What This Trade Does

Dave · December 16, 2009 at 12:46 pm · Filed Under Mariners 

The weird thing about the internet age is that by the time big moves are announced, they’ve been analyzed to death and there’s not much more to say. We got one of the best pitchers in baseball without giving up any real significant pieces of the franchises future. This is amazing, but you know this already.

So, at the risk of moving on from celebration prematurely, I’d like to spend a few minutes and talk about what this trade does to the team and the rest of the off-season.

Lee’s addition is a huge lift to the team’s true talent level, as the M’s have essentially swapped out (for now) one of Doug Fister/Jason Vargas/Carlos Silva for an all-star. They added about 4 to 5 wins to their expected total for 2010, depending on how much you like the collection of 5th starters the M’s currently have. This move, combined with the Figgins signing, gives the Mariners a true talent level of about 84 wins. And that’s with Saunders in left, Carp at first, and Griffey DH’ing.

The Mariners are now contenders. This vaults them into a similar arena of ability with the Angels and ahead of the Rangers and A’s. This team now has a legitimate chance to win the division in 2010, and because they’ve gotten bargains on Figgins and Lee, they still have the resources to go add a couple more pieces to fill out the roster and really give themselves a chance to play in October next year.

So now, the calculations change a bit. 2010 just got more important relative to the future than it was last week. The M’s have now put themselves into a position where the value obtained from upgrading the roster has a far more dramatic effect on the team’s chances of making the playoffs. In terms of the risk/reward balance of transactions, the reward for any move that improves the 2010 team just went up.

I talked about this a bit on FanGraphs last week, but the Mariners have just put themselves in a situation where the marginal value of each additional added win just went way up. The wins that push the team from 84 to 85 wins, 85 to 86, 86 to 87, and so forth have a much higher rate of return. The price the M’s should be willing to pay, both in acquisition costs and in the long-term/short-term trade-off, needs to reflect that. And I think you will see the team be aggressive in landing two more quality position players and perhaps a reliever, reflecting the reality that adding 4 to 5 more wins to this roster would make the M’s the best team in the AL West.

Before this trade, picking up a solid left fielder might not have been such a great idea, as the short term addition of a win or so over what Saunders could be expected to produce wouldn’t be worth the long term cost of not letting the youngster develop. Now, that win is important, and you can justify getting a guy like Luke Scott to take Saunders job. You can justify trading Brandon Morrow while his value is still lower than it could be if you get a significant upgrade at another position. You can justify putting together a huge package to try to convince the Padres to move Adrian Gonzalez (though that is still very unlikely).

This move changes everything. The M’s are contenders.

Comments

171 Responses to “What This Trade Does”

  1. gwangung on December 16th, 2009 12:50 pm

    I talked about this a bit on FanGraphs last week, but the Mariners have just put themselves in a situation where the marginal value of each additional added win just went way up. The wins that push the team from 84 to 85 wins, 85 to 86, 86 to 87, and so forth have a much higher rate of return. The price the M’s should be willing to pay, both in acquisition costs and in the long-term/short-term trade-off, needs to reflect that.

    Aha! I thought so!

    The purse strings open, they’ll be more aggressive with the minor leaugers, etc. And the good thing is that, based on track records, Zduriencik will not cripple the team, but will have coverage for future years (i.e., long enough for prospects in the system to prove themselves and be capable replacements).

  2. shemberry on December 16th, 2009 12:52 pm

    The exciting part of all of this, is that I trust that Jack is going to do it right. He may be willing to pay more for those extra wins, but I am convinced he can and will do it without sacrificing the future of this organization.

  3. Jeff Sullivan on December 16th, 2009 12:53 pm

    Beat you!

  4. laloffice on December 16th, 2009 12:55 pm

    [link button please thanks]

  5. edrid on December 16th, 2009 12:56 pm

    Spending $9M on Lee vs. $12-14M on the likes of Harden, Sheets, etc to bolster our rotation… “wow” is all I can think of… Les put that extra $$$ towards someone to drive Ich and Chone in!!!

  6. Banton on December 16th, 2009 12:57 pm

    As if no one has said this before, this is literally jaw-dropping. To pick up,on the relative cheap, Figgy, and the addition of Lee (with picks if he walks) is truly inspired hunting on the part of JZ. This is the guy that we have needed for so long, and it will lure other FA’s to come here.

    I thought that Saunders would be an okay fit this year in LF, but Dave is correct. Get a solid glove/bat that will enhance our chances, allowing Saunders to continue development. I am all for a Johnson-like DH, and it may be that Carp can hit enough slaps to handle the bag at first. And if we could pick up a vastly reduced, overlooked pitcher who needs to reinvent himself, all the better. In JZ and Tango we trust.

    Un %#$@ing believable. We’re contenders! Who would have thunk it for ’10?

  7. wayupwaydown on December 16th, 2009 12:57 pm

    Considering that Washburn pitched very well last year when he was here, does the signing of Lee still add 4-5 wins over what he provided last year before he was traded?

    Just wondering if that was part of you analysis.

    Either way it is a great trade.

  8. Jeff Sullivan on December 16th, 2009 12:58 pm

    It doesn’t matter how we are now relative to last year. It matters how we are now relative to last week.

  9. wayupwaydown on December 16th, 2009 1:01 pm

    Jeff, I understand. Thanks for the clarification.

  10. earinc on December 16th, 2009 1:02 pm

    The folks at Halos Heaven call Tony Reagins “The Ninja.” If so, what does that make Jack? Who could out-stealth a ninja? The Invisible Man? Batman? Phil Ivey? We love you, JZ.

  11. KingCorran on December 16th, 2009 1:06 pm

    So now there are four major possibilities that upgrade the M’s chances significantly.

    * LF Jason Bay. Cheapest star option in the FA market. If you hate his D, you disagree with me here (I hold he’ll be league average there, but that’s another discussion. I’ll accept disagreement here; just listing the options).

    * LF Matt Holliday. Better D than Bay, and likely a modestly better bat. More expensive, although backloading a year or two of contract mitigates this. St. Louis’ proposed deal is only five years, not eight… so he’s gettable.

    * 1B Adrian Gonzalez. The big hurt here is that the guy WANTS to go to Boston (supposedly). He’d be the best get… if the price is Buchholz + another top Boston guy, we can definitely beat that with a Triunfel + Morrow + top prospect trio. It’s just a matter of what Z thinks is worth the cost.

    * ’1B’ Prince Fielder. Who cares if the guy will end up as our DH? More expensive (salarywise) than a dirt-cheap Gonzalez, he’s no glove guy. But even coming from a tin-can ballpark (and Gonzalez succeeding in Petco Pitcher’s Haven), his bat is an upgrade. Sign Johnson to man first, and Fielder can go straight to the no-glove role. And his higher cost and worse defense (not to mention other marquee players left behind him in MIL) means he should be CHEAPER (prospect-wise) than Gonzalez.

    If you see one of these four come to Seattle this offseason… you have to call Seattle the clear AL West favorites.

  12. Dave on December 16th, 2009 1:08 pm

    So now there are four major possibilities that upgrade the M’s chances significantly.

    No. If you had compiled the list of pitchers that would upgrade the roster a week ago, Lee wouldn’t have been on it. Don’t limit yourself to the guys that ESPN has heard of.

  13. Paul B on December 16th, 2009 1:14 pm

    Derek had 15 pitchers on his depth chart.

    Today, there are 16.

    It will be interesting in Arizona to see which make the team, and who the 4th and 5th starters will be.

