David · April 1, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

Well, push has come to shove, and the Mariners now have a decision to make. Supremely talented center fielder Milton Bradley has reportedly burned his bridges in Cleveland, after a confrontation with the manager about failing to hustle on a ground ball. This is nothing new for Bradley, who is easily one of the most volatile personalities in the game. Among his indiscretions over his professional career are an incident where he spit on an umpire in the minor leagues, been involved in fights with teammates, accused the Expos of being a racist organization, and recently drove away from a police officer after being pulled over for speeding, which led to a three day jail sentence, which has yet to be served.

Bradley is an angry young man who has had to deal with a lot growing up. He is, essentially, everything the Mariners do not want their players to be as human beings, despite his exemplary record of community service. He is considered a problem in the clubhouse and does not fit the family-friendly image the Mariners marketing team has designed.

However, Milton Bradley is exactly what the Mariners need in a ballplayer. Just looking at his accomplishments on the field, we have a 25-year-old center fielder who hit .321/.421/.501 last year, good for a .328 EqA, making him one of the best players in the American League. He is a quality defensive player with a middle of the order bat who controls the strike zone and has exemplary secondary skills. As an athlete, he fits everything the M’s want in a player. His tools are above average across the board, and his breakout last year looks like natural improvement rather than an early peak. Even more appealing to the Mariners would be his pricetag, at just $1.7 million for this year, and he’s not eligible for free agency until after 2006.

A trade for Bradley would answer a lot of questions on the field, as he would solidify the outfield defense as well as provide the explosive bat the Mariners need in the middle of the order. However, it would create just as many questions in the clubhouse, where his acquisition would fly in the face of everything the M’s have done the past two years. If they truly believe character is more important than talent, than Bradley won’t be an option. You have to wonder, however, if Bob Melvin and Bill Bavasi would consider the fact that Bradley could possibly be nurtured in the veteran-laden clubhouse that they’ve built.

If ever there was a chance to obtain an all-star player at a discounted rate, this is it. He fits the Mariners needs to a tee. We now get to find out just how much emphasis the M’s place on chemistry and the desire to have everyone on the team be a marketable personality.

Update: I have learned that the Mariners did indeed inquire about the availability of Bradley last summer, and were interested in acquiring him despite his off-field issues. The deal broke down over the inclusion of Clint Nageotte, but the M’s were not hindered by his issues then, and it is possible that they will not be hindered by them now.

Comments Off on  

David · April 1, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

I’ve been attempting to get around to writing a season preview post, with my thoughts on the team by position, the strengths, the weaknesses, and the outlook for 2004. I now feel like it would be completely redundant, as Dan Werr nails it in his team preview at Baseball Primer. There really isn’t a whole heck of a lot in the article I disagree with. So, here’s my shortened season preview:

Well done, Dan, we agree. But go M’s anyways.

Comments Off on  

David · April 1, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

As a point of clarification, I recieved an email from David Andriesen last night, with two requests.

1. Please spell his name right.

2. Realize that his editors added the Top Prospects section to the end of the Jose Lopez article, and he had nothing to do with the content.

I’m not sure why I kept adding a second s to his last name, but I’ll be more careful from now on. And, we won’t hold that abomination of a prospect list against Andriesen. Someone really should talk to those editors, though.

Comments Off on  

JMB · March 31, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

A hearty “Welcome Aboard!” to anyone who might be reading the good ship USS Mariner for the first time thanks to this Seattle Weekly article.

Comments Off on  

JMB · March 31, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

Hiram Bocachica has lost out on his bid to make the Opening Day roster. Also moved out of camp: JJ Putz, Pat Borders, Mickey Lopez, Jose Lopez. We’re now down to 30. Oh, and I guess this means Ben Davis makes the team.

