The Rotation

Dave · May 23, 2008 at 7:54 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

The Mariners built this team around a pitching rotation of “five number ones”.

The Mariners rotation has a 5.27 ERA, second worst in baseball.

This is why you don’t build a team around a pitching staff.

Comments

65 Responses to “The Rotation”

  1. msb on May 23rd, 2008 7:57 pm

    The Mariners built this team around a pitching rotation of “five number ones”.

    yeah. that was a good one.

  2. Cole on May 23rd, 2008 8:02 pm

    It says something about the Mariners front office that they consider Washburn, Silva and Batista number ones.

  3. SexsonMendoza on May 23rd, 2008 8:02 pm

    More like a couple of want-to-be No. 1′s and three No. 5′s, and we know who they are.

  4. SexsonMendoza on May 23rd, 2008 8:03 pm

    More like a couple of want-to-be No. 1′s and three No. 5′s, and we know who they are. Anyway, your sarcasm caused to at least crack a smile after watching the M’s get slaughtered yet again.

  5. pygmalion on May 23rd, 2008 8:04 pm

    Dave, please remind us why the team isn’t as bad as it looks. It’s becoming a lot harder to believe that this isn’t a 105 loss team.

  6. Benne on May 23rd, 2008 8:07 pm

    I think the magnitude of suck by the M’s finally caused LL to go down for good.

  7. Tom on May 23rd, 2008 8:07 pm

    And conversely, if you build a team solely around hitting like the mid ’90′s Mariners, don’t expect to much further than the first round of the playoffs (and yes, I know we had Randy Johnson, but that’s it).

    The fact is, it’s not pitching that wins championships or even hitting that wins championships. If you want to win championships, you have to be good in EVERYTHING on the field.

    Hitting, pitching, fielding, speed, depth, coaching, etc.

    And the teams with the best balance of these things will usually find themselves playing very late into October.

    It’s just that simple.

  8. Bodhizefa on May 23rd, 2008 8:10 pm

    If we start the firesale now, the better the chance of us getting the #1 pick next year. Seattle Mariners baseball, ladies and gentlemen!

  9. pygmalion on May 23rd, 2008 8:12 pm

    Reasons for hope:

    Washburn’s FIP is only a couple hundredths of a point higher than what it’s been the past few years. His XFIP is the lowest it’s been in the last five years. His LOB% is 59% – insanely low, the equivalent of his unsustainable 81.8% in his last Angels year. LD% is 22.9% – that sounds really really high. Regression to the mean could mean huge improvement here.

    Batista’s FIP is only up about .14 from last year, and XFIP is up only .05. LOB% is way down. LD% is pretty high. Some regression to the mean could help out here, too.

  10. nickwest1976 on May 23rd, 2008 8:12 pm

    DONG, DONG, DONG, DONG….

    DONG, DONG, DONG, DONG!!!

    The sounds of the Yankees run scoring chime. I think it’s going to be in my brain for a while now after the amount of runs the Yankees scored.

    All I can do is laugh right now. I have never, ever seen anything like this display of baseball.

  11. pygmalion on May 23rd, 2008 8:13 pm

    By “hope” I mean “the hope of avoiding a 100 loss season”.

  12. Tom on May 23rd, 2008 8:14 pm

    #10: It actually sounds like the clock tower over at WSU.

  13. smb on May 23rd, 2008 8:19 pm

    The Mariners built this team around a pitching rotation of “five number ones”.

    Beyond delusional. Way beyond. We have two at best, and neither of them has managed to pitch like it for more than a game or two in a row this year, if even that. Of course, you could have a dozen “number ones,” but they can’t all throw a CG SO every time, so your weak defense and complete inability to provide run support when necessary become a real liability. We might regress to the mean and start winning some games, but what good is that when your mean is “SUCK.”

  14. Mr. Egaas on May 23rd, 2008 8:25 pm

    The 2008 Seattle Mariners: Is it football season yet?

  15. pygmalion on May 23rd, 2008 8:28 pm

    Bad news:

    Bedard’s FIP and XFIP are 5.00 and 4.38, either the highest or second highest in the past five years. His LOB% of 78.7% is actually pretty good, and higher than you would expect. So there is no hope of regression on that front. His GB% is down. His BB/9 is up. He hasn’t been pitching like a number one, obviously.

