Game 27, Dodgers at Mariners

August 20, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 5 Comments 

Yusei Kikuchi vs. Clayton Kershaw, 4:10pm

Kikuchi was scratched from his last start, but is back to face perhaps the greatest lefty of his generation. I can’t imagine how often coaches just tell lefties to copy Clayton Kershw. Not the weird wind-up; that’s not something any coach wants to see emulated. But the interplay between a straight, rising fastball, a diving curveball, and then a great slider in between. As M’s fans, we remember the team working with James Paxton to Kershaw-ify his delivery, a move that lasted a few years before he dropped his arm angle down in the minors and suddenly started throwing 98. But I think they may have done it again: I think the M’s have told Yusei Kikuchi to look at some of the things Kershaw’s done over the years.

For years, Kershaw’s three pitch mix worked so well because he had impeccable command of each (he also throws a change, because hey, why not). He was able to limit home runs and walks, and still get Ks at the top of the zone with the fastball, or the bottom of the zone with breaking balls. After his first few years in the league, his GB% was consistently high in large part because of those breaking balls; batters sitting fastball adjusted late, and ended up topping some of them.

Since 2017, the new drag-less baseball and declining velo meant that Kershaw was no longer the HR-suppressing guy he was at his 2011-2016 peak. He’s given up 73 HRs since 2017, and it hasn’t really mattered. Like Justin Verlander or Gerrit Cole, Kershaw has traded solo HRs for dominance in every other facet of the game. And unlike Verlander/Cole, he’s had to do it without top-shelf velocity.

Specifically, in 2019, Kershaw sat at 90-91 with his fastball and leaned in to becoming a junkball artist. He threw his FB 43% of the time, his slider 40%, and his curve 16%. The slider got whiffs and grounders, and the fastball kept hitters honest. In part due to his ability to get ahead, batters swung at over 60% of his sliders, but under 45% of his fastballs. If you’re putting Kershaw sliders in play more than Kershaw fastballs, you’ve pretty much already lost.

This year, he’s thrown *even more* breaking balls, and batters are hitting a staggering number of ground balls. He’s at 65% in the early going, 17 percentage points higher than last year. The key is that slider, with 88% of all balls in play getting smacked into the ground. It’s always been a cutter, at only 3 MPH slower than his FB last year, but a bit more than that now, as his FB velo’s returned somewhat. He’s tweaked the movement on that slider, getting a bit more drop despite throwing it at 88 (his FB’s now 92). Batters know it’s coming, but can’t quite stop.

I mention all of this because a lot of it sounds like Yusei Kikuchi’s revised gameplan. Gone is last year’s 86 MPH slider – a pitch that yielded 11 HRs last year. Instead, he’s now throwing a power cutter at 91-92, just a few MPH lower than his revved-up fastball. Last year, he threw that slider less than 30% of the time, but it’s now his #1 pitch. It doesn’t have the drop it once did, but it doesn’t need to; it’s functionally a fastball, and batters looking four-seam either top it or swing over it. And batters looking cutter aren’t ready for a four-seam – his whiff% on his fastball has doubled since last year. Like Kershaw, Kikuchi’s GB% has spiked.

Even better for Kikuchi, he’s yet to give up a HR. Even with the ground ball spike, he’s been quite lucky to avoid dingers thus far, but it’s worth noting that even if he wasn’t lucky on HR/FB ratio, he’d still be giving up fewer between an improved K rate AND all of those grounders. So why isn’t his ERA following the trend? The one thing Kikuchi hasn’t emulated is Kershaw’s consistently amazing strand rates. That’s going to take some additional work, even if Kikuchi’s absurdly low 55% strand rate should regress towards the mean.

1: Haggerty, LF
2: Moore, SS
3: Lewis, DH
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, 1B
6: Lopes, RF
7: Long, 2B
8: Bishop, CF
9: Odom, C
SP: Kikuchi

An off day for the struggling JP Crawford, while Evan White rests the knee he hurt on a foul ball in last night’s contest. Kyle Lewis gets a DH day, allowing Braded Bishop to play his more natural position of CF. I think the team’s technically better at 1B and SS at the plate, but the overall line-up is…not a great one. We’ll see if Kershaw takes advantage.

Kikuchi’s best friend on the team seemed to be Dan Vogelbach, so we’ll see how he’s adjusting to life without “Uncle Vogie.” Kyle Seager’s wife tweeted that her kids have never loved a teammate as much as they loved Vogie. I think all of these players recognize that a DH can’t stick on the roster with a sub .200 average and sub .400 SLG%, but I think a lot of players are missing a surprisingly good clubhouse guy. We’ll see if someone else steps up to fill the Uncle Vogie role, or if the clubhouse chemistry is a little different (not necessarily worse) going forward.

Game 26, Dodgers at Mariners: Roster Moves

August 19, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 10 Comments 

Taijuan Walker vs. Luis Urias, 6:40pm

You can’t say the M’s didn’t let us know their patience was wearing thin. On August 9th, Ryan Divish wrote a story for the Times about the M’s frustration with Dan Vogelbach’s prolonged slump and how they couldn’t afford to keep him on the roster if he didn’t snap out of it. After an abysmal road trip, Vogelbach – hitting .094/.250/.226 – the M’s today DFA’d the husky DH who’d made the AL All-Star game a bit more than a year ago.

Since that power+patience fueled hot streak, he’s utterly collapsed. The HRs are few and far between, the result of an overly-patient approach that’s also pushed his K rate higher, and an out-of-whack swing that’s seeing him posting the high ground ball rates that sunk his first call-ups in Seattle. It’s been a surprisingly rapid, and surprisingly thorough, decline.

