Game 134, Angels at Mariners

Mike Snow · September 2, 2009 at 3:23 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

Day game for Felix Day!

Jose Lopez is at first base. Last year, when he was shifted over to first, it was on the one hand a relief from the agony of watching Sexson or the futility that was Miguel Cairo. On the other hand, it was terrifying to think that the front office might be seriously thinking of Lopez as the future at first base. That would have made him into a worthless asset, all so the team could try to fill a different hole instead, and at second base you don’t have Russ Branyans to easily plug in.

This year, I can handle Lopez at first base with equanimity. I know it’s not a glimpse of the future, just a temporary expedient. Next year I could see Lopez back at second, or replacing Beltre at third (less likely now given the other moves that have been made), or playing for another team altogether. Regardless of which it turns out to be, I have a lot more confidence that it will have happened because Zduriencik determined that was the best way to allocate his resources.

RF-L Ichiro
CF-R Gutierrez
1B-R Lopez
DH-R Sweeney
3B-R Beltre
UT-R Hall
SS-R J. Wilson (real helpful, I know)
C-R Johnson
LF-L Saunders

Comments

141 Responses to “Game 134, Angels at Mariners”

  1. msb on September 2nd, 2009 3:27 pm

    And continuing the new 710 tradition, Shannon Drayer wishes us a Happy Felix day, as she hosts her first pregame show.

  2. _David_ on September 2nd, 2009 3:36 pm

    Rob Johnson aside, I wonder where this lineup ranks among the best single game defensive units in recent memory?

  3. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 3:42 pm

    Well, I firmly believe that Mike Sweeney’s defensive skills at DH have been greatly undervalued.

  4. msb on September 2nd, 2009 3:44 pm

    Rob! what a surprise!

  5. Willmore2000 on September 2nd, 2009 3:45 pm

    I love you Jack Wilson. No cigar, but I love the hustle and thought.

  6. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 3:46 pm

    How many web gems will this game have?

  7. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 3:46 pm

    Bill Hall 2B ’10?

  8. Willmore2000 on September 2nd, 2009 3:47 pm

    We have real defenders, whooo.

    By the way, this defensive lineup looks like it might be the best in baseball.

    It can’t hit for shit, but defensively it looks as solid as anything else out there.

  9. msb on September 2nd, 2009 3:47 pm

    How many web gems will this game have?

    Well, if ESPN even notices that it has been played …

  10. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 3:48 pm

    Okay, Rob, now work on your pitch-blocking as well as your throwing arm.

  11. hidalgo on September 2nd, 2009 3:50 pm

    I especially like Hall at UT. Hook ‘em horns!

  12. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 3:50 pm

    Is anyone else getting a black screen for FSN?

  13. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 3:50 pm

    What would be more improbable, Felix no-hitting the Angels, or a guy like Fister no-hitting the Mariners?

  14. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 3:50 pm

    Hrmph. I have to say, being at work and having USSM up, the constantly scrolling Twitter feed is irksome. Is there a way to halt it?

  15. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 3:53 pm

    Lauren – Just ask your IT folks to block all such Tomfoolery…. like mine has.

  16. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 3:55 pm

    Ichiro! Coming back with a vengeance. At this pace he will have 200 hits by next week.

  17. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 3:58 pm

    It wasn’t scored a hit according to Gameday.

  18. Paul B on September 2nd, 2009 4:02 pm

    Fangraphs says Ichiro had a single.

    And Sweeney takes a called third strike with the bases loaded.

  19. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:05 pm

    If the Angels get out of this Jam, only Felix will be more pissed than me…

  20. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:05 pm

    By the way, this defensive offensive lineup looks like it might be the best worst in baseball.

    Fixed.

  21. red_devil20 on September 2nd, 2009 4:06 pm

    I understand the value of Beltre, Hall, and (previously) Cameron. I really do. But really, strikeouts piss me off.

  22. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 4:07 pm

    Is anyone else tired of the Mariners not scoring runs with RISP? Count me as someone who is pissed (with Dirk and Felix).

  23. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 4:08 pm

    Well, their strikeouts were less harmful than Sweeney’s.

  24. JerBear on September 2nd, 2009 4:08 pm

    Frick. Bases loaded, no outs, and they get exactly jack shit accomplished. I’m a little tired of this scenario…

  25. red_devil20 on September 2nd, 2009 4:09 pm

    I didn’t add him in because I’m having difficulty finding and understanding his value, though his designated hugger quotient is off the charts.