    I’d give a mention here of French, often forgotten (Derek even had a question mark next to his name) but he could fit in Safeco just like Washburn did. Left handed flyball pitcher, without overpowering stuff. For someone like him, a good March could mean he’d be in the rotation.

  14. KingCorran on December 16th, 2009 1:14 pm

    ESPN hasn’t heard of Fielder yet. =) At least, not in connection to the M’s.

    You’re right – no limitation necessary on Z’s options. That wasn’t quite the idea I was intending to portray, but that’s my bad. These are the more obvious guys; a Branyan-Johnson doublesigning would provide some help for sure… and I definitely am not going to say Z can’t pull something else out of his butt and boggle our minds again. I would, however, prefer to see a star-level power bat enter our lineup before the season starts.

    Maybe he can convince St. Louis to trade Pujols before his 10-5 rights kick in… or pry some other ‘non-available’ player away from his GM’s cold dead fingers. All I know is, nothing is beyond the reach of Z at this moment.

  15. CCW on December 16th, 2009 1:16 pm

    mmm… “star-level power bat”.

  16. wabbles on December 16th, 2009 1:17 pm

    “The M’s are contenders.”

    I think my computer just wacky on me, I don’t remember ever reading this in the past several years. (No, 2007 doesn’t count, that was ill-informed wishful thinking.)
    As far as 1B and LF, I don’t see us going the free agent route. Z has other plans, methinks.
    So is there going to be another January event like last year where we can give the M’s front office more standing ovations?

  17. fiftyone on December 16th, 2009 1:19 pm

    What this trade does… is beg the question, “Who will catch these guys?” Dave, is the Johnson-Moore combo still a viable solution for 2010?

    Another thing this trade does is sell tickets, and maybe maybe maybe the budget, whatever it is, inches up a little.

  18. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 1:20 pm

    I am still mystified that Cliff Lee became available. Cliff Lee! And that the M’s got him for three middling prospects. Cliff Lee!

    Z’s the man. If Shannon Drayer tweeted tomorrow that the M’s were in serious talks for David Wright, I’d believe it. (Albert Pujols, I wouldn’t believe. But Wright? Sure.) Zduriencik has made me a believer in his wheeling-and-dealing skills.

    And in case it hasn’t become clear: Dude. Cliff Lee!

  19. Dave on December 16th, 2009 1:20 pm

    So is there going to be another January event like last year where we can give the M’s front office more standing ovations?

    I’m hoping to announce this tomorrow.

  20. konatoby on December 16th, 2009 1:20 pm

    So now there are four major possibilities that upgrade the M’s chances significantly.

    No. If you had compiled the list of pitchers that would upgrade the roster a week ago, Lee wouldn’t have been on it. Don’t limit yourself to the guys that ESPN has heard of.

    Especially for how the deal came from left field the Boonies thin air into fruition, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if somehow Jack Z gets someone like, ah dunno, Pujols as a finale

  21. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 1:23 pm

    And at that event, can someone ask how the M’s managed to insert themselves into the Halladay deal, and come out with Cliff Lee? (Dude; Cliff Lee!) I’m probably not going to be able to make it, but I’d love to know how they did that.

  22. Paul B on December 16th, 2009 1:23 pm

    I’m hoping to announce this tomorrow.

    Methinks you’ll need a large venue.

    Can we rent the convention center?

  23. just a fan on December 16th, 2009 1:23 pm

    Let’s carry 11 pitchers!

  24. KingCorran on December 16th, 2009 1:24 pm

    Believe Pujols over Wright… there’s probably more reason for St. Louis to trade him (assuming Holliday falls through).

    Speaking of Holliday… if the Cardinals best offer is $80MM/5years, SOMEone will beat it. $90/6 will come from somewhere, especially if Bay goes off the market. It’ll be interesting to see where Z goes from here… his options are virtually limitless after scoring Figgins and Lee for only $18MM out of 2010′s payroll.

  25. Chris_From_Bothell on December 16th, 2009 1:25 pm

    You can justify putting together a huge package to try to convince the Padres to move Adrian Gonzalez (though that is still very unlikely).

    A week ago, when I heard that the Ms were talking to the Padres about Gonzalez, I wrote it off. Managerial due diligence. The Ms don’t have the depth in their farm system. The Ms don’t have pieces the Padres need. The Padres can’t be convinced to part with Gonzalez any more than the Ms can with Hernandez. And so on.

    After today, I believe Obi-Wan Zduriencik, ninja in a sweater-vest, could pull it off. There’s no reason to believe he couldn’t get a 3rd team involved and make it happen. And who knows what else he has cooking that no one has heard anything about yet?

  26. KingCorran on December 16th, 2009 1:26 pm

    Re: catcher… I’d expect the tandem to be Moore/Alfonzo right now.

  27. gwangung on December 16th, 2009 1:28 pm

    So is there going to be another January event like last year where we can give the M’s front office more standing ovations?

    Sorry, but I don’t think standing Os are going to be enough.

  28. MsofEnchantment on December 16th, 2009 1:28 pm

    Would the Orioles do a Lopez for Scott trade?

    The salaries are comparable, and Scott doesn’t have a spot in their crowded outfield. He’s a multi-million dollar super sub, which is not a great allocation of resources for them. Lopez would be an upgrade over Wigginton at third as well:

    2009 Lopez: .272/.303/.463 wOBA .325 3B UZR/150 (sample size too small)
    2009 Wigginton: .273/.314/.400 wOBA .311 3B UZR/150 -30.2

    With the bat, Lopez and Wigginton are essentially the same guy except Lopez has more power – which in BAL would only get better. Defense, and budget is where this would make more sense for the O’s. Lopez would a be big upgrade on D (did I just say that?) and would be much cheaper than any of the FA options out there.

  29. behappy on December 16th, 2009 1:29 pm

    The neat thing about the way Jack is building our team this year is he left the two easiest postions to fill for last. Which is 1B and DH.

    Last year he took care of the more difficult postions CF and SS. Then with this move he can cross SP of the list of things to do. What this does is buy him time to put together a package for an all-star 1B men. I believe there are maybe two available for the right price. Prince Fielder and Adrian Gonzalez. How would they look in the middle of the line-up? If that move doesn’t go through he can easily find a 1B in the open market. And DH is the last thing he needs to look for. I am always a fan of using the DH as a “day off” for the regulars.

    Anyway, am I way off base here? Does that seem possible to anyone else?

    I know it would cost the farm, but it looks like he wants to win it all this year. Also adding one of those players would add another 5 wins to the total. If Dave is correct on his math, that move would bring us to 89 wins. Wow.

    Just a thought.

    Merry Christmas to all the Mariner Fans!!

  30. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 1:34 pm

    CLIFF LEE

  31. rsrobinson on December 16th, 2009 1:36 pm

    So if my math is correct, the M’s still have in the neighborhood of $8M to spend on free agents, right?

  32. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 1:37 pm

    No, no, Jeff. Not CLIFF LEE! M*****F**ING C**** L**!

  33. Islets of Ryan Langerhans on December 16th, 2009 1:39 pm

    The price tag on Adrian Gonzales is apparently quite high – the Red Sox are going after him, and the Padres want Buchholz and Ellsbury in return.

  34. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 1:39 pm

    Not sure if this has been asked yet, but for those with their ear to the ground, or for the number crunchers, is an ‘Erik Bedard as #3 SP’ even possible/desirable at this point? (Understandably, his image has been sullied here, but is the relationship beyond repair?)

