Ichiro and free agency, Lowe’s woes, and more

February 21, 2007 · Filed Under General baseball, Mariners · 54 Comments 

Ichiro’s comments yesterday on free agency are covered extensively.

“Ichiro may leave” in the PI.
Geoff Baker on the same subject. The picture of Ichiro hanging out in his pink shirt is worth it.

The Japanese star was taking live batting practice in his first spring workout here Tuesday when Seattle reliever George Sherrill sent him lunging out of the way on a pitch that ran inside. After the chuckles subsided all around him, Ichiro finished the workout, then let reporters know that Sherrill’s errant slider was about the only “pitch” he has seen yet from a Mariners squad he is thinking seriously about leaving.

That comes after not one but two blog entires (“Ichiro won’t rule out free agency” and “Agent confirms Ichiro “very disappointed,” mulling options“)

Lowe may go under the knife again, or Lowe still not cleared to throw. Short version: the arm’s not right, and they’re going to MRI it to see what the deal is. Results may drive another surgery.

The Times follows up on WSJ story on the M’s re-working their suites and includes this tidbit:

Safeco Field opened in 1999 with 67 luxury suites and subsequently added another suite on the press-box level. For the first few years, 98 to 99 percent of the suites were filled, said Aylward. He said last year’s percentage was in the mid- to upper-80s.

At the PI, the Go 2 Guy, who for some reason showed up at the wrong spring training league and is still filing Mariner stories, writes about Moyer and Garcia and Adam Eaton, who “In a better world, from a Seattle perspective, Adam Eaton would be wearing a blue uniform in Peoria instead of a red one in Clearwater, Fla.” In a better world, his asking price would have been reasonable for the team to pay. That was a good pass for the M’s.

Also, my “Bugs Bunny, Greatest Banned Player Ever” post here at USSM is going to be in the next Best American Sports Writing annual. I’m super excited.

Community Projections: Beltre, Ibanez, and Ichiro

February 21, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 14 Comments 

Sorry about the delayed writeups on the community projections – I was hanging out with my mom, who takes priority over blogging. So, we’re doing a three-in-one recap today.

Adrian Beltre

Community Projection: .283/.346/.511, 604 AB, 171 H, 40 2B, 3 3B, 31 HR, 51 BB, 7 HBP, 112 K
High: .304/.385/.603
Low: .243/.297/.373
Dave: .278/.341/.477

You guys love Adrian Beltre. Love him. I’d be curious to see what the projections would look like if he had started off hot and then crashed and burned at the end of the year, rather than vice versa. However, it looks like his May through September juvenation was enough to convince you guys that his struggles weren’t permanent, as the community thinks he’s going to have his best non-2004 year of his career. An .857 OPS from a gold glove caliber third baseman in Safeco Field is a borderline MVP candidate. I think this projection’s a bit too optimistic, but it’s plausible at least. This is the kind of production we were hoping for when he signed here.

Raul Ibanez

Community Projection: .280/.350/.466, 572 AB, 160 H, 29 2B, 2 3B, 24 HR, 60 BB, 2 HBP, 107 K
High: .302/.388/.548
Low: .267/.317/.385
Dave: .282/.334/.435

An age-34 power spike is almost never sustained, so you guys are right to bring his slugging numbers back down towards career norms, but again, I think this might be a little too optimistic. Ibanez has been a consistent player, but he’s entering his age 35 season, and decline is inevitable eventually. Assuming he doesn’t get as many intentional walks this year, and more of the balls that left the yard turn back into doubles or long outs, he could go from being a minor star back to a role player. If he hits as the community projects, though, he’ll continue to be a valuable hitter, albeit one who shouldn’t be playing left field in Safeco.

Ichiro!

Community Projection: .330/.379/.438, 684 AB, 227 H, 25 2B, 9 3B, 11 HR, 49 BB, 5 HBP, 68 K
High: .367/.427/.555
Low: .301/.346/.381
Dave: .327/.384/.461

Finally, I like someone more than you guys do. The .108 isolated slugging perecentage here looks low to me, so I’ve given him a little more power than you guys have, but the projections aren’t that different. Everyone agrees that he’s basically going to continue doing his thing, slapping singles all over the park and being the best player on the team. As a center fielder, his value has gone through the roof, and hopefully this year, we can look forward to a season free of articles from national pundits writing their token “Ichiro is overrated” column.

Ah, spring training, season of news

February 20, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 52 Comments 

Newcomer Vidro in for tough assignment

The team’s bringing in all kinds of people to talk to Vidro. Including Edgar! Sort of!

