My Favorite Pitch Sequence Ever

Dave · May 21, 2008 at 6:10 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

You know what you haven’t tried yet, Jarrod? That 85-87 MPH fastball. I bet that will fool them. Try it again.

Comments

85 Responses to “My Favorite Pitch Sequence Ever”

  1. Dave on May 21st, 2008 8:27 pm

    Fontaine’s awesome.

  2. crazyray7391 on May 21st, 2008 8:28 pm

    If Bavasi refuses to fire McLaren could somebody else pull rank and do it anyways? I’m not sure how that kind of thing works. This is just unbearable. I’ll say it again, I will never sit here and say that I’m going to give up on the M’s and root for some other team, this is my team, but good lord this is pathetic. Something has to change. I can understand Bavasi staying until after the draft, but how much longer can we just stick with this team and just not do anything worthwhile?

  3. Teej on May 21st, 2008 8:32 pm

    “They were just finding holes.”

    I guess that’s true. The bullpen can technically be called a hole.

  4. scott19 on May 21st, 2008 8:32 pm

    Agreed — Fontaine definitely has been the one bright spot.

  5. CC03 on May 21st, 2008 8:32 pm

    I think we all know Bavasi and McLaren are out of here eventually. Let’s not fool ourselves. They won’t be kept.

  6. Max Power on May 21st, 2008 8:36 pm

    If Bavasi refuses to fire McLaren could somebody else pull rank and do it anyways? I’m not sure how that kind of thing works.

    I’d think the answer from a practical standpoint is ‘no’. It would indicate (pretty emphatically) that Bavasi’s been undermined, so you might as well fire him if you’re going to go that route.

    It also doesn’t solve anything. McLaren’s not good at what he does, but the problems go way beyond him. Look at 1B for example. Sexson’s done but he can’t be benched because there is no fallback plan. Bench Sexson, DFA Sexson, then what? LaHair? Cairo? WFB?

    How about SS? Who do you go to if you get rid of Betancourt?

  7. jsa on May 21st, 2008 8:40 pm

    #35 > Free healthy arms don’t clear waivers

    Ok, as someone late to party here, I gotta ask why DFA Cha? Who do they have to eat the innings? Any speculation on Why Cha, Why Now, and Why not DFA Washburn, and who’s coming up?

  8. sealclubber253 on May 21st, 2008 8:43 pm

    [5x button term violations]

  9. don52656 on May 21st, 2008 8:46 pm

    Well, you could put Ibanez at 1B and Reed in LF if you really wanted to cut Sexson loose. But your point is well-made; McLaren doesn’t have very many tools to work with. He has compounded the problem by not using the tools he has in an effective manner, and it sure looks to me like this team has given up on him, which is not only a darn shame but an indication that a rather thorough house-cleaning is in order.

    I wonder if Washburn is heading to the bullpen? He has endurance problems and clearly isn’t an asset in the rotation. I would have like to have seen Dickey brought up and put either him or Baek into the rotation, put Washburn into the bullpen, and send Morrow down to learn to be a starter.

  10. don52656 on May 21st, 2008 8:49 pm

    Plus, all our farm teams develope is a bunch of AAAA guys (minus Felix and JJ)

    Not true. Asdrubal Cabrera is starting for Cleveland, Adam Jones is starting for Baltimore, George Sherrill is closing for Baltimore, Rafael Soriano (when healthy) is closing for Atlanta. Shall I go on?

  11. Max Power on May 21st, 2008 8:52 pm

    looks to me like this team has given up on him, which is not only a darn shame but an indication that a rather thorough house-cleaning is in order.

    I think this is a misconception too. The team hasn’t given up on him, it’s more complicated (and more simple than that):

    -Sexson’s lost his batspeed
    -Vidro’s legs gave out a few years ago
    -Washburn was mediocre to begin with, is also past his peak
    -Putz and Bedard have been hurt
    -Beltre and Ichiro are slow starters
    -Ibanez is slow
    -Betancourt had minimal offensive value to begin with, he seems to have sacrificed his defensive value by bulking up in the last couple of years

    etc etc. I don’t have the foggiest idea how bought into McLaren the team is, but at some point, does it matter?

  12. don52656 on May 21st, 2008 8:57 pm

    The reason I think the team has given up on him is that they are not only less talented than they perceived, but they are also underachieving for him. I never thought this team was going to win the West, but I also didn’t think they would regress to 2004. With Bedard/Hernandez heading the rotation, this team shouldn’t be on a pace to lose 100 games.

  13. don52656 on May 21st, 2008 8:58 pm

    Plus, every one of the factors you cite were present last year, and the team finished in 2nd place.

  14. Richard on May 21st, 2008 8:59 pm

    A curious though popped into my head recently that I thought I’d share. It will never happen, but what if instead of firing Bavasi they gave Lincoln and Armstrong the boot and PROMOTED Bavasi. Bavasi leaves the talent evaluation to the next GM and excels in a role better suited to his talents. I have no idea if that’s a disaster of a solution or not, but it seemed intriguing enough to spark discussion. Thoughts?

  15. HamNasty on May 21st, 2008 9:00 pm

    My new thing is to root for the Mariners… just ones that are now on other teams. Go Ortiz, ARod, Griffey, Johnson, Jones, Sherrill, Varitek, Fuentes, Cabrera! Welcome to my new favorite team Baek, glad to have you aboard.

    Baek was by no means great or really all that good, but he filled his role as good as anyone on the team and did decent when asked to spot start. Of all the guys on the 25 man roster Baek was probably the least problematic to the M’s current state.