Update: That 30 figure is misleading, because as far as I can tell, it includes two guys (Chris Snelling and Aaron Taylor) who’ll start the season on the disabled list. So let’s call it 28. Of those 28, two are invited players: Terry Mulholland and Mike Myers. The guy hanging around right now is Aaron Looper, but I think he’d need a minor miracle to make the club; if any extra pitchers are kept, I’d have to think it would be one of the lefties (Myers or Mulholland).

Comments Off on  

JMB · March 31, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

Pitcher X, in case you’re wondering, is Jarrod Washburn. Bloomquist kills that guy — he’s 8-for-15 against him with two doubles and a triple, good for a .533/.533/.800 line.

My biggest complaint about Andriessen’s prospect list? No Shin-soo Choo. C’mon, that’s inexcusable.

In any event, I’m not going to worry too much about it. It’s gorgeous in Seattle today and I have the day off.

Comments Off on  

David · March 31, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

And, I’m not sure how I missed this one, but Art Thiel talks to Bavasi about statistical analysis, including the revelation that the M’s attempted to hire Craig Wright as a consultant, and are still searching for a statistical analyst after Wright turned them down. Overall, I don’t really disagree with too much that Bavasi says here, but I wish someone would push him when he throws out generic quotes.

“I have a hard time answering the question of how statistical analysis helps you below the majors. I’m going to return to squat — veteran scouts, not younger scouts” implies that he believes statistical analysis at the major league level is important, but we never hear which stats he feels are relevant. For instance, if he likes Raul Ibanez because he hit well at Safeco Field in 60 at-bats, that is totally different than if he has a list of comparable players who progressed after age 30 and sustained that level through their mid-30’s, and is anticipating Ibanez has made significant changes and will be able to repeat his prior performances.

There’s a huge difference between believing in statistics that cause you to play Willie Bloomquist at first base because he’s 8-10 lifetime against Pitcher X, and actually understanding what the sabermetric principles have established over the past few years. The Mariners might believe in statistics at the major league level, but I’m far from convinced that they know how to apply them properly.

Comments Off on  

David · March 31, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

Some interesting, and starkly different, pieces in the P-I today.

David Locke quotes liberally from Baseball Prospectus, even using RAP, PECOTA’s projected standings, and saying that “Seattle native Derek Zumsteg of baseballprospectus.com has all the answers”. Nothing to spice up a column like hyperbole. Hooray for Derek getting yet another mention in the paper. Of course, if Derek has all the answers, I’m rather upset that he hasn’t shared them with me yet. Either way, a sort of fun piece to see in the local dailies.

In his first piece, Dave Andriessen does a profile on Jose Lopez, which isn’t anything you haven’t read before here. The M’s love Lopez, he doesn’t get on base that well, and he doesn’t have a set position. He closes the article with one of the worst excuses for a “top prospect” list that you’ll ever seen in print, including names like Craig Anderson, Greg Dobbs, and A.J. Zapp. Adds bizarre comments like Felix Hernandez’s “90 MPH fastball”, Jeff Heaverlo being “ready to produce”, and called Zapp an “excellent fielder”.

In his second piece, Dave Andriessen does a profile of Bill Bavasi that makes me shake my head. A few of the gems:

There are entire Web Sites dedicated to how stupid he is, petitions calling for him to be fired. It’s the same thing that greets every GM for every team, though perhaps not at the same volume.

I’ve never seen anything like the backlash that came upon Bavasi during his first offseason. There is almost always a honeymoon phase, where fans give the new guy the benefit of the doubt. The offseason transactions were so obviously and universally stupid that he brought the wrath upon himself. This is not a common occurrance, and did not meet him at the press conference. The negativity came from a series of moves that can best be described as ill-conceived.

“If the general manager’s job was just to go out and pick a few free agents, we wouldn’t have to have those interpersonal skills and experience managing people and managing a budget. The general manager’s job is much bigger than what I think most fans perceive or understand.”