We’ve all seen players that flame out after a brief spark, and the M’s have been hurt by call-ups who are great for a couple of weeks, but can never regain that glory (Jeremy Reed and Willie Bloomquist are the go-to examples here). But in Vogelbach, I think we have a neat parallel to another M’s/Cubs 1B who made an All-Star team and will be a damned hard pub quiz questions years hence. Yes, the M’s have finally repaid the Cubs for the three-month success of Bryan LaHair.

LaHair was a lefty-swinging 1B who came through the M’s system as a competent gap-hitting guy who’d sometimes get hot. That’s not a great prospect profile, but that he had one at all was a minor miracle; he’d been a 39th round pick. He got a couple of games for a truly awful 2008 M’s team, but left after that, resurfacing with the Cubs years later. In 20 games, he hit reasonably well – enough, at least, that he’d come back in 2012 while the Cubs gave newly-acquired 1B prospect Anthony Rizzo more AAA seasoning. In the first half, LaHair hit .286/.364/.519 with 14 HRs and made the NL All-Star team. By the end of calendar year 2012, LaHair had signed a contract with the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks, and I think a move to NPB or KBO is potentially in Vogelbach’s future.

Vogelbach had a bigger prospect pedigree, but that was largely based on draft position (he was a somewhat risky 2nd rounder). Vogie detonated short-season and the Pioneer League, but once he moved up, his lines looked a bit like LaHair’s had a decade earlier: solid batting average, some patience (Vogelbach had more, to be fair), and a slugging percentage on the wrong side of .500.

That’s the guy the M’s called up back in 2016 after the mid-year trade. Vogie hit well in Tacoma, but didn’t have an ISO over .200. He was again a good overall hitter for Tacoma in 2017, but his ISO went down to .166. Given his speed and position, that wasn’t going to cut it in the majors, and to his credit, Vogelbach reinvented himself somewhat, ditching the short, contact-focused swing and essentially selling out for power. He killed AAA in 2018, which is nice, because in doing so he burned his final option year. It worked in the big leagues in 2019 for a while, but pitchers found a hole and relentlessly attacked it.

We’ll see if another AL team picks him up, or if he’ll ply his trade in Asia. For a guy who leaves the M’s with a career .199 average and .397 slugging percentage, I think there’s refreshingly little animosity directed his way. We all *wanted* this to work. It just didn’t.

https://publish.twitter.com/?query=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2Feuqubud%2Fstatus%2F1296218060420866049&widget=Tweet

With Mallex Smith demoted and Vogelbach now gone, the M’s have brought up two righty hitting OFs to deal with a number of left-handed starters in the coming days. First, there’s UW product Braden Bishop, who had a rough go in 20 games last season, but is probably the best CF defender on the M’s roster by a good margin. They’ve also brought in Sam Haggerty, whom the M’s got off of waivers from the Mets months ago, and who was drafted/developed initially by Cleveland. Haggerty’s actually a switch hitter, so has some versatility once the M’s face another RH starter or just a reliever later in games. Haggerty has a bit more plate discipline than Bishop, but is similarly lacking in over-the-fence pop. Bishop made more contact and hit for higher average in the minors, while Haggerty stole more bases.

The M’s face lefty Julio Urias, once a top-5-in-baseball prospect. The lefty came up at the age of 19, but injuries and the sheer depth of the Dodgers staff have slowed his ascent. Coming off of TJ rehab last year, the Dodgers opted to use Urias out of the bullpen, and he was a formidable reliever for them. But they’ve moved him back to the rotation, seeing if some of the gains he made in velocity would stick around. So far, they have. He’s sitting 94 with his fastball, up from 93 in 2016-2018. His best pitch is a change at 85. It’s been good for years, but never had much of a gap in vertical movement from his standard, rising fastball. That’s changed a bit this year, as the change has more drop than in prior years, something he’s been able to do despite throwing it much harder than before. Yes, he has a slider and curve, but it’s the change that’s enabled him to run pronounced reverse platoon splits in his career.

I had a lot of good things to say about Tony Gonsolin in yesterday’s post, and he went out and shoved last night for the Dodgers. He didn’t get the win, AND he was utterly outpitched by Marco Gonzales, but it seemed to be enough that he’ll stick around in the Dodger rotation. But that’s not why I bring him up. I was thinking yesterday about who he reminded me of, and for non-Iwakuma four-seam-and-splitter guys, the go-to example is probably Matt Shoemaker. But there’s another starter who throws plenty of splitters but is a fly-ball pitcher despite it: tonight’s starter, Taijuan Walker. Pitch tracking has improved baseball analysis, I think, and it’s certainly something I lean on heavily in these posts. But it kind of fails us here, where we really need it: Why is Gonsolin so effective compared to Walker? I mean, I think Walker was pretty successful 2017, I’m not saying he’s a failure as a pitcher. But Gonsolin has been ridiculously hard to hit, while Walker’s first M’s tenure was beset by HR trouble? The differences are so subtle, but they’re picked up on by hitters remarkably quickly. Ah well, maybe Gonsolin’s in for some dinger problems of his own in the coming months/years, but I’d love for Walker to have a dominant streak like Gonsolin’s. Hell, he’s certainly shown flashes of it this year.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, 2B
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: White, 1B
7: Lopes, DH
8: Haggerty, LF
9: Bishop, RF
SP: Walker

Game 25, Mariners at Dingers…er, Dodgers, sorry

August 18, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 2 Comments 

Marco Gonzales vs. Tony Gonsolin, 4:10pm

The Mariners hit four home runs and scored 9 – count em NINE – runs, but fell to the Dodgers 11-9 after Justin Dunn was hit hard literally and then figuratively. The bullpen did what it’s done so often this season and refused to stop the Dodgers from adding on, but the M’s line-up kept putting pressure on the Dodgers’ pen, and had chances to win the game late. That they didn’t only helps their draft position, so I guess it’s what passes for a win in 2020. It was, if nothing else, very watchable.

