inning anyways.

  40. _David_ on July 21st, 2007 10:21 am

    22: Jose Reyes slower than Ichiro? He is 10 years younger…

  41. ndrfx on July 21st, 2007 10:23 am

    Oh come on. He’s 50/50 on those calls god damnit.

  42. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:24 am

    I know this is early, but Towers seems to have his command and movement which means the M’s have to be patient or its going to be a quick game.

  43. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:26 am

    CBC commentators are saying that Sexson can carry a team on his back for a month or two once he gets hot. Ummm, so when is that going to be?

  44. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:26 am

    TB up 1-0 already. Good to see the Devil Rays doing some dirty work for us beating the Angels and Yankees.

  45. Sports on a Schtick on July 21st, 2007 10:26 am

    At least Richie made him throw some pitches.

  46. scraps on July 21st, 2007 10:29 am

    We aren’t going to work the count today, and from Dave’s description of Towers, we shouldn’t. Taking pitches today is a recipe for striking out. That doesn’t mean swing at any old crap, but it does mean that the pitch count’s going to be low, and it isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

  47. ndrfx on July 21st, 2007 10:29 am

    See what I’m talking about? Third pitch was a strike, such bullshit this ump is.

  48. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 10:30 am

    When he’s on, Weaver is fun to watch pitch – he has a nice, smooth delivery and his pitches do move around.

  49. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:30 am

    #46, that may be true…but are the Mariners supposed to make Towers look this good?

  50. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 10:31 am

    Let’s watch the second time through for the M’s. They may just need the first run to get used to his pitches.

    If he puts ‘em down on 2-3 pitches each the second go ’round, then we’re in trouble.

  51. JR Ewing on July 21st, 2007 10:32 am

    mustard, bring a fries sign for blowers, they showed some guy last night with a sign. good way to get on tv back in seattle

  52. maalox on July 21st, 2007 10:32 am

    Game’s on channel 99, people!

  53. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 10:33 am

    Gosh, those are frustrating. Little bloop base hits.

  54. Greg08 on July 21st, 2007 10:33 am

    ya right handed hitters are only hitting .321 off of Weaver..

  55. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:34 am

    I’ll be taking a sign tomorrow, maybe i can sneak in a promo for ussmariner.com on there.

  56. Mr. Egaas on July 21st, 2007 10:34 am

    Am I the only one getting it on FSN?

  57. Axtell on July 21st, 2007 10:35 am

    54-

    What are right handed hitters hitting off him since he came off the DL? He’s been a completely different pitcher since then.

  58. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 10:35 am

    I’m getting it on FSN. I think the people kvetching are out of the Seattle area.

  59. Mr. Egaas on July 21st, 2007 10:35 am

    Ah right right. MLB.tv is crap on Saturdays. This is the kinda stuff they don’t tell you when you sign up.

  60. jordan on July 21st, 2007 10:36 am

    crap

  61. argh on July 21st, 2007 10:36 am

    Would Adam Jones have made that throw to the plate closer?

  62. jordan on July 21st, 2007 10:37 am

    wow.. i get it on FSN too

  63. erich39 on July 21st, 2007 10:37 am

    I love watching Yuni play left field…

  64. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:37 am

    Weaver threw 2 different pitches that whole AB, Weaver needs to mix it up more then anyone. Gameday also has him getting hosed on a few strike calls already.

  65. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:38 am

    Holy cow. Baseball on already? Now I have to split my time with Harry Potter.

  66. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 10:39 am

    Game is proceeding just like yesterday – only 1 run given up when it could have been a lot worse. Now watch as we work our comeback.

  67. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:39 am

    Ooh. I’m tempted to watch the rest of the game on CBC. Even the commercials will be more fun!

  68. GD on July 21st, 2007 10:40 am

    No problems viewing mlb.tv in Switzerland, as per.
    Though west coast night games starting at 4am my time are an issue.

  69. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:40 am

    #67, where are you watching from?

  70. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:41 am

    Ugh, can’t do it. The picture is so much worse. For shame, CBC!

  71. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:42 am

    Mustard: plain ol’ City of Seattle. With limited cable, no less.

  72. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 10:44 am

    You guys complain so much about Sexson. Do any of you actually realize that his strikeout percentage is down and his walk percentage is up along with his contact percentage, his isolated power index, and his expected BA. His BABIP is almost a hundred points below where it has been the last three years, which suggests he’s been getting very unlucky.

  73. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:44 am

    nice, didnt think you got CBC there. Not a fan of Jim Hughson and his play by play.

  74. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 10:44 am

    Lauren – what channel (I assume Comcast).

  75. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:44 am

    Does anyone know if us MLB.tv viewers out of the Seattle area are going to get Fox fucked again for the game tomorrow?

  76. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:45 am

    Aw. Adorable Lyle Overbay commercial! Those Canadians are so cute.

  77. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:46 am

    fishiam: as maalox said, 99.

  78. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:46 am

    Hey, we have some good commercials here! hahah

  79. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 10:46 am

    Wow, the picture really is worse (and I don’t have HD).

  80. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 10:47 am

    DAMellen — all we know is he looks hopeless at the plate. That’s something stats can’t measure :)

  81. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:47 am

    72- Unlucky or bad it doesn’t matter he isn’t helping the team. I would rather have a 1B that was over achieving then an unlucky one.

