He’s rested, he’s ready…

DMZ · January 3, 2009 at 8:40 am · Filed Under Mariners 

Left-handed power, bargain price, willing to accept a one-year deal, West Coast… Barry Bonds underwent hip surgery to ensure he’s ready for the 2009 season!

What?

Weirdly, this story’s not carried on MLB.com, where the stories are not subject to the approval blah blah blah…

Comments

80 Responses to “He’s rested, he’s ready…”

  1. Mat on January 3rd, 2009 5:36 pm

    I don’t believe the ramifications of signing Junior and Bonds are in the same stratosphere.

    There’s no way of really knowing for sure, but if they were going to impact the attitude in the clubhouse, I imagine that both of them could foster resentment amongst their teammates.

    Bonds is reasonably likely to be good, so players won’t resent that an inferior player is taking their playing time and hurting the team, but they might resent that he’s an ass or at least that the media will focus on him. And he would be subject to the same drug testing that they are in 2009, so I’m not sure how much the cheating thing specifically would be an issue.

    Griffey is likely to be fairly bad–especially relative to what he’ll get paid and the amount of attention that he’ll garner–so players might resent that he’s losing games or that he’s taking their playing time or that the media keep writing stories about Griffey and ignore most of the rest of the team. Which could be a problem even if Griffey is a really nice guy and the fans love him.

    As for the relative magnitudes of the problems, I would guess that Bonds would be a somewhat bigger problem, but that it wouldn’t be as big of a difference as the media might lead you to believe. Signing Griffey for PR reasons would be more or less like the M’s hired the coach’s son to make the coach happy. No players like having the coach’s son on the team unless he’s clearly the best player out there.

  2. eponymous coward on January 3rd, 2009 5:36 pm

    I’ve never seen any reason not to sign Bonds that doesn’t come from a mindless knee-jerk reaction colored by the media choosing him as the whipping boy for the entire PED problem in baseball.

    I’ll bite.

    – He may be looking at jail time after March. It’s not unreasonable to not want to sign somebody who will be physically unable to make your roster because he’s in federal custody.

    – He’s old, and after a year off, it’s an open question whether he could perform at his age 42 level at age 44.

    – The Mariners as an organization don’t want to be signing steroid users who are unrepentant (Morse admitted it).

  3. DaveValleDrinkNight on January 3rd, 2009 6:24 pm

    Can the professional ethicist hit for power and play LF?

  4. Sklyansky on January 3rd, 2009 6:44 pm

    He can’t be an any worse teammate than Washburn or Silva. I don’t think we’ll hear quotes of him wanting to beat up Ichiro, or blaming other people for his own performance problems.

    I’ve always felt he got a bad rap, in much the same way that Erik Bedard does. The media asks stupid questions (“how did it feel?”), he chooses not to answer them, which makes *him* the bad guy.

  5. diderot on January 3rd, 2009 6:50 pm

    I’ve never seen any reason not to sign Bonds that doesn’t come from a mindless knee-jerk reaction

    Really? OK, so how about this:
    ABs for Shelton, Branyan, Balentien, Clement…hell, for that matter, maybe Johnson, Carp, Tui and Morse by the end of the year.
    There is NO sense in signing Bonds, Griffey (and maybe even Jones) from a pure baseball perspective. They figuratively and literally are on their last legs. How do they help us when we really could be competitive?
    The signing of any of these guys frankly smacks of Bavasi logic.

    Actually, I think Bonds posts are an excellent way to clarify whose opinions are worth listening to, and whose aren’t.

    Jeff, no offense, but could it be that you just called yourself out?

  6. JI on January 3rd, 2009 7:18 pm

    I think Jones is done — he’s at best an average CF defensively

    UZR/150 had him at +12 last year, and ~17 for his three year average.

  7. DMZ on January 3rd, 2009 7:51 pm

    Whether or not there’s a “pure baseball” reason to sign those guys depends on your definition of that term. If there’s a way Bonds or Jones wins games next season without blocking player development, sure. Wins are always good.