  26. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:12 pm

    Frick. Bases loaded, no outs, and they get exactly jack shit accomplished. I’m a little tired of this scenario…

    This is why, as great as defense is, and however equal a great-defense/below-average-offense player is to a great-offense/below-average-defense player, I’d rather they add wins through offense than defense — all things being equal.

  27. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:14 pm

    I fell like I’m being overly negative here, but….

    God Dammit!

  28. xkpilot on September 2nd, 2009 4:14 pm

    Does anyone know what Hall’s & Wilson’s averages are since they came over?

  29. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:15 pm

    Yeah, because that has worked out so well thus far.

  30. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:17 pm

    I’ve just assumed that Griffey’s (besides the merchandise and ticket side) and (especially) Sweeney’s value is to make the clubhouse a place where guys enjoy coming to work, such as 23-year-old aces who are a couple years away from free agency and might have to decide whether to take a 4- or 5-year deal or wait it out and cash in big-time. Is Mike Carp that good?

  31. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:19 pm

    This is why, as great as defense is, and however equal a great-defense/below-average-offense player is to a great-offense/below-average-defense player, I’d rather they add wins through offense than defense — all things being equal.

    Or, I should say, have fun overpaying for those players.

  32. JerBear on September 2nd, 2009 4:21 pm

    I’d rather they do a little of both. I get just as irked watching the opponent score because of bad defense as I do watching my team fail to score because of bad offense.

    I know you can’t have it all, but I think they’ll get there – they have room to add offense without taking away from the defense. Beltre’s had a tough year with injuries, Branyan’s out right now, their DH slot has been useless, and they’ve got a rookie LF who’s still acclimating and hasn’t shown any power yet… I’m hoping against hope they keep Beltre, then upgrade a few of those other slots, and all of the sudden things are looking much better.

  33. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:21 pm

    Positive spin – Kazmir has thrown 47 pitches after two innings

  34. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:22 pm

    killer – That’s why I said all things being equal. If the defense is cheaper, then fine.

  35. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 4:24 pm

    Phew–Twitter scrolling issue solved as soon as comments went beyond one page length.

    Bases loaded, no outs, THREE strikeouts? Argh.

  36. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:25 pm

    Yeah, and I think it’s pretty clear that all things aren’t equal, which makes it all hypothetical.

  37. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:25 pm

    Also, that’s in the context of this team. Given their offensive deficiencies, I’d just rather watch more offense. I’d rather they have more offensive outbursts. I don’t mind 2-1 games, as long as that’s not THE ONLY THING THEY EVER DO!

  38. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:28 pm

    Me too, but I think if we’re even going to be any better next year, there will be more 2-1 games, rather than less.

  39. eponymous coward on September 2nd, 2009 4:29 pm

    This is why, as great as defense is, and however equal a great-defense/below-average-offense player is to a great-offense/below-average-defense player, I’d rather they add wins through offense than defense — all things being equal.

    Last I checked, a 2-1 win counts exactly the same in the standings as a 7-4 one.

    Also, all things are NOT equal. Quite often, the market overvalues certain skill sets (hitting balls over fences) and undervalues others (stopping balls from getting through infields) when it comes to salaries and contracts, and this creates inefficiencies. Granted, if you’re the Yankees, you can spend a bazillion dollars on 9 power hitters in your lineup- but the M’s aren’t the Yankees.

  40. xkpilot on September 2nd, 2009 4:30 pm

    At least Felix won’t win the Cy Young with this offense. Less money to have to cough up later (like we will be able to keep him anyway).

    The loss to the Angles the other night should have been our only loss for this 14 game streach if we think we are a playoff team. I hope Griffey/Sweeney/Wok are letting the guys know that.

  41. naviomelo on September 2nd, 2009 4:31 pm

    I think most of us would be happy with more wins regardless of how we get there. It would be fun to see how many balls in play we could possibly turn into outs.

  42. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:33 pm

    The loss to the Angles the other night should have been our only loss for this 14 game streach if we think we are a playoff team. I hope Griffey/Sweeney/Wok are letting the guys know that.

    Who really thinks we are a playoff team?

  43. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:34 pm

    Yes, but the entertainment value of having a team that will win 7-4 and 11-9 games in addition to 2-1 games is greater than a team that can’t win if they give up more than 4 runs. If it only mattered if they won or lost, I’d just read the score in the paper the next day and never watch a game.