  16. scott19 on May 21st, 2008 9:05 pm

    With Bedard/Hernandez heading the rotation, this team shouldn’t be on a pace to lose 100 games.

    True — and yet, the same could be said about the ’92 team with RJ and Fleming or some of the ’80s teams with Langston and Moore.

  17. eponymous coward on May 21st, 2008 9:08 pm

    Plus, every one of the factors you cite were present last year, and the team finished in 2nd place.

    … while being outscored in a way that’s closer to being a 79-83 win team.

  18. Max Power on May 21st, 2008 9:08 pm

    Plus, every one of the factors you cite were present last year, and the team finished in 2nd place.

    Yeah, but the problems were pretty evident all over the place – namely, they massively outperformed their Pythag. It was a lot of smoke and mirrors.

  19. scott19 on May 21st, 2008 9:09 pm

    64: Despite the fact he’s a shoe-in for the HOF, however, I can’t bring myself to rooting for A-Rod…sor!

  20. Max Power on May 21st, 2008 9:16 pm

    Geez Dave, I just saw your LL posting re: Baek – you’re not super happy with Wash, eh?

  21. crazyray7391 on May 21st, 2008 9:18 pm

    Max Power

    I know what I said about somebody pulling rank and firing McLaren anyways isn’t logical. At this point though, I think that the M’s FO really needs to take a close look at what’s going on. They are seriously losing their fan-base. Since the Bedard trade went down, there have been some angry fans, and as the seasons gone on, with the moves that have been made, the number of angry fans has rapidly been growing. I know it’s not logical and they probably won’t do it, but they need to make some kind of a statement to let the fans know that they do see what is happening here. They’ve already shown that they aren’t going to step up and DFA Sexson, Vidro, or Washburn, so letting McLaren go would at least show us SOMETHING. If they really think that we are stupid enough to think that Bavasi and McLaren are doing a good job then they can just go to hell.

    Again, making a move like that may not be logical, but I’m a die hard M’s fan damnit and I’m sick of our FO making these dumbass moves and expecting us to buy into it. I’m a fan, I don’t have to think logically all the time, I just want my team to show me that there is a reason to believe in what they are doing. Right now I just feel helpless, and it really just blows.

  22. Max Power on May 21st, 2008 9:26 pm

    but they need to make some kind of a statement to let the fans know that they do see what is happening here.

    For the sake of appearing to ‘do something’ I’d agree with you, but from the standpoint of 2009 and beyond, I’d assume Dave’s right – they’re better off waiting until after the draft.

  23. crazyray7391 on May 21st, 2008 9:31 pm

    I understand that, it’s just hard to stomache. If it takes waiting until after the draft for some major moves to be made, then that’s fine I guess. They just need to stop moving around players like Clement, Reed, and Baek. Those players aren’t the problem and right now they probably aren’t the answer either. I just want to see an actual problem addressed, plain and simple. If they go ahead and do that after the draft, I’m ok with that, but it has to happen at some point.

  24. sealclubber253 on May 21st, 2008 9:46 pm

    60- my point was before it was removed that the M’s don’t take advantage of the good farm players they develope. They either trade them away for junk or just ruin them. Now we are letting another replacement level starter and good long releaver go because… Oh hell, I don’t know why.

  25. Sports on a Schtick on May 21st, 2008 10:36 pm

    When everything is said and done will Washburn end up the most loathed Mariner pitcher of all-time? At least Ayala wasn’t stealing money and throwing teammates under the bus.

  26. Mothy on May 21st, 2008 10:50 pm

    Has anyone seen this quote from the Mariners’ website from Washburn? He said he was wanting to stay in after giving up 9 runs already.

    “I knew the bullpen had a rough night last night,” Washburn said later. “I wanted to eat up some innings and do what I could to help the team. Who cares if I give up 20 runs at that point?”

    I care! Jeez. How about you do what you could to help the team by not bad mouthing your teammates and by not sucking?

  27. Benne on May 21st, 2008 11:27 pm

    When everything is said and done will Washburn end up the most loathed Mariner pitcher of all-time? At least Ayala wasn’t stealing money and throwing teammates under the bus.

    It will be hard for him to top Ayala and Slocumb, but he’s definitely up there on the list.

  28. John D. on May 21st, 2008 11:53 pm

    [number 1, wrong thread, number 2, you’re making this up]

  29. edgar for mayor on May 22nd, 2008 2:32 am

    [button term violations]

  30. mln on May 22nd, 2008 2:48 am

    “In play. no out-Fastball” should be Jarrod Washburn’s new middle name after this game.

  31. galaxieboi on May 22nd, 2008 8:31 am

    Dave is totally right. Bob Fontaine is very good at his job.

  32. pygmalion on May 22nd, 2008 8:42 am

    Mothy: If we’re already going to lose, why not leave him in? It’s not like his pitching performance can cost us more than one game at a time. He’s right. As long as he has arm strength, he might as well keep pitching and save the bullpen. The game was over and it was time to minimize our costs.

  33. edgar for mayor on May 22nd, 2008 2:21 pm

    button term violations

    Does someone please want to explain to me what I did wrong here? I have no idea waht this is.

  34. edgar for mayor on May 22nd, 2008 2:22 pm

    what*

  35. Mothy on May 22nd, 2008 4:43 pm

    Pygmalion: Although the likelihood of winning that game was certainly very low, I’d like it if the players and coaches didn’t give up on the game in the 3rd inning. Showing a little heart and a willingness to battle is the difference between a bad team that’s watchable and a bad team that is unwatchable.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.