Today, their ace faces off against another of the Dodgers’ unheralded back-of-the-rotation guys, in this case, FB/Splitter guy, Tony Gonsolin. I’ve made no secret of the fact that the splitter is my favorite pitch, as it mixes the brilliant grounders-and-whiff majesty of the change-up with effectiveness against same- and opposite-handed batters. It’s the pitch that dominated the game when I was young (Mike Scott in 1986, for example), and it’s the pitch that made Hisashi Iwakuma one of the most compelling Mariners of the last ten years.

I’ve written about this a lot, but I loved the fact that Iwakuma could throw a pitch out of the strike zone the overwhelming majority of the time, and STILL induce a ton of swings on it. Not only was he able to get whiffs by doing this despite underwhelming stuff – he didn’t mind if batters DID hit the ball. Out-of-the-zone balls put in play are, statistically speaking, really terrible for batters. If you can throw a pitch where the *best* outcome a hitter can manage is a weak ball in play, you’re doing something right.

Gonsolin throws a four-seam fastball with solid rise/backspin, and then a harder splitter than Kuma’s. So this is Kuma + 5 MPH of velo? Well, no. All of that backspin means the splitter doesn’t dive quite like Kuma’s, and as a result, Gonsolin is definitely a fly ball pitcher. And even in 2020 in Dodgers Stadium, that’s something of a dangerous game to play (as we all saw last night). Even his splitter is something of a fly ball/air ball pitch, which is interesting. On the plus side, he too gets some weak swings on it.

Batters find it hard to resist Gonsolin’s split, though it’s not quite as tempting as Kuma’s, despite being thrown a bit higher. Lucky for Gonsolin, his slider’s much better than Kuma’s ever was, and he’s working on a curve with steep vertical drop, too. Like Kuma, all of this has resulted in very low BABIPs and BA-allowed, which has allowed Gonsolin to pitch around the occasional HR (sounds like Kuma). I think he’s a very tough match-up, and better than Ross Stripling. If there’s a silver lining here, he’s made two starts this year and hasn’t pitched 5 IP yet. If the M’s get 4 IP or more against the underside of the Dodger bullpen, hey, that’s all you can ask.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, RF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Vogelbach, DH
7: White, 1B
8: Long, 2B
9: Gordon, LF
SP: Gonzales

Game 24, Mariners at Dodgers

August 17, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 3 Comments 

Justin Dunn vs. Ross Stripling, 6:40pm

The M’s visit the Dodgers today, allowing the two Seager brothers to face off for the first time. Due to injuries and the comparative rarity of these interleague games, the two somehow haven’t yet played a game against each other in the regular season. Nathan Bishop and the Dome and Bedlam blog have been highlighting the degree to which Kyle’s been underrated by Mariner fans, and I’m coming around to this view. At first, I thought it seemed odd; Kyle’s beloved by just about all M’s fans I’ve ever encountered. But when you think about his stature in M’s lore compared to, say, Jay Buhner – a lesser ballplayer who became a legitimate nationally-known figure in the late 90s – I start to understand the point.

I think Kyle’s weird mid-career dip in production hurt his standing a bit; he seemed ready to take off after his brilliant 2016, but then shifting and bulking up seemed sapped his batting average and thus contributed to a drop in overall value. Still, he’s come back from all of that and been one of the leaders of this year’s group, and he finished 2019 looking very strong as well.

The other, perhaps larger, reason Seager’s gone underrated has been the glut of ridiculously good AL West 3Bs during his M’s tenure. This is the Duke Snider problem in action – a deserving player goes relatively unnoticed because others at the same position are having historically great careers/seasons. Seager’s first peak occurred in 2014, but that was during the heyday of Adrian Beltre’s late-career surge with Texas. Beltre out fWAR’d Seager in both 2014 and 2016 on his way to a hall of fame career. Josh Donaldson switched off of catching in 2010-11, and had his first full season in 2013, Seager’s second full year in Seattle. Donaldson put up over 7 WAR, and 13 in two seasons before moving to Toronto and getting somehow even better. Beltre retired and Donaldson’s been injury-prone in recent years, but somehow, it hasn’t mattered. The Astros developed Alex Bregman, who’s been worth over 16 fWAR in his last two seasons in Houston, and the A’s have replaced Donaldson with Platinum-Gloved Matt Chapman, worth “only’ 12.7 WAR the last two years.

The same sort of thing may develop with JP Crawford. Crawford’s plate discipline has been great, and his defense unbelievable, and it may get him to a place where he can post 3-4 WAR seasons year in and year out. That’s incredibly valuable. It might allow him to be the 3rd best SS in the division. Carlos Correa’s been streaky and missed time, but as an MVP candidate when he’s healthy. Marcus Semien somehow became an all-world defender in a 7.6 WAR year last year. And now the Angels’ low-K afterthought, David Fletcher, is working on another 3-WAR season? Fletcher hasn’t really played much SS, and now he can do this?