  82. Greg08 on July 21st, 2007 10:47 am

    well Axtell, i will agree wit you there. But hitters still have hit .300 off him in July..

  83. Mr. Egaas on July 21st, 2007 10:47 am

    CBC plays Arrested Development at midnight sometimes.

  84. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:48 am

    Just so everyone knows, CBC does not usually have baseball games and its the last channel I checked as a last resort. lol I’ll take what i get though today.

  85. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 10:48 am

    I don’t put too much stock into ‘lucky’. If you’re batting around 200 you should better have a lot of home runs or something else to make up for it. I don’t count walks as that something.

  86. David J. Corcoran I on July 21st, 2007 10:50 am

    How bout those Mariners?

  87. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:51 am

    A hitter has some effect on his BABIP also, all contact is not created equal. If he is driving the ball hard it will go up, if all he can manage is weakly hit GB’s and FB’s that number goes down.

  88. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 10:52 am

    So you’re into stats when they enforce what you think and against them when they offer a different opinion? Interesting.

  89. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:52 am

    Corco: we’re not going out. You’re too young for me. Welcome back though!

  90. waldo rojas on July 21st, 2007 10:53 am

    Does anyone remember where I left my shoes last night?

  91. hcoguy on July 21st, 2007 10:53 am

    People are down on Sexson because his range sucks and he makes too much money which means we are likely stuck with him for the duration.

  92. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:54 am

    DAM: the real answer is that none of the real stat-wielders are here yet today. Apparently none of us are capable of really contradicting the Sexson stats effectively, but I’m sure there is a counterargument to be made.

  93. ndrfx on July 21st, 2007 10:55 am

    God damnit, son of a!

  94. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:55 am

    WOW. Ok, cbc is awesome. They just played the umpire loudly saying “GODDAMN IT MOTHER–”

    Then they replayed it.

  95. clarke on July 21st, 2007 10:56 am

    and acknowledged it…we’ve all seen it on us stations and they just pretend it didn’t happen

  96. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 10:56 am

    Look at that speed.

  97. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 10:56 am

    So it was on FSN too?

  98. clarke on July 21st, 2007 10:57 am

    was watching cbc

  99. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 10:57 am

    yeah, the mic on that ump was awesome and the acknowledgment of his profanity was funny too.

  100. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 10:57 am

    Turbo, the new igniter!

  101. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 10:57 am

    Vidro helping his cause, I am going to say that Ibanez will not be helping his cause with this AB.

  102. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 10:57 am

    Have you not been watching him flail away at the plate virtually every game? It’s just frustrating and hard to watch I guess.

  103. scraps on July 21st, 2007 10:58 am

    So you’re into stats when they enforce what you think and against them when they offer a different opinion? Interesting.

    So you don’t pay attention to folks when they explain why they don’t think the stats you’ve cited tell the whole story? How about that.

    I still think Sexson will come around, but when you’re BABIP is in the toilet and you aren’t making much solid contact, something might be really wrong. And when the walks are rising at the same time, that something might be alowing bat speed.

  104. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 10:58 am

    #94, we always get the real deal.

  105. scraps on July 21st, 2007 10:59 am

    you’re = your

  106. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 10:59 am

    Fair enough, Lauren. A raise in walk% along with an extreme drop in BABIP usually does indicate a player who is playing okay (especially when the k% is down and PX is up and all that), but I’m sure there’s a stat somewhere out there that says he sucks too. There always is.

  107. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 11:01 am

    BABIP is not a repeatable skill for pitchers, but it sure is for hitters. The numbers that really matter for hitters is OPS, which includes ability to drive a ball for good contact.

    The poster boy for this is Ichiro. He’s got a tremendous BABIP. A lot of that is speed combined with good ground-ball contact skills.

    Yeah, Sexson’s walking, and when he hits the ball he’s still driving it for power, but he’s hitting a lot more weak fly balls. That suggests that he’s lost some ability to drive the ball for base hits.

    That means he’s lost something as a hitter. He’s still hitting lefties pretty well, so the best thing to do with Sexson is to turn him into a platoon player. If only we had a capable, left-handed hitting first baseman.

  108. dirty dirty on July 21st, 2007 11:01 am

    sexson’s ops+ this year (91) is the worst it’s been since his debut in ’97. if that helps convince you he’s falling off the wagon …

  109. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:02 am

    But he’s making more contact than he did last year. Obviously, Sexson was never a guy who made a lot of contact, but an increase is an increase. That would usually indicate an improvement. Also, I don’t understand your first thing. When did I ignore someone who explained that the stats I used didn’t tell the whole story?

  110. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:02 am

    103- I agree. I also think that Sexson is a HUGE part of the Mariners race to the playoffs. If he turns into the power hitter we need I think we could easily get into the playoffs. Hitting .200 Slugging .400 with only approximately 28-30 HR isn’t going to get us there.

  111. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:02 am

    We have hashed out that Sexson is terrible this year many times – you can check almost any game thread. A quick one if you wish to see some stats: Sexson is LAST among qualifed AL first basemen in OPS+ at 0.706. For $14 million a year. Yeeeeahhh.

    DAMellen, aren’t you the same one who argued how good Heathcliff Slocumb was in 1997?

  112. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:02 am

    Nice play Weaver.