  35. Marinerman1979 on December 16th, 2009 1:40 pm

    Is Prince Fielder a realistic option? I love his bat, and think it is well worth the high price in players to get him. The question is, could he be realistically had?

    This Lee trade sure does open up the imagination.

  36. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 1:42 pm

    addendum: a HEALTHY Erik Bedard.

    Seriously, that trio would rival anything out there (not that the top two are anything to sneeze at already!)…or am I half-baked?

  37. Paul B on December 16th, 2009 1:42 pm

    Re: catcher… I’d expect the tandem to be Moore/Alfonzo right now.

    I thought I remembered seeing that signing, but didn’t find it in a search. Must research Alfonzo.

    With the bat, Lopez and Wigginton are essentially the same guy except Lopez has more power – which in BAL would only get better

    Any deal involving Lopez would have to be with a team that notices that Safeco field just killed him.

    His 2009 OPS on the road was .883, and only .641 at home.

    If a potential trading partner thought that was a mirage, or didn’t notice it, then no deal.

  38. Doc Baseball on December 16th, 2009 1:42 pm

    Cliff Lee – AS THE NUMBER 2 !!

    Felix, followed by Cliff Lee.

    That is simply … awesome.

  39. Shrike on December 16th, 2009 1:44 pm

    I’m firmly of the belief that the M’s really should pursue Nick Johnson to upgrade their 1B/DH depth chart. Injury risk he might be, he’s an OBP machine whose price in talent and money to acquire should be palatable. And the marginal wins added are just what the Ms need at this point in time.

  40. KaminaAyato on December 16th, 2009 1:44 pm

    is an ‘Erik Bedard as #3 SP’ even possible/desirable at this point?

    Oh for heaven’s sakes… what’s wrong with Hyphen? He’s not flashy but he puts in his time, eats innings and induces ground balls, which with our defense will hoover anything up.

  41. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 1:45 pm

    Earlier in the offseason, Dave, you advocated a high-variance strategy for the M’s. “Play the kids,” you said, “This team needs to take chances to contend.”

    Is that strategy no longer operative, in your mind? Or do they need to play Tui and Saunders because of the potential upside they represent?

  42. Wells on December 16th, 2009 1:46 pm

    Dave, do you have any kind of feeling as to whether it’s realistic to hope an extension gets done?

  43. Coolalvin206 on December 16th, 2009 1:46 pm

    Mariners just became the most dangerous team in a 5 game playoff series.

    Rotation?

    Felix
    Lee
    Rowland- Smith
    Morrow
    Snell

  44. Dave on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    I didn’t even fathom that they could bring in Cliff Lee when I wrote that.

  45. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    I am too busy sending people obnoxious text messages to analyze anything right now.

    Cliff Freakin’ Lee.

  46. Dobbs on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    5-man rotation in a series?

  47. joser on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    Well, I don’t think it’s a certainty that the owners will open the purse strings further. You’d certainly like them too, of course, and it’s clear Zduriencik would make good use of the money, but if the bids for some of the other big names get as crazy as they might, he may go looking for better values that don’t require that much.

    And that goes for more than just money: it sounds like Moorad wouldn’t let the face of the Padres’ franchise go without a lot of talent in return, and I trust that Zduriencik won’t break the future no matter how much upside there is to winning in the present — especially when there are other options (for him, there seemingly always are: he’ll create them if necessary).

    One interesting consideration is keeping something (money, prospects) in reserve for a difference-making move in July. If the team is in some kind of tight pennant race by mid-summer, a key piece then may be worth more (and actually cost less) than the equivalent right now.

    And speaking of now, I expect things will go quiet for a little while here. We have the holidays upon us, and while there probably will be lots of phone calls going on among agents and GMs and players in and around the present-opening and candle-lighting and egg-nogging and whatnot, the PR depts are short-staffed and the lawyers are at the beach and nothing much formally gets done until everybody gets back. So unless they whip out something by Friday (with this crew, it’s possible) I’m going to relax until after the New Year.

    Merry CliffLeemas everybody!

    Can we rent the convention center?

    You know, there’s this big facility down by the Kingdome we’re fairly familiar with. A bit cold and drafty this time of the year but it’s got a lot of empty seats (and our joy will keep us warm).

  48. Zeke on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    For a 1B position, would Garrett Atkins be of interest? I realize last year was not one of his best, but his BABIP dropped by 0.75 points from the 4 year average prior to 2009. There could be a bounce back and it might be a good value pickup.

  49. Scott5000 on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    How nice would Adrian Beltre look on this club, if the whole Red Sox deal falls through.? So nice that the M’s are an attractive club for players to go to! All Hail Jack!

  50. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 1:51 pm

    Nothing against our favorite Aussie (he can stay at #3). But is Bedard in the picture at all?

  51. feingarden on December 16th, 2009 1:53 pm

    This trade does a lot of things, like give me hope, start me budgeting for trips to MSP (closest M’s games) and new M’s gear (voting with my wallet), and making me really look forward to the season (I’ve started a spring training countdown on my whiteboard, but that’s mostly to irritate the people counting down to Christmas).

    But far and away the best thing this trade does for me is give me the opportunity to do a bit of surfing over at Halos Heaven and see THEM moaning, wringing their hands, dropping f-bombs everywhere, and calling THEIR front office idiots. The trade is a win right there, folks.

  52. Zeke on December 16th, 2009 1:54 pm

    For a 1B position, would Garrett Atkins be of interest? I realize last year was not one of his best, but his BABIP dropped by 0.75 points from the 4 year average prior to 2009. There could be a bounce back and it might be a good value pickup.

  53. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 1:55 pm

    I didn’t even fathom that they could bring in Cliff Lee when I wrote that.

    That’s kinda what I thought.

    I’m still high on Saunders, though I couldn’t tell you exactly why. I’m encouraged by his approach and his AAA numbers. I’m less enthused about Tui, and I think the M’s would be well-suited to find an upgrade at 2B or 3B, and trade Lopez.

    Is a left-field improvement the M’s best strategy right now? Or is first base the easiest place to find a quality player? Or should we just kick back, and wait for Z to reveal his next unexpected masterstroke?

  54. TumwaterMike on December 16th, 2009 1:57 pm

    There’s rumors all over cyberspace involving this team or that team but not a mention of the M’s. Z keeps things close to the cuff until things about reach fruition then we get the news. For all we know he could be working a deal with anybody. I heard the Dodgers are scrapped for cash. Just a thought

  55. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 1:57 pm

    Dave, do you have any kind of feeling as to whether it’s realistic to hope an extension gets done?

    I’m not Dave, but the answer I’d give is “way, way too early to tell, but odds are against it”.

    A lot can change in a year though, so who really knows?

    Oh, by the way: CLIFF FREAKIN’ LEE

  56. Toddk on December 16th, 2009 1:57 pm

    So if my math is correct, the M’s still have in the neighborhood of $8M to spend on free agents, right?

    I was thinking it was closer to $15m after the Johjima money. Did I miss something?

  57. TumwaterMike on December 16th, 2009 1:57 pm

    Sorry I meant to strapped for cash.

  58. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 1:59 pm

    1B/DH are the likely upgrade candidates I’d imagine, and I’d be surprised if we didn’t get someone from outside the organization to fill at least one of those holes (Johnson, Branyan, Gonzalez).

    I’m sure they’re looking at opportunities to improve at 2B/LF also, but a move at either of those spots would be a little more surprising.