Crawford’s been a streaky hitter, and he’s shown a variety of approaches. Before his injury last year, Crawford showed good pop, with an ISO of .189 in the first half. This approach came with a few more Ks than he’d like, and in the second half, he improved his plate discipline – taking more walks and striking out less. That approach has carried over into 2020, and it’s very much like Fletcher’s in Anaheim. But it’s *so* powerless (his ISO in 2020 is .061) that it saps his overall value. He’s hitting the ball on the ground much more often than last year, or in his previous stints with the Phillies, and while his average and OBP are up, his ceiling’s probably down. Maybe it’s a trade worth making? It’s just going to be tough to keep up with the other shortstops in what’s suddenly baseball’s deepest position. Hell, Corey Seager is almost an afterthought now with Tatis Jr. going nuclear in San Diego, Bo Bichette coming on in Toronto/Buffalo, and Correa/Trevor Story/Semien/Lindor/etc. all starring for their teams.

Ross Stripling was a 5th round pick by the Dodgers back in 2012, coming up as an unexciting depth guy with solid but not amazing control. Something clicked around 2016, and Stripling’s had nearly immediate success in the big leagues. He’s not overpowering, but he’s never had an ERA or FIP over 4. It’s never been under 3 either, but for a guy the Dodgers were counting on only as a 5th starter, that’s pretty darned good.

Stripling, a righty, throws a four-seam fastball from a high release point at about 91. It’s arrow-straight and has a bit more vertical movement than average, but it’s not some high-spin thing; it’s pretty much dead-on league average in that regard. He has a change, and then two solid breaking balls: a slider and curve. He’s used the slider more in his big league career, but has had much more success with the curve. He’s tried using the slider to lefties, but they’ve done quite well on the pitch, which is nice, as they’ve struggled somewhat with his fastball. Flip that for RHBs: they see his fastball quite well, but struggle with the breaking stuff. Overall, righties have used that FB success to post much better numbers than lefties over the course of Stripling’s 400 IP+ career. The key has been keeping them off-balance with his change, a pitch he rarely throws to righties.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, RF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Vogelbach, DH
7: White, 1B
8: Long, 2B
9: Lopes, LF
SP: Dunn

Game 23, Mariners at Astros

August 16, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 2 Comments 

Justus Sheffield vs. Lance McCullers, Jr. 11:10am

It’s an early game today as the M’s try to salvage a game in this series against the team that has utterly destroyed them these past two years. Justus Sheffield will try and establish some consistency and repeat last week’s brilliant start with another, while Lance McCullers tries to recapture his past glory.

McCullers’ story was a pretty easy one to describe: electric when healthy, but rarely healthy. He used a sinking four-seam fastball in the mid-90s with a demonic hard curveball from hell to limit base hits and rack up strikeouts. Perhaps a bit like Sheffield, he relied *heavily* on that breaking ball, and when his arm gave out a few times, armchair pitching coaches argued that his pitch mix was behind his health woes. I’m not sure about that, but it’s undeniable that he 1) threw his mid 80s hard curve all the time, even more often than his FB in some years and 2) couldn’t stay on the mound. That mix correlated with injury, but it also correlated with a lot of batters walking back to the bench, shaking their heads.

The righty missed 2019, and the delayed season meant he was ready to go for the 2020 sprint. But he simply hasn’t been himself, with his K rate way down, and his ERA in the early going sitting over 6. He’s all but abandoned his four-seam for a sinker, but that’s not as big of a change as it sounds: his four-seam always had plenty of sink, and with his low 3/4 delivery, it often played a bit like a sinker. In the early going, his sinker’s been…fine. It’s a little slower than he’s been in the past, and not a big swing-and-miss pitch, but his fastball never was.

The problem’s that hellacious curve. It’s simply not fooling anyone, and batters enter today slugging over .700 on it. It’s still his biggest whiff pitch, and it’s something to be respected, but we simply aren’t in a “just hope you get a fastball” or “don’t fall behind, because if you do, it’s over” situation anymore. I wonder if batters have just gotten used to a pitch he’s thrown over 3,000 times in the bigs, or if it’s just that a couple of MPH drop in velocity makes it play a bit more like a regular hard curve or slurvy slider and less like the utterly unique pitch that it used to be. Either way, M’s fans will take it.

They’ll also take Evan White’s positive day in yesterday’s 2-1 loss. He walked on 4 pitches off of Cristian Javier in one of the most befuddling 4 pitch walks you’ll see, especially from a pitcher who ended up having a great day. Then, he started his final at-bat at 3-0 against Brooks Raley beforing launching a nearly 440 foot HR to dead center. Getting ahead in the count is so critical for a hitter who’s been guessing up at the plate, and it allowed him to do some damage on fastballs for a change.

The Times’ Ryan Divish has a fun mailbag column today, and he fields a question from our own commenter stevemotivateir on White’s struggles. Divish argues (before yesterday’s game) that sending White to Tacoma wouldn’t accomplish much, as he wouldn’t face the tough pitchers that have caused him this horrendous start. The coaches seem confident that he can work through this in Seattle. Divish points to his solid exit velocities (something I think is a bit overblown, but has some relevance) and his plate discipline: the fact that he’s laid off balls and swung at strikes. That’s true, and it was on display in yesterday’s game. But I wonder if that’s more of a warning sign than it looks.

If there’s one thing major league hitters do, it’s hit in-zone fastballs. Sure, pretty much everyone has a problem with low/away sliders, particularly with two strikes, but in general, you don’t make it to this level by swinging through strikes, and definitely not fastballs. What stands out about White’s struggles isn’t that he’s missed some breaking balls – any young player will do that. It’s that he’s swung through 38% of all fastballs, and hitting .076 against them. Yesterday’s HR *and* his whiff rate trend against fastballs are great early signs that he may be coming through this. But learning to lay off sliders away – as tough as it is – can be done. It’s been a kiss of death to whiff on in-zone pitches, and White’s got to show more of this. In recent games, he’s been fouling them off, which again is an encouraging sign. But as he nears 100 PAs, he’s got to start making pitchers honest within the strike zone.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, RF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Vogelbach, DH
6: Lopes, LF
7: White, 1B
8: Gordon, 2B
9: Odom, C
SP: Sheffield

Game 22, Mariners vs. Astros

August 15, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 2 Comments 

Nick Margevicius vs. Cristian Javier, 4:10pm

Can’t get worse than last night’s game, right? Nick Margevicius was solid in his first start, but his stylistic similarities to Nestor Cortes have me a bit worried.