What horrors await Vidro as DH?

“It’s something where Jose is going to have to find what works for him,” Mariners manager Mike Hargrove said. “You see some guys who sit on a bench, other guys who ride the bike the whole time and then they’re too tired when they have to go hit.”

But Hargrove quickly added: “Jose has been a good hitter for a number of years, and cream rises to the top.”

So Jose Vidro is a congealed dairy product. Awesome.

Have I mentioned lately how awesome it is, as an angry M’s fan, to have Hargrove regularly quoted in news stories? I don’t even have to write a joke there. Hargove statements are self-contained jokes-with-punchline. All you have to do is laugh.

I do have a question, though, related to that.

If cream rises to the top, how come you’re possibly the worst active manager and you haven’t been displaced by someone better?

Anyway, yeah yeah yeah, he used to hit, he was injured, everyone thinks he’ll be awesome. We’ll see, obviously. We hope for success.

The PI has a similar story.

Baker, 2: Ichiro passed his physical! And Mike Hargrove’s pondering what he’ll say to the team next Tuesday!

“We did a lot right all year except for 11 days,” he said, referring to an 11-game losing streak that sank Seattle’s hopes in August. “A lot of good things happened here last year that obviously were overshadowed by 11 days we spent on that road trip.
“But last year was a good season for us.”

Bwahahahhahahahahaha. Ooooh, Mike, you kidder.

Baker, earlier, on Sexson:

Believe me, the guy on the mound isn’t running through his K/AB ratio or his VORP at a time like that. And it’s that type of psychological edge that doesn’t show up on paper. I agree that Sexson is too inconsistent at times and strikes out in some key situations. But every successful team needs his fear factor in the lineup. Try to replace it with a platoon of less-feared guys and chances are the other hitters in the lineup would suffer.

Soooooooo…. I can’t let that go by.

You know what teams need? Tall guys. Tall guys give the team an intimidating appearance, and pitchers can’t look down on them. It rattles them. I agree that talent’s important, but teams need to be tall. Try and replace tall guys with shorter guys, and production drops. Maybe not in any way you can measure, and it might even go up, but the tallness factor is there, and it’s real.

And hard-to-pronounce names. If a batter’s name is too hard to pronounce in the prep meetings, a lot of teams just skip them. It’s why some of the best hitters have strange names. Teams need to make sure that they have a couple of guys in the lineup with crazy names to force the other team to expend more effort. Now, I know you’re thinking “You’re just saying that because your last name is Zumsteg” or “I’ve looked at this, and that’s just not true,” but while it may not show up in the statistics, or win column, or production, there it is.

Also, sunglasses. The sunglasses a lineup wear have to be balanced. You want at least two, three guys in full wraparounds, and two or more without any sunglasses at all. You need to mix it up, but keep the intimidation. On average, you want one lens per batter, which is tough with nine in the lineup. And you can’t have guys with monocles up there, don’t talk crazy.

The PI writes about Brandon Morrow. You may remember Morrow from the hilarious “AP writes story about Morrow not pitching, we post story, he immediately throws two innings” post back on 7/28. Ahh, memories.

Important Monday news for you

February 19, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 11 Comments 

Times:
Pitcher readies for life in AAA. Feierabend appears headed to Tacoma.

In the notebook, Beltre’s got some kind of… approach thing. And Lowe’s meeting with Yocum. He hopes to be cleared to start his rehab.

Geoff Baker thinks the Angels are going to win next year because:
– their 5th guy “has the stuff of an ace”. So did Gil Meche, you can see where that got us.
– “pitching and defense win games”. So does offense.
– they have a good bullpen
– also, the Angels weren’t so hot defensively last year, Gary Matthews Jr isn’t a good defensive center fielder by any metric, so that’s not going to help. In fact, in Pinto’s PMR, Mathews was a sliver above Chone Figgins, who got the most time out there for the Angels last year. Unless you’re arguing that Figgins can now play third full-time, except that Izturis was better there than Figgins.

I continue to disagree that the Angels are anything special or that they should be considered favorites in the division.

PI:
Thiel on John McLaren’s return as bench coach.

McLaren still chokes up when he talks of the legendary season that saved Major League Baseball in Seattle. Unfortunately, a part of the reason the story is legendary is because it happened a long time ago.

Hickey: Rhodes, Mariners hope for repeat.

When Arthur Rhodes was a Mariner, Seattle was at its best.

Rhodes is back with the Mariners, who could use some of that same mojo.