    But really, at this point, the Mariners could announce they’ve attached Ted Williams’ severed head to a cyborg body and signed him to a three year deal, and I’d just shrug.

  59. gwangung on December 16th, 2009 2:02 pm

    Or should we just kick back, and wait for Z to reveal his next unexpected masterstroke?

    I’d vote yes on that.

    What Dave and Derek do here is very smart, very analytic moves; what Jack is doing is smart, anayltic AND creative. What he’s doing is as beyond the smart M’s blogosphere, as the smart Ms blogosphere is beyond the typical sports radio fan (no offense intended to Dave or Derek, but this was just great work by Jack).

  60. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 2:04 pm

    But really, at this point, the Mariners could announce they’ve attached Ted Williams’ severed head to a cyborg body and signed him to a three year deal, and I’d just shrug.

    Nah. Z invented a time machine and went back and picked up peak-level Sandy Koufax and Lou Gehrig.

  61. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 2:04 pm

    Mariners just became the most dangerous team in a 5 game playoff series.

    Wouldn’t a Beckett, Lester, Lackey, et al, at least equal our rotation? Carpenter, Wainwright and ’09 Piniero aren’t shabby either, assuming we were lucky enough to make their acquaintance next fall.

    ps: remind me not to bring up Erik Bedard again in this hallowed forum

  62. Zeke on December 16th, 2009 2:09 pm
  63. joser on December 16th, 2009 2:11 pm

    Bedard is a free agent and according to the last account I heard won’t be healthy enough to pitch until sometime during the season. He’s a bit like Pedro was last year, but without the pedigree — a talented but risky arm who might make the difference for a team looking for a mid-season acquisition. I don’t really expect anybody will sign him this winter.

    The one interesting FA pitcher (to me, not to the Mariners) out there right now is our good friend Joel Pineiro. Will he be able to keep up his groundballingest ways (especially away from Duncan’s tutelage?) He did himself no favors with his postseason appearance, but I think the teams with hitter-friendly parks (Rockies, White Sox, Brewers, maybe the Reds) should be willing to take a chance.

    5-man rotation in a series?

    Yeah, what? With the way Fox has dragged them out with extra rest days, you don’t need anything like that many. The ALDS will go: Felix, Lee, RRS, Felix, nobody because you just won three.

    The longer series are more interesting, but even there you’re not looking beyond 3 (on short rest) or 4 guys.

  64. sonichound on December 16th, 2009 2:13 pm

    I would be surprised if they weren’t at least talking to the Padres about Gonzalez. Lopez, Morrow and another prospect enough? Seems comparable to what they are after. Anyone interesting out there to fill in our 2B hole if Lopez is dealt?

  65. Paul B on December 16th, 2009 2:15 pm

    the Mariners could announce they’ve attached Ted Williams’ severed head to a cyborg body and signed him to a three year deal

    Great. Thanks for the mental picture. Now I have to go rinse out my brain.

  66. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 2:18 pm

    Larry Stone thinks we’re in on Gonzalez.

  67. TumwaterMike on December 16th, 2009 2:19 pm

    this just off the presses. The Governor just hired Z to balance our state budget.

    In her words, Governor Gregoire released the following: “What Jack Zduriencik has done for the Seattle Mariners in such a short time, turning them from a laughing stock in baseball to a top rate Major leage baseball team should be commended. I have all the faith that he could do the same for the State of Washington.”

  68. EdgarforHOF on December 16th, 2009 2:19 pm

    Yeah, most of this is still extremely hard to accept. I keep waiting for something horrible to happen, such as Cliff Lee breaking his ankle after the press conference. I’m almost as excited about the 2010 seasons as I was following the 1995 season. In Z we trust.

  69. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 2:21 pm

    Okay, I don’t want to be a wet blanket and I know you were trying to make a joke, but the “no politics” rule still applies.

  70. Kazinski on December 16th, 2009 2:21 pm

    According to Jack, Amaro approached him about Lee at the winter meetings. This deal may well have come about because Jack can keep his mouth shut about a deal until its done:

    Zduriencik knew full well Amaro wanted to acquire Roy Halladay from the Toronto Blue Jays, something he’d been working on since last summer. But what Amaro said next got Zduriencik’s deal glands salivating.

    “He said ‘Look, if I’m able to do Halladay, would you be able to do Cliff Lee?’ ” Zduriencik said.

    Obviously on a contingent deal like this being a leak free organization is a real asset, and the inability of the Phillies to openly shop Lee probably worked the the Mariners favor.

  71. TumwaterMike on December 16th, 2009 2:22 pm

    I’m sorry you took it in that context.

  72. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 2:33 pm

    Filed under “things that don’t really matter when you’re having a Merry Cliffmas”, the ESPN poll on who wins the AL West currently plays out like this:

    Angels 48%, Mariners 37%, Rangers 10%, Athletics 5%

    Homers Washington, Oregon and Montana (but not Idaho?) are joined by the greater Massachusetts and New York eastern seaboard (including DE, RI & NJ) in giving the nod to the Mariners.

    Texas votes to secede from the Union, and also for the Rangers to win the division.

  73. nickwest1976 on December 16th, 2009 2:33 pm

    I have this feeling Jack Z has an Adrian Gonzo or Prince Fielder trade brewing. He knows Lee is probably a one year player in Seattle and will want to take advantage of the Felix/Lee duo this year and try and win now.

  74. Willmore2000 on December 16th, 2009 2:34 pm

    So what is the super deal that could get us Gonzalez?

    Lopez+Triunfel+Morrow+Fields+Carp, does that do it?

    If we do that and sign Beltre to play 3rd, move Figgins to 2nd, is that a playoff team?

  75. robbbbbb on December 16th, 2009 2:36 pm

    Re: Gonzalez or Fielder? I don’t think so. Why don’t I think so? Because that isn’t Z’s M.O.

    The Zduriencik way is not to do the expected, but to do the totally unexpected. Gonzalez? Fielder? Harden? The media’s speculating about those things. Ergo, they’d be too expensive. Let’s go do something unexpected.

    And yeah, the M’s organization’s ability to keep its mouth collectively shut was probably a prime motivator in the Cliff Lee deal. Good for them.

  76. johnfree63 on December 16th, 2009 2:40 pm

    One name I think to watch is Joey Votto. The Reds have Yonder Alonzo down on the farm and he is supposed to be MLB ready. Both of them can’t play 1B at the same time.

  77. marinermoose79 on December 16th, 2009 2:42 pm

    Jack Z Park? Jack Z Stadiam ? screw safeco field name, as much as i like it, but it needs a new name now named after JACK Z!

  78. Dave on December 16th, 2009 2:45 pm

    Walt Jocketty’s response when asked if he would trade Votto this winter: “Oh God no.”

  79. The Dreeze on December 16th, 2009 2:47 pm

    These last few days I feel like I’m constantly walking into a closet full of Henieken…

  80. Paul on December 16th, 2009 2:53 pm

    Thank you Jamie Moyer! In the Russakoff article defending the trade from the Phillies perspective is this quote:

    Of course, the other albatross hanging from Amaro’s pocketbook is Jamie Moyer’s guaranteed $8 million this year. If you recall, last offseason Moyer, who has been in and out of the hospital in recent months with rehab setbacks, fought for and received a second year in guaranteed money. That obligation to one of the most likeable Phillies in recent history may prove out to be the insurmountable obstacle in the way of a Halladay-Lee-Hamels rotation.

    I have always liked Moyer. If his $8 million extension is the straw that broke Amaro’s budget, forcing him to jettison Cliff Lee, Jamie is now my favorite ex Mariner.