    If it costs a couple million more to add offense over defense, and they can afford to, then to hell with it. The Mariners are an upper-middle-class baseball team.

  44. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 4:36 pm

    Hmmm, Gamecast thinks that ball was a strike.

  45. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 4:36 pm

    Hey, maybe Rob is learning how to play defense.

  46. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 4:36 pm

    But, no harm done!

  47. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:38 pm

    Yes, but the entertainment value of having a team that will win 7-4 and 11-9 games in addition to 2-1 games is greater than a team that can’t win if they give up more than 4 runs. If it only mattered if they won or lost, I’d just read the score in the paper the next day and never watch a game.
    If it costs a couple million more to add offense over defense, and they can afford to, then to hell with it. The Mariners are an upper-middle-class baseball team.

    So, pay millions for shits and giggles?

  48. naviomelo on September 2nd, 2009 4:38 pm

    The Mariners are an upper-middle-class baseball team.

    And they’re achieving “upper middle class” results after only months of having been run properly. If you want better results, you have to capitalize on market inefficiencies everywhere you can given a healthy, but finite budget.

  49. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 4:39 pm

    Oh, and it looks like Gameday has updated the scoring to call that play in the first an Ichiro single.

  50. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:41 pm

    So, pay millions for shits and giggles?

    Hell yes! Baseball is entertainment. I want the club to win, and I’ll take more wins over more offense. But in the end, it’s entertainment.

  51. Dave Clapper on September 2nd, 2009 4:41 pm

    Yes, but the entertainment value of having a team that will win 7-4 and 11-9 games in addition to 2-1 games is greater than a team that can’t win if they give up more than 4 runs.

    Not for me. I love watching this team. This defense is incredibly exciting.

  52. Goody on September 2nd, 2009 4:41 pm

    Watching Jerry Mills umpire has made me realize that I have no idea what a strike is and even fewer ideas of how to come to that decision

  53. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:42 pm

    The Mariners are an upper-middle-class baseball team.

    Who are paying:

    12.25 Mill to Silva
    9.5 Mil to Batista
    7.75 Mil to Bedard
    7.67 Mil to Jojima

    And who knows how much to guys who were cut or traded….

  54. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:42 pm

    “Johjima” – rats

  55. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 4:44 pm

    Time for another 13-pitch at-bat from Jose?

  56. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 4:45 pm

    Never mind, jinxed him.

  57. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:45 pm

    Speaking of Rats (or shitty umpires)… WTF was that called third strike to Ichiro? 6 inches off the plate?

  58. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 4:48 pm

    Well, with 5 guys who are undervalued because of their defensive contributions, and a stable of cheap rotation pitchers, I just believe a club like the Mariners can afford to overpay for a little offense for a more diverse scoreline.

    Obviously, crappy deals like Silva, Batista and Johjima hurt. But I’m not advocating $12 million going to some pitcher who is competing with four or five minimum salaried pitchers for the 5th spot in the rotation.

  59. Jeff Nye on September 2nd, 2009 4:48 pm

    Yes, but the entertainment value of having a team that will win 7-4 and 11-9 games in addition to 2-1 games is greater than a team that can’t win if they give up more than 4 runs.

    Actually, I like watching the sort of games that today’s Mariners play much better than the football-score affairs from the Kingdome days.

    So your statement is hardly universal, and certainly not worth wasting budget dollars on.

  60. Dave Clapper on September 2nd, 2009 4:50 pm

    But I’m not advocating $12 million going to some pitcher who is competing with four or five minimum salaried pitchers for the 5th spot in the rotation.

    You’re advocating overpaying for offense instead. The single-minded desire to overpay for one very specific thing is precisely what generated each of those contracts.

  61. red_devil20 on September 2nd, 2009 4:51 pm

    You what’s entertaining? Champagne showers and grown men pouring beer on each other next to a trophy with a bunch of flags on it while Bud Selig looks sheepishly on. That’s good times, I don’t care how Z adds wins to get us there, just get us there. Defense and other under-valued attributes? Great. Offense or other “old school” charms? Sweet.

  62. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 4:51 pm

    You’re advocating we throw away what little progress the new FO has made, just so you can get off on a home run once in a while?

  63. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 4:55 pm

    Hey, Adrian can swing through the low-and-inside slider from a lefty just as well as the low-and-outside slider from a righthander.

