Drayer: Yuni to KC for minor leaguers

DMZ · July 10, 2009 at 12:16 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

her story

Two pitchers — Derrick Saito, command lefty
Dan Cortes, big right hander who walks dudes

If the M’s aren’t picking up Yuni’s salary, our front office deserves end-of-year awards.

Divish with more @ the TNT

Comments

87 Responses to “Drayer: Yuni to KC for minor leaguers”

  1. scottiedawg on July 10th, 2009 12:16 pm

    Pitchers Daniel Cortes and Derrick Saito.

  2. jimmylauderdale on July 10th, 2009 12:17 pm

    710 just said Dave would be on in 10-15 min to break down the deal.

  3. scottiedawg on July 10th, 2009 12:18 pm
  4. Sports on a Schtick on July 10th, 2009 12:24 pm

    Go KC! Mariners Lite!!!

  5. Jay Yencich on July 10th, 2009 12:24 pm

    Cortes looks like he’s in the middle of a pretty serious regression this year.

    Saito is putting up some interesting numbers, but he may end up with the short pitcher stigma.

  6. Jeff Nye on July 10th, 2009 12:26 pm

    (insert standard comment about heavy traffic days and not hitting post repeatedly if it doesn’t appear to go through the first time)

  7. Go Felix on July 10th, 2009 12:28 pm

    Well bye.

  8. Tek Jansen on July 10th, 2009 12:28 pm

    For Yuni, I’ll take a regressing Cortes and an interesting, short Saito.

    Now KC can have a Yuni-Bloomie DP combo. Let the good times roll.

  9. TheMsfan on July 10th, 2009 12:33 pm

    Solid return for Yuni, wish him luck in baseball hell.

  10. Sports on a Schtick on July 10th, 2009 12:34 pm

    Sorry for the double post but me fingers can hardly contain themselves.

    Looks like the M’s are sending some money to offset Yuni’s salary but I’m very happy to get these two prospects. We just got arguably the best pitcher in the Royals system and another arm for Yuni.

  11. Lauren, token chick on July 10th, 2009 12:35 pm

    Farewell, sweet Yuni! For your sake, I hope you get your shit together.

  12. Paul B on July 10th, 2009 12:36 pm

    Cortes looks like he’s in the middle of a pretty serious regression this year.

    His walks are up and his strikeouts are down this year. I wonder why?

  13. Paul B on July 10th, 2009 12:38 pm

    Dave’s on 710. Just starting to talk about the trade now (started off talking mostly about FG).

  14. snapper on July 10th, 2009 12:39 pm

    Steal for the M’s. Anything would have been.

    Looks like Drayton Moore has really lost it.

  15. RoninX on July 10th, 2009 12:40 pm

    I wonder if this portends another deal in the works, or if turning Yuni in any kind of prospects was simply too good a deal to pass up.

  16. lokiforever on July 10th, 2009 12:41 pm

    I wonder if Yuni even gets it? Swinging at the first pitch out of the strike zone for an infield pop-up to end a rally (when the pithcer just walked the previous batter on 4 straight pitches).

    Or that putting on 25 pounds affected his range.

  17. coasty141 on July 10th, 2009 12:44 pm

    “Daniel Cortes, 21, has improved more so than just about any prospect in the system in the past two years. He was stolen from the White Sox in a trade for reliever Mike MacDougal. Cortes’ improvements can be tied to a fastball that has jumped into the mid-90s range, as well as the development of a curveball that is now a plus pitch. The right-hander’s change-up, though, is lacking and he could be facing a move to the bullpen where he could become a dominating eighth- or ninth-inning pitcher. He posted a 3.48 ERA (but 4.40 FIP) at Double-A in 2008 and allowed 103 hits in 116.2 innings. Cortes posted a high walk rate of 4.24 BB/9 and a strikeout rate of 8.41 K/9, which should be higher given his stuff.”- Marc Hulet via fangraphs.com

  18. Paul B on July 10th, 2009 12:45 pm

    I wonder if this portends another deal in the works, or if turning Yuni in any kind of prospects was simply too good a deal to pass up.

    yes and yes.