  81. johnfree63 on December 16th, 2009 2:54 pm

    Dave, I’m thinking just about anything is possible now. The Padres and Brewers also said they wouldn’t trade Gonzalez or Fielder but, their names keep coming up.

  82. just a fan on December 16th, 2009 2:55 pm

    If you’re looking for a coal lining to this trade (or whatever is the opposite of silver-lining), maybe it’s that this deal encourages absurd rosterbation.

    If somebody came on last week and said “Let’s deal Aumont, Gillies and J.C. Ramirez for Cliff Lee!!!1111″, they would have been laughed off the site and sent back to the Seattle P-I website.

    Now, I feel free to say, hey, maybe we could deal Mike Carp and Josh Fields for Adam Dunn. Who’s to stop me?!

  83. joser on December 16th, 2009 2:55 pm

    Henieken drinkers are in the closet now? I guess with the gay folks out there’s room in there now for the Dutch.

  84. sonichound on December 16th, 2009 2:58 pm

    Nice call on Votto johnfree63. I hadn’t even thought of that. Either him or Alonzo would look nice in an M’s uni.

  85. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 2:58 pm

    I, USSMariner.com contributor, along with my fellow readers, do solemnly vow to clothe, feed and nurture the as-yet-unnamed lovechild of Jack Zduriencik and Cliff Lee.

    I will teach it the way it should go, as Whitey Herzog did teach the ’85 Cardinals. I will not speak of Carlos Silva within earshot of the child unless I precede it with profanities like ‘Bavasi’ or “Heathcliff”.

    These things I do solemnly swear, unless St. Cameron convinces me otherwise.

  86. KaminaAyato on December 16th, 2009 3:00 pm

    Henieken drinkers are in the closet now? I guess with the gay folks out there’s room in there now for the Dutch.

    No, no, no… He refers to the Heineken commericial where a bunch of ladies are ooohing and aaahing about a large closet of clothes. Then suddenly they head a bunch of men screaming and they stop. Camera head to the guys where they enter their closet filled with Heineken and they’re screaming like girls.

  87. Paul L on December 16th, 2009 3:03 pm

    Any thoughts about about how Gonzalez would adjust to the AL? I’d be worried about that.

    Also, I fully expect that Z’s list contains people I’m not even thinking about, and who will make my jaw drop.

    The last couple of years have put us in the minds of players around the league that we’re serious, and as far as the AL goes, other than NY and Boston, why not come here?

    It’s nice to be able to sit back and watch things unfold without freaking out every time you hear your name mentioned and thinking “Who stole from us this time?”

  88. marinermoose79 on December 16th, 2009 3:05 pm

    Day 3 after Lee Rumors and im still in La La land. ITS Z’S WORLD NOW, Cant beleive we finally have a GM with a BRIAN!! WHOA WHOO!

  89. joser on December 16th, 2009 3:05 pm

    Jamie is now my favorite ex Mariner.

    Maybe he’s secretly still a Mariner?

  90. marinermoose79 on December 16th, 2009 3:08 pm

    BREAKING NEWS!! Jason Bay is in Seattle right now, yeah i know its the holidays he could be visting family BUT his in JACKS Z WORLD now you never know what might happen :)

  91. marinermoose79 on December 16th, 2009 3:08 pm

    [Hi! Posting the same thing twelve times is a good way to get yourself in the mod queue or worse.]

  92. joser on December 16th, 2009 3:13 pm

    Also: I’ve seen the commercial. I caught the reference. To reference another: that wasn’t where he was going with it, but that’s where I went.

  93. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 3:19 pm

    More love for Jack Z and the Mariners.

    Favorite quote: “When he got hired, there was some pessimism,” Dave Cameron said. “He’s bald, he’s a scout – he looked like the Bavasi template for a GM…”

  94. KaminaAyato on December 16th, 2009 3:19 pm

    Fair enough. My sarcasm/joke radar is so broken that it would take hitting me over the head with a 2×4 for me to get the majority of things.

  95. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 3:20 pm

    I’m thinking just about anything is possible now. The Padres and Brewers also said they wouldn’t trade Gonzalez or Fielder but, their names keep coming up

    Anything (trade-wise) is possible, but not necessarily desirable. I’m sure we can get Gonzalez, but I’m also sure the price would be very, very high. The good news is that if the Red Sox get him, both the Padres AND the Mariners will make sure the price is very, very high.

  96. Paul L on December 16th, 2009 3:21 pm

    Listening to the Sports Guy podcast and he just went off a little on the trade. He said he’s in an AL keeper league so he knows about prospects, and he’s looked at this from every angle, and he can’t believe we got Lee for nothing.

    I know no one cares, but it sure is nice to be in a positive sense for a change.

  97. Jeff Nye on December 16th, 2009 3:24 pm

    Well, we underpaid, but “nothing” is an exaggeration.

    The three guys we gave up are all “good but not great” prospects.

  98. Paul L on December 16th, 2009 3:24 pm

    Any thoughts on Johnny Damon?

  99. Mike Snow on December 16th, 2009 3:25 pm

    No.

  100. Rck74 on December 16th, 2009 3:28 pm

    I don’t see how this team improves without a big bat. Last year we had the fourh worst run differential at minus 52. We were lucky to be above .500 with all the one run wins. Washburn had a great year for us last year and I only hope Lee can match it. Felix and Ichiro had great years. They won’t be easy to match. Our lineup is still pathetic. Lee had a 6.29 era in 2007, a 5.43 era in 2004 and a 4.40 era in 2006. He’s no given. 3 of the past 6 six years have been mediocre at best. Our 3-5 starters are unproven. I could easily see this as a 75 win team.

  101. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 3:28 pm

    No.

    Well stated.

  102. joealb on December 16th, 2009 3:29 pm

    Ryan Doumit! Dave hit on him a while ago and now he makes even more sense. He can’t be any worse then Johnson behind the plate and he can actually hit and from the left side to boot. Some 1st base and a little left field and the M’s would add 1.5 maybe 2 wins right there.

  103. Carson on December 16th, 2009 3:31 pm

    Any thoughts about about how Gonzalez would adjust to the AL? I’d be worried about that.

    What on earth about his skillset would make you worried about that?

  104. Rulo Montero on December 16th, 2009 3:31 pm

    I felt this message pretty much like.. “Angels get ready, we are going to war!”

  105. Kazinski on December 16th, 2009 3:34 pm

    Gonzales, Votto, and Fielder are just pipe dreams. All three would take a massive package of prospects to land. Word is Boston is offering Bucholz and Ellsbury for Gonzales, who are the Mariners going to offer to top that?

    We would be talking at least 2 of Morrow, Triunfel, Moore, Lopez and then some throw-ins for any of the three. Fielder would be the cheapest of the three because he is making the most, but if Boston can’t land Gonzales they would be in the market for Fielder, assuming the Brewers are even interested in moving him.

  106. joser on December 16th, 2009 3:35 pm

    What on earth about his skillset would make you worried about that?

    I doubt it’s the skillset so much as the Cirillo/Aurillia hangover.

  107. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 3:42 pm

    Dave, I agree that the calculations have changed. And here are some more subtle changes:

    The budget cap (whatever it was) just increased.
    Silva’s days are even more numbered.
    Nick Johnson is more likely to get a second year.
    Russ Branyan definitely will not be our first baseman.
    The M’s are more likely to carry 11 pitchers instead of 12, or carry only one of Hall/Hannahan.
    It is now conceivable that the M’s will carry another DH only type. For instance, Vlad Guererro.