  64. Dirk on September 2nd, 2009 4:55 pm

    I thnk if we took the $30 Mil per season going to Bedilvasta and gave like half to Felix and the other half to bring in some offense would be a good thing.

  65. Chris_From_Bothell on September 2nd, 2009 5:01 pm

    Guys, I had this whole “wins are wins no matter what” vs. “you can shop for offense specifically” argument on here a few days back. It’s really not worth it.

    In Z We Trust. Throw money at higher quality players and make sure each position is getting consistently upgraded, and the rest will take care of itself.

  66. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 5:01 pm

    You’re advocating we throw away what little progress the new FO has made, just so you can get off on a home run once in a while?

    Hell no! I like a diversity of scores. A team that wins with offense, defense and pitching, and parts of each. I think the 2-1 games have more value as entertainment when they’re sprinkled with 9-8 games.

    If we can add the same amount of wins through offense over defense for a couple more million at maybe two positions, then what is the big deal?

    I think hockey is a much better game when the outcome can be 2-1 or 6-5 than if the outcome can be 2-1 or 3-2. And those 2-1 games are a lot more enjoyable when they’re not strung upon 2-1 after 2-1 games.

  67. Jeff Nye on September 2nd, 2009 5:05 pm

    If you find “a diversity of scores” more valuable than just adding more wins, then I don’t know what to tell you.

  68. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:05 pm

    Hell no! I like a diversity of scores. A team that wins with offense, defense and pitching, and parts of each. I think the 2-1 games have more value as entertainment when they’re sprinkled with 9-8 games.
    If we can add the same amount of wins through offense over defense for a couple more million at maybe two positions, then what is the big deal?
    I think hockey is a much better game when the outcome can be 2-1 or 6-5 than if the outcome can be 2-1 or 3-2. And those 2-1 games are a lot more enjoyable when they’re not strung upon 2-1 after 2-1 games.

    Okay.

  69. EagleBonesFalconHawk on September 2nd, 2009 5:06 pm

    [lose the capslock and post better]

  70. naviomelo on September 2nd, 2009 5:06 pm

    I like a diversity of scores. A team that wins with offense, defense and pitching, and parts of each.

    Did you know that that’s how every game is won?

  71. naviomelo on September 2nd, 2009 5:07 pm

    Are we allowed to DFA commenters?

  72. Sports on a Schtick on September 2nd, 2009 5:08 pm

    Is too much to ask the offense to do something once every five starts?

  73. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 5:08 pm

    Hey, guess what everybody, Kazmir’s been perfect through five!

  74. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:10 pm

    Hey, guess what everybody, Kazmir’s been perfect through five!

    Actually, he’s been perfect through the last 18 outs.

  75. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 5:15 pm

    Actually 15, but who’s counting?

  76. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:16 pm

    Oops…

  77. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 5:21 pm

    Well, maybe you were just being prescient.

  78. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 5:21 pm

    Now it’s 18, but who’s counting?

  79. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:22 pm

    I jinxed it…

    Maybe taking some pitches would help.

  80. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 5:26 pm

    They were taking pitches before, even getting Kazmir’s pitch count up nicely.

  81. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:27 pm

    I guess it’s just regression to the mean.

  82. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 5:28 pm

    It sure would be nice to have someone like Morales making 600 K playing first base next year for the Mariners.

  83. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 5:29 pm

    Jeff Nye – I wouldn’t say at the expense of wins. Zduriencik can and will add wins anyway he thinks best. Maybe the only way is through defense, but I have a preference for more offense if that’s possible. If they got 100 2-1ish wins, that’s wonderful. It’d just be, like, more fun, if there was some bigger scores tossed in there to get to 100. (Although, 100 wins would be plenty fun however they got them, I guess)

    It’s a preference, not a demand.

  84. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 5:32 pm

    It would have been interesting to see what the division standings would have looked like had the Mariners stayed healthy.

  85. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:33 pm

    Jeff Nye – I wouldn’t say at the expense of wins.

    But by saying you’re willing to spend millions on getting that extra offense, it IS at the expense of wins.

  86. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 5:35 pm

    OMG, twinkle toes walked. Bring in a pinch runner.

  87. Colm on September 2nd, 2009 5:36 pm

    Gah.
    How many times has Beltre seen this park hold those long hits?
    I’ll be sad to see him go, but he’ll look like a better hitter in almost any other park in baseball.