Cristian Javier is a 23-year old righty with a fastball at 93, a change, and two high-spin breaking balls. The curve looks quite good, but he’s only thrown it a few times, opting instead for his solid slider. The FB looks like a Yankee-style offering, and while it’s been ok, teams that have hit Javier have done damage off of it. The slider’s been hard to hit.

So, Evan White. With three more Ks last night, he has 34 in 77 PAs. He looked frustrated at times, despite notching a much-needed double. I’ve been trying to think of an M’s precedent for this, and there just isn’t one. Mike Zunino was ok/fine at the start of his career. Javier Baez struck out all the time but kept hitting homers. Scott Spiezio wasn’t at the beginning of his career in 2005, and wasn’t given this many PAs with the M’s that year. Same with Miguel Olivo. Stephen Vogt went 0 for his first call up with Tampa, but it was under 30 PAs and he struck out just twice.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, LF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Vogelbach, DH
7: Long, 2B
8: White, 1B
9: Smith, RF
SP: Margevicius

Game 21, Mariners at Astros – Evan White’s Start

August 14, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 5 Comments 

Yusei Kikuchi vs. Framber Valdez, 6:10pm

The M’s head back to Houston, where this bizarre season began. The Astros no longer seem like an unstoppable juggernaut, and are a good ways back of the surging Oakland A’s. Their line-up is hitting reasonably well, though quite a bit behind their standards of 2017-2019, but they’re struggling to play defense. The pitching is stuck in a similar predicament. They’re not out and out awful, but after years of being the best or one of the best teams in the game, being mediocre must seem pretty shocking.

Tonight’s starter, Framber Valdez, has been the best of an inconsistent bunch of starters. Justin Verlander got hurt, Josh James blew his chance to snag a rotation slot, and Gerrit Cole’s in pinstripes. The Astros have been very fortunate that Valdez was still kicking around the system as a depth guy. He throws a hard sinker at 93, and it’s very effective at getting grounders. His career GB% is 63%. It was much less effective at staying in the zone. His walk rates in 2018 and 2019 were off-the-charts high, which didn’t exactly kill his effectiveness, but certainly hampered it.

All that’s changed thus far in 2020, as his walk rate has fallen below 5%. He also throws a curve and a change he’s more confident in this campaign, and he’s throwing them all for strikes. The curve’s always gotten whiffs (when people swung at it), but poor fastball command probably limited his opportunity to use it. The M’s are a ground-ball hitting line-up, so this may be a tough match-up.

Evan White’s one of the M’s GB aficionados, with a GB% of 48.6%, significantly higher than the league average of 42.3%. It’s elevated, and it can’t exactly be a surprise, as it’s right in line with his GB% in Everett (48.8%) and Modesto (48.6%). It was lower last season, but he may be falling into old habits. Of course, the GB rate is not the big concern with White – it’s his inability to make contact. With a K rate of 42.5% in 73 PAs, it’s a major concern, and the M’s are undoubtedly working with him a lot. This is the kind of situation where you’d love to have a minor league to send him to – not the “alternative training site” but a league, playing actual games.

I wanted to see how common this was, and what happened to players who strike out so often in their first big-league at-bats. So, I looked for rookie-eligible players with at least 100 PAs in each seven seasons with K% of 30% or more. I found 82 player-seasons (some players, like Byron Buxton, had more than one qualified season), only 6 of which topped the 40% mark. While this would’ve been unthinkable in the ’80s or ’90s, many of these players were successful right from the beginning, despite elevated Ks. Aaron Judge and Kris Bryant are on the list, and both won Rookie of the Year. George Springer, Trevor Story, and Javier Baez have all been pretty productive, too. But obviously, it’s not really a list you want to be on, especially as a 1B. Many are IFs or CFs, and the list is littered with back-up catchers.

No, a really high K rate isn’t a kiss of death that’s impossible to come back from. But you need to be productive despite it. Sure, he’s hit the ball hard when he’s made contact, but he’s often hitting the ball down. He’s had 20 batted balls of at least 95mph, but 8 of these have been at under 5 degrees, meaning ground balls (another, at 7, was also a grounder). Another 4 were hit with such a large angle, that they became easy pop-ups. White’s been unlucky on balls in play, but his batted ball profile has to improve, too.

A number of these high-HR prospects had huge K rates – Joey Gallo being the classic example, but Baez and Judge fit the description, too. The catchers weren’t really supposed to hit, and hang around for other reasons. Many of the player had really high K rates coming up, so this wasn’t a gigantic shock – again, Gallo works for this, as would someone like Carlos Peguero, who debuted earlier than our view here.

I’ve tried to poke around and find some guys who had AA K rates in the same vicinity as White, and then high K rates as rookies. Springer and Santana K’d too much at that level, as did Gallo. Others, like Marrero, Aguilar, and Colabello, came through the minors more as *low* K guys. So, excluding the middle infielders and catchers, I just looked for a group of players who K’d within a couple of percentage points of White’s 23. Let’s see who we find…

…oooooh. Oh no. This is…this is not the list you want to be on at all. To be clear: I’m not saying White will share these guys’ fate. Widening the K rate bars just a teensy bit would include Judge, so just imagine Aaron Judge is listed too, and you’ll feel a lot better.