  108. Carson on December 16th, 2009 3:43 pm

    I doubt it’s the skillset so much as the Cirillo/Aurillia hangover.

    Touche. And funny you say that, because right after I posted it I told my cube mate that very thing.

    But like, most people should be able to figure out he’s not Cirillo/Aurillia… right?

    (maybe it was the double l’s?)

  109. Adam B. on December 16th, 2009 3:46 pm

    We’re already worrying about how Gonzalez would adjust to the AL? I know the ambrosia taps are on free-flow right now, but simmer down folks.
    We have a long ways to go before that bridge needs crossing.

    Anyone else remember when Harden was Zduriencik’s first “mistake”? :)

  110. ivan on December 16th, 2009 3:46 pm

    He’s getting old (34 next season), he’s expensive ($14M/yr), and he is starting to have some injury issues.

    But he hits from both sides of the plate, he is a walk machine, and if the M’s want to spend the cash, if he would agree to the trade (he’s a 5-10 guy), and his team is looking to dump salary, say hello to 1B/DH LANCE BERKMAN.

    There are any number of reasons why this can’t and won’t happen. Maybe people who know more about it know that Berkman might not be all that good anymore. But my gosh, CLIFF LEE(!) makes the idea of Berkman not quite as nuts as it was yesterday.

    If Jack Z can get Cliff Lee for three minor leaguers, I’m beginning to think anything is possible.

  111. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 3:47 pm

    Gonzales, Votto, and Fielder are just pipe dreams. All three would take a massive package of prospects to land. Word is Boston is offering Bucholz and Ellsbury for Gonzales, who are the Mariners going to offer to top that?

    Morrow, Saunders, and Triunfel. But I doubt JZ would do that. But it could be done.

  112. Paul L on December 16th, 2009 3:48 pm

    Yes, it’s the hangover, plus it seems like every time someone comes from the NL to the AL they struggle.

    yea, I know this is based on no statistical analysis. I fully expect to get flayed.

  113. TumwaterMike on December 16th, 2009 3:49 pm

    Would anyone be opposed to bringing Endy Chavez back? He could play left and bat 9th. We could then be the go-go M’s. Imagine the innings when you would have Chavez 9th, Ichiro 1st and Figgins 2nd all coming up to bat.

  114. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 3:49 pm

    I wondered when The Impaler would be mentioned. Can you imagine a worse offseason for the Halos…I mean, even worse than right now *snicker*?

  115. codybond31 on December 16th, 2009 3:49 pm

    Order of Dream Scenarios of filling out the line-up:

    1)
    1B Trade for Adam Dunn – Fits everything we lack. LH Power, High OPS. This would probably take Carp, Saunders and a Shawn Kelly Type.

    3B – Trade Lopez for Alex Gordon – Trade due to extreem low value now. Left hander, and they traded for Josh Fields. The Royals is where every ex-Mariner goes.

    LF – Sign Jason Bay

    2)
    1B: sign Nick Johnson/Adam LaRoche
    3B: re-sign Beltre
    LF: trade Lopez + package for Carl Crawford

    Which one is better, 1 or #2?

    Whats Yours?

  116. KingCorran on December 16th, 2009 3:53 pm

    Red Sox were reportedly offered Gonzalez for Buchholz and one of their other two top-3 prospects. They turned this down.

    I would think this sets the bar for Gonzalez negotiations… say, Morrow + Triunfel + Prospect X, where Mr. X is just about any minor leaguer not named Saunders/Fields?/Ackley.

    Furthermore, this sets the bar for more-expensive/fat/defensively-challenged/soon-to-be-a-DH/etc Prince Fielder. Fielder can’t cost more than Gonzo, the Brewers covet Morrow, Boston’s not (likely) working on trying to get him when they’re focused on Gonzalez, and Zduriencik has relationships to fall back on there.

    I haven’t seen any non-fanblog speculation on a Fielder move yet. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what Z is working on behind the scenes… the only reasons we might see this one coming would be because of the MIL connection, the prior known discussions with MIL for Morrow, and our realization that the impossible is not (impossible) with Zduriencik.

    I’d rather see Gonzo in a Mariners uniform than Fielder, but either would be great. And Fielder is probably slightly more likely. More likely still is some tangent we STILL can’t imagine…

  117. pareto on December 16th, 2009 3:54 pm

    Let me just add: CLIFF LEE (!)

    Stone just tweeted to expect a new deal with Langerhans. Any chance he’d be offered anything other than a minor league deal with a spring training invite?

  118. KaminaAyato on December 16th, 2009 3:55 pm

    How about we let Dave or DMZ do a revised look at the 2010 roster with these moves and the remaining dollars and then just sit back to see what Dr Z does?

    While Dr Z’s shown that he can do just about anything, how about we stop the rosterbating now? He’s also shown that we’ll never have a clue what he’s doing until it’s been all but done.

  119. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 4:00 pm

    And Fielder is probably slightly more likely.

    I don’t know. It seems to me that fat guys are always one bad buffet experience away from being an unmovable contract.

  120. Steve Nelson on December 16th, 2009 4:00 pm

    The Jack Zduriencik entry at Wikipedia is in dire need of updating.

  121. Briggstar on December 16th, 2009 4:04 pm

    Anything less than 2 Perfect Games to start the 2010 season and a sweep of the Phillies at the end may have half of this forum on suicide watch!

  122. NorthofWrigleyField on December 16th, 2009 4:08 pm

    The folks at Halos Heaven call Tony Reagins “The Ninja.” If so, what does that make Jack? Who could out-stealth a ninja? The Invisible Man? Batman? Phil Ivey? We love you, JZ.

    How about the Flash? Jack Flash? As in Jumpin’ Jack Flash it’s a gas! gas! gas!

  123. nathaniel dawson on December 16th, 2009 4:08 pm

    Would anyone be opposed to bringing Endy Chavez back?

    If the Mariners need an outfielder in the middle of the summer and feel his knee has healed fully that he can still be the same kind of player he was last year, he might be a guy they’d have interest in.

  124. Islets of Ryan Langerhans on December 16th, 2009 4:08 pm

    Can you imagine Silva and Fielder fighting over the chicken wings at the post-game buffet? Yikes!

  125. just a fan on December 16th, 2009 4:09 pm

    While Dr Z’s shown that he can do just about anything, how about we stop the rosterbating now?

    But now all the ridiculous common-fan trade offers sound so much less ridiculous with Zduriencik. We just traded a AA reliever, a high-A outfielder and a high-A pitcher for an Ace. I realize there’s more to it than that, but, WOW. What else is there to say. Unbelievable.

    Prince Fielder, Adam Dunn, Justin Verlander, etc., etc. The rosterbation possibilities are endless. And they’re possible, too!

    I’m gonna go blind!

  126. nathaniel dawson on December 16th, 2009 4:10 pm

    The folks at Halos Heaven call Tony Reagins “The Ninja.” If so, what does that make Jack? Who could out-stealth a ninja? The Invisible Man? Batman? Phil Ivey? We love you, JZ.

    Count Zduriencik

  127. Juicer on December 16th, 2009 4:10 pm

    I like the Fielder talk but I am leery of the body by Silva type players. If you look at Mo Vaughn and even his father Cecil they fell off the map pretty significantly after 32. Most players decline but they fell off the map. Prince is 25 so it is no big deal now but just a thought.

  128. mattlock on December 16th, 2009 4:10 pm

    Cant beleive we finally have a GM with a BRIAN!!