  16. coasty141 on May 23rd, 2008 8:30 pm

    Holy F Balls ! Did Dave just use ERA to describe the Mariners rotations performance? I don’t think he’d let Patrick Sullivan get away with that.

  17. pygmalion on May 23rd, 2008 8:32 pm

    Middling news:

    Felix is mostly okay, as his FIP is identical to last year, and XFIP is up only .28. However, his GB% is way down to 49.2%. Also worrisome, but easily correctable: a significant spike in his use of his fastball, from 57% to 64.6% at the expense of his slider and curve ball.

    Silva is Silva. His GB% is down, but only 5% and that could be luck and noise. His LOB% of 67.8% looks a little low. But his HR/FB rate looks way too low, at 7.0%. That’s not sustainable. So, mixing this all together, maybe we just get more of the same from him.

  18. Daniel M on May 23rd, 2008 8:42 pm

    It is a good thing that we changed the entire coaching staff from last year except the hitting coach. Just think what the record would be with last years coaching staff.

  19. edgar for mayor on May 23rd, 2008 8:50 pm

    One of the biggest lies in baseball is pitching wins ball games.

    Sure pitching helps…but there are two other cogs, Offense and Defense. The Seattle Mariners don’t have a single cog running right now.

    The Offense is limp and anemic. Without a pure clutch hitter on the roster, and the bad luck fortune of poor Adrian Beltre this offense isn’t going to get much better. The team is ok with sending Clement down even though Vidro shared the same OPS with more AB’s.

    The Defense is down right puke worthy. We are quickly finding out Yuni is not as advertised. Ibanez continues to cost us run after to run with the worst range I have ever seen. Lopez continues to amaze me with his lack of range as well. Sexson is as Slow and ever and I believe that without Ichiro and Beltre we just might be averaging more than an error a game.

    The starting pitching was great for the first month, but the pen let us down. Now Both are bad.

    The Mariners don’t have anything. I wish we hadn’t won 88 games last year…because if we hadn’t we would still have 5 very good players to help us out in the near future.
    But no the would be following through, on a plan.

  20. fetish on May 23rd, 2008 8:51 pm

    Yeah,
    Even with positive expectations for the back 3,
    no one with half a brain should have said, or believed, that Silva, Washburn and Batista were “Number 1″ type of guys.

  21. scott19 on May 23rd, 2008 8:58 pm

    The 2008 Seattle Mariners: Is it football season yet?

    One of my faves as well! :)

  22. jspektor on May 23rd, 2008 9:00 pm

    2005 Starting Rotation: Franklin, Meche, Pineiro, Sele, Moyer
    2006 Starting Rotation: Felix, Meche, Pineiro, Washburn, Moyer
    2007 Starting Rotation: Felix, Weaver, Batista, Washburn, Horrible Ram
    2008 Starting Rotation: Felix, Bedard, Silva, Washburn, Batista

    Two questions:

    how the heck did we win 88 games last year?
    what would we look like now if held onto Pineiro and Moyer?

  23. fargomsfan on May 23rd, 2008 9:04 pm

    Quote of the year

    Playing on this team and seeing what’s happening around me, I feel that something is beginning to fall apart,” Suzuki said through a translator. “But, if I was not in the situation and I was objectively watching what had happened to this team in the past week, I would probably be drinking a lot of beers and brewing it.”

    What kind of beer?

    “Usually I enjoy Japanese beer, but given the situation, if I was objectively watching the game, I wouldn’t care if it was Japanese beer, American beer or beer from Papua New Guinea,” he said.

  24. Steve Nelson on May 23rd, 2008 9:06 pm

    I don’t know why I ever doubted Bavasi’s ability to turn around a franchise. In the span of one week, look what Bavasi has accomplished in Detroit and New York.

  25. edgar for mayor on May 23rd, 2008 9:07 pm

    23-

    I love Ichiro when he is honest. I feel the worst for him. First year here 116 wins…and no championship. Now 7 years later, still nothing.