  113. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:04 am

    CBC announcer, Rance Mulliniks is now praising Duncan as a pitching coach who can turn pitchers around, and taking on reclamation projects.

  114. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:05 am

    Nice 8 pitch inning.

  115. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:05 am

    I argued that our bullpen was better with him than without him and I proved my point. He had the lowest FIP (the stat Dave said is most important for relievers) of any reliever on our team. He wasn’t good, but he was the best guy we had and our bullpen improved with him.

  116. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:07 am

    49 pitches through 4. Gameday shows his pitches looking hittable, usually in the 83-87 range and not much movement variance, but I will take another regressing to the mean start.

  117. dirty dirty on July 21st, 2007 11:08 am

    fishiam, that’s ops not plus. it doesn’t account for the difficulty of batting at safeco. let’s see what he does here.

  118. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:09 am

    I am loving how the CBC guys are actually questioning the umps calls in favour of the Mariners. You rarely see this.

  119. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:09 am

    Way to not help me out, Rich.

  120. dirty dirty on July 21st, 2007 11:09 am

    that’s sexson. always reaching.

  121. Axtell on July 21st, 2007 11:10 am

    118-

    Am sure that’s in response to Gibbons getting tossed yesterday for arguing the 2 check swing strikeouts yesterday.

  122. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:11 am

    I’d like to see Broussard get some more starts. Why not give Sexson some rest on the bench? Or atleast, like everyone’s been saying for a while, platoon him. Just because he’s making loads of money? Or because it may hurt his confidence?

    I just want whatever will help the M’s have a better chance to win ballgames really.

    From this at-bat, he’s not getting around on pitches he should/used to.

  123. Mike Honcho on July 21st, 2007 11:12 am

    56 pitches in 5 innings for Towers.

    Apparently the guys want to get done with this game as quickly as humanly possible.

    It sure looks like a beautiful day in Toronto, but this is ridiculous…

  124. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:12 am

    117 – yeah, I noticed that, I thought THT listed OPS+ by default. I’m looking for the usual site that gives OPS+ – I’m betting it doesn’t make Sexson look any better – I mean look how far behind the NEXT TO LAST batter he is.

  125. clarke on July 21st, 2007 11:14 am

    lol, cbc needs to turn off the ump mic or whatever that is

  126. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:15 am

    Aaron Hill- “ahhhh f**k, f**k”
    I love how you can hear this crystal clear.

  127. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:15 am

    Well we all want the Ms to win more games, Pumpkin. The question is how best to do that. I agree with giving Richie a few extra days off cuz I’m sure he’s getting frustrated, but I think we have to give him a chance to get himself together too. Broussard is good though and I’d be in favor of giving him a little extra time in the lineup. I’d like to see Sexson, Guillen, and Vidro all rest a little more to fit Benny in there.

  128. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 11:15 am

    Ha! Now a curse word admitted on FSN. This must be profanity day or something. The effects of the free-speaking Canadians?

  129. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:15 am

    Sexson OPS+ 91, lowest of any full season.

  130. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:15 am

    Aaron Hill was loud enough to get up to the booth, and Dave is now apologizing for him.

  131. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:17 am

    No appologizes on CBC and they even showed the live replay.

  132. fetish on July 21st, 2007 11:17 am

    #107 – I am not convinced that pitchers do not have meaningful impact on BABIP. As you mentioned, it clearly appears to be a repeatable skill for hitters.

    I have a strong suspicion that the variability in a pitchers BABIP between years/months/etc has everything to do with what batters they’re facing. Do you know if anyone has done any research into “expected” BABIP based on batters faced?

  133. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:18 am

    Where are you guys finding OPS+?

  134. dirty dirty on July 21st, 2007 11:20 am

    DAM: baseball-reference.com has it.

  135. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:21 am

    Yeah I know, but I thought there was a site where you can see who’s leading the league and that kind of stuff.

  136. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:21 am

    134 – but you can’t select for position players (maybe if you register/pay you get that ability). Go to the page for Sexson and his career stats will show his OPS+.

  137. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:23 am

    Ichiro needs a double or triple to get us going here.

  138. dirty dirty on July 21st, 2007 11:23 am

    so what’s the story then? is he, as we suspect, at the bottom of al first basemen? or is the stat not out there for free. anyone have a prospectus? i’m traveling.

  139. David J. Corcoran I on July 21st, 2007 11:24 am

    89: Don’t worry about it, you’re too old for me.

  140. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:24 am

    I think we need to steal here.

  141. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:24 am

    I can do a manual search at BR, using the list of qualified 1B at THT. Give me a few minutes.

  142. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:26 am

    Come on, Ichiro. Zaun couldn’t throw out my sister and you’re at least as fast as she is. We need a man in scoring position. Oh good. There he goes. Now try again.

  143. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:26 am

    138 with a OPS+ of 91 I would say bottom 10 easy, possibly bottom 5. We will see what fishiam comes up with.

  144. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:26 am

    Stupid hit and run…..the Jays are horrible at throwing out runners. Zaun fluked out last night. STEAL!

  145. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:27 am

    Nix that, I love the hit and run. haha

  146. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:27 am

    That’s a run if…oh well. Good job, Turb.

  147. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:27 am

    Please, just one more hit. I’ll also accept a wild pitch or pass ball.