    Hmm, I don’t know about everyone else, but I’m pretty happy with just having a GM with a “BRAIN”. ;)

  129. Steve Nelson on December 16th, 2009 4:11 pm

    @TumwaterMike:

    this just off the presses. The Governor just hired Z to balance our state budget.

    In her words, Governor Gregoire released the following: “What Jack Zduriencik has done for the Seattle Mariners in such a short time, turning them from a laughing stock in baseball to a top rate Major leage baseball team should be commended. I have all the faith that he could do the same for the State of Washington.”

    I think that’s too easy. How about we give him something really challenging, such as Program Manager for the Dreamliner?

  130. mattlock on December 16th, 2009 4:13 pm

    Can you imagine Silva and Fielder fighting over the chicken wings at the post-game buffet? Yikes!

    Oh god. I haven’t laughed that hard since “Ichiro Figgins” and “Cupid Brother Tucker”. :D

  131. TumwaterMike on December 16th, 2009 4:15 pm

    If we had both Fielder and Silva on the team, would the M’s need an extra plane for road games?

  132. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 4:17 pm

    The rosterbation possibilities are endless. And they’re possible, too!

    I’m gonna go blind!

    Very funny. But rosterbation doesn’t cause blindness, just unemployment.

  133. BackdoorSlider on December 16th, 2009 4:20 pm

    I rosterbate twice a day, it’s healthy.

  134. just a fan on December 16th, 2009 4:22 pm

    But rosterbation doesn’t cause blindness, just unemployment.

    Sooo. . . you’re saying it’s totally worth it?

  135. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 4:26 pm

    I rosterbate twice a day, it’s healthy.

    Now I have to reconsider the meaning of your username.

  136. diderot on December 16th, 2009 4:29 pm

    Gonzales, Votto, and Fielder are just pipe dreams

    Agreed. And while we’re at it, let’s add Bay and Holliday to the list.

    Dave has talked about Z having ‘a plan’. But obviously, the plan either changes or is flexible enough to accommodate unforeseen opportunities like Cliff Lee.

    One thing he hasn’t shown so far is the willingness to pay full price for anything. And the other is not to fully mortgage the future for today.

    So Dave may be right that the calculus has changed with the new acquisitions, but it would be surprising if the methodology has, too.

    I agree that there is no package we could put together for Gonzalez that would match the perceptual value of names like Buchholz and Ellsbury. If Prince Fielder were in play, I’d assume the same thing would apply.

    And I remain fully supportive of Saunders in left. Fix first base. If there’s a way to flip Jose Lopez so that Felipe Lopez is signed and winds up playing second, do that. And what about yet another starter–Ben Sheets at a discount? Wang?

    Let’s just stay away from the Bavasi approach of paying–or overpaying–for ‘names’.

  137. tangotiger on December 16th, 2009 4:33 pm

    Who could out-stealth a ninja?

    Daredevil, the man without fear.

  138. murphy_dog on December 16th, 2009 4:34 pm

    I’m afraid that Prince Fielder would be the second coming of Kevin Mitchell….

  139. KingCorran on December 16th, 2009 4:35 pm

    IMO, you really can’t talk about not overpaying for names and then start dropping Sheets and Wang in the next sentence.

    The problem with ‘names’ is that in the upper tiers, those names exist because of the talent behind them. If we were avoiding names for the sake of avoiding names, Cliff Lee and Chone Figgins wouldn’t be Mariners.

    Fielder, Gonzalez, Bay, and Holliday *may* be pipe dreams under normal circumstances. But I refuse to write them off, or accept the argument that we should pretend they don’t exist. They *do* exist, *are* available at some price, and *would* make a difference. Does that mean we will get them? Of course not… but we have a GM who can pull off incredible deals.

    It may not be possible to get *most* of the four in here at an affordable cost… but I wouldn’t be surprised if Z found leverage in ONE of those four situations that made it possible.

  140. amnizu on December 16th, 2009 4:36 pm

    If we had both Fielder and Silva on the team, would the M’s need an extra plane for road games?

    Would we need to add seismic stability to Safeco field in case they both are playing and there is a bunt down the first base line? What about the added cost in laundry detergent? Do they make a camera with a wide enough lens to get them both in the team photo?

    Okay enough fat jokes…. Fielder is a pipe dream, M’s have 8 to 9 Mil left to work with this off season and potentially 3 positions to fill, it looks to me like we are going to be playing at least one youngster somewhere.

  141. Mike Snow on December 16th, 2009 4:37 pm

    Can you imagine Silva and Fielder fighting over the chicken wings at the post-game buffet?

    No – last I heard, Fielder was vegetarian.

  142. Matt Staples on December 16th, 2009 4:37 pm

    People are getting a bit ahead of themselves here insofar as expecting a lot else to happen this winter. Believe me, I’m happy with what Jack has done, and very little he might do would surprise me, but I would be pretty happy at this point with some decent/solid moves. Expecting Jack to fill out the roster like a roto team probably won’t meet with success. Once we’re free of the Silva albatross and get to draft some players other than relief pitchers, though, we might be able to amp up the expectations a bit. So far, he’s been masterful.

  143. murphy_dog on December 16th, 2009 4:41 pm

    Adam LaRoche?

  144. Juicer on December 16th, 2009 4:41 pm

    It is in Wiki so it has to be true. Snippet about Kevin Mitchell.

    “Traded to the Mariners after the 1991 season, he arrived at spring training the following year 30 pounds overweight.”

    Not sure if Even Silva can beat 30 pounds. That is all day on the couch with a Mainline drip of Eggnog and Krispy Kreme Doughnuts.

  145. Dave S. on December 16th, 2009 4:42 pm

    Not that I expect it to happen, but I like what someone mentioned above about Alex Gordon. Nice buy low candidate. I doubt it’d take very much to get him, either.

  146. diderot on December 16th, 2009 4:45 pm

    you really can’t talk about not overpaying for names and then start dropping Sheets and Wang in the next sentence.

    I guess I didn’t make myself clear. I have no problem with signing anyone…as long as we’re not overpaying and they can clearly make our team better. Because they’re the most mentioned people in a limited market, of course Boston or New York money is going to be needed for Bay or Holliday (even if it’s paid by someone else). I say that’s a mistake.

    That’s also why I prefaced Sheets with ‘at a discount’. And Wang may scare away suitors because of last year’s injury.

  147. Juicer on December 16th, 2009 4:46 pm

    Is it me or does it feel like Jackie Z is driving down I-5 in a Ferrari F-40 and Bavasi was sitting on the side of the road with a hammer and chisel making a wheel out of granite.

  148. lombardie360 on December 16th, 2009 4:58 pm

    What if during the Lee/Halladay deal there were talks of “Look there is no way Billy Beene will trade me Brett Wallace. Get em for me, well keep talkin, and Ill tell Morrow to go get one of those new licenses or a passport as a starter.”

    Wallace bats Left and we need a 1b which hes supposed to become….I dont know if Im crazy. Not very good at making this stuff up. Im just making my own Jack Z next move hypothesis to see if I can be the one to call it.

  149. The Ancient Mariner on December 16th, 2009 5:00 pm

    Personally, if the M’s can just add Scott and Doumit, I’ll consider this a well-rounded offseason; but given the track record our stealth bomber of a GM has compiled so far, I’ll happily admit that he might have something better up his sleeve.

  150. Toddk on December 16th, 2009 5:01 pm

    Man this thread is brutal!