    Poor Griffey, Poor Edgar, Poor Ichiro

  26. fargomsfan on May 23rd, 2008 9:09 pm

    Not only nothing, but the team around him is not in the general vicinity of even bothering to show up

  27. windwardtrades on May 23rd, 2008 9:12 pm

    Ichiro is not a winner. His giving up on that catchable ball in the 5th (I think) was a door opener for the Yanks continuing the big inning. A little extension maybe? Or God forbid, maybe get his pants dirty with a minor dive for the ball. What a joke. Argues a punch out which then results in muffing an outfield out, and then makes a offline poor throw to the plate which results in another run for NY. I don’t buy the story on his value. In fact I think the opposite. Get the interpreter for the interview….

  28. jspektor on May 23rd, 2008 9:12 pm

    I don’t know why I ever doubted Bavasi’s ability to turn around a franchise. In the span of one week, look what Bavasi has accomplished in Detroit and New York.

    That is hilarious

  29. scott19 on May 23rd, 2008 9:22 pm

    25: Methinks poor Ichi may be the modern-day Eddie Collins…one of the greatest players of his day, he makes it all the way to the post-season — only to get gypped out of a ring due to circumstances beyond his control (i.e. teammates who were trying to throw the World Series).

    Apples and oranges, perhaps…though as destiny would have it, poor Eddie never got another chance. :(

  30. M'sFever on May 23rd, 2008 9:28 pm

    Hey guys, look on the bright side, we are going to get a great draft pick next year!

  31. scott19 on May 23rd, 2008 9:29 pm

    Though to add, Collins did get rings earlier with the A’s and White Sox…

    Maybe I should’ve cited Ernie Banks instead.

  32. edgar for mayor on May 23rd, 2008 9:31 pm

    27 – Excuse Ichiro in trying to keep himself from getting injured in a standard flyball. Your not even close…

  33. Phightin Phils on May 23rd, 2008 9:32 pm

    Steve Nelson (24) — … look what Bavasi has accomplished in Detroit and New York.

    Made me chuckle, and recall a bit from the M’s Braniac of Strategy on the Field and Team Leadership post game interview tonight — it was something about how other teams out there turned things around with 3 solid, “clean” wins. He mentioned Detroit, Baltimore, and NY!

    “A clean game” to turn “things” around. Huh.

    Clean the house.

  34. scott19 on May 23rd, 2008 9:37 pm

    In the span of one week, look what Bavasi has accomplished in Detroit and New York.

    Yeah…doin’ a heck of a job, Billy!

  35. John in L.A. on May 23rd, 2008 9:41 pm

    Ichiro is not a winner. His giving up on that catchable ball in the 5th (I think) was a door opener for the Yanks continuing the big inning. A little extension maybe? Or God forbid, maybe get his pants dirty with a minor dive for the ball. What a joke. Argues a punch out which then results in muffing an outfield out, and then makes a offline poor throw to the plate which results in another run for NY. I don’t buy the story on his value. In fact I think the opposite. Get the interpreter for the interview….

    You are wrong. Let’s just get that out of the way. You are not just run of the mill wrong, either. You are embarrassingly wrong. You are point-at-you-and-laugh wrong.

    But I think my favorite way in which you were wrong in your bargain bin collection of wrong was this:

    “Argues a punch out which then results in muffing an outfield out…”

    What the hell?

    And what was the interpreter crack about?

  36. jspektor on May 23rd, 2008 9:41 pm

    Bavasi: Baseball Nepotism at its finest.

  37. coasty141 on May 23rd, 2008 9:44 pm

    24.) Bavasi has become the Isiah Thomas of the MLB! Not good

  38. fermorules on May 23rd, 2008 10:18 pm

    OK, I’ll grant that this team doesn’t have five No. 1s. Obviously, that is not the case.

    Still, it’s not unreasonable to expect them to perform better than this. And while Silva, Washburn and Batista have been poor, it’s now spread to Bedard and Hernandez, too.

    My point is, lack of talent can’t be blamed for the total collapse. Something is amiss with virtually every pitcher and player on the roster.

  39. Benne on May 23rd, 2008 10:34 pm

    Ichiro is not a winner. His giving up on that catchable ball in the 5th (I think) was a door opener for the Yanks continuing the big inning. A little extension maybe? Or God forbid, maybe get his pants dirty with a minor dive for the ball. What a joke. Argues a punch out which then results in muffing an outfield out, and then makes a offline poor throw to the plate which results in another run for NY. I don’t buy the story on his value. In fact I think the opposite. Get the interpreter for the interview….