  88. Mike Snow on September 2nd, 2009 5:37 pm

    It would have been interesting to see what the division standings would have looked like had the Mariners stayed healthy.

    It would have been interesting to see what the division standings would have looked like had the Angels stayed healthy.

  89. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 5:38 pm

    Yesssss!

  90. Jeff Nye on September 2nd, 2009 5:38 pm

    I like Bill Hall.

  91. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 5:38 pm

    It would have been interesting had this been a weak division.

  92. G-Man on September 2nd, 2009 5:40 pm

    “Mike Scoscia has seen enough” says Sims.

    You’d think Kazmir had given up 8 hits and 4 runs in 3 innings instead of pitching a gem.

  93. EagleBonesFalconHawk on September 2nd, 2009 5:41 pm

    oh billy billy the old billy baroo

  94. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 5:41 pm

    Does pitching a gem against us really count? I mean, it’s pretty cheap.

  95. G-Man on September 2nd, 2009 5:42 pm

    Heh, an instant reply with the original sound.

  96. Sports on a Schtick on September 2nd, 2009 5:43 pm

    Nice outing by Kazmir. Granted it was against a jalopy of a lineup but I’m sure the Angels will take it. Though they gave up quite a bit for him…

  97. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:43 pm

    Bill Hall 2, Angels 0.

  98. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 5:43 pm

    I know that there is a lot of love for Beltre here, but I am looking forward to more Hannahan and Hall next year at third.

  99. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 5:44 pm

    Ahh, Johnson. At least you didn’t wait around to do that. Boom!

  100. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:46 pm

    Maybe Rob should just start running towards the dugout on infield grounders… it would save time.

  101. EagleBonesFalconHawk on September 2nd, 2009 5:47 pm

    possiblity of Felix to complete this game?

  102. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 5:49 pm

    Sims with the OOZR shoutout.

  103. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 5:50 pm

    114 pitches, does he try for the CG?

  104. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 5:50 pm

    killer_ewok18 – Perhaps that is true. But there’s also inefficiencies for specific offensive players, such as Branyan. Oh well, I guess the point of free speech is for smart folks like you and Jeff to set straight ignorant folks like me.

  105. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 5:51 pm

    At 113 pitches? I think not. I’m guessing the Gamecast delay is him being taken out, though I wish he could get that last out in the 8th.

  106. Sports on a Schtick on September 2nd, 2009 5:51 pm

    96 MPH fastball on the 114th pitch. Yikes.

  107. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 5:51 pm

    Oh! Yay! He did.

  108. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 5:53 pm

    If we were chasing the pennant, Felix would definitely have to go back out there for the 9th.

  109. Sports on a Schtick on September 2nd, 2009 5:54 pm

    Guerrero, Morales and Izturis. Please don’t throw flat fastballs DA.

  110. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 5:56 pm

    At least Vlad leads off the inning. Vlad=Mariner Killer.

  111. Lauren, token chick on September 2nd, 2009 5:57 pm

    Oh, Felix. So great. I just can’t root against him winning the Cy Young for fear of his increased salary.

  112. msb on September 2nd, 2009 5:57 pm

    Make them pay, Old Man.

  113. Sports on a Schtick on September 2nd, 2009 5:57 pm

    Speaking of flat fastballs, thank you Fuentes.

    And here comes Sweeney!!!!

  114. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 5:58 pm

    I could do without that chicken sound being played over the PA when a guy is intentionally walked.

  115. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 6:00 pm

    Déjà vu?

  116. red_devil20 on September 2nd, 2009 6:00 pm

    Sweeney is AWESOME!!!

  117. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 6:02 pm

    Is a sac fly too much to ask for??? Sac flies in the first and 8th and were up 4-0.

  118. Sports on a Schtick on September 2nd, 2009 6:03 pm

    Go Bill Hall!! Do it! FINISH HIM!!!

  119. hidalgo on September 2nd, 2009 6:03 pm

    Ahhh…once a Mariner, always a Mariner….

  120. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 6:04 pm

    The Mariners better have the best clubhouse atmosphere in baseball next year.

  121. EagleBonesFalconHawk on September 2nd, 2009 6:05 pm

    bill hall please just park one in the bleachers…

  122. killer_ewok18 on September 2nd, 2009 6:06 pm

    The Mariners better have the best clubhouse atmosphere in baseball next year.

    Not if it means bringing Sweeney back!