AA K rate AA wRC+
Marc Krauss 24.4 110
Mike Olt 24 168
Jon Singleton 23.6 148
Evan White 23 132
Matt Thaiss 22.6 136
Jabari Blash 22.3 150
Jake Cave 22.3 121
Clint Frazier 22 129
AJ Reed 20.7 168

The player White looks the most like may be Thaiss, but of course your eye just goes right to Jon Singleton, with a very similar K rate in the same league (Texas League), and, of course, a very similar path to the majors (the very first extension prior to playing a game in MLB). Damn it. I’d always thought Blash struck out more, but he may have been saved by two very short stints in AA that I’ve rolled together for K% purposes. Many of these guys are still around; Jake Cave was OK for Minnesota a few years ago and still plays for them. Clint Frazier’s just never gotten an opportunity in New York, but he’s with them now. I just don’t know how we ended up with the flame-out first basemen in this – admittedly completely unscientific – list.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, RF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Lopes, DH
7: Long, 2B
8: White, 1B
9: Gordon, LF
SP: Kikuchi

Game 20, Mariners at Rangers

August 12, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 18 Comments 

Taijuan Walker vs. Jordan Lyles, 6:05pm

The M’s, like pretty much every team, had struggled to turn balls in play into hits this season. Playing in Arlington has certainly helped, as there’ve been all sorts of base hits in this series. That’s been good for both teams, and despite a few HRs, it’s felt like an old-school series, without tons of strikeouts.

I mention this because I happened to check the M’s batting splits, and they’ve been the worst *home* batting team. One big driver of those ugly numbers, and no, I wasn’t going to say “Evan White”, is their BABIP, which is .237, the lowest in MLB. Their isolated power is awful, too, at .106, tied with this Ranger ballclub. Why is T-Mobile park playing like it’s 2011?

The line-up is undoubtedly part of it, of course. But another possibility came up today: T-Mobile park is using a Coors Field-style humidor to store baseballs. Ben Lindbergh of the Ringer tweeted this as part of a discussion about MLB trying to get some consistency in the ball, not only between years (which they’ve completely failed to do) but between parks. Thus, the M’s, Mets, and Red Sox applied to use the humidor, and MLB approved it. The humidors all seem to be set to the settings Colorado used, and which Arizona adopted as well: 70 degrees and 55% relative humidity.

The question that immediately comes to mind is: how does this differ from how the balls were stored before? Colorado and Arizona are two of the driest parks in the game; other than Salt Lake City, I’m not sure there are too many places *less* humid than Phoenix/Denver. But New York, Boston, Seattle, etc. have relative humidity sitting much higher than 55% most of the time. But maybe comparing it to the overall city isn’t the point – what matters is how different it is from the room where the balls were stored last year. Air conditioning, heating, air flow, etc. could have kept the humidity higher or lower than 55%; I have no idea what it was. All we can do is just see how T-Mobile plays compared to their AL West rivals, none of which (to my knowledge) have gone with humidors yet.

This may make some competitive sense, given that the M’s were probably stunned when Seattle suddenly stopped preventing HRs and played much more neutral in 2016-2019. With a staff of young pitchers, it might be good if the ball didn’t fly as far at home, however much that might frustrate the hitters. But again: it’s not clear that this move WOULD inhibit ball flight, and certainly not as much as the 2020 baseball’s increased drag already does. It’ll be interesting to follow this throughout the year. For now, the M’s have a wRC+ of 119 on the road, compared to that ugly 64 at home. These are splits of an already-tiny sample, but hey, you know the drill.

We’re at the 1/3 mark on this little season-let, and the M’s brass is pretty encouraged with how things are going. Not on the field, but the progress in remaking what had been a moribund farm system. That Seattle Times story from Ryan Divish talks about the M’s system ranking #3 in BaseballAmerica’s new system rankings, up from, well, 30 a few years ago.

Different fans react to this very differently, from optimists excited that the vaunted plan is coming together, and pessimists pointing to other times the M’s have amassed a stable of highly-regarded prospects. It’s so easy to move the goalposts; I’ve derided the team talking about contention in 2019-2020, then 2021, and Divish’s story quotes Dipoto speculating that it could be 2022. But then, if they’re really good a year ‘late’ I don’t think anyone will deduct style points or whatever. What we need to do is figure out how to measure the success or failure of each year, starting with this one. Essentially, we need to get more specific about measuring progress (or the lack thereof).

So, what should it be? Does *each* young player the M’s are counting on need to meet some target? Or most? Or half? To me, some of the most important measures are: Can Sheffield and Dunn limit walks, namely, can they keep their BB% around 9-9.5%? Can Dunn strike out 7-8 per 9? Can Evan White strike out less than 30% from this point forward? Can JP Crawford finish with an ISO above .130 and a K% less than 20% (he’s shattering that K% goal right now)? Can Kyle Lewis maintain his hot start by hitting at a 110 wRC+/DRC+ level from here until the end of the year? Can Yusei Kikuchi finish the year with an ERA/FIP nearer to 4-4.5?

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, 1B
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Long, 2B
7: Vogelbach, DH
8: Lopes, LF
9: Smith, RF
SP: Walker

Game 19, Mariners at Rangers – Kyle’s House

August 11, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 4 Comments 

Marco Gonzales vs. Mike Minor, 6:05pm

After a nice easy victory in the Rangers’ new park, the M’s are back at it with their ace facing veteran starter, Mike Minor. It was going to be interesting to see if Kyle Seager’s long-standing success in Arlington would follow him a few miles to the new Globe Life Field, and a grand slam would seem to settle the matter. Wherever it is, whatever you call it, the park the Rangers play in is Kyle’s House.