I agree with this entirely, and think that it is one of the main reasons that the game has been so resistant to the advances of statistical analysis. Billy Beane is not a good GM because he understands sabermetrics, but because he has the personality necessary to convince his entire organization that his way is the right way. General Managers have to be able to deal with people, and most of the hardcore statistical types are woefully lacking in those skills. I’m sure that Bill Bavasi has the personality that will allow him to get the organizational philosophies across to all those under him. The problem is that he doesn’t have the right philosophies.

Bavasi doesn’t emphasize a few statistics in the way Oakland GM Billy Beane does, but he is looking for a well-rounded roster. He appreciates power pitchers and speedy runners but won’t stockpile any type of player exclusively.

“I think you have to kind of mix and match,” he said. “In general, I’d prefer to have a veteran club that has enough youth to it to stay healthy. “It’s a game that takes into respect physical skills and also intellect, and that comes from experience. All of the good clubs have a real solid element of experience to them. We appreciate that and understand that.”

Power pitchers and speedy runners. That basically epitomizes what is wrong with the Mariners. They are completely sold on a particular style of player, regardless of how well a player does anything else. If you run fast, even if you completely suck, there’s a spot for you here. Slow, lumbering slugger? Please, apply elsewhere. We don’t need your kind. Bring us more Hiram Bocachicas and Eric Owens’!

That’s the recipe the Mariners would like to see over the long term. Lincoln has no doubt that he’s got the right man for that job.

“Whenever you hire someone, particularly for an important position like this, you always have questions as to whether you made the right decision,” he said. “That’s typical. But in this case, I have to say that this is one of the best decisions we ever made. He has been even better than either (team president Chuck Armstrong) or I ever anticipated.

“He’s an excellent communicator, he’s decisive, he makes quick decisions, he came in and took over very quickly. He is better in all aspects of his performance than we expected, as well as validating what I thought was the case, which was that he was the perfect fit.”

I have no comment, other than to pray that God is a Mariner fan, because otherwise, we’re headed down a hole.

Comments Off on  

JMB · March 30, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

The M’s released OF Eric Owens today (you’ll have to scroll down to find it). The roster is now down to 35.

Comments Off on  

David · March 30, 2004 · Filed Under Mariners

It isn’t every day that a deal comes along that is such an easy choice that you feel compelled to make the purchase just based on the ridiculous value you’re getting for the money. Today is one of those days, so as a service to our readers, here is something I discovered this morning while shopping through MLB.com’s subscription packages.

Since I reside in North Carolina, I was considering dropping the $80 to buy access to MLB.tv, which would allow me to see some live Mariner baseball this year. $80 is a bit steep for watching through questionable connections on my computer, however, so I was surfing for alternatives. I was hoping to find some package that would also give me the condensed games, so I could watch the west coast games (which begin as I’m heading to bed) the next morning. While going through the subscription options, I found this page. It presents three options:

1. Purchase MLB.tv, which allows you to watch a large majority of games live, but no condensed games or optional footage, for $15 per month or $80 for the season.

2. Purchase MLB All Access, which includes MLB.tv, plus gameday audio, condensed games, video highlights, and some other fluff that I probably won’t use. This is $20 per month, or $110 for the season.

3. Sign up for MSN Premium, which, near as I can tell, is a bundle of free programs that Microsoft is selling as a subscription model for $10/month. Newsflash, folks: Pop-up blockers, spam filters, and email accounts are free. Don’t pay for them. But wait, MSN Premium includes MLB All Access. Hey, thats promising. And its $10 per month, rather than the $20 per month if you buy directly from MLB.com? Already sounds like a good deal. Hey, why not just throw in the first 3 months for free, just for the heck of it? Wait, they do.

So, you can pay $80 for 6 months of MLB.tv, $110 for 6 months of MLB All Access, or $30 (3 months free, 3 months paid) for 6 months of MSN Premium, which includes MLB All Access. You don’t have to be a math major to figure this one out.

Seriously, $30 for what MLB All Access is offering is a steal. Go sign up now.

Comments Off on  

« Previous PageNext Page »