    Dumb comments make ponies weep.

  40. scott19 on May 23rd, 2008 11:01 pm

    Look at it this way…they may be lacking in #1′s, but at least they’re playing like #2′s.

  41. Breadbaker on May 23rd, 2008 11:04 pm

    So we now have the answer to Austin Powers’ famous question: Who is number two’s boss?

    John McLaren.

  42. Colm on May 23rd, 2008 11:27 pm

    If people keep blathering about fucking ponies, I’m going to have to de-camp to Lookout Landing more often. It wasn’t all that funny two months ago…

  43. RosanjinScholar on May 23rd, 2008 11:35 pm

    [inviting flame wars is not a useful contribution to discussion]

  44. beef on May 23rd, 2008 11:35 pm

    If people keep blathering about fucking ponies, I’m going to have to de-camp to Lookout Landing more often. It wasn’t all that funny two months ago…

    wheeee. please go then, cause ponies is waht you gonna get!

  45. Colm on May 23rd, 2008 11:57 pm

    Could you at least make the pony references amusing then?

    It’s been a couple of hours since I had a sherbet, and I’m a bit petulant.

  46. DMZ on May 24th, 2008 12:09 am

    Ponies ponies ponies.

    Are ponies really any less annoying than the constant “you jerks are all negative and hate the mariners blergh blergh blergh” comments?

  47. Colm on May 24th, 2008 12:16 am

    At least I can do something with those comments, Derek. Or better, sit back and read while you or Dave Cameron or some other interested party lacerate the upstart.

    The prattle about ponies just baffles me. The joke played itself out weeks ago. I suppose it’s harmless; I just feel like kicking the dog because I’ve argued with the missus.

  48. Colm on May 24th, 2008 12:17 am

    Back from LL, btw. It’s a nice place Jeff’s got, but I like the view here better.

  49. scott19 on May 24th, 2008 12:22 am

    The prattle about ponies just baffles me.

    It could always be worse, though…after all, Rizzs is still rambling on yet about how great that ALDS series back in ’95 against the Yanks was.

  50. Colm on May 24th, 2008 12:38 am

    I met Rizzs once. He scares me.

  51. Benne on May 24th, 2008 12:39 am
  52. Colm on May 24th, 2008 12:43 am

    There’s a special corner of hell for you m’dear. One where they show Care Bears movies.

  53. Benne on May 24th, 2008 12:46 am

    What if Bavasi signed Cheer Bear to DH for us? He (it is a he, right?)can’t be any worse than Turbo.

  54. Colm on May 24th, 2008 12:52 am

    Oh yeah he could. I have the “Forever Friends” DVD within a few feet of me right now – hidden from my children in case they ever insist on watching it again. It’s gallingly bad – way worse than Barbie Fairytopia. It has an eerie, pointlessness to it, as if made to appeal to people who are wasted on heroin.

    At least Turbo’s fat enough that we could use him as a draught-excluder.

  55. scott19 on May 24th, 2008 12:54 am

    50: I did, too…at one of the Fan Fests some years back. Seemed liked a personable enough guy…however, his “Hey folks, let’s remember the good old days!” schtick that he starts every time he knows the team is playing like crap and doesn’t have anything better to talk about on the air gets really annoying after a while. I mean, geez, twenty years from now, even if we haven’t been to the WS yet, he’ll still be talking about how great the ’95 and ’01 seasons were.

  56. Colm on May 24th, 2008 12:58 am

    Nah, it’s the creepy, patently-faked affability.

    I just had a brainwave: With the perma-tan and the glinting teeth and shiney eyes, Rizzs reminds me of George Hamilton playing a vampire in Love at First Bite.

  57. scott19 on May 24th, 2008 1:04 am

    Ah, I remember that movie — where George Hamilton actually becomes Dracula (er, sort of)! :)

    Interestingly, during a game in which we were getting blown out last year and our thoughts started to drift elsewhere, someone had mentioned that they always thought Rizzy reminded them of Neil Diamond. Actually, I could see that, too.