Then again, so could Rhodes.

The notebook’s got more or less the same stuff as the Times.

Hey! You know what’s worked really well for the Mariners in the past? Trying to recapture the magic of past teams.

Unimportant news:
Griffey’s latest injury is from wrestling with his kids.

Other important but not Mariner-related news:
5″ new snow at base at Summit West in the last day, 6″ in the last 48 hours. Forecast is for 8-14 inches of new snow by sunset. Or, 8-14 inches of new snow by sunset.

I’m just pointing that out. For reference. I’m not suggesting you should call in sick and meet me up at Snoqualmie or anything.

Washburn new team leader, other ephemera

February 18, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 57 Comments 

(photo by ms.Tea, generously licensed)

From an ESPN spring training article:

“I’ve always been on teams where someone said what needed to be said. Last year, we didn’t have that,” Washburn said. “Now, I’m more comfortable [doing that].”

Really? Wasn’t that Ibanez’s role? Or Bloomquist’s role? Or even Hargrove?

Teh Times: “Ichiro’s next step subject of speculation“

Saturday’s news and rule changes

February 17, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 50 Comments 

MLB tried to bury a set of rules by releasing the story late on Friday. I wrote something up on the Cheater’s Guide Blog anyway (and remember, if you like this kind of rules geekery and cheating, you can pre-order the book for $11).

MLB.com:
Aaron Small wants his shot.
Chaves wants the pitchers to throw strikes
MLB.com auto-playing super-loud ads on all their pages is amazingly annoying and unfriendly

Seattle Times:
Geoff Baker on Felix’s mound session and Felix’s conditioning, Lopez’s injury, and so on. Baker’s putting out some fairly substantial content in this blog thing of his, especially compared to what we’re used to from the company over at the PI.

Baker thinks the division is there for the Angels to take, and I… I don’t understand that, but it does seem to be a fairly common opinion. I like the Angels for fourth, but I’d have to admit I haven’t given it substantial consideration.

He also offers a pointer to a WSJ article which discusses, among other things, the M’s creation of the All-Star Suite, which we discussed here at the time of announcement as an ill sign for suite revenue. Ah hah! We have been validated.

The new All-Star Club is a bit short on intimacy — with a capacity of 140 people — but it is $100 to $125 per game versus at least $17,000 for a 10-game suite package. The lounge has the potential to generate well over $1 million annually, which the team says would be a net gain because on a typical night 10 to 14 suites were sitting vacant. “We’re smarter now than we were when we planned this facility,” says Mr. Aylward.

In a business sense, he means.

Seattle PI:
What’s Edgar doing?
Jaime Burke wants a spot

In the notebook, Baek and not getting a spot
Ted Miller wastes newsprint and electrons with a column pointing out that Bonds potentially breaking Aaron’s career home run record will be awkward. He doesn’t like Bonds, Selig’s no help, society’s in the downward spiral, being flushed down the drain of history, or something. No link.

Spring Training Preview

February 16, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 80 Comments 

With training opening, this is a good point to look at the team the M’s are bringing in and how things might break down.

Rotation (5)
SP-R Felix Hernandez
SP-L Jarrod Washburn
SP-L Horacio Ramirez
SP-R Miguel Batista
SP-R Jeff Weaver

Possible flux: without a job up in the air, it’s going to take an injury or total abject ineffectiveness to get one of those out.

Other candidates in that case:
SP-L Jake Woods
SP-R Cha Baek

Bullpen (7-8)
RP-R J.J. Putz
RP-R Chris Reitsma
RP-R Julio Mateo
RP-L George Sherrill

Possible flux: Lots. The first three there have been described as “locks” already, with Sherill, RP-L Arthur Rhodes and Jake Woods described as “in”.

Candidates: That would still leave 1-2 spots for RP-R Jon Huber, RP-L Eric O’Flaherty, RP-L Ryan Feierabend and hopefully, if he’s able to come back, RP-R Mark Lowe (among others).

Starting lineup (9)
DH-B Jose Vidro
C-R Kenji Johjima
1B-R Richie Sexson
2B-R Jose Lopez
SS-R Yuniesky Betancourt
3B-R Adrian Beltre
LF-L Raul Ibanez
CF-L Ichiro!
RF-R Jose Guillen

Possible flux: barring injury, this is the lineup they’ll go into the season with

Candidates: An outfield injury likely puts OF-L Jeremy Reed into a starting job for a while. You might hope for an Adam Jones appearance, but it’s not going to matter how well he does until the team has a manager willing to play him. It may be a question of whether he dislikes Jones or Reed less, which is always a great way to pick your lineup.