    The M’s aren’t looking at Ronnie Cedeno as the permanent solution at shortstop. I’ll bet money on that.

  19. Jay Yencich on July 10th, 2009 12:50 pm

    His walks are up and his strikeouts are down this year. I wonder why?

    Hard to say, but he has had some issues with the law recently.

  20. RoninX on July 10th, 2009 12:52 pm

    The M’s aren’t looking at Ronnie Cedeno as the permanent solution at shortstop. I’ll bet money on that.

    Clearly this is true, but I was more curious about the short term rather than the long term. Either way, I like shipping as washed up SS for pitching prospects with (at least?) MLB bullpen upside.

  21. Joe on July 10th, 2009 12:53 pm

    Apparently KC liked Willie so much they wanted the guy he used to sub for.

    I’m starting to think any trade speculation should automatically begin with KC and the Phillies, no matter how absurd it might seem, just because those two teams have such a lust for ex-Ms.

    And yeah, this is clearly just the first shoe to drop; there will be a second trade — though it might still be days away.

  22. Paul B on July 10th, 2009 12:54 pm

    Looks like Drayton Moore has really lost it.

    Desperation, maybe? Mike Aviles has a 22 OPS+ this season after a good year last year, and they don’t have anyone else to put at Short…

    Luis Hernandez has an OPS+ of 19.

    Tony Pena is at -35 (yes, a negative OPS+).

    And WFB isn’t a good enough fielder to play short every day.

  23. ewdewald on July 10th, 2009 12:56 pm

    Dave’s on 710. Just starting to talk about the trade now (started off talking mostly about FG).

    Can anybody summarize? I wasn’t able to find live streaming in time.

  24. Joeyjojo Jr Shabadoo on July 10th, 2009 12:56 pm

    Hooray! I don’t care if they got Bob Ueker in return, I’m so happy to have him out of there. Thank you KC for continuing to take M’s castoffs. Outside of Willie there isn’t a single M turned Royal I would want back.

  25. SonOfZavaras on July 10th, 2009 12:57 pm

    This from the trade-blurb on http://www.kansascityroyals.com...

    He has been tough to strikeout throughout his career, fanning just once every 11.86 plate appearances, the sixth-best total in baseball since 2005 (min. 2,000 at bats).

    Way to try to sell the sunshine without mentioning the butt it’s coming from to your fans, fellas. Yeah…it’s tough to strike out if you don’t see many pitches!

  26. Kazinski on July 10th, 2009 12:58 pm

    KC was so happy with Willie, why not go out and get the player that was keeping Bloomquist on the bench if he’s available?

  27. snapper on July 10th, 2009 12:58 pm

    And WFB isn’t a good enough fielder to play short every day.

    But he’s still gotta be better than Yuni.

  28. Jay R. on July 10th, 2009 1:00 pm

    Great news! Getting anything in return for keeping him out of the lineup and the organization is a bonus. Hopefully the next step brings us a decent infielder.

  29. robbbbbb on July 10th, 2009 1:00 pm

    Baker’s reporting that the M’s ate salary, but Zduriencik wouldn’t detail how much.

    I don’t care. The M’s got actual talent back for Yuniesky Betancourt. Outstanding.

  30. Joeyjojo Jr Shabadoo on July 10th, 2009 1:01 pm

    Jay, who hasn’t peed on a fence before? As long as it wasn’t an electric fence, then I don’t know if it’s that worrisome.

  31. Coolalvin206 on July 10th, 2009 1:02 pm

    Why didn’t we get a middle infielder who was a major leaguer?(IE Freddy Sanchez)

    Does this mean Cedeno will start the rest of the year? (Sigh)

  32. robbbbbb on July 10th, 2009 1:02 pm

    On further reflection, you have to be asking yourself: “Why did Kansas City do this? What do they gain from it?”

    As far as I can tell, absolutely nothing. They sent something away for nothing. How does that help them? They’re out of the pennant race, and so it’s not like this is a short-term fix to shore up a component of their team. Or have they gotten that sour on Cortes, due to his legal issues?