  151. The Ancient Mariner on December 16th, 2009 5:04 pm

    lombardie360, you did register that Beane dealt Wallace to Toronto for one of the players they got from Philly, right?

  152. Ian on December 16th, 2009 5:09 pm

    I do like the fact that Angels blogs are calling it Black Monday given the pitching avalanche that ensued. It’s gonna be a fun year.

  153. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 5:10 pm

    I didn’t buy into Dave’s Luke Scott thinking before Lee came along, but now it makes all kinds of sense. I really think that’s the direction we’ll end up going in left. Not necessarily Scott himself, but a proven bat and most likely left-handed. I just don’t see the M’s going with two rookies in the lineup.

    On another note… I haven’t heard too much about it, but has anyone looked at Holliday’s home/away splits? If you just look at his away numbers, he’s a totally different player. And not one that you’d ever consider giving $15-20MM.

  154. Miles on December 16th, 2009 5:46 pm

    Mr. Snow,
    Prince treats.

  155. joe simpson can hit on December 16th, 2009 5:53 pm

    I had a thought after reading Z’s account of the trade this afternoon, and that is that we owe some thanks to Amaro, who did a favor frankly by trading Lee to us. Obviously he feels comfortable dealing with Jack, but he could have easily traded to Lee to another organization. Especially when you consider that what we gave was not off the charts by any means. He could have done this deal with someone else. Thank God he did it with Seattle.

  156. universalguru on December 16th, 2009 5:56 pm

    A bit of that may have to do with Gillick and Looper’s influence in Philly as well.

  157. Leroy Stanton on December 16th, 2009 5:59 pm

    I had a thought after reading Z’s account of the trade this afternoon, and that is that we owe some thanks to Amaro, who did a favor frankly by trading Lee to us.

    I agree completely. He could have very easily pulled out after he had the agreement with Toronto. He didn’t need us. I’m sure he was tempted, but integrity and his reputation were probably considerations. I was very worried when I heard that Drabek was in and none of our guys were going to Toronto.

  158. lombardie360 on December 16th, 2009 6:10 pm

    @Ancient Mariner

    Yes I know. what Im saying is since Beane wouldnt deal him to us, Jack told the Blue Jays hey get Wallace for me since Billy boy will never let me have him. Get it? (And I in no way mean that to be rude.)

  159. nathaniel dawson on December 16th, 2009 6:14 pm

    Adam LaRoche?

    Definitely a guy to consider. A pretty solid player, wouldn’t cost the M’s a draft pick, certainly would be better than what we have now.

    Not that I expect it to happen, but I like what someone mentioned above about Alex Gordon. Nice buy low candidate. I doubt it’d take very much to get him, either.

    He’s not going to come cheap from K.C. They need all the good, cheap players they can get right now, and he holds quite a bit of promise to break out. He’s the exact kind of player they would want to keep around right now.

  160. The Ancient Mariner on December 16th, 2009 6:22 pm

    what Im saying is since Beane wouldnt deal him to us, Jack told the Blue Jays hey get Wallace for me since Billy boy will never let me have him.

    Ehh, no.

  161. Dave S. on December 16th, 2009 6:43 pm

    If Baker (and Langerhans) are to be believed, the M’s have approached LaRoche.

  162. Dave S. on December 16th, 2009 6:49 pm

    He’s not going to come cheap from K.C. They need all the good, cheap players they can get right now, and he holds quite a bit of promise to break out. He’s the exact kind of player they would want to keep around right now.

    Yeah, I probably underestimated his perceived value to KC. But it seemed like they soured on him quite a bit last year, and between the trade for Fields and Billy Butler’s presence, it seems like they have other priorities on the corners.

    A permanent move to 1B would probably do him a lot of good, since his glove at 3B doesn’t seem up to it. But I’m veering way off topic now, so I’ll stop.

  163. nick.h on December 16th, 2009 8:33 pm

    All this talk about Doumit, I just want to throw this out there and you can take it or leave it. Last week at work one of the Pittsburgh Pirates showed up at work (I saw his union card… pretty cool, lol) and apprently Ryan isn’t a very good catcher, and doesn’t WANT to catch. They’re converting him to a RF.

    In other news: what do we think about D. Lee if the Cubbies pick up part of that contract and he waives the no trade clause (and the Red Sea parts…).

  164. ClaytonMiles on December 16th, 2009 8:43 pm

    Thank you for all the great perspective from Dave and DMZ. I am happy to see all the national exposure you have earned in the last two weeks. I promise I will start donating as soon as I can.
    This really makes me likely to attend more games next season (9 last year). Who knows what move will happen next, but I am sure it will improve the team.
    If some of Jr.’s incentives are based on ticket sales, how much is he likely to benefit from Lee and Figgins – both in $ and wins?

  165. The Ancient Mariner on December 16th, 2009 9:00 pm

    It’s not news that Doumit isn’t a very good catcher. The point is, he could catch at need, which would make him a very useful player to have on the roster.

  166. Seattleken on December 16th, 2009 10:49 pm

    Since the Jays are trying to move Overbay I can see the M’s getting him basically for his 7M contract. He’s be better than Capp with the bat and glove, is left-handed with an .800 OPS. He sucks vs lefties but has a .380+ OB% vs righties as is a nice fit for the new mariners with OB% and plus defense.

    This understanding that the better options of Adrian Gonzalez and Prince Fielder are not at all likely.

    I would rather have Overbay for one year at 7M and than 2 years Branyon or Johnson at 6M a year who are weak with the glove and are extremely fragile.

  167. joser on December 16th, 2009 10:59 pm

    Wang may scare away suitors because of last year’s injury.

    He scared me more when he was healthy. Did you see the first couple of innings of that Fox Saturday game when he gave up 8 runs to Cleveland in the first couple of innings? No thanks.

  168. nick.h on December 16th, 2009 11:17 pm

    If memory serves that was his last, or second to last start, before his DL stint. I saw that too and it was horrifying. But seeing what he did in years before he’s got talent. I still wouldn’t want to have him.

  169. Steve Nelson on December 17th, 2009 7:40 am

    @lombardie360

    What if during the Lee/Halladay deal there were talks of “Look there is no way Billy Beene will trade me Brett Wallace. Get em for me, well keep talkin, and Ill tell Morrow to go get one of those new licenses or a passport as a starter.”

    Wallace bats Left and we need a 1b which hes supposed to become….I dont know if Im crazy. Not very good at making this stuff up. Im just making my own Jack Z next move hypothesis to see if I can be the one to call it.

    Helpful hint – and I don’t know any other way to say this without being blunt. If you’re going to start hypothesizing, it helps if you start with a bit of base knowledge before throwing out ideas. Otherwise you end up exposing your lack of preparation.

    So, why would you hypothesize that Beane would be unwilling to trade Wallace to the Mariners? Beane is well known to be willing to talk with any team about any player.

  170. msb on December 17th, 2009 7:47 am

    I loved this little throw away note from Geoff Baker: “For nearly a year, Trader Jack had talked with Blue Jays general manager Alex Anthopoulos about landing Halladay for the Mariners.”

  171. Carson on December 17th, 2009 7:53 am

    Maybe I shouldn’t be so geeked about stuff like this, but any word on a press conference?

    I do enjoy seeing the new players slip on the uni and hat. This time there is extra intrigue, as I’m curious to see his body language and words after all the stuff in the press. Oh, and that he’s really awesome, too.

    He seemed to really want to stay in Philly, but I’m sure he’ll move past that and fall in love with our little slice of America.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.