  148. agingfan on July 21st, 2007 11:27 am

    Frankly, I am rooting for a passed ball here

  149. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 11:28 am

    MY TURBO LOVER!!!

  150. nfreakct on July 21st, 2007 11:28 am

    Vidro back to .300.

    It’s not a good sign when right now I’d rather have Ibanez on the bench and Vidro DHing than the other way around.

  151. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:29 am

    Can we please get Jones up here fast? I hate knowing that Raul is not going to come through for us. Brutal.

  152. agingfan on July 21st, 2007 11:29 am

    damn

  153. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:29 am

    At least he gave it a good ride.

  154. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:29 am

    He came close. Boy, Wells really deserves those gold gloves doesn’t he?

  155. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 11:30 am

    :’(

  156. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:31 am

    Close only counts in horseshoes.

  157. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:31 am

    Ral is struggling, he might never get another U from me.

  158. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:31 am

    So, here are the results – and Aubrey Huff is actually worst in both OPS and OPS+. But still …

    RK PLAYER TEAM OPS OPS+
    1 Carlos Pena TAM 1.009 162
    2 Mark Teixeira TEX .963 149
    3 Justin Morneau MIN .938 146
    4 Ryan Garko CLE .903 140
    5 Paul Konerko CHW .887 129
    6 Kevin Youkilis BOS .876 130
    7 Kevin Millar BAL .839 123
    8 Casey Kotchman LAA .836 125
    9 Dan Johnson OAK .795 114
    10 Sean Casey DET1 .764 104
    11 Richie Sexson SEA .704 91
    12 Aubrey Huff BAL .688 82

  159. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 11:31 am

    Dang

  160. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:32 am

    Yeah that’s certainly ugly. Where are you getting these numbers from?

  161. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:32 am

    Vernon is good though and I love that they have Jessie Barfield there to talk about him. A bit of credibility.

  162. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 11:32 am

    150 Sadly I’ve been thinking the same thing for the past week. Just bring in Adam Jones for Ibanez, and take care of Vidro later.

  163. dirty dirty on July 21st, 2007 11:32 am

    thanks fishiam!

  164. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 11:33 am

    156:

    And hand grenades. And nuclear weapons and government work.

  165. Tabas on July 21st, 2007 11:34 am

    Hola. from Mexico!!

  166. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:34 am

    I thought he was going to lose the ball when it went from sunlight to shade, but he tracked it all the way. Bah.

  167. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:34 am

    160 – The OPS and list of qualified batters are from the link I provided earlier at the Hardball Times. the OPS+ comes from here: Baseball Reference

  168. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:35 am

    #164, yeah i’ll give you that. haha

  169. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:35 am

    Damn. I thought that was gone. Woo.

  170. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:35 am

    Missed the link first time: here

  171. Tabas on July 21st, 2007 11:35 am

    Nice Game from weaver

  172. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:35 am

    Broussard at .794 115

    Platoon them with their splits and you get Sexson .751 vs. LHP and Broussard at .800 OPS

  173. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:35 am

    On baseball reference you can get stats by position?

  174. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:36 am

    That was a beautiful strikeout pitch.

  175. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 11:37 am

    Would all of the people who thought before the game we were going to get a pitcher’s duel please raise your hand?

    Didn’t think so.

  176. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:38 am

    173 – I don’t think so, not for free anyway. But you can get them by position (though not OPS+) at The Hardball Times.

  177. JR Ewing on July 21st, 2007 11:38 am

    vegas was fooled . . . they expected 10.5 runs

  178. nathanp2112 on July 21st, 2007 11:39 am

    177 – game’s not over

  179. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:41 am

    Oh beltre. Not even sexson’s arms make contact with that.

  180. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:41 am

    So will everyone love Sexson if he puts one in the seats right here?

  181. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:41 am

    There has only been 6 hits, 10 runs doesn’t look good.

  182. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:42 am

    180- No. If he continues to do it on a regular basis, yes.

  183. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 11:43 am

    Just started watching the game. I’m a bit confused here…didn’t Josh Towers used to be one of the worst pitchers in baseball?

  184. carcinogen on July 21st, 2007 11:43 am

    Cy Towers is killing us….or is it our hitters?

  185. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:43 am

    #182- What if i changed “love” to “tolerated” hahha

  186. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 11:44 am

    And Turbo has our only two hits of the game…ughh.

  187. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 11:44 am

    I figure our hitters are just laying off to make Towers overconfident. On the fifth or sixth time through the lineup, then they’ll nail him.

  188. JR Ewing on July 21st, 2007 11:45 am

    check the number of hits/runs the mariners have had in these east coast day games at the beginning of a trip . .. nothing in new york in may, nothing today.

  189. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:46 am

    Towers is up to 86 pitches – if Jose can foul off a dozen more, maybe they’ll take Towers out of the game due to pitch count.

  190. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:46 am

    VERY nice at bat, counts as a base hit.

  191. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:47 am

    I’m okay with this.

  192. pablothegreat on July 21st, 2007 11:47 am

    190: I guess not. How is that an error?

  193. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:47 am

    Changed to an error, now on to the bullpen.

  194. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 11:48 am

    189 Nice prophecy

  195. Jigga8481 on July 21st, 2007 11:48 am

    They’re not actually pinch hitting johjima against a righty are they?

  196. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:48 am

    Not sure, they are saying that Glaus would have had the force at second if picked cleanly.