  33. Paul B on July 10th, 2009 1:09 pm

    Can anybody summarize? I wasn’t able to find live streaming in time.

    To boil it down to 2 bullet points:

    1. Gutierrez is great, better than expected so far this year. He’s worth 20 million this year, so he’s a bargain.

    2. echo’d DMZ comment at the top,

    If the M’s aren’t picking up Yuni’s salary, our front office deserves end-of-year awards

    Basically, glad to get two guys that may turn out to be useful. Mentioned Cortes lack of control, but as a possible upside comparison mentioned JJ Putz.

  34. TomG on July 10th, 2009 1:10 pm

    Why didn’t we get a middle infielder who was a major leaguer?(IE Freddy Sanchez)

    Because you have to give up value to get value.

  35. Sports on a Schtick on July 10th, 2009 1:11 pm

    Sanchez is Pittsburgh’s lone All-Star. He will probably stay a Pirate at least another week.

  36. dsmiley on July 10th, 2009 1:11 pm

    Christmas in July! Woo hoo!

  37. scottiedawg on July 10th, 2009 1:12 pm

    Scroll down a bit and I asked a question about Cortes and Saito in this Baseball America Prospects chat.

  38. sweeper on July 10th, 2009 1:17 pm

    Are there possibly still trade talks in the works with the pirates for wlad or halman?

  39. dw on July 10th, 2009 1:19 pm

    All I can say is that we should be sending Royals fans sympathy bouquets.

    The Royals are starting to make the Pirates look like a well-run franchise.

  40. scottiedawg on July 10th, 2009 1:19 pm

    Let me know if we’re not allowed to speculate on anything solid here, but what kind of return would Wlad and Halman bring? Just Sanchez? Or Snell as well?

  41. egreenlaw9 on July 10th, 2009 1:20 pm

    What, Z couldn’t get Greinke in the deal?

    Seriously, this is amazingly good news.

    Yuni for any team’s top pitching prospect? AND a command lefty out of the pen?

    I’ll take that any day.

  42. CMC_Stags on July 10th, 2009 1:23 pm

    Are there possibly still trade talks in the works with the pirates for wlad or halman?

    This deal does not preclude any other deal.

    It makes some kind of deal for middle infield help even more likely as the deal now has one fewer player above AA who could “play” SS.

  43. dw on July 10th, 2009 1:23 pm

    OK, and I’ll say something else:

    The M’s paid X% of the $10M they owe Yuni for the rights to two prospects. When you look at it like this, the trade seems a little less imbalanced.

    OTOH, this is a prime example of a GM seeing undervalued talent and acquiring it in exchange for overvalued talent. Given how many Bavasi trades had the M’s on the wrong side of that equation, it’s nice to come out the winner for once.

  44. Jeff Nye on July 10th, 2009 1:26 pm

    It’s not open season for rosterbation, but I don’t know that we can necessarily stop you. Let’s just try to keep it somewhat reasonable, huh?

  45. Lauren, token chick on July 10th, 2009 1:29 pm

    We cannot acquire Snell without the -ing!!

  46. TomTuttle on July 10th, 2009 1:30 pm

    Hahahahahaha, have fun in Kansas City, Yuni!

    Enjoy being in baseball purgatory!

  47. Nate on July 10th, 2009 1:30 pm

    The M’s paid X% of the $10M they owe Yuni for the rights to two prospects.

    Wasn’t 100% of that money already spent anyway?

  48. TomG on July 10th, 2009 1:31 pm

    The more I read about Cortes, the more I picture an Aardsma lite. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing at all.

  49. eternal on July 10th, 2009 1:31 pm

    Thoughts on other trades…I know at this point we just want to get to the playoffs and maybe it is silly to think of what to do once we get there, but run prevention is more valuable than run scoring in the playoffs. If we trade Bedard or Washburn, it would seem that it could seriously hamstring the team if they got there. This is, of course, assuming Bedard stays healthy and I can understand not wanting to take the risk but it is something to think about.

  50. scottiedawg on July 10th, 2009 1:32 pm

    We were on the hook for it, but theoretically KC could’ve taken some of it. Yuni was a sunk cost, you are right on that point.