  58. Tom on May 24th, 2008 1:53 am

    Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, the ponies are sending me subliminal messages.

    They are saying we must encourage Howard Lincoln to get rid of Chuck Armstrong and replace him with someone like Terry Ryan or Larry Beinfest so the repairing can begin, then this new president can fire Bavasi and other people that need to be fired.

    Man, these ponies are smart.

  59. msb on May 24th, 2008 7:37 am

    I like ponies. But then, I don’t have to watch “My little pony, the end of Flutter Valley” 5 times a day.

    The Mariners built this team around a pitching rotation of “five number ones”.

    do we excuse that comment as it came out of the mouth of their pitching coach, who is paid to shine them up?

  60. jro on May 24th, 2008 8:02 am

    This is why you don’t build a team around a pitching staff.

    Dave – not sure I agree with this statement without knowing the alternative plan. Do you have a post on how the team should be built? (Link?)

  61. eponymous coward on May 24th, 2008 8:55 am

    There are plenty of teams that have relied heavily on the talent on their pitching staffs. The problem is the Mariners are spectacularly incompetent at identifying quality starting pitching, because they are paying Silva, Washburn and Batista 25-30 million to provide marginal improvement on three Cha Seung Baeks. A well-run team who wanted to really have outstanding pitching would be allocating that money considerably differently, to where there was a 3rd pitcher in the King Felix/Bedard class making a huge contract, and then using cheap pitch-to-contact innings eaters at 4-5, or would have converted Morrow to a starter last year, so that by now he might be ready to enter the rotation similar to what Piñeiro did in 2001, or… well, you get the idea.

    They’ve compounded that inefficiency with their money by having a terrible defense back up three pitchers whose assets are that, given a solid defense behind them, they can fool you into thinking they are much better than they actually are. I’m convinced that if we actually HAD a world-class defense behind these guys, at least one of them would be having an Aaron Sele/Paul Abbott/Ryan Franklin in 2003 sort of mirage year. Instead, the defensive shortcomings make them look like garbage.

  62. pygmalion on May 24th, 2008 10:33 am

    Dave – not sure I agree with this statement without knowing the alternative plan. Do you have a post on how the team should be built? (Link?)

    This is sort of related, although not entirely, because it relates to payroll, and sometimes you payroll can be bizarre. But Baseball Prospectus studied this and found that the “happy zone” for expenditures on pitching payroll is more than 33% of your payroll, but less than 50%. Teams that spent more than 50% or less than 33% on pitching tended to be bad.

    Why is this? Here’s a simplified explanation. There are two parts to baseball: Run creation and run prevention. Offense is all there is to one-half of the game. But pitching does NOT equal the other half of the game, because it is split between pitching and defense. So too much focus on pitching can be self-defeating unless you managed to acquire amazingly dominant strike-out pitchers. It is therefore a bad idea to think that good pitching can carry a team that is bad at defense and offense, because defense and offense are more than half the game. Pitching is also far less consistent than either hitting or defense. So you are putting yourself in a situation where catastrophic bad luck is more likely to strike your team than otherwise.

    Pitching becomes more important in the playoffs because dominant starters and closers become more important, due to a variety of factors. And maybe that is what makes people think that you should build a team around a pitching staff. But then we are usually talking about teams that are at least decent at offense and defense, not horribly bad, like we are.

  63. pygmalion on May 24th, 2008 10:34 am

    Oops. Must have accidentally deleted the “slash” from the close bquote.

  64. beckya57 on May 24th, 2008 10:39 am

    I agree with your analysis of the M’s, but not with your conclusion. Lots of teams have built around their pitching–the 1990′s Braves come to mind–and done just fine. The M’s problem is that they have BAD pitchers. Silva, Washburn and Batista are #4 starters on their good days and #10 starters on their bad ones. Felix is still learning, and Bedard has seriously underperformed (yet another reason to hate that trade). I still think he isn’t healthy, but who knows. It’s the players, not the model, that is the problem.

  65. Wells on May 24th, 2008 11:23 am

    You’ve got a very schizophrenic attitude towards ERA. Some posts it’s only used by morons who don’t understand pitching, and then now you use it to make a baseball point.

    Which is it?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.