Minor’s been one of two remarkably good (cheap) free agent pick-ups by the Rangers. After years with the Braves and then a relief season with the Royals, the Rangers picked him up and converted him back to starting. He rewarded them with an above average season in only 157 innings, using good control and enough barrel-avoidance to run a .257 BABIP. Much of this is attributed to his very high-spin fastball, which he rode to a 6 (or 4) WAR season, depending on if you like RA9-based WAR or FIP-based WAR in 2019. The out-of-the-running Rangers thought about dealing him, but when their other FA pick-up, Lance Lynn, made a run at the Cy Young award, they thought they’d keep both and see where they stood in 2020.

Like a few pitchers we’ve seen – including Justin Dunn last night! – Minor’s velocity is down pretty noticeably this year. He averaged 92.8 last year on his fastball, but only 90.7 this year. Remember that velo is generally lowest in April and *peaks* in August with the warmer weather, and it’s got to be a bit of a concern. It’s coincided with an upward trend in his BABIP and two pretty poor starts his last two times taking the ball: he’s given 13 hits and 11 runs in 10 2/3 IP.

Minor also throws a change and slider, each at 27% of his pitches. He’s got a curve he’s used more in the past, so he does have a real four-pitch mix. The lefty has very even platoon splits in his lengthy career.

Justin Dunn worked around some wildness to have his best start yet last night, working 6 innings for his first big league W. As I alluded to above, though, he sat at 90 mph on his four-seam fastball, down significantly from previous starts. We’ve gone through worrying about velo in Arlington before, but it’s something to watch. Of course, what hitters do with the pitch is more important than its velocity, and it was fascinating to see how different the pitch played. I mentioned in yesterday’s post that his lack of command/control with the fastball meant that hitters didn’t swing at it. The Rangers broadcast made a big deal of the fact that he hadn’t given up a hit on the pitch, but that wasn’t because it’s some amazingly hard-to-hit offering: he just couldn’t find the zone, and batters just walked instead. Coming in, batters swung at about 30% of his fastballs. Last night, it was just about 50% (24 of 50), and since it was coming in with below-average oomph, they put a ton of those fastballs into play.

It worked last night, in part because Dunn was able to get two absolutely huge strikeouts after allowing the first two batters to reach in the 5th. But those were his only Ks; he’s sitting at 8 on the year, and has still walked more than he’s K’d. This is concerning, as nice as it was to see his fight in the 5th-6th. I’ll be curious to see if that FB velo was the result of a conscious decision to allow more balls in play/fewer walks, or just a one-game blip after what amounts to a long road trip for 2020 (the Seattle-to-Texas flights have to be about the longest travel in the Covid-sports-world).

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, RF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Long, 2B
7: White, 1B
8: Gordon, LF
9: Lopes, DH
SP: Gonzales

Lots of moves around the league today. The M’s have picked up Seth Frankoff, who pitched a few games for the Cubs a few years back, and who spent 2018-2019 starting in Korea for the Doosan Bears. In his limited views in the bigs, Frankoff has a sinker and fourseamer around 92, a cutter at 88, and a curve. He didn’t show it for Chicago, but he’s also got a change-up with plenty of armside run.

The Rangers picked up ex-Reds slugger Derek Dietrich a few days ago, assigning him to their alternate site. But they’ve called him up for tonight’s game, which perhaps makes some sense, as many Rangers starters like Rougned Odor, are really struggling at the plate. They’ve also brought up pitcher Wes Benjamin, optioning Jimmy Herget, who pitches last night, along with rookie Anderson Tejeda.

The biggest news of the day was M’s prospect Austin Shenton taking a George Kirby pitch *over Cheney’s CF wall*. This is such a rare, improbable feat that I wouldn’t have believed it had News Tribune writer Lauren Smith not got the video. Rainiers’ radio guy Mike Curto’s done a lot of sleuthing over the years about batters who’ve homered over the tall wall that rises at 425 feet at Cheney. The first absolute no-doubt HR over the wall was hit by AJ Zapp, the R’s first baseman, in 2004. The very next year, M’s prospect Shin-Soo Choo hit another one, in a game attended by your humble scribe, because King Felix was the R’s starting pitcher. That game was played with a powerful wind blowing directly out, a factor that helped Choo’s drive immensely, and which contributed to an off-night by Felix standards (he gave up 2 wind-aided HRs, and walked 3 to just 2 Ks in 7 IP).

Other than those two in-game bombs, Curto mentions that just two players have done it *in BP/practice*. The first was Jose Canseco of the old Tacoma Tigers, and Jay Buhner in 2001, when he was on a rehab assignment. Shenton’s bomb didn’t have wind assistance, and while it wasn’t in a real game environment, it was a hell of a lot closer to it than batting practice. Given the height of the wall, that’s gotta be nearing the 460′ foot or so HR that the Nats Juan Soto hit in New York the other night. Amazing.

Game 18, Mariners at Rangers: Mixed Signals

August 10, 2020 · Filed Under Mariners · 3 Comments 

Justin Dunn vs. Kyle Gibson, 6:05pm

Sorry for the lack of a post yesterday, though I was kind of planning on writing about Justus Sheffield’s lack of development, and how he really needed to show some signs of being able to compete consistently at the big league level. Well, he certainly showed a sign. 6 scoreless, and no walks, 7 Ks? That’ll do nicely. Somewhat similar to Justin Dunn, I’d been growing concerned about Sheffield’s fastball. With the shift to a sinker, he’s lost velocity, and it’s now a below-average pitch in terms of release speed. It’s definitely picked up sink, and should be a ground ball pitch, but it can’t get grounders if no one swings. The slider’s great, but a slider-dominant pitcher seems destined for the bullpen.