  51. mln on July 10th, 2009 1:32 pm

    “Now KC can have a Yuni-Bloomie DP combo. Let the good times roll.”

    Yes, and Mariners fans will be looking on with jealous envy for the next several years.

    The Mariner … uh… dream DP combo. What could have been. Sigh.

  52. Steve Nelson on July 10th, 2009 1:34 pm

    Yuni’s value has been below replacement level – that is, with a bit of work to find a non-Cedeñoesque replacement the Mariners could have released Yuni and improved the team while continuing to be on the hook for virtually all of Yuni’s remaining salary.

    Instead not only are the Mariners not on the hook for some part of his salary, they also got back at least one player who has some MLB potential.

    I don’t see how this is anything other than another great move. We would have been happy just seeing Yuni go away. Now he’s gone and the team gets value back as well.

  53. tylerv on July 10th, 2009 1:34 pm

    wish i could trade my girlfriend for two prospects. once in love, but no more. good move.

  54. Jay Yencich on July 10th, 2009 1:36 pm

    re: earlier comments

    When I posted that link to Cortes’ law run-in, I wasn’t being all that serious about it, just making fun of the phenomenon.

    You may remember a few years back when a few Mariners farmhands got in trouble for wrecking some cars. As it turned out, it was just a Midwest League tradition for players to buy beaters and crash them together at the end of the season, obsolescence made fun, if you will, but the police were not aware of what was going on and ended up making a mess of things.

  55. diderot on July 10th, 2009 1:38 pm

    I realize Sanchez is a better hitter, but we really need Wilson more. Imagine a guy who hits a little better than Yuni…and fields a lot better. Even if he is already in his early 30′s, we need someone to play there for a couple of years until someone else emerges.

  56. mln on July 10th, 2009 1:39 pm

    There is one downside to this trade that many people have not considered.

    What will become of the Bizarro Yuniesky Betancourt Fan Club?

  57. TomTuttle on July 10th, 2009 1:50 pm

    There is one downside to this trade that many people have not considered.

    What will become of the Bizarro Yuniesky Betancourt Fan Club?

    It gets suspended in Bizzaro World purgatory, duh!

  58. WSU_Dave on July 10th, 2009 1:50 pm

    I feel sorry for the fans over at the Royals message boards. They have no idea what they are getting, talking about Yuni’s excellent defense and such.

  59. iHam on July 10th, 2009 1:53 pm

    As a longtime Royals fan (OK, OK, get it out of your system, but at least they’ve got a World Series Trophy in their case…albeit from when I was still in high school,) I see this as good for Seattle, and not likely to drag KC down any further than they already are…and if Yuni can keep from injuring his new teammates wake up and smell the reality of his situation, it might turn out pretty good for them…

    BTW, for a chuckle, take a look at this How to be a Royals Fan guide.

  60. idahowriter on July 10th, 2009 1:55 pm

    Poor bastards in KC.

  61. SequimRealEstate on July 10th, 2009 1:57 pm

    Farewell, so long, I hope that you take this as an opportunity that all of us here would love to have had Mr. Betancourt. Good luck, Good Bye.

    In Z we trust. I have never wanted a GM’s autograph before but I sure want his. Thank You.

  62. iHam on July 10th, 2009 2:06 pm

    At least one KC sportswriter isn’t amused…Quote from Idahowriter’s link above:

    Betancourt is very much a worthy successor, and is very much similar to, the Neifi Perez, Angel Berroa, Tony Pena Jr. line of shortstops in Kansas City. To pull off the remarkable feat of extending this dynasty of ineptitude, the Royals traded…

  63. Steve Nelson on July 10th, 2009 2:10 pm

    Cortes urinated in public while intoxicated. He’ll fit right in when he walks over to Pioneer Square after home games.

  64. sweeper on July 10th, 2009 2:13 pm

    In Z we trust. I have never wanted a GM’s autograph before but I sure want his. Thank You.

    deals like this make me happy i got him to sign a ball at fanfest. Thank you jack z!