An infield injury could see DH-L Ben Broussard or DH-R Mike Morse, though it does still seem likely Broussard’s going to be moved. To fill a middle infield or third need, that’ll be UT-R Willie Bloomquist. IF-R Oswaldo Navarro, Bust-R Michael Garciaparra, and ?-L Bryan LaHair are all on the 40m, but it seems unlikely that they’d ascend. They’ve got about as much a chance as non-roster invitees 3B-L Sean Burroughs, IF-R Gookie Dawkins, or IF-R Rey Ordonez, which really zero.

Bench (3-4)
With 21-22 roster spots already spent (5+7 or 8+9), this’ll be thin.
UT-R Bloomquist
OF-R Reed
C-R Rene Rivera

Flux: possible. Reed may still get moved, say if some other team suffers an injury and the M’s sense opportunity. I thought C-R Rob Johnson might get considered for the backup catcher slot, but the team doesn’t really care about it, and Rivera’s already on the 40-man roster, so that’s less thinking the team has to do. Except–

Candidates: If there’s a fourth bench spot open, Broussard gets paid way more than Morse does. Broussard’s salary might be so large as to force Hargrove to only carry 12 pitchers.

What’s there to watch for, then?
Without position battles, we’re going to be hoping not to see gruesome injuries, first, but moreover, looking to see if the team was out of their gourd this off season:

Is Jose Vidro in good health and hitting as well as his peak form, as the team hopes?
Is Horacio Ramirez a solid middle-rotation starter with the potential to be a #1 starter, as the team hopes?
For Miguel Batista, nearly the same question.

If I’m reading the schedule right, the first broadcast game is March 15th. Until then… I guess we just hope.

M’s spend, skimp, as 2007 approaches

February 15, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 34 Comments 

The M’s are going to claim they’re way over $100m in payroll this year. Larry Stone covers the new old math

The team is using a working budget figure of $111 million, which includes about $103 million in raw salaries, another $6 million or so in pro-rated signing bonuses, and their annual “contingency fund” of $2 million for prospective deals and minor-league callups.

The M’s monetary woes are reflected in their interviewing process.

Spring training almost starting… almost… almost…

February 14, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 67 Comments 

“I’m more excited going into this spring than I’ve ever been. In my heart, I believe we have a chance to [win the division].”

— Hargrove, quoted on MLB.com

or, even better

“We feel like we had a good season last year — notwithstanding the 11-game debacle,” Hargrove said. “We were able to establish a winning attitude here, an attitude where when we take the field every day, we expect to win that ballgame.

“A lot of people pay lip service to that, but there’s a difference between saying it and believing it. Our players, certainly by the end of the year, got to that point and got over that point.”

almost as good as

“Neo, sooner or later you’re going to realize just as I did that there’s a difference between knowing the path and walking the path. ”
— Morpheus

Larry LaRue in the News Tribune has health updates and the first “it’s an open competition” story.

“For me, the challenge in camp is to give every pitcher here a fair chance at making the team,” Chaves said Tuesday. “Later in camp, when the innings disappear, that’s tougher. Early on, I want to give everyone a fair shot.”

Note that they’re already looking at a seven-man bullpen. Hooray for Hargrove.

Community Projection: Yuniesky Betancourt

February 13, 2007 · Filed Under Mariners · 48 Comments 

143 of you have spoken, and Yuniesky Betancourt is apparently going to experience deja vu this season. I’d imagine that his projection will look closer to his 2006 season line than any other projection we end up doing. Take a look at this:

2006 Actual Performance: .289/.311/.403, 558 AB, 161 H, 28 2B, 6 3B, 8 HR, 17 BB, 1 HBP, 54 K
Community Projection: .289/.320/.410, 562 AB, 162 H, 29 2B, 7 3B, 8 HR, 23 BB, 3 HBP, 59 K

4 more at-bats, 1 more double, 6 more walks, 2 more hit by pitches, and 5 more strikeouts, but other than that, it’s the exact same line. I’ve been spearheading the “Betancourt has essentially maxed out his skillset” argument for the past six months or so, and while I agree with the general sentiment that there’s not much room for growth, I didn’t mean that he’s literally going to just repeat last year over and over.

The other projections of note:

Low Projection: .218/.247/.318 – probably the least believable “real projection” we’ve had yet.
High Projection: .311/.351/.461
Dave Projection: .279/.314/.374

« Previous Page — Next Page »