  123. Colm on September 2nd, 2009 6:06 pm

    Tha’d be cooooool

  124. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 6:11 pm

    What are the odds that DA can strike out Vlad 2 nights in a row?

  125. Hud67 on September 2nd, 2009 6:12 pm

    Strike that, I think Vlad lined out to Jose last night.

  126. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 6:13 pm

    Not if it means bringing Sweeney back!

    Oh god no. To justify his existence this year, he needs to have taught some of the good ballplayers to emulate his enormous clubhouse skills. I want Guti and Lopez doing the tickling!

  127. hidalgo on September 2nd, 2009 6:14 pm

    Man do I love run prevention!

  128. Mustard on September 2nd, 2009 6:16 pm

    Thank you minimal M’s offense for not spoiling another nice outing by Felix.
    It was a nice way for me to passs some hours here at work!

  129. msb on September 2nd, 2009 6:18 pm

    Excitement in the bookend-innings, some frustration in-between

  130. just a fan on September 2nd, 2009 6:20 pm

    How many times does Felix have to wait until the 7th or 8th to get some runs? Help a brother out, guys!

  131. Mustard on September 2nd, 2009 6:21 pm

    If it wasnt for Grienke, we would be having Felix for CY discussion.

  132. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 6:24 pm

    At least FSN is not including the Mariners in their ‘Who will win the AL pennant’ poll.

  133. Liam on September 2nd, 2009 6:37 pm

    Soggy Bottom Boys playing in the clubhouse again.

  134. mw3 on September 2nd, 2009 7:38 pm

    It was nice to see Wak leave Felix in to throw 114 pitches.

  135. SonOfZavaras on September 2nd, 2009 7:40 pm

    I’m beginning to thinks that Dave Sims visits this site.

    He referenced “Felix Day” at least three times.

    Maybe he did so before and I just never noticed- I haven’t caught every broadcast this year- but still, it makes a guy think….

    Oh yeah. Guerrero forgot he’s a gold-plated Mariner-killer two days in a row. Euphoria!

    Excerpt from a conversation with my younger brother when Guerrero led off the ninth:

    Younger Bro: “At least we know Guerrero can’t hit a grand slam from the leadoff spot this inning.”

    Me: “Don’t tempt him. If there’s a way to do it, he will. Against us, he knows no physical laws.”

  136. Lantern on September 2nd, 2009 10:19 pm

    Is Hall the new Mark McLemore?

  137. Seattleken on September 2nd, 2009 11:59 pm

    I quite like what Jack Z has been doing to rebuild the team but I think they are still three years away. The run diff is an awful -52, its only been that one run games have fallen their way 29-16. This is like 2007 a win total that is an illusion, and we know what happened in 2008.

    Next year even with improvement they are still atbest a .500 team. So even though it hurts they have to allow Beltre to go and use their resources to build the farm system by paying high prices for international prospects and signing and selecting high priced draft picks.

    If they can trade players for prospects but realistically Jack doesn’t have much to work with re: trading quality high value vets for prospects. His only players that would get top prospects are Ichiro (who as a GM you can’t move and keep fans), Lopez (as discussed) who will do even better away from Safeco and getting close to his prime hitting years 27-29, and Felix who has to be the franchise player that you use Silva’s and Batista money to sign long term in two years.

    It should be an interesting off-season but I will be extremely upset if the front office pays for present day players in an attempt to win a title.

  138. Jeff Nye on September 3rd, 2009 1:26 am

    I’m not sure why that idea keeps resurfacing again and again and again.

    When you have a $112 million payroll, 7th highest in all of MLB, there is no such thing as “three years away”. This isn’t Cleveland.

    This team can compete next year with the right moves, while not mortgaging the future. We just have to spend our money better than we have in the past, and there’s a leadership team in place that can do that now.

  139. mln on September 3rd, 2009 4:06 am

    Bad news Mariners fans. The St. Louis Cardinals just extended the contract of Ryan Franklin through the 2011 season, so there is no hope of reacquiring him in the offseason.

    Bummer, isn’t it?

  140. Mike Snow on September 3rd, 2009 7:57 am

    We still have a chance to bring Pineiro back, though.

  141. Paul B on September 3rd, 2009 12:20 pm

    When you have a $112 million payroll, 7th highest in all of MLB, there is no such thing as “three years away”. This isn’t Cleveland.

    What if a substantial chunk of that money was going to Silva and Johjima?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.