  8. Jeff Nye on January 3rd, 2009 8:04 pm

    But Mike Morse needs at-bats, Derek!

  9. The Ancient Mariner on January 3rd, 2009 8:25 pm

    I’m really surprised no one caught the Nixon (Richard, not Otis) reference in the title — that should have made it clear to everyone that the post was a joke . . .

  10. Roger on January 3rd, 2009 9:29 pm

    I haven’t got any work done today because I’m distracted. Darn you, Barry Bonds! (shakes fist) Darn you to heck!

  11. BigB on January 3rd, 2009 9:38 pm

    Left-handed power, bargain price, willing to accept a one-year prison sentence, West Coast…

    /fixed

    Seriously though, if he wouldn’t disrupt the clubhouse too much, he could just be worth the gamble.

  12. Milo on January 3rd, 2009 9:45 pm

    Bring him, all dissention will fade when the first ball goes over the right field fence.

  13. GTownHoyas on January 3rd, 2009 10:54 pm

    Bring him, all dissention will fade when the first ball goes over the right field fence.

    If after 762 home runs, no dissension has faded, what makes you think that after one over the right field fence of Safeco Field, it will?…

  14. gwangung on January 3rd, 2009 11:08 pm

    Really? OK, so how about this:
    ABs for Shelton, Branyan, Balentien, Clement…hell, for that matter, maybe Johnson, Carp, Tui and Morse by the end of the year.

    Um, you really mean that about Carp and Morse?????? And why should we care about Shelton and Branyan? Particularly when Bonds is better than even money to out-produce them—the point of those is that they’re cheap and easily expendable.

    I see some twitching of the knee there.

  15. xeifrank on January 3rd, 2009 11:32 pm

    How many HRs does Bonds need to pass Oh as the all-time leader? Might be nice for a team to have him on the roster for the chase. Kind of sucks for Bonds that he appears to be stalled at #2 on the all-time HR list.
    vr, Xei

  16. diderot on January 4th, 2009 1:00 am

    I see some twitching of the knee there.

    OK, I admit I have no idea what that means.
    Jeff’s original point was that he’s never seen an opposition to Bonds based on anything but ‘a mindless knee jerk reaction’. I say there are other legitimate baseball reasons.

    If there’s a way Bonds or Jones wins games next season without blocking player development, sure. Wins are always good.

    Absolutely. Having cake and eating it at the same time is great. But I still think not very realistic in this case.
    But most importantly, whatever happened to this?…

    Speculation on any player’s use of steroids, that’s going to be gone as soon as we come across it in almost every case.

  17. awestby51 on January 4th, 2009 1:17 am

    There is NO sense in signing Bonds, Griffey (and maybe even Jones) from a pure baseball perspective. They figuratively and literally are on their last legs.

    Griffey is, and Bonds could done, but CHONE projections show Jones as a 7.5 million dollar player if he’s only an average defender. Since he only gets paid 5 million next year, there is definitely sense in getting Jones.

  18. xeifrank on January 4th, 2009 1:40 am

    Griffey is, and Bonds could done, but CHONE projections show Jones as a 7.5 million dollar player if he’s only an average defender. Since he only gets paid 5 million next year, there is definitely sense in getting Jones.

    I think we will be seeing the automated projection systems breaking down when it comes to the Andruw Jones projection(s), especially the ones that have Andruw Jones worth $7.5Mil.
    vr, Xei

  19. Sports on a Schtick on January 4th, 2009 3:33 am

    Andruw Jones was a train wreck last year. 76 strikeouts, 3 home runs in 209 at bats. He made Yuni look disciplined at the plate.

  20. Corey on January 4th, 2009 9:14 am

    Before I started reading, I thought this was almost going to be a Cam Bonifay joke or something. Let Bonds go rot, as he should, on the sidelines of life from now on. Yeck.