  197. JR Ewing on July 21st, 2007 11:48 am

    broussard or kenji here ? who do you want ?

  198. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:48 am

    Is there anyone else in the league that hits for a high average and not much power that’s in the DH spot?

    I guess that would equate to low XBH and high avg.

  199. Jigga8481 on July 21st, 2007 11:49 am

    Gotta be Broussard

  200. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:49 am

    I want Burke. Kenji needs his day off and Jamie has come through during his small sample size time.

  201. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 11:49 am

    So, 158, where are the NYY and TOR 1B numbers?

    They can’t look pretty with the crap they’ve been trotting out.

  202. robbbbbb on July 21st, 2007 11:50 am

    I don’t think we can put this one on the pitchers. The home plate umpire is giving the pitchers the outside corner all day long. This pitchers’ duel is on the umpire.

  203. pumpkinhead on July 21st, 2007 11:50 am

    Time to shine Benji

  204. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:50 am

    Now switched back to a basehit…

  205. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 11:51 am

    Broussard is the right call. And they changed it back. Good call.

  206. argh on July 21st, 2007 11:51 am

    crap

  207. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:52 am

    Ditto

  208. Paseman on July 21st, 2007 11:53 am

    Is it just me or does Ben Broussard = Jose Vidro with power?

  209. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 11:53 am

    201 – I guess no single individual on those two teams has enough qualified ABs (3.1 AB/game) and so they don’t show up on a list filtered to include only qualified batters.

  210. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 11:53 am

    When the M’s play like this it makes me a sad panda.

  211. Jigga8481 on July 21st, 2007 11:53 am

    According to Joe’s tracer Josh Towers just got 20 outs without ever throwing a pitch in the strike zone.

  212. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:54 am

    Weaver got away with one there. If that bat didnt break, it was gone.

  213. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:55 am

    Wells scares me ever since I found out he hit the hardest home run of the year, came off the bat at 121MPH. It was noted in a recent THT article.

  214. Xteve X on July 21st, 2007 11:56 am

    100 MPH for Weaver on that last pitch??? BS.

  215. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:57 am

    showed 91mph on CBC.

  216. Jigga8481 on July 21st, 2007 11:57 am

    I was at a game at Safeco this year and apparently Kevin Milwood threw one 108.

  217. carcinogen on July 21st, 2007 11:58 am

    We got good Weaver today…too bad the offense decided to take the day off….Sexson is making me angry.

  218. Jigga8481 on July 21st, 2007 11:58 am

    The gun must be set to km.

  219. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 11:58 am

    87 on Gameday.

  220. argh on July 21st, 2007 11:58 am

    I’m enjoying the CBC commercials — bitchy angels in heaven snacking on Philadelphia Cream Cheese and noting the new female angel with the “perky” wings — “Those can’t be real….” sez one.

    Don’t think that would fly here in the theocracy.

  221. huhwhat on July 21st, 2007 11:58 am

    Yuni…

  222. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 11:58 am

    Yeah, and Verlander’s curve clocked in at 93.

  223. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 11:59 am

    Scott Downs coming in, pretty tough lefty.

  224. Jigga8481 on July 21st, 2007 12:00 pm

    He’s gonna be facing a tough lefty though

  225. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 12:00 pm

    I love it when managers bring in lefties to face Ichiro! Thanks Gibbons!

  226. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:01 pm

    51 appearances for Downs, leads the AL.

  227. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 12:01 pm

    Downs is going to be facing a pretty tough batter also…

  228. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:02 pm

    Well it gets even easier for him now!

  229. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 12:04 pm

    My new policy is to root for Vidro to reach base on an error every time he comes to bat.

  230. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 12:04 pm

    They have to accidentally hit a home run or something right? The BJays aren’t going to shut them out, please!

  231. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:05 pm

    Anybody else would’ve reached. Well Accardo isn’t the toughest closer in the league. Of course, he’s not the worst either.

  232. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 12:05 pm

    Gotta run – go M’s.

  233. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:05 pm

    Well we will be facing Accardo next inning. He is hittable and prone to blowing a save.

  234. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 12:06 pm

    229, how about we root the same for the entire lineup? Then we would be unbeatable.

  235. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:07 pm

    Oh God. I’d be so sad to see Weaver throw a CG loss.

  236. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:07 pm

    Dear God, please dont let Weaver get a complete game loss. I mean this is his longest outing this year. Can I please ask for one more hit in the 9th, and that it at least be a HR?

    Thanks,
    Mariners Fan

  237. carcinogen on July 21st, 2007 12:08 pm

    This game is ass-tastic!!! See the ball, hit the ball, fellas!

    If this game can’t sell the FO/Mac on at least the need for a platoon at 1B, and probably other changes…I don’t know what will.

  238. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:08 pm

    At least a HR? And not a super homerun?

  239. Spadam on July 21st, 2007 12:09 pm

    236. He pitched a 9 inning, 4-hitter vs. PIT. But yes, we need some runs.

  240. brian_sun on July 21st, 2007 12:09 pm

    236: I thought Weaver had a 9 inning complete game shutout earlier in the year.

  241. carcinogen on July 21st, 2007 12:10 pm

    238: I think we need a Super Duper Veteran Effect(tm) home run!