  65. Steve Nelson on July 10th, 2009 2:17 pm

    I feel sorry for the fans over at the Royals message boards. They have no idea what they are getting, talking about Yuni’s excellent defense and such.

    I think that being a Royals fan takes its toll on the weak-minded. The Royals, having a black hole at shortstop, went out and acquired the starting shortstop for a team that had an equally large problem at shortstop. And many fans see this as a great step forward for the team.

    I’m guessing that many of these are the same Royals fans who took issue with Dave’s organizational ranking of the Royals at Fangraphs this spring.

  66. Bodhizefa on July 10th, 2009 2:27 pm

    If the Royals wanted to get the 2007 Mariners squad back together so badly, why don’t they just hire Bill Bavasi and save themselves some trouble?

  67. DLCheeZ on July 10th, 2009 2:31 pm

    The Mariners have agreed to pay some portion of Yuni’s salary going forward.

    If the Royals got Jack to pay Yuni’s entire salary, the deal looks better for them. If Jack got away with paying none of Yuni’s salary, the deal looks better for us.

    Given the two players received in return, where’s breakeven?

  68. SeasonTix on July 10th, 2009 2:37 pm

    Getting rid of Yuni is awesome … it’s something the Bavasi regime never would have done.

    I have 100% confidence in this FO and it’s SO nice for change!

  69. Steve Nelson on July 10th, 2009 2:37 pm

    Given the two players received in return, where’s breakeven?

    Breakeven is simply getting rid of Betancourt and eating the salary owed him. That move by itself would have made the team better. Getting anything at all in return swings the deal positive for the Mariners. Getting something back and not being responsible for any portions of Betancourt’s salary is yet further in the Mariners favor.

  70. Breadbaker on July 10th, 2009 2:40 pm

    There is an additional point to make here: this is a message to Jose Lopez. No one is here to protect you other than your own performance on the field. Unless you’d like to play for the Nats or Pirates.

  71. Steve Nelson on July 10th, 2009 2:43 pm

    Maybe Dayton Moore is smarter than I give him credit for. As suggested by a commenter at fangraphs, maybe the Royals have decided to make a serious run for the right to draft Bryce Harper next year.

  72. jld on July 10th, 2009 2:56 pm

    Yuni is owed $13M for the next three years ($3M, $4M, and $6M). Is it plausible that we’re still paying most of that? Or does ‘cash considerations’ usually mean less than that?

  73. Matt Staples on July 10th, 2009 3:02 pm

    Playing Yuni and WFB certainly can’t hurt KC’s chances of landing Harper. Do they need Woodward or Corcoran?

  74. droppedrod on July 10th, 2009 3:02 pm

    This from a KC sports site. I think he cribbed from posts on Yuny from USS Mariner.

  75. wabbles on July 10th, 2009 3:02 pm

    OK, refresh my memory here. Wasn’t there a post recently showing how bad Yuni was even compared to replacement level? So how many wins does plugging Wilson or some other random player, even from Tacoma, into Yuni’s roster spot get us?

  76. droppedrod on July 10th, 2009 3:04 pm

    Try this again:

  77. NBarnes on July 10th, 2009 3:07 pm

    If the Royals got Jack to pay Yuni’s entire salary, the deal looks better for them

    Better in the sense that it’s better than if they were paying all of Yuni’s salary, yes.

    Better in the sense of ‘good’, no. Yuni has been below replacement level this year. Releasing him and eating the entire future value of his contract would have improved the team. Instead, Zduriencik got two might-have-a-future minor league arms and, reportedly, some of the money back, too. That’s not just advantage->Seattle, that’s pure win. There’s no way in which this is anything other than a coup.

  78. Slurve on July 10th, 2009 3:11 pm

    Meh I think you’re allowed to pee on a fence if you get stabbed 8 times saving a co-worker from gang members

  79. tylerv on July 10th, 2009 3:12 pm
  80. Breadbaker on July 10th, 2009 3:22 pm

    I think we can tell the gentleman from Kansas City that Yuni’s defense was not affected by his hamstring issue. That’s just Yuni.