  21. ProdigalReality on January 4th, 2009 9:26 am

    Sign Bonds, we could use a player like Bonds teaching the young players how to be an absolute cancer in the locker room.

  22. CCW on January 4th, 2009 9:41 am

    If no one signed him last year, no one’s going to sign him this year. Some day, the GMs will come clean and explain why he wasn’t offered a job last year (maybe he just demanded too much money?). Until then, though, we’re just going to have to be content knowing that he’s unsignable… for some reason.

  23. msb on January 4th, 2009 9:54 am

    speaking of B Bonds, the free online game this morning is Millwood’s no-no vs the Giants. Both Barry & I think the HP ump has a very generous strike zone.

    btw, Harry Kalas is another announcer with no compunctions about mentioning that Millwood has a no-hitter going.

  24. DMZ on January 4th, 2009 10:13 am

    Bonds’ agent last year was supposedly willing to sign league-minimum deals.

  25. Dave Clapper on January 4th, 2009 10:52 am

    Derek, I’m sorry that an entire thread worth of comments (well, with the exception of the Ancient Mariner) fails to recognize a joke when they see one.

    Nobody’s signing Bonds, folks. Explaining humor sucks, but… hello? The humor is that this news was put out there at all, that “Oh, Barry had knee surgery? Well, we’ll for sure sign him now!” would ever enter the heads of ANY GMs who wouldn’t consider signing him last season when the trial wouldn’t have impacted THAT season.

    Get it?

    Jeez.

  26. joser on January 4th, 2009 11:01 am

    Normally I won’t even wade into a Bonds thread (“abandon hope of sensible debate, all ye who enter here”) but I saw this rumor and thought “I bet Junior came up in the Bonds thread” and, yep, sure enough, so that makes this on topic:

    Five teams have shown interest in future Hall of Famer Ken Griffey Jr., his longtime agent Brian Goldberg said. According to Goldberg, three American League teams and two NL teams have expressed some level of interest. The Mariners and Rays are known to be two of the AL teams eyeing Griffey, who’d like to play at least one more season.

    Of course agents say all sorts of things to the press. Some of them are even true. Sometimes.

    Personally, I think the Rays should sign Bonds. Why not? Give him his own locker room at Tropicana where he can entertain the press, or not, as he pleases. Would certainly get fans out to see/boo the Rays when they play in the other AL East cities…

  27. Secret Agent Man on January 4th, 2009 3:31 pm

    Derek, I’m sorry that an entire thread worth of comments (well, with the exception of the Ancient Mariner) fails to recognize a joke when they see one.

    As Derek said, “Weirdly, this story’s not carried on MLB.com.”

    Or, more to the point, “What?”

  28. beadyeyes123 on January 4th, 2009 3:55 pm

    Bobby Abreu, yes. Barry Bonds no. Abreu has some legs and solves a power issue without the media frenzy that Bonds brings. I am not opposed to Bonds due to speculation of steroids, I am opposed because he will bring distractions that we just do not need.

  29. BobbyAyalaFan4Life on January 5th, 2009 10:02 am

    *yaawwwwwwwwn* Barry who?
    Hells to the no.
    With all the positive moves the M’s have been making, I’d hate to see them bring in anyone that’s going to be a negative presence or a general distraction…we don’t want the media circus. I like what Z, et al., are doing, and I’d rather we get to do it just as quietly as possible so when we are back int he thick of things, it’ll be a nice surprise for the rest of the west.
    Aaron M.

  30. BigJared on January 5th, 2009 2:22 pm

    He’ll take a cheap one year deal, Abreu most likely will not. Jones and Jr.? Done and more done.
    Even at his advanced age Bonds would likely outproduce any of the three and quite possibly Jr. and Jones combined. I’ll even boldly predict he’s still a much better hitter than anyone on our current roster which sorely lacks that mythical impact bat.

    The arguments against seem to have very little to do with winning baseball games. It isn’t likely to happen but I fully support the idea.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.