  242. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:10 pm

    Sorry about that, going by the CBC commentator’s and they said it was his longest…didnt double check.
    #238, do Super HR’s count as two runs? If so, then a Super HR would be great.

  243. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:11 pm

    We’ve already been through this today, so I’ll just say this: more time off for Richie, sure, but a fullblown platoon would be a mistake.

  244. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 12:12 pm

    234 I root for other members of the team to get a hit in every at bat, naturally. What do you do?

  245. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:13 pm

    244: I root for all triples.

  246. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 12:13 pm

    244, Vidro hate is so last month =)

  247. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:13 pm

    I root for all triples….from Turbo.

  248. Jeff Manto on July 21st, 2007 12:13 pm

    Richie Sexson makes Jeff Manto look like an All-Star

  249. carcinogen on July 21st, 2007 12:13 pm

    243: Sorry, I came late…around where were the comments discussing why full platoon would be a mistake?

  250. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 12:14 pm

    Ral is going lose some other letters pretty soon.

  251. Spadam on July 21st, 2007 12:14 pm

    245: root for that now.

  252. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:14 pm

    Nobody makes Jeff Manto look like an all-star. Sorry, Manto.

  253. Paseman on July 21st, 2007 12:14 pm

    At least Raul is a veteran! At least he’s a good leader! At least hes a great clubhouse guy! At least he doesn’t embarass the club! (except at the plate)… I give up, please bring up Jones….

  254. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 12:15 pm

    Oh, beautiful. Ibanez really deserves to remain in the #3 spot.

  255. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 12:16 pm

    246 247 I like triples better than anything but ITP HR’s, but rooting for either of them feels a bit like rooting for a full solar eclipse.

  256. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:16 pm

    Not specifically that a platoon would be a mistake, but that Richie could turn it around. It was just me saying it so feel free to disagree. I just don’t feel like discussing it anymore.

  257. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 12:17 pm

    Where’s Greg Pirkl c.1994 when you really need him?

  258. terry on July 21st, 2007 12:17 pm

    Alright….i’m starting to get worried here…..

  259. Mustard on July 21st, 2007 12:18 pm

    Since I am going to be at tomorow’s game, right over the M’s dugout, what should be the sign i create?

  260. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 12:18 pm

    2 backward K’s in the bottom of the 9th, stellar.

  261. scott19 on July 21st, 2007 12:19 pm

    242: He is the venerable Jim Hughson, after all. He’s probably more used to doing all those Canucks games on TV. :)

    Although, he did just shower a heap o’ accolades on JJ a moment ago.

  262. Jeff Manto on July 21st, 2007 12:19 pm

    252, If Lou gave me a little more time in 96′ I could have been an All-Star. Damn you, red ass!

  263. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:19 pm

    Fuck.

  264. agingfan on July 21st, 2007 12:19 pm

    Weaver deserved better than that

  265. Spadam on July 21st, 2007 12:19 pm

    Bummer. Go Twins.

  266. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 12:19 pm

    Wow… maybe I should thank FOX that wasn’t on TV.

  267. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 12:20 pm

    Hmm, Ibanez was under an OPS of .500 in July before this game…

  268. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 12:20 pm

    Fuck.

    On the bright side, Weaver looked really good.

  269. scott19 on July 21st, 2007 12:21 pm

    Yeah, Fox decided to treat us to the powerhouse White Sox today instead. Yippee!

  270. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 12:22 pm

    I’m sorry, but it had to be said. That was weak.

  271. terry on July 21st, 2007 12:22 pm

    #259: I’ll pay you $5 bucks (canadian) if you paint USSMARINER.COM across your chest and dye your hair teal.

  272. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 12:22 pm

    Nice mouth on you there, DAMellen.

    Stupid AND uncouth. Nice combo.

  273. Jeff Manto on July 21st, 2007 12:22 pm

    Yeah, if you follow the Washburn-esque logic that ERA is a more important stat than wins, then Weaver’s performance was actually a mini-victory of sorts.

  274. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 12:23 pm

    270 – Thanks for the apology. That was a great affront to my fragile sensibilities. :(

  275. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 12:23 pm

    Oh, and I see our other dumb newbie is not doing any better.

  276. carcinogen on July 21st, 2007 12:24 pm

    256: ok…frankly I’m tired too. My opinion is that the “Richie turning it around” ship has sailed, and that he should only be allowed to hit against lefties. Reasonable minds can differ, though…so let’s leave it there.

  277. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 12:25 pm

    Dave, I wasn’t aware that this is a G Rated forum.

  278. scott19 on July 21st, 2007 12:26 pm

    Go figure…after all those craptastic outings early in the season, Weaver finally pitches his best game of the year with ZERO offense behind him.

    Almost like a line from an Alanis Morissette song! :(

  279. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 12:28 pm

    I wasn’t aware that it was a free for all either. It doesn’t have to resemble a Pioneer Square wino bar either.

    An inability to express oneself adequately without resorting to profanity is usually an indication of a less than stellar mind.

  280. JeffS on July 21st, 2007 12:29 pm

    Lets all light a candle for Bonser!

  281. kenshabby on July 21st, 2007 12:29 pm

    JeffS – Actually, this is a ‘PG-13′ rated blog/forum/whatever. But just like with PG-13 films if we mention the f-word more than thrice the rating is automatically changed to ‘R’.