  81. Lauren, token chick on July 10th, 2009 3:25 pm
  82. Lauren, token chick on July 10th, 2009 3:26 pm

    (I particularly liked “Betancourt does not reach base with any frequency, nor does he reach ground balls with any frequency.”)

  83. dw on July 10th, 2009 3:33 pm

    Wasn’t 100% of that money already spent anyway?

    True, but I was pointing out this isn’t diamonds for crap, its diamonds for crap and money. Still a big win for Z and the M’s, but not the Fleecing Of The Century.

    Given the two players received in return, where’s breakeven?

    If the SS position has an average UZR higher than Betancourt over the next 2.5 seasons, it’s a win. If Cortes gets his act together and gets some quality MLB service time, it’s a win. If the millions the M’s will save on Yuni’s contract go towards taking a flier on another Branyan-type performance, it’s a win.

    IOW, there are many ways this deal is a win for the M’s, and there are only a couple of ways this could be a win for the Royals, all of which involve Yuni not being an underwhelming fielder or impatient hitter. But most importantly, Yuni is no longer going to be injuring M’s in the field or airmailing the ball into the luxury suites. And that’s already a win.

  84. scott19 on July 10th, 2009 3:40 pm

    Great…the M’s finally manage to dump Yuni, and they wind up getting the guy who used to do those goofy Burger King ads…

    Oh, wait…that was Dan Cortese.

  85. Joe on July 10th, 2009 3:49 pm

    Yuni is owed $13M for the next three years ($3M, $4M, and $6M).

    That last year ($6M in ’12) has a $2M buyout: unless Yuni turns himself into another player between now and then, they’re taking the buyout. And even if Yuni does transform back into the guy we thought he was when he debuted, or better, the M’s will take the buyout and leave the Royals on the hook for the rest (assuming the M’s are even paying any part of his salary at that point, of course).

  86. Joe on July 10th, 2009 3:54 pm

    In case you missed it, Shannon Drayer offers a nice analysis from her unique perspective on her blog

  87. Joe on July 10th, 2009 4:45 pm

    OK, refresh my memory here. Wasn’t there a post recently showing how bad Yuni was even compared to replacement level? So how many wins does plugging Wilson or some other random player, even from Tacoma, into Yuni’s roster spot get us?

    According to Fangraphs, his WAR sits at -.8 so far this year, which means some replacement level shortstop in that spot for the rest of the year should be worth almost a win.

    Which brings us to the “break-even” question. That Fangraphs valuation offers one way to look at it. Going forward, assuming he was no better in the second half of this year than he was in the first, Yuni was going to cost the team $3.6M over and above the $1M in salary he would paid over the rest of the year (vs just dumping him and plugging in some league-minimum SS). Assuming he didn’t improve (or decline further) over the rest of his contract, that’s $7.2M worth of suck for each of ’10 and ’11, plus the $3.6M for the rest of this year, for $18M total loss resulting from his poor performance, even if he was playing for free. That’s what Zduriencik got the team out of, and even got something back in exchange.

    So let’s take the worst case evaluation: both these prospects from KC blow their arms out or quit to go to culinary school or whatever, and the deal requires the M’s to pay all of Yuni’s $10M freight ($1M in ’09, $3M in ’10, $4M in ’11, and the $2M buy-out in ’12).

    The team is still $8M ahead.

    Now, the accountants out there are going to be pulling their hair out and screaming, because I’m comparing opportunity cost on one hand with real dollars on the other: it’s not like the team gets $8M back from the karma tree because Yuni’s not on the team. But the point is that somebody else is on the team playing SS, and even if’s just a replacement-level guy getting paid the league average, he’s not costing the team $8M in non-production that has to be made up somewhere else in the field and/or at the plate. And when you’re trying to build a team that wins divisions, that is very real and very much what the calculation is all about.

    Oh, and meanwhile: that worst case scenario probably won’t happen. The M’s probably aren’t on the hook for the whole of the contract, and at least one of those prospects probably will provide some non-negative value to an M’s team in the future.

    I can’t see any way to spin this deal where — for the M’s at least — it isn’t made entirely of win.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.