But Sheffield showed a template of how to succeed as a starter yesterday. Yes, the pitch mix was tilted strongly in favor of the slider, but he was able to throw the sinker for strikes, getting 6 called strikes along with a smattering of fouls, and a couple of whiffs. He gave up just 7 balls in play off the pitch, which is probably just what he and the M’s want: get some swings, get a couple of grounders, but keep showcasing the slider that’s so troublesome.

Of note: that slider’s a flyball pitch, at least when batters can hit it. That’s helped drive Sheffield’s GB% down at least in the early-going this year. It’s kind of an anomalous result given the shift to a sinker, but it’s probably understandable if the M’s have Sheff throw more sliders than any other pitch type.

Dunn’s in a very similar situation to Sheffield last year. His four-seam fastball isn’t blazingly fast, it doesn’t have the high spin or rise that might help it play really well at the top of the zone, and worst of all, he hasn’t been able to command the thing at all. This year, the result is simply that no one’s swinging at it. Batters are still taking over 70% of his fastballs, an insanely high take% for a fastball (it’s usually about 50:50). Things are fine if they DO swing, as they’re hitting grounders or missing it entirely, but the problem’s that they’re content to take called balls and earn a walk.

Dunn’s slider looks great by movement data. It really sweeps across the zone, thanks to a 3/4 or lower 3/4 arm slot, and it has good vertical movement, too. That isn’t necessarily because of spin. Dunn’s slider possesses nowhere near the tight spin of Austin Adams’, Matt Magill’s, or even Taylor Williams. In fact, it’s a bit behind Justus “freakishly low fastball spin” Sheffield’s, and well behind league average. But given the slot, spin direction, and velo (low 80s), it gets nice two-plane break. Here’s the problem, though: batters don’t seem to care.

All three of the big league HRs he’s given up have come off of the slider, and he’s simply not putting away people at the rates you’d expect. It’s still early days for Dunn, but I’d like to see how this skillset is going to work consistently as a starter. Sheffield showed something yesterday, but Sheffield already had a weapon he knew worked against lefties and righties.

Evan White currently stands as the position player with the lowest WAR in MLB. To say that things have been rough is an understatement, and while he made more contact yesterday, he still looks kind of lost (he’s not the only M’s hitter that this could apply to). Yes, his BABIP is atrocious, but a 43% K rate won’t play at 1B or anywhere else. The M’s player development group is to be commended for the work they did with White and Dunn at AA Arkansas, but there’s plenty more to be done. The M’s desperately need White to take the 1B job for the next decade. If they’re going to compete in the medium term, they can’t have the kind of holes they have in their rotation and line-up.

That’s depressing, so let’s focus on the good stuff: Houston is having development issues of its own. For the second straight season, Josh James is struggling mightily. From a pure stuff point of view, he’s probably the most talented young pitcher in the AL West with the possible exception of Jesus Luzardo, but nothing’s working for him right now. The Astros turned an org depth guy into a star thanks to a sleep apnea diagnosis and good instruction, but as with Dunn, they need to take the next step, and it hasn’t happened…again. Chris Devenski’s 2019 struggles are back. Their young position player future stars in Kyle Tucker and Abraham Toro have face-planted early on.

No one expects everything to go right in player development (well, maaaaybe the Dodgers), but this has to be worrying for Houston. They let Gerrit Cole go, and now have lost Justin Verlander. After trading a number of pitching prospects these past few years, they made a big bet on their PD group to help them through. So far, it’s not exactly working. It’s very early, but the A’s are putting some distance between them at the top of the division.

The M’s head to Texas now for a series against the Rangers in their brand new ballpark. The new park is covered, which helps on these August days when the temperature’s 100 degrees. But after struggling at the plate this season, the Rangers and M’s have agreed to open the roof for today’s contest, where the temperature is…100 degrees. Hmm.

The M’s face long-time Twins sinkerballer Kyle Gibson. Gibson’s sinker (and four-seamer to lefties) comes from a high angle, which may make it harder for batters to really pick up, even though they’ve now faced him many times before. He’s not a strikeout guy, and battled inconsistency in the Twin Cities, which is part of the reason they let him walk. He gives up a fair number of HRs, and has battled some control issues off and on, but is a fairly dependable innings eater for a back-of-the-rotation starter. Texas may see if there’s something more in there, but so far haven’t really changed his arsenal. His best pitch is a slider that works against RHB and LHBs. As you’d expect, the righty has had more trouble against lefties, who K less and walk more against him than RHBs. But it’s righties who’ve hit HRs more frequently, so this isn’t necessarily a bad match up for Kyle Lewis.

1: Crawford, SS
2: Moore, RF
3: Lewis, CF
4: Seager, 3B
5: Nola, C
6: Long,
7: White, 1B
8: Vogelbach, DH
9: Lopes, LF
SP: Dunn

Ryan Divish had a story on Vogelbach’s slow start and how it could force a roster move soon. Vogie’s out of options.

Also per Divish: the M’s have put Carl Edwards Jr. on the IL, recalling Bryan Shaw. They’ve also picked up free-agent reliever Brady Lail, who’d just been released by the White Sox. In a just 2 games for the Sox and Yankees, Lail showed a really interesting change-up, a cutter, and a disappointing four-seam fastball at 90-91. Just from the movement, you can tell he was a Yankee farmhand; the telltale four-seam movement and change drop seem to be highly prized, and have worked well with some players. Less well with Nick Rumbelow and Nestor Cortes, Jr.

« Previous PageNext Page »