  282. joealb1 on July 21st, 2007 12:30 pm

    Don’t worry DAMellen, not all of us are offended by an outburst of emotion! So davepaisley, how long have you been a regular reader of this fine blog?

  283. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 12:31 pm

    278 This is Weaver’s second best outing. Don’t forget his CG SO of the Pirates.

  284. pygmalion on July 21st, 2007 12:32 pm

    Or were you considering the level of competition?

  285. JR Ewing on July 21st, 2007 12:33 pm

    mustard, some sign about wanting fries from mike blowers did they show any today ?

  286. Xteve X on July 21st, 2007 12:39 pm

    And Krueger on the post game saying how Felix needs to establish his fastball tomorrow instead of throwing so much breaking stuff. Now –that’s– quality analysis.

  287. terry on July 21st, 2007 12:41 pm

    #72 aka DAM:

    Sexson’s BB rate isn’t that different from his career average and his ISO would be his career worse (by a long shot) if his season ended today.

    How optimistic are you about his significantly decreased LD%, increased GB% and career low HR/FB%? Sometimes a low BABIP has nothing to do with luck.

    The Ms are paying Sexson $14M to be worse than a replacement level first baseman (his bat is roughly replacement level while he plays minus defense). The only redeeming thing about his ’07 season really is that his platoon splits are make him a weakly passable partner for Ibanez or Broussard.

  288. Jeff Manto on July 21st, 2007 12:49 pm

    Sexson is not going to turn the corner. What kills me the most about the Sexson is not any stat but the fact that he doesn’t seem to care about his terrible performance. At some point a player can no longer be said to be in slump. It is ridiculous that he is paid more than Vladimir Guerrero.

  289. beckya57 on July 21st, 2007 12:50 pm

    I see I’m not the only one who’s fed up with Sexson and Ibanez. Note to management: Could you please, please bring up Adam Jones already???!!

  290. OppositeField on July 21st, 2007 12:57 pm

    You know, it’s really a shame that for all the times the bullpen has gone to work and gotten the job done in the 9th inning this season, the offense couldn’t return the favor tonight. Hats off to Weaver, regardless.

    Also, since this is my first post on here, I’d like to echo the great minds on U.S.S. Mariner and say BRING UP ADAM JONES

  291. Crooklyn Banks on July 21st, 2007 1:32 pm

    Wow, this was an odd game.

  292. joser on July 21st, 2007 1:36 pm

    What kills me the most about the Sexson is not any stat but the fact that he doesn’t seem to care about his terrible performance.

    And by what trick of mind-reading do you know this?

  293. kentroyals5 on July 21st, 2007 1:36 pm

    *UUUUUUUCKKKKKKKK YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU RAUUUUUUUL…have some ‘U’s

  294. kentroyals5 on July 21st, 2007 1:38 pm

    I know $$ and name recognition is a reason to keep bad players in the lineup, but if the ultimate goal is winning why are Richie and Ibanez playing everyday and not really getting moved anywhere in the order? Hideous management

  295. scott19 on July 21st, 2007 2:24 pm

    283: You’re right…did space on that one! :o

  296. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 2:24 pm

    Aw, man. People dissing the wonder of profanity again? And another loss? Suckola.

  297. Karen on July 21st, 2007 2:48 pm

    Couldn’t watch or listen to the game…hadda go shopping…

    It’s ESPECIALLY irksome to see a Weaver outing was wasted, losing by a shut-out AND by a single run. Ouch.

  298. JI on July 21st, 2007 3:07 pm

    I didn’t know that a Pioneer Square wino bar was where people usually say ‘fuck.’ You learn something everyday.

  299. Crushgroovin on July 21st, 2007 3:11 pm

    1 Carlos Pena TAM 264 53 76 18 0 22 63 1 0 47 80 .288 .399 .606 1.005
    2 Mark Teixeira TEX 252 45 77 21 1 13 46 0 0 43 61 .306 .411 .552 .963
    3 Justin Morneau MIN 350 61 102 17 2 26 81 1 0 38 53 .291 .364 .574 .938
    4 Ryan Garko CLE 268 43 85 16 1 12 39 0 1 20 55 .317 .384 .519 .903
    5 Paul Konerko CHW 339 47 91 23 0 21 58 0 0 53 64 .268 .366 .522 .888
    6 Kevin Youkilis BOS 322 54 100 23 1 9 46 2 1 45 48 .311 .406 .472 .878
    7 Kevin Millar BAL 249 31 69 13 1 9 37 0 1 43 48 .277 .393 .446 .839
    8 Casey Kotchman LAA 268 34 77 17 3 9 40 2 0 28 26 .287 .362 .474 .836
    9 Dan Johnson OAK 256 30 64 15 1 10 37 0 0 45 45 .250 .362 .434 .795
    10 Sean Casey DET 282 27 84 23 0 2 35 2 0 30 28 .298 .363 .401 .764
    RK PLAYER TEAM AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG OPS
    11 Richie Sexson SEA 307 46 62 15 0 15 49 1 0 41 69 .202 .306 .397 .703
    12 Aubrey Huff BAL 342 33 88 21 3 6 42 0 0 21 56 .257 .299 .389 .688

  300. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 3:16 pm

    282 – “So davepaisley, how long have you been a regular reader of this fine blog?”

    How about back to the days of asbsm on usenet, when Derek, Jason, Dave, Karen and msb were regulars?

    Or, to put it another way, roughly when you were still soiling diapers on a regular basis.

  301. joealb on July 21st, 2007 3:41 pm

    Hey davepaisly, I was just asking a question. It was a response to your remark of “newbie”. While I’m not sure how long each individual reader has been reading this blog I can say you have been around longer then me. My hat is off to you sir! I started 2 seasons ago and love the work these guys do.
    Now in reference to your statement that you have been reading this blog since I was “still soiling my diapers on a regular basis”. How the F*%K (notice I had some respect for your tender sensibilities) do you know when I stopped soiling my diapers on a regular basis? As a matter of fact, I feel the urge to soil RIGHT NOW!!!!!

  302. joealb on July 21st, 2007 3:56 pm

    On a serious note, davepaisley, you should remember one of the comment guidelines is to refrain from saying things that might get you punched in a bar. F*%K by itself usually doesn’t lead to fisticuffs. Calling someone “Stupid AND uncouth” has a good chance to start a brawl. Just food for thought….

  303. msb on July 21st, 2007 4:13 pm

    sigh. never thought I’d feel sorry for Jeff Weaver.

    did I hear Neihaus say that Towers was 5-0 against the Ms at Rogers Center?

  304. davepaisley on July 21st, 2007 4:19 pm

    OK, joealb, I apologize – should have directed my diaper comment at the poster who deserved it. The one who has been posting here for, what, 48 hours? And proved his inability to take a hint several times already. I’m not really sure why you have picked up his torch at all.

    There’s even a place for occasional profanity (see today’s game, where the ump takes one in the ribs and was caught on TV reacting vociferously), but it should at least be part of some kind of comment that makes a point, rather than a one word exclamation that adds nothing to the debate.

    Honestly, if you are OK with comments here turning into a profanity-riddled stream-of-consciousness rambling, I’d be surprised, as the place would be unreadable in a matter of days.

  305. msb on July 21st, 2007 4:21 pm

    Weaver draws Haren next week.

  306. nwtrev on July 21st, 2007 4:30 pm

    so i missed the game. i was working. but read the re-cap. where is our offense?? weaver kicked ass today

  307. joealb on July 21st, 2007 4:43 pm

    Right on davepaisley, no appology necessary. I really wasn’t taking up anyones “torch”. I just thought your comment a little absurd considering DAMellen had just written exactly what I was thinking at the time. When it comes to ramblings, I stop to read very few of the comments around here that are not left by the authors. The rest, usually, are not worth the time to read. Maybe Churchill but that is about it. Your comment just caught my eye. After that, I couldn’t help myself, I have to admit, I CRACKED UP writing the “soil RIGHT NOW !!!!!” line.

  308. terry on July 21st, 2007 5:22 pm

    IMHO, on content-driven sites such as this one, profanity detracts from the content in about 99.9999999999% of instances and consequently reflects poorly on the author. There’s a huge difference between standing out and being outstanding.

  309. Karen on July 21st, 2007 5:27 pm

    [with the exception of Churchill, about 200 USSM blogger contributor/commenters just got dissed, methinks]

    I feel so inadequate.

  310. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 6:20 pm

    I’m sure you’ve all stopped looking at this by now, but I’ll just say again that I’m sorry I swore. However, I do think I made my point rather nicely. Josh Towers is not that good a pitcher and he ripped through us like tissue paper, plus wasting a performance like that from any pitcher is upsetting, but from a guy like Weaver who has struggled so much this year, it seems even more awful.

  311. fishiam on July 21st, 2007 7:03 pm

    This is so funny, I just have to post it. ON ESPN’s summary of the M’s BJ’s game is this summary:

    A CLOSER LOOK
    • Summary: Josh Towers outdueled Jared Weaver and Toronto’s bullpen made Aaron Hill’s RBI single stand up as the Blue Jays shut down the surging Mariners.

    On the positive side … Angels lose so we’re still 1 back.

  312. Lauren, token chick on July 21st, 2007 7:22 pm

    My job will only be done when everyone recognizes my title as mistress of fuck!

    Wait, that came out wrong.

  313. bhsmarine on July 21st, 2007 7:46 pm

    Sounded right to me Lauren, but I am the same guy that made the DSL joke. I think profanity is the simplest way to show your feelings. We all knew exactly what DAMellen meant when he said “Fuck”. I understood it and sympathized along with him.

  314. DAMellen on July 21st, 2007 8:52 pm

    And that’s three. One more and we officially have to change our rating to “R.”

  315. Ace on July 21st, 2007 10:44 pm

    This is baseball not gardening. You need to use the proper vocabulary to express the technical nuance. For instance would people still be quoting Lee Elia 25 years later if he hadn’t expressed himself so eloquently:

    [deleted, there's no need to be that way about this]

  316. msb on July 21st, 2007 11:02 pm

    ah, Uncle Lee. I gather he was in Toronto today, doing some advance scouting, and so stopped by to see McLaren

  317. terry on July 22nd, 2007 7:23 am

    I’m just suggesting that threads laced with F-bombs don’t help the credibility cause….

  318. terry on July 22nd, 2007 7:26 am

    BTW, people quote Lee Elia 25 years later because he imploded…. he wasn’t exactly being a wordsmith…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.